- Joined
- May 9, 2017
Who the hell watches porn on their PHONE?The lesson: Because Mr Labelle learned about women from looking at porn on his phone, he thinks normal people learn the same way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who the hell watches porn on their PHONE?The lesson: Because Mr Labelle learned about women from looking at porn on his phone, he thinks normal people learn the same way.
Yeah, they can't stand it. I think this is part of why they rail against non-trans actors portraying trans characters in films and tv-series, as well as "traps" on the internet. These are generally considered more sympathetic/attractive respectively than them.Troons are ugly, obvious males. They are extremely jealous of traps, who might actually attract a heterosexual male. Look at Bill, look at him, he's a fat fuck. Nobody would ever mistake him for a female.
Who the hell watches porn on their PHONE?
Billy wanks off in all sorts of strange places. If you don't like it, stay out of the ladies' washroom at Horton's you fucking bigot!Who the hell watches porn on their PHONE?
>goes to store
Fucking this. It's like getting mad about "having-two-arms-normativity". And this obsession they have with attacking normativity is fucking cancer even from their supposedly progressive perspective, where it's supposed to be okay to not be the norm.Heteronormativity is the dumbest fucking word.
Of course being hetero is normative.
That cucked faggot with the "hide the pain" look has two kids, and the reason he has two kids is that someone with a penis fucked someone with a vagina and an egg was fertilized. Standard, PIV, missionary-with-the-lights-out heterosexuality.
4% of the population is gay or trans.
When 96% of the population is heterosexual, heterosexuality is normative.
Damn.
I don't like this new pedo dad character
You want a stupid word? The counter would be trans-homonormativity. That word just looks retarded. I want to put it out of its misery. Anybody with a gender studies degree is an asshole.Heteronormativity is the dumbest fucking word.
Of course being hetero is normative.
That cucked faggot with the "hide the pain" look has two kids, and the reason he has two kids is that someone with a penis fucked someone with a vagina and an egg was fertilized. Standard, PIV, missionary-with-the-lights-out heterosexuality.
4% of the population is gay or trans.
When 96% of the population is heterosexual, heterosexuality is normative.
Damn.
Wait that's actually a thing?You want a stupid word? The counter would be trans-homonormativity. That word just looks retarded. I want to put it out of its misery.
I like how vapid consoomerism is directly tied to validating tranny ideology in this one. He might as well be admitting that his whole identity is derived from a marketing gimmick.
I'm so sorry but it is.Wait that's actually a thing?
Because Guillaume feels oppressed by those norms, like the one about not being sexually attracted to little kids.Why does that equate to destroying "social constructs" that society clearly generated for a reason? Just because its a norm doesn't make it a bad thing by default. Its a norm we wear pants, its also a norm that hitting your partner isn't cool. Some of these norms are codified into laws, but unspoken social rules usually evolve for a reason. Unless the norm is actively harmful there isn't a reason to deconstruct it even if it is just a social construct.
*steeples fingers*People who like to masturbate in bed, with a sex doll that doesn't fit in a chair, public transpiration perverts, etc.
Its a wide and diverse group that doesn't need your judgement.
Because Labelle, and troons like him, are deviants in more ways than "Oh I'm a guy and I'm painting my nails." They are deviant in attitude, sexuality, personality, and outlook. And they know it. They destroy "social constructs" because they don't want to be deviant, but they also don't want to give up their deviant attitudes. It's not them that needs to change; it's society.People always have to take shit too far. The idea that little girls can play with trucks and watch x-men sounds cool to me, little boys can paint their nails cool.
Why does that equate to destroying "social constructs" that society clearly generated for a reason? Just because its a norm doesn't make it a bad thing by default. Its a norm we wear pants, its also a norm that hitting your partner isn't cool. Some of these norms are codified into laws, but unspoken social rules usually evolve for a reason. Unless the norm is actively harmful there isn't a reason to deconstruct it even if it is just a social construct.
*steeples fingers*
Am I to assume you are a member of this "wide and diverse" group?
Who the fuck says? Women don't want to kiss dried up crinkly lizard lips!