U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hay man, you're going to have to link that study one more time- because it does seem like there are a great many people who have linked the technique to additional risks and it is banned in a lot of countries already.

If you think that I'm being disingenuous in any way, I don't care- this isn't a hugbox snowflake.
Ill field that for you, because of poisoned search results I did a study search for incidents and tests pre 2020:


This article is covering the very problem we are discussing right now, courts and public perception that knee on the neck as a restraint (including a few others too in the study) can kill you when done correctly.


A little bottom note for those of you searching for this topic, I have found that most major search engines are putting out results in a manner that I think are getting pushed as a form of gaslighting. If you force the engines to only give you results that were indexed before the topic of interest, it gets around this.
 
Oh, lovely, a new CHAZ... We gonna see more joyriding kids get shot indiscriminately for accidentally wandering into that street?
Screenshot_12_03_2021_00_40_59.png

Well you were close
 
What's the story behind this? Is it because hospitals turn away black patients or because rappers and basketball players don't donate their money to build hospitals in the hood?

In the US, there are hospitals everywhere, even in the hood, but the care you get varies. They don't turn away black people or anyone else. Every hospital has to take emergency patients regardless of their ability to pay. Keep in mind that we don't have universal national healthcare like Canada or Britain so a lot of people are totally uninsured or have some kind of healthcare tugboat like Medicaid. But the general idea in the hospital is treat first, figure out the payment later.

Ideally the care you get would be the same depending on where you go, but the inner city staff get kind of based. A lot depends on how busy the hospital is and what kind of cases they often get. A big sticking point seems to be how many people think the ER is a primary care physician. There are hospitals in the cities where army medics go to learn how to treat bullet wounds. Rural places can also be shitty for different reasons.

I get the strong feeling having been a patient in a number of places that if you come off as obviously injured, educated, cooperative, and not obviously drug-seeking, you'll get good care. That being said, I have seen some shit.

But in general, I would say George Floyd coming in hot like that would have gotten good care at the ER 99/100 times.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand the point some of you are trying to make. That Chauvin didn't act in the most optimal way in hindsight?
Well obviously, the man didn't have hindsight. In these kinds of situations what's being judged is whether the police officer acted reasonably considering the situation, his training and the means at hand. With that in mind I don't know how anyone can think this man

Everything he did was within his training and reasonable considering the situation. Floyd was a large man, obviously out of his mind on one substance or another, due to that or perhaps despite it he wasn't being fully compliant. You can see this in the full video, the guy is doing everything he can to make things more difficult. Struggling against the cops, pushing away from the back of that car, saying he's claustrophobic, that he can't breathe(This is before being on the ground), this hurts, that hurts ect. Now in this situation what do you do? You can wrestle this guy into the car, but to do that you either need to apply a lot of force quickly and decisively or risk something going wrong(Like the guy getting your gun, punching you, grabbing one of your fellow officers, slithering away).


I don't know what the safest method is; but I know knee on neck is pretty risky and can fathom that having three other guys sit on him and just avoiding his neck might be a bit better, even on the pr;

or you know, restraining him upright, turning him over on his front.

Hay, cuff him to a post if you want.

If knee on neck is the "safest way to subdue suspects" and we can't have an honest conversation about where Chauvin fucked up in refusing to switch to any other restraint past a certain point, even after we both agree it wasn't murder,

We're fucked.

First of all, you say knee on neck is risky? You know what else is risky? Having a big ass man on drugs not properly secured. The guy could do anything from shaking you off and hurting someone, hurting himself or ingesting drugs. You want him as tightly secured as possible because the guy is obviously losing his shit. You can see they don't even restrain him that much at first. He's moving his upper body about and wriggling about saying "I can't breathe, my knee hurts, my stomach hurts"
[First.png
I'm glad you have all these great ideas about how a suspect should be restrained, but I think I'll veer on the side of the people who are putting their health and the health of the people that live in that area on the line. Not to mention actually receive training and have experience in these matters. For every case where a cop looks like he's going too far, there's 20 where a moment of softness leads to buttload of complications and potentially casualties. (reminder that in the Jacob Blake case armchair officers were saying they should have tackled the man. If they did that and the guy slammed his head against the pavement and died I wonder if they would have had the same take)

Now knee on neck you say?
Second.png

I guess knee on upper back and then knee on neck at some 5 second point during a 50 minute arrest event doesn't sound as good for the media.
Also from his body position I am pretty sure that he wasn't applying that much force on the guy regardless. Try it out yourself and see how you have to lean and position to apply a lot of pressure that way.


