Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Troons are ugly, obvious males. They are extremely jealous of traps, who might actually attract a heterosexual male. Look at Bill, look at him, he's a fat fuck. Nobody would ever mistake him for a female.
Yeah, they can't stand it. I think this is part of why they rail against non-trans actors portraying trans characters in films and tv-series, as well as "traps" on the internet. These are generally considered more sympathetic/attractive respectively than them.
 
Repost
EwT3xRsWEAUdOG8.jpeg

EwT3jtyWQAggMyf.jpeg

 
Heteronormativity is the dumbest fucking word.

Of course being hetero is normative.

That cucked faggot with the "hide the pain" look has two kids, and the reason he has two kids is that someone with a penis fucked someone with a vagina and an egg was fertilized. Standard, PIV, missionary-with-the-lights-out heterosexuality.

4% of the population is gay or trans.

When 96% of the population is heterosexual, heterosexuality is normative.

Damn.
 
Heteronormativity is the dumbest fucking word.

Of course being hetero is normative.

That cucked faggot with the "hide the pain" look has two kids, and the reason he has two kids is that someone with a penis fucked someone with a vagina and an egg was fertilized. Standard, PIV, missionary-with-the-lights-out heterosexuality.

4% of the population is gay or trans.

When 96% of the population is heterosexual, heterosexuality is normative.

Damn.
Fucking this. It's like getting mad about "having-two-arms-normativity". And this obsession they have with attacking normativity is fucking cancer even from their supposedly progressive perspective, where it's supposed to be okay to not be the norm.
 
Heteronormativity is the dumbest fucking word.

Of course being hetero is normative.

That cucked faggot with the "hide the pain" look has two kids, and the reason he has two kids is that someone with a penis fucked someone with a vagina and an egg was fertilized. Standard, PIV, missionary-with-the-lights-out heterosexuality.

4% of the population is gay or trans.

When 96% of the population is heterosexual, heterosexuality is normative.

Damn.
You want a stupid word? The counter would be trans-homonormativity. That word just looks retarded. I want to put it out of its misery. Anybody with a gender studies degree is an asshole.
 
People always have to take shit too far. The idea that little girls can play with trucks and watch x-men sounds cool to me, little boys can paint their nails cool.

Why does that equate to destroying "social constructs" that society clearly generated for a reason? Just because its a norm doesn't make it a bad thing by default. Its a norm we wear pants, its also a norm that hitting your partner isn't cool. Some of these norms are codified into laws, but unspoken social rules usually evolve for a reason. Unless the norm is actively harmful there isn't a reason to deconstruct it even if it is just a social construct.
 
Why does that equate to destroying "social constructs" that society clearly generated for a reason? Just because its a norm doesn't make it a bad thing by default. Its a norm we wear pants, its also a norm that hitting your partner isn't cool. Some of these norms are codified into laws, but unspoken social rules usually evolve for a reason. Unless the norm is actively harmful there isn't a reason to deconstruct it even if it is just a social construct.
Because Guillaume feels oppressed by those norms, like the one about not being sexually attracted to little kids.
 
People who like to masturbate in bed, with a sex doll that doesn't fit in a chair, public transpiration perverts, etc.

Its a wide and diverse group that doesn't need your judgement.
*steeples fingers*
Am I to assume you are a member of this "wide and diverse" group?

People always have to take shit too far. The idea that little girls can play with trucks and watch x-men sounds cool to me, little boys can paint their nails cool.

Why does that equate to destroying "social constructs" that society clearly generated for a reason? Just because its a norm doesn't make it a bad thing by default. Its a norm we wear pants, its also a norm that hitting your partner isn't cool. Some of these norms are codified into laws, but unspoken social rules usually evolve for a reason. Unless the norm is actively harmful there isn't a reason to deconstruct it even if it is just a social construct.
Because Labelle, and troons like him, are deviants in more ways than "Oh I'm a guy and I'm painting my nails." They are deviant in attitude, sexuality, personality, and outlook. And they know it. They destroy "social constructs" because they don't want to be deviant, but they also don't want to give up their deviant attitudes. It's not them that needs to change; it's society.
 
Where does heteronormativity even come into it? The kid wants to play with makeup, he isn't necessarily going to be gay. Plenty of straight rocker, metalhead, goth and emo men wore makeup and picked up chicks back in the day. And he looks far too young to be interested in girls OR boys, both the adults seem pretty noncey in this scenario - one letting his kids wear makeup labelled "CUTE" (though if it's just gloss it probably isn't that bad) and the other commenting on the kid getting dates.
 
Back