- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
Ruining your childhood, one franchise at a timeDon’t forget Jar Jar Abrams who has moved on to working with Warner Bros. on several DC Comics projects.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ruining your childhood, one franchise at a timeDon’t forget Jar Jar Abrams who has moved on to working with Warner Bros. on several DC Comics projects.
That's also way I don't belive Karman when he says people are overhyping the Daily Wire going into entertainment.
I think the worst take on the firing of Gina Carano might be from Gary/Nerdrotic. He keep saying that Favreau should have said something, expressed his opinion on social media to defend her. That's fucking retarded. One of the main rules in Hollywood (and in any company tbh) is that you don't shit where you eat. We don't know what is happening at Disney/LF but Favreau is clearly not the enemy here. The guy cares about the brand and what SW is all about. He is responsible for The Mandalorian (yes I get it, it's not Shakespeare), he brought Luke back and he also created Cara Dune for Gina Carano, so it's safe to assume that he got pissed when KK fired her. The difference between Favreau, Gina and Carl Weathers is that Favreau is working for LucasFilm while the 2 actors are just regulars and aren't part of the main cast.
Sorry for bringing up the Gina discussion again.
Gary is maybe the worst of the Fandom shits due to sheer laziness.I think the worst take on the firing of Gina Carano might be from Gary/Nerdrotic. He keep saying that Favreau should have said something, expressed his opinion on social media to defend her. That's fucking retarded. One of the main rules in Hollywood (and in any company tbh) is that you don't shit where you eat. We don't know what is happening at Disney/LF but Favreau is clearly not the enemy here.
No one who cared about Star Wars would canonize Chuck Wendig's fanfic.The guy cares about the brand and what SW is all about.
It sure isn't.He is responsible for The Mandalorian (yes I get it, it's not Shakespeare),
I wonder why...he brought Luke back
Because he thought she was charismatic and would be liked. Which she was. Gina was a rising star.and he also created Cara Dune for Gina Carano
No. It's not safe to assume anything. If you are pissed off, either shit or get off the toilet.it's safe to assume that he got pissed when KK fired her.
Exactly, lol. She's here to stay. It's the same situation with Alex Kurtzman at CBS. These two people got there not because of their talent but because they know how Hollywood works. It's disgusting but it's the game.
and as to how 'obviously' KK is gonna get fired anytime this decade...LOLNO:
Doomcuck strikes out yet again, womp womp woooooomp.
Was there anyone who believed that she would be outside of Fandom Menace cucks?
After seeing a bunch of Fandom Menace videos and comments.
I can say some of their logic on Kathleen Kennedy is insane. I mean i don't like the woman either.
But this is legit a YouTube comment I have seen.
"How has Disney not been responding to KK actively ruling the Mandalorian. This is nuts"
Like way would she tried to destroy a show, that's making her money?
Did you even read my comment? The guy I was criticizing was saying almost the same thing as you. I disagree with both of you.Personally for me, those fandom menace people hyping the Daily Wire as some kind of future rival to Hollywood is easily for me the most cringeworthy thing I've heard them do. There is no way Ben Shapiro and his little cadre are ever going to compete with Hollywood. It's like believing indie game developers will be able to compete with triple A gaming companies.
Firing KK won't fix anything when the entire company is overrun with SJW fruitcakes. All the old Lucasarts vets and old Lucasfilm people are either fired, retired, or kept in a place where they can't change much. Sure, KK can get fired, but you know what that will lead to? Another SJW fruitcake taking her place. Maybe even someone who's more leftist/radical than KK was. Removing KK is like chopping off a head from a hydra, two more heads will take its place.We've gotten a raft of saviours. Iger, Lucas, Filoni, Favreau. Every Goddamned time it goes the same. None of these people disagree with her except maybe George. And he isn't in the fucking building anymore. There's not going to be a magic bullet. Firing Kennedy worn't save Star Wars because everyone there is infected. There is not white saviour riding a pale horse.
Heck, to me, the Jedi Knight games were the perfect capstone to the Original Trilogy, ESPECIALLY Jedi Academy. We see the final attempts of the Empire to regain its power be foiled by a New Jedi Order that Luke Skywalker set up, we see how Luke has evolved from that farmboy in Tatooine to the new Yoda, and we see a Jedi Knight from this new order defeat an Ancient Sith Lord whom the Imperials were trying to revive, bringing things back to full circle considering the fact that this series started with Sith Lords plotting the Old Republic's demise, and Jedi Academy ends it with an Ancient Sith Lord being defeated by a Jedi Knight who works for the New Republic.After all of this, I am fine with everything ending with Luke and R2 and the child leaving in the elevator.
