DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

[Optimus Prime]

That aside any other Amerimutts expecting the stimulus and if so any plans that money?

Mine's going straight into savings. It'll probably end up going toward a new car or a down payment on a new apartment once the pandemic is over and some family considerations are taken care of.

 

[SojiroSakura]

Source: "First Impressions Series - Dead Space 3
Mrhuthstuff's stream

Bugged shaving mechanics. His mom never taught him how to do it, dood! Nuttin' he could do.

 

[Dread Pirate Retard]

Source: "First Impressions Series - Dead Space 3
Mrhuthstuff's stream

View attachment 1986818

Bugged shaving mechanics. His mom never taught him how to do it, dood! Nuttin' he could do.

Jesus Christ it's not even a proper chin strap it's a fucking neck strap. It looks like he's wearing a helmet.

 

[OJ Simpson]

Source: "First Impressions Series - Dead Space 3
Mrhuthstuff's stream

View attachment 1986818

Bugged shaving mechanics. His mom never taught him how to do it, dood! Nuttin' he could do.

These 2 are special.

 

[YMB]

The very fact that he thought wrasslin' was real well into his 20's is a dead giveaway.

Holy shit that is fucking hilarious if true. Phil isn't that much older than me and I knew that wrestling was scripted when I was in like the 3rd grade. He probably really thought Kane and The Undertaker were brothers and Vince McMahon died in a limo explosion. I can just picture it dawning on him that it's not real like "HO-LY SHIT, DOOOOOD."

If anyone has a clip of him admitting that dumb shit please post it.

 

[Iron Father]

@SauceRyuKen that's hilarious regarding Phil still thinking wrestling was real into his 20's. Source?

 

[SojiroSakura]

I'm sorry but I will never ever understand how phil thinks that reviews are supposed to be "objective". It's literally impossible. All reviews are subjective. There's so many clips of him shitting on others for not being "objective". He's seriously not human.

 

[Zappin’ And Spazzin’]

I'm sorry but I will never ever understand how phil thinks that reviews are supposed to be "objective". It's literally impossible. All reviews are subjective. There's so many clips of him shitting on others for not being "objective". He's seriously not human.

It's even more frustrating that he (usually) follows up his ranting with "it's just my opinion, it's okay if you disagree" nonsense. You KNOW he doesn't mean it, he just says that to give himself a backdoor in case people really do decide to take him seriously and try to confront him on what he says. Bonus points if he said "how does anyone defend this?!" moments before suddenly pussyfooting.

 

[Iron Father]

The main thing DSP offers his supporters is a public shout-out when they donate, so this recent pearl-clutching over people mocking/"harassing" private citizens who donate to him is utterly retarded. They gave you money for attention by your own admission, therefore they're purposely putting themselves out there. If they can't handle the attention, they can stop donating to a living Internet meme that toxifies all who touch him. Simple.

Also why does he think his haturz give a fuck if some random retard's contribution gets miscredited to OIC? "That's so disrespectful and fucked up dood!"

Spoiler

In his OIC rant I get a very strong sense that he's pissy about OIC getting so much attention within his community. He's pretending it's nothing like King Tut but chargebacks aside he very obviously hated the fact King Tut took attention away from the pig and I'm getting similar vibes. "Every time I get a tip everybody says "thanks OIC" and it's fucked up!!!"

Goes to show you can shower the pig in money but he'll always bite the hand that feeds, because this is the United States of Phil, he is the supreme being!

 

[JimiHendrix]

I'm sorry but I will never ever understand how phil thinks that reviews are supposed to be "objective". It's literally impossible. All reviews are subjective. There's so many clips of him shitting on others for not being "objective". He's seriously not human.

you can objectively review a games quality based on things that make a game objectively good, that's why shit like game design is taught in college, because there are good things to do and bad things to do. that's why it's entirely possible to have a bad game, that physically is competently put together. such as a game that doesn't crash/lag/has no bugs, but still plays like shit, y'feel?

phil however doesn't know anything about game design and is too stupid to do this properly, he just screams about it.

 

[snort inquisition]

The main thing DSP offers his supporters is a public shout-out when they donate, so this recent pearl-clutching over people mocking/"harassing" private citizens who donate to him is utterly retarded. They gave you money for attention by your own admission, therefore they're purposely putting themselves out there. If they can't handle the attention, they can stop donating to a living Internet meme that toxifies all who touch him. Simple.

Also why does he think his haturz give a fuck if some random retard's contribution gets miscredited to OIC? "That's so disrespectful and fucked up dood!"

Spoiler

View attachment 1986899

In his OIC rant I get a very strong sense that he's pissy about OIC getting so much attention within his community. He's pretending it's nothing like King Tut but chargebacks aside he very obviously hated the fact King Tut took attention away from the pig and I'm getting similar vibes. "Every time I get a tip everybody says "thanks OIC" and it's fucked up!!!"