Within the statute (1) applies. Culpable negligence is creating unreasonable risk. What is unreasonable is going to be determined by the court, but it will probably read something along the lines of "you didn't know if his overdose was fatal or not, but choosing to continue the knee-to-neck choke even without that information added in additional risk we do not deem reasonable".

Thats also where we disagree. He was negligent as far as it appears. His training, I guarantee you, does not include "once you start knee on neck, you absolutely cannot stop, you cant switch to another procedure, this is the safest procedure in the book, even when your other officers are saying dude we should do something else, you are trained not to stop".

He did not create the situation, but he mishandled it.

He did take chances of death, because knee-on-neck past the point of "bro, should we use another hold, hes not really breathing very well" is consciously taking chances of death.
It's obvious Chauvin is taking it easy on this guy, the officers are discussing on what he might be with them thinking it might be PCP. PCP absorbs through the skin, removes your ability to feel pain and because of that makes you able to exhibit preternatural strength. These things combined make someone on PCP: Angry, Delusional, Super-Strong and Untouchable with bare hands unless you want to become drugged up(Which could kill you since you don't have tolerance like the druggie does). This is why officers are thought to use gloves and could potentially be the reason they don't want to switch Floyd about a bunch. It's a very reasonable course of action to take considering the circumstances.

Consider that most people don't understand what it feels like to try to restrain someone who is genuinely trying to get away and or hurt you. You need more people, way more people. And if you aren't willing to hurt them maybe even more than that. This is why decent self-defense courses teach people to just run even if they think they can't. It turns out in 99.9% of cases they can. Consider that if this guy ran and hurt someone you'd be here saying Chauvin should have suplexed him into the curb. These are real situations where things are at stake and you have to make choices with imperfect knowledge.


The second degree manslaughter might stick for the aforementioned reasons though. Did his actions contribute to Floyds death or did he fail to act in a way to mitigate the situation? I don't think anything could have prevented Floyd's death, but I do think the court is going to find that he did fuck up pretty badly with how he handled the situation and probably should have switched to an upright hold with the other three cops helping. Over there, I don't think he did everything in his power that was reasonable to try and help the situation.
His goal isn't to just help Chauvin, he's not an MD. His goal is to keep him from committing more unlawful actions, apprehend him and do his best to keep him safe. What are you basing the idea that he didn't do what was reasonable to help him? Reminder that he was restrained in this way because he was flopping about and hurting himself. It's not reasonable to demand they do that under the circumstances. People screaming to let him go and perps screaming they're dying is the usual not the exception. Watch some other arrests in black areas and you'll see the same shit.


The max sentence for that is 10 years. Hes already basically served about a year in remand, so thats knocked down to 9~ at the max now. He also may lose time for good behavior (though with such a short sentence + due to the public perception, probably not). At the end of the day, I'm hoping that this is how the trial turns out and antifa really doesnt get what they wanted. He should pay some price for his fuckup, but not life, and not hard time for decades.

Antifa is going to sperg out anyways. BLM is going to sperg out anyways, but thats on them...
Antifa already got what they wanted, they got it the moment Blacks and Antifa lost their shit and committed crimes with no repercussions and the powers that be supported them. They got what they wanted the moment people's heads were filled with 8 minutes and 46 seconds. Do you understand that most people, most non-politically active people think this shit was a racial execution. What do you think that means for the future.

It's not on Antifa, it's not on BLM they won't suffer for this. The average person is, more specifically a certain type of average person. Following the Fentanyl Fraud event, policing on black people went down but went up for white people. Why? Hint, it wasn't because of actual crimes happening.

Every public official now knows what he must and mustn't do if he doesn't want to be publicly destroyed, every Police Chief knows what orders to issue, where to police and how to treat certain officers. And every police officers knows that even if they follow the book, even if they do everything that can be reasonably expected from them it won't matter as long as the suspect is black. Even the dispatcher on the George Floyd call sighs when the callers says Floyd is black. So now black people know they can get away with it, and that if they don't they'll be martyred. Cops will do everything they can to not end up like Chauvin, so policing of Black people will be avoided, but crime will go up. The amount of people they're expected to arrest and police is going to go up, who do you think they'll go after. Can't go after Blacks, and any raise in other minority arrests will cause a shit avalanche. They'll go after the only safe group. White people, mostly white men.

So with all of that shit coming down the neck of America I think "Antifa" and "BLM" got exactly what they wanted. It's not an attack charge, it's a victory dance.
 