We dont need anything else to continue the Star Wars story on screen (we sure as hell dont need to see anymore Mandalorian). Yes, the Luke scene can be seen as "fan boy dreams" or whatever, I guess, but what it did, is replace the last demeaning image we saw of Luke on screen during the TLJ, so at least it did that. We leave with Luke the warrior and our friend R2.
Back in December I was amused to see what the Book of Boba Fett was, but not anymore. Now I dont want any of it and I sure as hell do not want to see what horrors they dream up for Obi Wan.
It never should have taken the Gina issue to be the last straw, but that is what happens when star wars has been important to me since I was a child. I let it pull me back in, but at this point this current "thing" isnt Star Wars.
I am not interested in what people who hate me deem to allow us to view.
Oh for the love of God. How mentally disturbed are these people. They won, they have won everything and control everything, but yet it is still all of us racist bigots that manage to hold everyone down.
It's not Trump's fault you got crappy scripts
that right there is my planned 'personal canon ending' as far as I'm concerned...or perhaps just ending with Jedi Outcast since that story, for me, is at least on par with the likes of KOTOR. there's just something about Luke's final words to Kyle Katarn at the end, when he's being hard on himself for good reasons: "You were never a failure" that genuinely feel like this is something that Yoda would never have said. which is a good thing, since it actually gives hope that this Jedi Order will not make the mistake of every last one before it - persecuting dark side use to the point of instigating a significant darksider faction to split offHeck, to me, the Jedi Knight games were the perfect capstone to the Original Trilogy, ESPECIALLY Jedi Academy.
Bad movies are Trump's fault...k.
It kind of is, considering that after the Orange Man got into the White House, all Hollywood can think of is how to get him out.
It's not Trump's fault you got crappy scripts
Because even in victory, they can still taste the bitter defeat they suffered back in 2016. That, and their victory has been as effective for them as winning the Mandalorian Wars were for the Republic.Oh for the love of God. How mentally disturbed are these people. They won, they have won everything and control everything, but yet it is still all of us racist bigots that manage to hold everyone down.
Gamergate. The phantom that never dies! XDAnd bad games are the fault of gamergate naturally.
that right there is my planned 'personal canon' ending as far as I'm concerned...or perhaps just ending with Jedi Outcast since that story, for me, is at least on par with the likes of KOTOR. there's just something about Luke's final words to Kyle Katarn at the end, when he's being hard on himself for good reasons: "You were never a failure" that genuinely feel like this is something that Yoda would never have said. which is a good thing, since it actually gives hope that this Jedi Order will not make the mistake of every last one before it of instigating a darksider faction to split off(heck, the only reason the two main antagonists get so many force users to follow them in those last two games is because they artificially infused them with the force to begin with. and while Desann might've genuinely been a beast of a force user, he gets buffed by the Valley of the Jedi while Tavion with Marka Ragnoses unded spirit so...it's very debatable as to how strong this form of cheating actually made them).
you are a racist bigot everytime you choose not to consoom Disney Wars, and a double bigot if you yo ho ho it.Oh for the love of God. How mentally disturbed are these people. They won, they have won everything and control everything, but yet it is still all of us racist bigots that manage to hold everyone down.
Regarding the whole "Claudia Grey explaining sex in her novels" thing, I can't necessarily knock her for including sex since there were a lot of sexual implications in later EU series like NJO, Dark Nest, and LOTF. But that was mostly because the entire tone of those novels was mature, with grotesque levels of violence and instances of harrowing familial trauma. The novels weren't for children anymore; it was painfully obvious that they were being written to court a solely adult audience.
Most flew over my head.Troy Denning making a few sexual innuendos in his story doesn't seem that out of place with the gory violence and brutal fight scenes taking place in the surrounding pages.
The problem is that all of Claudia Grey's novels are couched within the "safe" publishing environment of current-day Star Wars, where a lot of the violence is toned down and the tone list largely kept light and easy for their Disney Drone audience.
I've noticed this too. Zahn and Luceno especially. all the old timers that get back in seem to want to ignore that the old EU was nuked when its convenient.High Republic has been an extremely vanilla affair, and outside of Charles Soule killing of characters in relatively tame fashion in his Light of the Jedi novel, there's none of the graphic or dark content that characterized the late EU. So when Claudia Grey dumps an explanation about Jedi Sex into her novels, it doesn't blend in like sexual implications in the old EU...it sticks out, hard.
We saw this in her Master & Apprentice novel, a book that's largely about political intrigue and character-building for Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan, a completely mellow and light affair...and then in saunters a Jedi Master telling Qui-Gon about how having non-committal gangbangs doesn't violate the Jedi Code because there's no attachment involved.