Goes to show you can shower the pig in money but he'll always bite the hand that feeds, because this is the United States of Phil, he is the supreme being!

i'm absolutely getting this vibe too, "every stream was always about tut tut tut" he's straight up jealous that people are talking about anything OTHER than him

it's so fucking pathetic

 

[David Davidson]

Big ups Mrhuthstuff. I forgot how big of a shill dsp was when he got his review copy of Fallout 4. Reminder, he skipped going to a family wedding for it.

Uhh, thats debunked. Phil said there was no wedding...

Okay, there was a wedding but Phil was scared to go to it because trolls were gonna SWAT the wedding!..

Okay, that wasn't probably going to happen, but he had to make an executive decision to keep his business afloat!

 

[Sugar Puppet]

i'm absolutely getting this vibe too, "every stream was always about tut tut tut" he's straight up jealous that people are talking about anything OTHER than him

it's so fucking pathetic

He actually was really jealous. I remember the stream chat during that timeframe and it wasn't like Phil described it. Phil claims EVERYONE hated Tut and people were telling Phil about how much of a nuisance he was and wanted him gone but the reality was that even though Tut was a dipshit for giving Phil all that money, the streamchat was generally pretty cool with him because Tut was gifting subs whenever someone would ask for one and was making Phil dance by playing shit he didn't want to play. Like when he said he'd show up to a stream if Phil would play Street Fighter 5 to make a contribution. Phil HATES that game and everyone knows Phil follows his schedule autistically and normally would call anyone a fucking nudnik for even suggesting he play it, but when Tut said he'd be back for a night stream if Phil was playing it, sure enough Phil's eyes lit up and he said 'Sure absolutely I'll change the schedule, I'll play it tonight'.

And when he would play Apex and other co-op games, twitchchat would praise Brian or Kekon or whoever and Phil would get pissy over that too. He needs to be center of attention at every moment or he gets jealous and spergs out.

 

[Draventren]

Ok you fucking degenerates, strap in. We're doing math.

Since Phil isn't gonna work today, I decided to do a deep dive on something I always wanted to look into, that is, the vest streak. 276 straight streams of "pahsitive contributions" that really helped our boy Phil out. A lot of us just default to the "$100 per stream for 276 streams". But how accurate is that really? Well, I did the research and the answer is "not at all accurate".

I'll attach the spreadsheet to this post but here's the breakdown. During those 276 streams Phil made $37,579. This does NOT account for anything "behind the scenes" or any tips that were off-stream after he turned off the stream for his YT audience. So this number is the bare minimum.

Of that 37 grand, $12,713.08 was from the top tip of each stream. That's 34%. Thirty four fucking percent from just one tip per stream. That's really bad boyos.

For the fees, I separated the top tip of each stream from the total tips, and then applied PayPal's 3% plus 30 cents to that transaction. For the remainder, I applied the highest discriminating factor I could find. By that, I mean for the "worst stream" Phil had during the vest streak, I took whatever the number of tips would HAVE to be so that the second highest tip would not supercede the top tip he had written down. That number was 15. Therefore the "remainder" amount was assessed a 4.50 fee (the 30 cent fee x 15 tips) as well as 3% of whatever the remainder was. This actually works in Phil's favor because I likely assessed him more fees on average than he was getting.

What number are we left with? Well, after all fees, Phil made $35,126.83 during the vest streak (before taxes). If we apply Phil's federal income tax bracket as well as his Washington state B&O tax, Phil made $26,295. Let that sink in. 26 grand and change in 276 streams. Now let's have some real fun.

276 streams for Phil is 138 working days at 6 hours of work a day (fuck Phil I'm not counting the pre-stream as work). That means Phil was making 190 bucks a day, or $31.75 an hour. That's AFTER taxes (which we know he won't pay anyway). As a yearly salary, that would be roughly 64 grand a year of take home money. If we factor in his average of $1,700 a month from bits, his average at the time of roughly $1500 a month from subs, his patreon at $300 a month, and YT at $750 a month (his own words), we're left with 138 days which is 4.5 months x ($1700 + $750 + $1500 + $300) = $19,125. After taxes? $14,316.

Finally, let's add that $14,316 to his $26,295 and we get $40,611. Now we take this stretch of time and apply it over a whole year and we get, drumroll, $107,416 (138/365 is .378, which means you multiply by 2.645 to get the yearly).