I think it won't be long before their victory dance will be a phyrric victory dance once the puppeteers will throw them under the bus.
Will they ever actually get thrown under the bus? I used to think so, but all of their cases are being quietly dropped or pleaded down. Anything bad that they do gets memory holed by the media. Antifa just tried to burn down the federal courthouse in Portland again, and the only thing you hear about it is an Andy Ngo tweet and a postmillennial article.
 
Oh my..
According to the Minneapolis Police Department’s own rules the day of Floyd’s death, the neck hold, or carotid restraint – in which officer Derek Chauvin pushed his knee onto Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes to restrict blood flow – should only be used when the officer fears for their life. Chauvin has been charged with second-degree murder and three other officers are charged with aiding and abetting murder.

In most of Europe, police officers are banned from using these kinds of neck restraints, sometimes also referred to as a chock hold, said Mr Hirschfield. Germany allows police officers to only briefly use a version of it, in which pressure is temporarily applied to the head (and not neck) to subdue somebody. Belgium forbids police from completely leaning on a suspect even temporarily, according to the Associated Press.
One exception is France, where on 28 May officers used it to pin down a black man in an incident captured by bystanders. In Hong Kong, police are also investigating a case in which a man died after police restrained and held him face down during an arrest.
Under international law, “police should only use force as a last resort and to the minimum extent possible” and neck restraints are treated as a serious form of violence, said Patrick Wilcken, a researcher on military, security and policing issues with London-based Amnesty International.
Uh........... What. They're calling a knee on the base of the neck where it meets the collar bone a "chokehold".
I get that they're liars and idiots, but that's truly exceptional. It's bone on bone. You believe morons dude.

I guess I ought to expand on this a bit. So, the idea that you would try to restrict blood flow, which occurs via arteries on the left and right of the trachea, with a knee is really dumb.
Here's a picture.
2122_Common_Carotid_Artery.jpg
So, the point of a carotid hold is to put pressure on that one bit up front called the carotid sinus. It's the location of a blood-pressure baroreceptor that regulates your heartbeat. Thing is, there's two of them, left and right, and they work in concert. So, you have to apply even pressure to both in order to get the effect you want (unconsciousness,) by tricking the person's heart into thinking that their blood pressure is too high so that it slows it's beating, blood pressure rapidly drops and and the person faints. So, even in a proper choke hold, you're not looking to collapse the blood vessel. That's not really a good plan since the tissues around the blood vessel are squishier than the blood vessel itself. Hence why the target is the baroreceptor. Anyway, you might be able to see how a knee on the back of the neck would be a very poor means of attacking two pressure points on the opposite sides of the trachea?
 
Last edited:
I have a feeling that people who are talking about restraining Floyd in a drugged-up state don't realize just how dangerous and quickly people turn when on drugs.

The people who do a fast 180 when on dope aren't too common, but there definitely are snappers out there and you never know who you're dealing with once the dope either comes out or goes away (the two most dangerous times imo). Or when being arrested lol.

I almost spilled my spaghetti everywhere to prove the point that NO, you can't deal rationally with someone on drugs. It simply cannot be done. They are quite literally out of their minds. If you want specific stories go ahead and ask, I have a TON of them.
 
I have a feeling that people who are talking about restraining Floyd in a drugged-up state don't realize just how dangerous and quickly people turn when on drugs.

The people who do a fast 180 when on dope aren't too common, but there definitely are snappers out there and you never know who you're dealing with once the dope either comes out or goes away (the two most dangerous times imo). Or when being arrested lol.

I almost spilled my spaghetti everywhere to prove the point that NO, you can't deal rationally with someone on drugs. It simply cannot be done. They are quite literally out of their minds. If you want specific stories go ahead and ask, I have a TON of them.
I've seen a methhead take 3 or four shots from multiple tasers and still had to be restrained to a carrying board.
 
I have a feeling that people who are talking about restraining Floyd in a drugged-up state don't realize just how dangerous and quickly people turn when on drugs.

The people who do a fast 180 when on dope aren't too common, but there definitely are snappers out there and you never know who you're dealing with once the dope either comes out or goes away (the two most dangerous times imo). Or when being arrested lol.

I almost spilled my spaghetti everywhere to prove the point that NO, you can't deal rationally with someone on drugs. It simply cannot be done. They are quite literally out of their minds. If you want specific stories go ahead and ask, I have a TON of them.

Hey, General, tell us some stories!
 