And that's what makes Grey's inclusion of sex even weirder. She doesn't actually use sexual implications for some kind of narrative tool...she just has it there to arbitrarily explain shit. To answer questions I don't think anyone was desperate to have answered, like "Durr, does the Jedi Code allow them to fuck?" It comes off as the same deranged cat-lady syndrome that J.K. Rowling suffers from...
and frankly, when you look at a lot of the shit Claudia Grey does in her novels--writing sappy romance, sacrificing lore integrity for drama, creating Tumblr-tier self-inserts like Holdo, fan-casting her characters like making her Gyasi character a Matthew McConaughey-type, and even describing one of her characters like a "male Hermione Granger"--it's clear that she's the exact kind of YA-writing Wine Aunt that carries her Rowling-esque narrative impulses from book to book like a plague.
I have my issues with the likes of Karen Traviss, and to a far lesser extent Christie Golden, but they make up for their strange authorial impulses by being relatively good authors. Claudia Grey, on the other hand, is nothing but misguided creative impulses.
I didn't think JK Rowlings was as untouchable as say, Mick McCormac or even Stephen King.Have I finally met someone else who doesn't like JK Rowling as a writer!
It's all down to personal preference. "Darker and meaner" is what I live for, being a fan of grimdark stories layered with existential dread. It's why I love New Jedi Order and its sequels so much.I always hated that. Not knocking you MM, but I don't equate lewd with adult. Mara and Luke, the Rogue/Wraith books to name a few were filled with death and romance.
I think the content got darker and meaner.
Have I finally met someone else who doesn't like JK Rowling as a writer!
I'd even argue that Rowling isn't on the creative level of the kind of authors who write tie-in consumer fiction for franchises like Trek, Dragonlance, Forgotten Realms or Halo. People like to scoff at the prose and writing craft of people like Troy Denning, Greg Bear, R.A. Salvatore, and Karen Traviss...because their writing output amounts to almost exclusively tie-in books. They're accused of only being capable of churning out juvenile consumer fiction, of being incapable of breaking out on their own to get famous off of their own original ideas.I didn't think JK Rowlings was as untouchable as say, Mick McCormac or even Stephen King.
Her worldbuilding was garbage, and she sorely needed an editor for the last few entries of Harry Potter.
I get you. I meant I don't see being Darker and meaner as mature. But there is absolutely value in it. Hell, I enjoy ol' Gen the Butcher's stuff sometimes.It's all down to personal preference. "Darker and meaner" is what I live for, being a fan of grimdark stories layered with existential dread. It's why I love New Jedi Order and its sequels so much.
Look forward to it.Although, I'll be the first to say that Fate of the Jedi aims for a much lighter tone than its predecessors, which I found surprisingly palatable, as I'll detail in my full coverage.
I'm not one of those. I think craft is craft.I'd even argue that Rowling isn't on the creative level of the kind of authors who write tie-in consumer fiction for franchises like Trek, Dragonlance, Forgotten Realms or Halo. People like to scoff at the prose and writing craft of people like Troy Denning, Greg Bear, R.A. Salvatore, and Karen Traviss...because their writing output amounts to almost exclusively tie-in books. They're accused of only being capable of churning out juvenile consumer fiction, of being incapable of breaking out on their own to get famous off of their own original ideas.
Telling a story. Rowling's books are filled with blabble. No sense for pacing or tension. Her language is lazy. I did not at any point through the slog of the Potter books ever need a thesaurus or to pause to digest things.And yet for all of their personal writing foibles (Lord knows Denning and Traviss have plenty), I'd still posit that they're leagues above Rowling, because they at least know how to flesh out a world, and write compelling characters.
I still couldn't figure out when half the romances in those books begin. Speaking of complexity, there's nothing along the line of Boromir or of Gollum. Nothing of nuance.They're capable of introducing moral greys, and creating drama that actually bridges on being compelling.
J.K. Rowling is only capable of pumping out trite one-dimensional characters and constructs fantasy settings with all the depth and nuance of a puddle. She's someone who aimed her first few books at children, and then conscious of that audience growing into adolescence, tried to "darken" the story with a more hostile setting, threatening conflict, and character deaths...all while failing to mature her writing style, plotting and character-writing to match. You read the later HP books, and it still feels like a Children's Author writing dark and edgy situations for her painfully simple characters/concepts, because her style never evolves, and her skills never improve. It's like if the authors of The Magic Treehouse dropped Jack and Annie into the jungles of Vietnam, started included violent and harrowing content, but didn't change the writing style or the depth of the characters. Harry Potter 5-7 feel exactly like this: Rowling tries to have war and death, struggle and trauma, romance and break-ups between characters...but it's all still written with the paper-thin characterizations and shallow world-building of the earlier, kiddier books. I think the moment it became painfully obvious that she was trying to bite off more than she could chew was when she tried introducing things like the Chosen One Prophecy, the Horcruxes and the Elder Wand...because that's precisely where her creative ineptitude and childish inexperience with world-building really showed. There were a wealth of vapid contrivances around all of these major plot points, where she'd even sacrifice the logical consistency of the rules she created to allow for stale, shallow drama between the characters, just like every YA author does.