Phil was on fucking pace to make $107,416 after taxes in a year where he wiped out all of his credit card debt. All of it. Fucking Thanos snapped. I want the people who support him to hopefully see this message and take a good hard look at it the next time they think Phil is struggling to make ends meet. Think about how much food costs, or a mortgage, or a car payment. Shit, take 25% away for these mysterious fucking chargebacks and you're still left with 80 grand AFTER. FUCKING. TAXES. If you can look at these numbers, which are irrefutable by the way because math doesn't discriminate against pigs, roaches, or pigroaches, and you can still say that Phil is just a guy who is down on his luck, you just might be insane.

For Phil's piggie cultists, even when you factor in EVERY bill he could possibly have, there's still $40K unaccounted for and that's just from last year alone. Still think the WWE Champions shit is fake?

I wanna save this and make some burner accounts to spam it as a copy pasta in his chat during streams. God I need a better hobby.

you can objectively review a games quality based on things that make a game objectively good, that's why shit like game design is taught in college, because there are good things to do and bad things to do. that's why it's entirely possible to have a bad game, that physically is competently put together. such as a game that doesn't crash/lag/has no bugs, but still plays like shit, y'feel?

phil however doesn't know anything about game design and is too stupid to do this properly, he just screams about it.

Phil doesn't know anything about any aspect of creativity. One of my favorite things he does is bitch about game's writing. I've mentioned before in here that I'm a writer as a hobbyist and I took some creative and practical writing stuff during education. One of the things you learn how to do is separate your tastes from quality. Whenever Phil bitches about videogame stories he can't separate the two things. A story is bad because he doesn't like it. See the TLOU2. I haven't played it or really engaged with it since I didn't care much for the first one (games that try and tell stories through huge exposition dumps that you can't engage with meaningfully bore the fuck outta me and TLOU was just people talking at you in between okay stealth/action scenes. Don't @ me) but everything I gained from Phil's "review" and complaints was that it people were acting dumb during dangerous times and that's "unrealistic" or something. Taking away from the fact that these people have been living in this type of world for years now and have a handle on surviving it, and the fact that one of our main characters is in her early 20s now, if I recall correctly? That's when you do dumb shit, it's sort of hardwired into you.

Then turns around and praises a game like Bug Snax which, again haven't played and only seen bits of it mostly through Phil, was about what I, and everyone else, expected once we understood the premise. I remember actually thinking to myself once I understood the premise "eating the snax turns you into a monster or something dumb like that" and lo and behold.

Hell, I don't even think it's a bad thing if your core complaint about something is that you don't like it. Sometimes it's hard to articulate well why you don't enjoy it even though people around you do. The opposite can also be true. So long as you understand that it's not the same thing as a proper, objective review tackling the themes, motifs, world, characters, etc of a story and don't try to play it off as such, that's a pretty useful tool to have. Like, I recommend games/music/books/movies I don't like to people, not because I want them to dislike it as I do, but because I can hear some quality to it that I just don't appreciate. Phil writes off anything he dislikes instead of thinking about why he dislikes it and using that as a basis to build an understanding of his biases and tastes so he can in better faith review things for his audience.

All that to say Phil is not an objective reviewer because, for all of his bloviating over the years about how much of a logical thinker he is, he is ruled by emotion and his own values. He's probably the sort to legitimately claim that music he can't understand the lyrics to = bad music because he has no appreciation for anything but the most obvious and manipulative aspects of art.

 

[Zappin’ And Spazzin’]

He actually was really jealous. I remember the stream chat during that timeframe and it wasn't like Phil described it. Phil claims EVERYONE hated Tut and people were telling Phil about how much of a nuisance he was and wanted him gone but the reality was that even though Tut was a dipshit for giving Phil all that money, the streamchat was generally pretty cool with him because Tut was gifting subs whenever someone would ask for one and was making Phil dance by playing shit he didn't want to play. Like when he said he'd show up to a stream if Phil would play Street Fighter 5 to make a contribution. Phil HATES that game and everyone knows Phil follows his schedule autistically and normally would call anyone a fucking nudnik for even suggesting he play it, but when Tut said he'd be back for a night stream if Phil was playing it, sure enough Phil's eyes lit up and he said 'Sure absolutely I'll change the schedule, I'll play it tonight'.

Phil also conveniently omits the part where he allowed himself to dance to someone else's tune at the prospect of easy cash. It's other people's fault that Tut became a meme, not the fact that he throws aside his dignity at the literal drop of a dime.

 

[We Are The Witches]

Even after Youtube took away the "go to channel" option, there are ways to confirm if a user in chat is from one account or another. @actually you asked @LyteSydeByll if the Anonymouse in DDM was from the account that made the Derich videos, right? He could simply be asked, if not then the following.

If the stream was live, this website seems to work fine from what I've seen, you copypaste the URL, enter, and then it should retrieve the users with their links to their YT profile:
https://1.err.tokyo/
Edit: There's also an extension for it.

