Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'
Click to expand...


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Islamic Content
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Kaiba Cuqk63, Sgt. Bidwell_9, William Tyndale and 66 others
Click to expand...
FEETLOAF said:
...so? Do you want children to ever have access to self-castrating poison? The law can exist in perpetuity, who cares?
What's the downside here?
Click to expand...
Call me an optimist but I can picture a world where we nobody even thinks this kind of shit is remotely acceptable, and I point to the rise and fall of the lobotomy as an analogous situation. It will come at a terrible cost for a generation or two, but eventually, trannymania too will pass.

And when it does, I don't want the law sitting around as a cudgel for some psychopath to use in a few decades when this law truly has outlived its usefulness, if it ever does.

That said, I would not describe the American inability to repeal laws after they no longer contribute to societal good as the primary reason I'm torn about this law, that's the rotten cherry on top; the "ice cream" in this terrible metaphor is that I start the day wanting the government to not pass laws in general, and really don't want the government to pass laws which turn people into felons, again in general, which heavily pre-loads the moral scales for me against this law right out of the gate.

So agree to disagree on this, I don't think we disagree about the treatments, or the people pushing them. The treatments and the people pushing them are why it's a such hard call for me.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: chickenbutt, gobbles, Antique Rice and 2 others
HarblMcDavid said:
Call me an optimist but I can picture a world where we nobody even thinks this kind of shit is remotely acceptable, and I point to the rise and fall of the lobotomy as an analogous situation. It will come at a terrible cost for a generation or two, but eventually, trannymania too will pass.

And when it does, I don't want the law sitting around as a cudgel for some psychopath to use in a few decades when this law truly has outlived its usefulness, if it ever does.

That said, I would not describe the American inability to repeal laws after they no longer contribute to societal good as the primary reason I'm torn about this law, that's the rotten cherry on top; the "ice cream" in this terrible metaphor is that I start the day wanting the government to not pass laws in general, and really don't want the government to pass laws which turn people into felons, again in general, which heavily pre-loads the moral scales for me against this law right out of the gate.

So agree to disagree on this, I don't think we disagree about the treatments, or the people pushing them.
Click to expand...
The difference between the fall of the lobotomy and "trannymania" (I like that term, should use it myself) is that the lobotomy was not inherently associated with a particular political philosophy that is being promoted heavily by the economic status quo and mainstream social spaces, both online and offline. I think the best case scenario is out of our reach until we got further documentation of the psychological damage this causes from a non-ideological source.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: chickenbutt, Pomme Poire Peche, Marvin and 8 others
In a perfect--no, a sane world--I'd say Alabama is meddling where it has no business meddling. But we live in Clown World and the Troons have proven to be the most obnoxious, detrimental (especially to gay people), group of sperges to exist on the planet. Extreme times call for extreme measures.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: chickenbutt, Marvin, round robin and 7 others
Atatata said:
What were the stats on autism and trooning out again? If you think about it that way, it could be that its just a covert way of making sure autists get the genetic rope lol.
Click to expand...
[Old post but I don't recall if this was brought up....]

In the early 2000s, some doctors (Geier) tried to use Lupron to "cure" autism. They got sued, lost their licenses, and were denounced by the medical establishment as conducting eugenics. A mere five years later with some rebranding, autists and their parents were begging for the same "treatment" and it was bigotry to say no. Funny how that worked out, huh?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Yeeted Teet, unwieldy_object, Pomme Poire Peche and 27 others
HarblMcDavid said:
And when it does, I don't want the law sitting around as a cudgel for some psychopath to use in a few decades when this law truly has outlived its usefulness, if it ever does.
Click to expand...
...Why not? He'd be using the cudgel to prevent children from getting self-castrating poison.
It's a law. It can't do things other than what it says it does. If it says "cudgel for beating trannies" you have to use it to beat trannies. I have no problem with that cudgel existing long after trannies do. I have no problem with that cudgel collecting dust on a shelf forever. It can exist forever, why would you care? I genuinely don't get it.
HarblMcDavid said:
The treatments and the people pushing them are why it's a such hard call for me.
Click to expand...
If those people didn't exist and trannies weren't a cultural phenomenon and they passed this law I would say, "I don't really see the need for it but sure go ahead." I genuinely don't get even 0.0001% resistance to this. It makes no sense and I'd love for you to make it make sense if you feel like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin
UselessIdiot said:
I've always thought that the word deadname/deadnaming sounded so melodramatic, but that's trannies for you!
Click to expand...
The way they act it’s like discovering the true name of a demon except with more autistic screeching.

Enjoy_the_Soylence said:
[Old post but I don't recall if this was brought up....]

In the early 2000s, some doctors (Geier) tried to use Lupron to "cure" autism. They got sued, lost their licenses, and were denounced by the medical establishment as conducting eugenics. A mere five years later with some rebranding, autists and their parents were begging for the same "treatment" and it was bigotry to say no. Funny how that worked out, huh?
Click to expand...

I’m looking forward to rubbing it in peoples faces several decades from now, assuming they’re still around.

Anyways I found this article..

University forced to apologise and compensate PhD student over 'transphobic' tweets​


A university has been forced to apologise and pay compensation to a PhD student subjected to a lengthy disciplinary probe over “transphobic” tweets, in the first case of its kind.

Jonathan Best, 50, was investigated for six months by Huddersfield University after a fellow student filed an anonymous complaint about 13 tweets from his account, and his writings on transgender issues.