And speaking of YA incompetence: Fuck me, does this woman not know to write romance. Every single time she tries to depict the relationships between all of her dinky teenaged characters, her writing takes a fucking nosedive. It was something that showed up in bursts in Book 5, but when she decided to make it the predominant emotional focus of Book 6, the book where it's mostly teenagers getting into aimless, spergy romantic feuds with each other, it became fucking unreadable. I mean, fuck, when you have the actual childish, mouth-breathing, scar-wearing, wand-waving autist fans collectively agreeing that the Harry and Ginny relationship came the fuck out of nowhere, you know Rowling fucked up. Within the confines of the story, their romance takes on drama and stakes that haven't been organically earned--with these characters having no relationship for the first five out of seven books, only to inexplicably start making doe eyes at each other and getting their jimmies rustled whenever they see the other person "snogging" (take a shot every time THAT word turns up in Half-Blood Prince). Rowling's romances are rushed and complete cringe, and what's worse is that she doubled down on it in Deathly Hallows, as if inexplicably convinced that she's good at it. I have troubling news for you, Rowling...you're not. You never have been. Please refrain from trying to mold your children's fiction writing ability to allow for mature situations, because you clearly can't do it.
yepPeople claim that Rowling's spergy lack of talent only came into light once unreadable bile like Cursed Child and Fantastic Beasts came about (to say nothing about her social media revelations about Wizard Feces), but I disagree. This woman always had an extremely limited range of creative talent...it just became more apparent the second she tried her hand at adding narrative sophistication, depth, and maturity to her work.
Wow. Y'know. If it was Traviss cum Hard contact I agree.I would take Karen Traviss and her retarded Mandalorian-fixated creative impulses over Rowling any day of the week...fuck, I'd even take Claudia Grey. Because despite both being waist-deep in a quagmire of misguided authorial whims, they can at least write decently on occasion. In fact--and this may shock all of you--I think Christie Golden is a better writer than Rowling.
I...actually read some of that and I really liked the stuff there. One of the few real missed opportunities with the death of the EU. If you're talking about what I think you are.Don't believe me? Well, when I cover FOTJ in the coming days, I'll prove it. Because Golden actually tries to add awkward, adolescent romance to Star Wars in the same way Rowling tried to do with Harry Potter...only far more competently, and in a way that actually enhanced the story instead of being a blight on it.
They were until George had to do his Vietnam parallel with teddy bears while completing ignoring North Vietnam was actively supported by USSR, China and "can't bomb an outhouse without my say so" LBJ.It's even funnier when you consider that Stormtroopers are supposed to be precise, accurate warriors:
Normies, casuals, and even fans have shit poor hearing, reading for closed captions/subtitles and language comprehension abilities when ANH blatantly spelled it out to the audience the stormtroopers were suppose to miss. Plus if we put in real life militaries including the special forces to the same criteria we put on stormtroopers on accuracy they do would also suck.And yet the average dumb fan makes Stormtrooper jokes about them missing all the time. Not that it's just on Disney, plenty of other works, even parts of the EU partook in this misconception.
Well, that's just it; bleak and grimdark don't inform the quality of the prose or story...they inform the tone. And a bleaker tone is something I appreciate, but not the expense of the writing. I'm of the opinion that the Del Rey post-Endor series like NJO and beyond were able to have one while preserving the other.I get you. I meant I don't see being Darker and meaner as mature. But there is absolutely value in it. Hell, I enjoy ol' Gen the Butcher's stuff sometimes.
It's quite telling that I find myself finding a bigger need to consult a thesaurus when reading the work of Kevin J. Anderson than Rowling.Telling a story. Rowling's books are filled with blabble. No sense for pacing or tension. Her language is lazy. I did not at any point through the slog of the Potter books ever need a thesaurus or to pause to digest things.
In all likelihood, neither does Rowling.I still couldn't figure out when half the romances in those books begin.
The "new" romance in the books, the one that blooms between Ben Skywalker and the "other character", is exactly what I'm talking about. And it's probably my favorite part of FOTJ so far, so rest assured, you aren't alone in your appreciation of it.I...actually read some of that and I really liked the stuff there. One of the few real missed opportunities with the death of the EU. If you're talking about what I think you are.