Gross Kelly Ronahan - Vampire Munchie Who Destroyed Her Own Legs

What part of Kelly's body will she start picking at next?

  • Stumps

    Votes: 1,437 58.6%

  • Arms

    Votes: 367 15.0%

  • Hands

    Votes: 118 4.8%

  • Face

    Votes: 229 9.3%

  • Hair

    Votes: 117 4.8%

  • Face

    Votes: 182 7.4%

  • She will find an entirely new way of harming herself

    Votes: 827 33.7%
  • Total voters
    2,453
  • Poll closed .
NoodleFucker3000 said:
Chop chop.



Both seems to have the same source reddit user amorette93, but OP only dm'd the mods with proof of her source so it's possible they're all bullshitting.
Click to expand...
Archive your shit, dude. Reddit posts especially get yeeted by mods all the time and then the thread makes no sense.

Kelly update from illness fakers
Kelly up for amputation from munch snark
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Eglantine, Rem Farms, User Name and 24 others
@Hank Scorpio Amputated limbs, removed organs, etc are picked up by a company that cremates them. Unless you request them to be returned to you and you live in a state where that's legal. In that case, you can do whatever you want (that's legal in your state/city). One man cooked and ate (with friends) his amputated foot. Another had his amputated leg made into a table.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Canadian_Cream, Ya Boi Skinny B.F., janekop and 23 others
NoodleFucker3000 said:
Chop chop.



Both seems to have the same source reddit user amorette93, but OP only dm'd the mods with proof of her source so it's possible they're all bullshitting.
Click to expand...
It's ironic AF that they're all wanting receipts now when 99% of the time they're happy to speculate until the cows come home (pun absolutely intended).

Also, they really can't get it into their heads that Kellys picking isn't compulsive, it's a choice. She could have stopped this any time, and chose not to. You can't sign yourself out, especially after a psych assessment for a wellness check multiple times if you're not right in the head.

I read all comments in both those threads, so many people wanting more info, but don't come here because they don't have the stomach for it, so they go to her insta. Wtf do they think they're going to learn from there?

Edited to remove old post of mine that got eaten and reappeared just now
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Rem Farms, Vol, janekop and 8 others
Crimewatcher 44 said:
@Hank Scorpio Amputated limbs, removed organs, etc are picked up by a company that cremates them. Unless you request them to be returned to you and you live in a state where that's legal. In that case, you can do whatever you want (that's legal in your state/city). One man cooked and ate (with friends) his amputated foot. Another had his amputated leg made into a table.
Click to expand...
I seem to recall another man having his leg taxidermied (or maybe it was embalmed...clearly I do not know enough about mortuary science) so it could be buried with him when he died. I've also heard of people having the cremated remains of their amputated limbs returned to them so it can be added to their own cremains once they pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rem Farms, spiritofamermaid, s0mbra and 1 other person
Blonde Bomb said:
I seem to recall another man having his leg taxidermied (or maybe it was embalmed...clearly I do not know enough about mortuary science) so it could be buried with him when he died. I've also heard of people having the cremated remains of their amputated limbs returned to them so it can be added to their own cremains once they pass.
Click to expand...
That's usually for religious reasons, Iirc it's part of some form of Judaism that you need to be buried with all your body parts (I guess minus the foreskin).
Crimewatcher 44 said:
Another had his amputated leg made into a table.
Click to expand...
it was a lamp.
R6f2e893cb8e3a230439b7de2358b3336.jpeg
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Rem Farms, Vol, Cantstopreading72 and 39 others
Jaded Optimist said:
That's usually for religious reasons, Iirc it's part of some form of Judaism that you need to be buried with all your body parts (I guess minus the foreskin).
Click to expand...
When we were taking a school field trip to our city cemetery, the grounds keeper told us that there was a lone leg buried there, with owner of said leg having wanted it buried in the plot he'd picked out for his funeral, but then he'd died elsewhere and was buried in another state.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Rem Farms, Ya Boi Skinny B.F., spiritofamermaid and 16 others
Anne Hyroe said:
It’s incredibly depressing and I can’t help feeling for the medical team, her family and Kelly herself. It’s obviously self-inflicted and Kelly has significant mental health issues that she resists treatment for, but double amputation is such a huge consequence for her actions.

I agree with the other medfag who thinks that the team will do anything possible to avoid amputation and that if it does happen then they will try to keep it below-knee. For most patients in that circumstance then amputation would probably be recommended to improve mobility, avoid infection and reduce long-term pain. For Kelly, they know that this will be an ongoing saga and any new wound site is just another opportunity to escalate. Surgery’s not my Specialty though so this is just an educated guess.
Click to expand...
From looking at Kelly’s shins, the state of her deteriorating musculature and the degree to which her wounds reach up to her proximal tib/fib I would assume that when the time does come for amputation they’ll likely have to do it above the knee. I could be wrong since I don’t have films to look at and make a better judgement call but I’d bet good money on it. The amount of limb they’d be able to save wouldn’t be enough to justify attempting to save anything below the joint.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Rem Farms, GreeneCoDeputy, spiritofamermaid and 14 others
Crimewatcher 44 said:
@Hank Scorpio Amputated limbs, removed organs, etc are picked up by a company that cremates them. Unless you request them to be returned to you and you live in a state where that's legal. In that case, you can do whatever you want (that's legal in your state/city). One man cooked and ate (with friends) his amputated foot. Another had his amputated leg made into a table.
Click to expand...
excellent post/avatar combo.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Rem Farms, Ya Boi Skinny B.F., LollyPop! and 10 others
Dobbys Spare Sock said:
It'd be more believable the cat chewed her legs than bechets.