However it may not work for offline videos or take too long, so this can be another way to verify the identity: you go to the offline video with the chat, locate the chatter and their image, then you copy "Copy Image Location". In DDM, Anonymouse should be around 4:44:30 or towards the end:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrNTgxkAgu4

I'm not embedding because you obviously need to see the chat, anyways, the link at this point should be:
https://yt4.ggpht.com/ytc/AAUvwnj3q1kmv49I3wCdNGGDyiF1Y0_HQn43v6nWNLDT=s32-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj
Then you just have to go to Anony's profile -the one making the videos- and also "Copy Image Location", it should be:
https://yt3.ggpht.com/ytc/AAUvwnj3q1kmv49I3wCdNGGDyiF1Y0_HQn43v6nWNLDT=s88-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj

You can see slight differences in the URL, but the first part is almost the same (characters after /ytc/ must be the same, also needs to be /ytc/ not /yti/). To my understanding, until the user changes their avatar, that part of the string won't change, once they do, even if they upload the same exact image, it'll change the URL. But as it is now, this should be proof that DDM Anony is the Anony making the videos.
You obviously can test this with other users if you wish.

Let's throw this in here too:

 

[JimiHendrix]

bunch of stuff about philbert

in my experiences 95% of the world have completely and utterly lost understanding of the words objective and subjective. i've had so many people i know personally argue with me and treat me like an idiot because they believe "well if a game is fun then it's a good game since games are meant to be fun"

fun is a subjective concept that's fine.

whether or not something is well made or well put together or well designed, is an objective concept.

apparently nobody fucking understands this anymore. drives me fucking insane.

 

[That Anony Mouse]

Even after Youtube took away the "go to channel" option, there are ways to confirm if a user in chat is from one account or another. @actually you asked @LyteSydeByll if the Anonymouse in DDM was from the account that made the Derich videos, right? He could simply be asked, if not then the following.

If the stream was live, this website seems to work fine from what I've seen, you copypaste the URL, enter, and then it should retrieve the users with their links to their YT profile:
https://1.err.tokyo/

However it may not work for offline videos or take too long, so this can be another way to verify the identity: you go to the offline video with the chat, locate the chatter and their image, then you copy "Copy Image Location". In DDM, Anonymouse should be around 4:44:30 or towards the end:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrNTgxkAgu4

I'm not embedding because you obviously need to see the chat, anyways, the link at this point should be:
https://yt4.ggpht.com/ytc/AAUvwnj3q1kmv49I3wCdNGGDyiF1Y0_HQn43v6nWNLDT=s32-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj
Then you just have to go to Anony's profile -the one making the videos- and also "Copy Image Location", it should be:
https://yt3.ggpht.com/ytc/AAUvwnj3q1kmv49I3wCdNGGDyiF1Y0_HQn43v6nWNLDT=s88-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj

You can see slight differences in the URL, but the first part is almost the same (characters after /ytc/ must be the same, also needs to be /ytc/ not /yti/). To my understanding, until the user changes their avatar, that part of the string won't change, once they do, even if they upload the same exact image, it'll change the URL. But as it is now, this should be proof that DDM Anony is the Anony making the videos.
You obviously can test this with other users if you wish.

Let's throw this in here too:
View attachment 1987210

can I just say how fucking obnoxious it is to try to reach the outside world while banned from Twitch?? Phil and Swagginz and Eternal_Napalm are blatantly lying and even BANNING people who ask about me. I made the videos because I needed to get word out about the situation but had a FUCKED time getting a mic. I don't want to get doxx'd and I have been threatened with it since 2017 when I first got involved in this nonsense.

Anyways, y'all are hard to satiate. The rich uncle video has NOT been found yet. Not the one I mentioned. It was requested by a guy I truly respect (even if he did donate to Phil to get it) and Phil mentions him name in it, so I do NOT want to expose that. He is told by Phil in this video about his gaming skills and whether Phil feels he has an innate talent with gaming that gives him an advantage. I know I have shared the video with permission a couple times so it might come out before I'm unbanned Sunday.

And I know you didn't like me "cackling" during the first Derich video. I'm sorry. I'm a big Deadwingdork fan (even tho his Discord mod Gabriel HATES me for good reason) and was taking after his format. I know it's not for everyone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxFj4iNmsJE

Don't forget. Kurt Cobain is a retard fucker. His words, not mine!

edit: did I really forget the Y in my username? wow, great, I'm a real Derich-brain tonight

 

[BlackDragoons]

Why doesn't Phil do Doordash if he is in that desperate need for cash? Hell I do it and I work two jobs just to even out the edges.

 

[Schmeckel]

Why doesn't Phil do Doordash if he is in that desperate need for cash? Hell I do it and I work two jobs just to even out the edges.

Phil actually interact with people? Phil drive anywhere without his soulmom? Pfft.