One tweet cited by the complainant stated “every trans woman is part of the same sex class as me. We’re all male”. They accused Mr Best of “misgendering” trans people and asked: “Could a trans woman student be expected to feel comfortable or respected being taught by him?”

Officials at the university launched a formal probe and summoned the music tutor to disciplinary hearings, later alleging he had potentially been “offensive” and not respected others’ “feelings”.

But in the first free speech case of its kind, the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education - which handles student complaints - has now criticised multiple “procedural failings” with the university’s investigation and ordered it to apologise and pay him £800.

The Office of the Independent Adjudicator also told the institution to swiftly review its disciplinary procedures, after Mr Best complained.

He told The Telegraph it illustrates the “chilling effect on free speech in action”, with censorship and a “low grade totalitarianism” sitfling scholarly debate on the distinction between gender identity and biological sex.

“In these free speech cases, the process is the punishment - getting through the process is grindingly difficult and stressful. It wears you down,” he said. “It makes you wonder if speaking and writing honestly is worth it.”

https://sneed.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/vTMykgtfSqztyrO8z2nphw--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTY0MDtoPTM5OS45NjgwMTI3OTQ4ODIwNA--/https://sneed.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/aCoX59F2D6vZ82rCKzcDqA--~B/aD0xNTYzO3c9MjUwMTthcHBpZD15dGFjaHlvbg--/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_telegraph_258/00cd36d9b7f34fa767431f976e17f6ac
Jonathan Best
Last week The Telegraph reported how leading professors are facing formal investigations for “liking” and sharing tweets that students deem transphobic, as universities struggle to weigh academic freedom against pressure from activists to protect minorities from harm.

In Mr Best’s case, a student sent screenshots of his tweets and blog posts to university authorities. One said: “There is no such thing as ‘misgendering’. There is no such thing as ‘deadnaming’.” Another claimed “misogynistic trans ideology” was being pushed in schools.

The formal complaint alleged “repeated transphobic behaviour” and “discrimination”. An investigation was opened in August 2019 and Mr Best defended the posts under freedom of speech laws.

The following month the complaint was dropped but four new charges were levelled over him publishing the original complaint redacted online and campaigning for innocence.

He was issued a formal warning by a faculty dean, despite not being notified of the charges or allowed a formal defence beforehand, and accused of “sexual, homophobic, racial or other unlawful harassment of any student” and bringing the university into disrepute.

He was found in breach of the university’s social media and trans equality policies that protect against a “humiliating or offensive environment”. Mr Best successfully appealed, then went to the ombudsman which reviewed the case.

The OIA ruled last month: “We are not satisfied that the University has adequately apologised for the delay and the impact of the procedural failings on Mr Best. We consider that distress and inconvenience was caused to Mr Best, which has not been recognised by the University.”

A Huddersfield University spokesman said it was “committed to equality, diversity and inclusion and will rigorously investigate claims of discrimination against any of our students. Whilst the University cannot comment on individual cases, we will of course follow any instructions issued by the OIA”.

Ministers are planning a raft of new laws to uphold free speech at universities, including allowing students and academics to sue for compensation through the courts if they feel unfairly silenced.

Article archive
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: Crepidodera fulvicornis, unwieldy_object, chickenbutt and 21 others
Link Archive

LILY WAKEFIELD MARCH 6, 2021

super-straight.jpg

In a new transphobic TikTok trends, users are claiming that refusing to date trans people is an "orientation". (TikTok/ kyleroyce)

One TikTok user has perfectly shut down a new transphobic trend of people “identifying as super straight”, claiming refusing to date trans people is an “orientation”.

The trend appears to have started with TikTok user @kyleroyce, who recently created a video in which he said: “Yo, guys, I made a new sexuality now, actually, it’s called super straight.

“Since straight people, or straight men like myself, I get called transphobic because I wouldn’t date a trans woman.”

The TikToker said he wouldn’t date a trans woman because “that’s not a real woman to me, like, I want a real woman”.

“Now, I’m super straight,” he added. “I only date the opposite gender, woman, that are born woman. So you can’t say I’m transphobic now because that’s just my sexuality.”

Anyone else super straight? Big respect to this guy createing a new thing. #superstraight pic.twitter.com/hdLdeV82xK
— Super straight (@TellYouHowItIs7) March 3, 2021
Click to expand...

Although it seems highly unlikely that any trans woman has ever wanted to date @kyleroyce, the hateful trend began to spread to other social media platforms.

The original video has been removed, and the TikTok user claims he has been banned from posting on the platform, but his video is being shared by others also claiming to “identify as super straight”.

One TikTok user perfectly explained why “identifying as super straight” makes zero sense.​

Other social media users have been forced to step in to explain why the trend is viciously transphobic and makes absolutely no sense, with one TikToker crafting the perfect response.

User @procrasclass posted a video responding to a commenter who claimed to be “super straight”.

He said: “Super straight means you think that men who date trans women are less straight, meaning that trans women are men, and therefore not real women. Which is not only transphobic, but scientifically inaccurate.”

To all the people who think #superstraight is a thing please what this tiktok
You may understand why superstraight is fucking transphobic pic.twitter.com/jtcpWm91ca
— I like pizza with kids on it (@ABlideran) March 6, 2021
Click to expand...

The TikTok user said it was “really funny” that transphobes were claiming to be “super straight”, adding: “You like women, but you’re excluding an entire group of women.

“If a plumber only works on shower drains and refuses to work on sinks, we don’t call him a ‘super plumber’.

“If anything, you’re ‘semi-straight’ or ‘straight impaired’.”
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: chickenbutt, Treasure Champs, Marvin and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back