That Chauvin didn't act in the most optimal way in hindsight?
Well obviously, the man didn't have hindsight. In these kinds of situations what's being judged is whether the police officer acted reasonably considering the situation, his training and the means at hand. With that in mind I don't know how anyone can think this man
Its in hindsight, but its also "other officers are saying get your knee off his neck" thats not just hindsight, thats failure to act, even with training. Again, I guarantee you, nowhere in his training does it say "you absolutely can never take your knee off Floyds neck, even when his breathing is getting more shallow".
Everything he did was within his training and reasonable considering the situation.
No, see above.
You can see this in the full video, the guy is doing everything he can to make things more difficult. Struggling against the cops, pushing away from the back of that car, saying he's claustrophobic, that he can't breathe(This is before being on the ground), this hurts, that hurts ect. Now in this situation what do you do? You can wrestle this guy into the car, but to do that you either need to apply a lot of force quickly and decisively or risk something going wrong(Like the guy getting your gun, punching you, grabbing one of your fellow officers, slithering away).
I'm not saying let him go, yeah he was struggling for a lot- but at a certain point, his breathing was getting more and more shallow, he was getting less and less responsive, and even other cops were like "dude, get off his neck". A guy who can barely breathe should not still have knee on neck.
His goal isn't to just help Chauvin, he's not an MD. His goal is to keep him from committing more unlawful actions, apprehend him and do his best to keep him safe. What are you basing the idea that he didn't do what was reasonable to help him? Reminder that he was restrained in this way because he was flopping about and hurting himself. It's not reasonable to demand they do that under the circumstances. People screaming to let him go and perps screaming they're dying is the usual not the exception. Watch some other arrests in black areas and you'll see the same shit.
I have not said he is an MD- but it is his responsibility not to make the situation unreasonably worse and should it appear that the perp is dying, to try and stop that. Keeping knee on neck implies neither, and that he froze.
 
The thing that is going to cause Chauvin's defense the most headaches I think is Chauvin's service history. He was apparently a bit of a hothead in the past. Whether that had ANY bearing on the Floyd incident might be immaterial, it's likely going to get brought up by the prosecution and what the jury does with that information, we won't know until later.

At this point, I have no sympathy for Floyd. You get hyped up on drugs or alcohol, you increase the risk of being a danger to society.
I had a bit of sympathy for Garner. I don't know how that incident got to the point it did, I don't remember if there was bodycam footage that would have shown whether Garner was chimping out or if the officer had just decided to go ham on a big dude that was selling loose smokes. Freddie Gray's case was murky in spots, no camera inside that van apparently? Heard of detained suspects thrashing around in a police vehicle to try and win the ghetto lottery but how the hell do you break your own damn neck in a police vehicle? Every other case out there that has resulted in chimping and chanting has been a terrible hill to die on. Mike Brown, Trayvon Martin, Breonna Taylor, Jacob whateverthefuck (fuck that stupid asshole and the people shrieking about him, seriously).
 
Every other case out there that has resulted in chimping and chanting has been a terrible hill to die on. Mike Brown, Trayvon Martin, Breonna Taylor, Jacob whateverthefuck (fuck that stupid asshole and the people shrieking about him, seriously).

BLM likes to make stuff up or stretch the facts, frankly. Breonna Taylor is the biggest example of this because all the information was released by police, and what they did seems pretty reasonable considering the facts. The warrant was no-knock, but they actually knocked on her door and then her current boyfriend started firing when they opened after multiple times, etc. Its a pity she got shot, but pretty obvious that was one possibility. The only person I would really care about within the list would probably be Trayvon Martin, but otherwise for every other person within the list- the police did act pretty reasonably and by the book.

With Floyd, where the left goes full lunatic is with the murder charges (he hated floyd, he intended to kill him!) and then trying to stretch the "he worked previously with Floyd as a bouncer, therefore thats motive!". Seriously, what the fuck?
 
BLM likes to make stuff up or stretch the facts, frankly. Breonna Taylor is the biggest example of this because all the information was released by police, and what they did seems pretty reasonable considering the facts. The warrant was no-knock, but they actually knocked on her door and then her current boyfriend started firing when they opened after multiple times, etc. Its a pity she got shot, but pretty obvious that was one possibility. The only person I would really care about within the list would probably be Trayvon Martin, but otherwise for every other person within the list- the police did act pretty reasonably and by the book.

With Floyd, where the left goes full lunatic is with the murder charges (he hated floyd, he intended to kill him!) and then trying to stretch the "he worked previously with Floyd as a bouncer, therefore thats motive!". Seriously, what the fuck?
Trayvon Martin was not shot by police, but another citizen who had no reasonable expectation of police training, techniques, or equipment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back