Does anyone know- would they try to get her in a better state of health before operating if they can? She's looked pretty ragged for a while now.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is my understanding that they would want her to be as healthy as possible before doing the surgery. So things like her blood pressure, heart rate, iron levels etc they would want these within the normal ranges to ensure that the surgery has the best chance of healing without complications, and so that she is less likely to die on the operating table. They would also be considering her mental state and the fact that she is going to pick her stumps, so they will want her to be healthier mentally.

They still have to weigh up the fact that she could easily become septic with these open wounds and that could kill her, so they would still want to operate. Because she is so unwell, I think they wont operate until it becomes an emergency situation - like she has an infection or something, because then it could go septic and kill her.

At the moment it's not acutely life or death so I dont think they will operate.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Rem Farms, spiritofamermaid, s0mbra and 4 others
how now brown cow said:
Yes, it is my understanding that they would want her to be as healthy as possible before doing the surgery. So things like her blood pressure, heart rate, iron levels etc they would want these within the normal ranges to ensure that the surgery has the best chance of healing without complications, and so that she is less likely to die on the operating table. They would also be considering her mental state and the fact that she is going to pick her stumps, so they will want her to be healthier mentally.

They still have to weigh up the fact that she could easily become septic with these open wounds and that could kill her, so they would still want to operate. Because she is so unwell, I think they wont operate until it becomes an emergency situation - like she has an infection or something, because then it could go septic and kill her.

At the moment it's not acutely life or death so I dont think they will operate.
Click to expand...
The medical team is in a real catch 22. They're fucked no matter what they do. Waiting to amputate means that Kelly has more time and opportunity to literally stick her fingers into the flesh on her legs, risking further infection and the resulting complications. Amputating means fresh stumps for Kelly to pick at, undoing all their hard work to save her worthless life and risking further infection and the resulting complications. Institutionalizing her would have to go along with any medical intervention they make. Leaving her outside of a fully supervised and medicated in-patient setting means she instantly goes back to destroying her body for attention.

There's no clear path forward or obviously correct actions with patients like her. The 'gotcha' for every decision they make is that Kelly is a non-compliant, ruinous patient who will fuck the situation up no matter what they do.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Rem Farms, janekop, spiritofamermaid and 22 others
Questionable Ceviche said:
The medical team is in a real catch 22. They're fucked no matter what they do. Waiting to amputate means that Kelly has more time and opportunity to literally stick her fingers into the flesh on her legs, risking further infection and the resulting complications. Amputating means fresh stumps for Kelly to pick at, undoing all their hard work to save her worthless life and risking further infection and the resulting complications. Institutionalizing her would have to go along with any medical intervention they make. Leaving her outside of a fully supervised and medicated in-patient setting means she instantly goes back to destroying her body for attention.

There's no clear path forward or obviously correct actions with patients like her. The 'gotcha' for every decision they make is that Kelly is a non-compliant, ruinous patient who will fuck the situation up no matter what they do.
Click to expand...

They aren't actually in a catch 22. The risk of complications and death is too high for the medical team to amputate, so they wont. As long as they can provide a rationale for their decisions they face no liability. The situation would have been case reviewed. The hospital would have clear policies saying things like "if a patient's vital signs are unstable then they are not a suitable candidate for elective surgery". All surgery is considered elective, unless it is emergency surgery. All the Is are dotted and the Ts are crossed. This is Kelly's problem, not her medical team's.

Kelly doesn't want them to amputate so the point is moot anyway. Her life isn't in immediate danger right now, so all they can do is manage the situation with what they have available to them even though they know it is pointless, which is to keep trying to talk some sense into her, and doing things like wound care, pain management, and physical therapy. They can't deny her that kind of care even if it is a total waste of time. They know her situation is going to degrade, but they can only refer her to psych and continue with wound care etc. The medical team aren't going to care about saving her legs if she doesn't. At this point their frustration probably outweighs their empathy for her. They will be looking at this like "okay I have to do this wound care, she is going to go home and destroy this work, I am getting paid to spend the time here doing my job so what does it matter to me".

Eventually Kelly will face a situation where the choice is amputate or die imminently- the medical team will amputate then, if Kelly consents. If Kelly does not consent she will die.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rem Farms, spiritofamermaid, Rice Satay and 10 others
I'm useless and not sure how to Archive Dropbox videos but Kelly has just uploaded an update video of her legs and YOU CAN SEE THROUGH FROM ONE SIDE OF HER RIGHT LEG TO THE OTHER.

Dropbox
It's gross I think by this point we all know what we're in for here.

*ETA also her right big toe is black and in any normal person would surely be lopped by this stage.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Trash Neko, AvrilsMeatsuit, Imminent dread and 68 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back