Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

272874BA-29E6-4DAD-B6BF-9F4D37A8BF9E.jpeg


:story:

The laughable part about this is that they had to capitalize music with a “M” just like how they’re capitalizing black people with the word “Black” to show how diverse and inclusive they are.

It almost reads like an ad for CNN than it does for the Grammys. “Sense Of unity across all lines of difference” = apparently more random amounts of black people and women hogging all the awards and delivering political agendas that have nothing to do with music.

At least 4chan’s /mu/ summed up this awards show with a bingo chart:

D2FD3EA6-3B87-4117-99D4-C90666AA8B73.png
 
The laughable part about this is that they had to capitalize music with a “M” just like how they’re capitalizing black people with the word “Black” to show how diverse and inclusive they are.
Yes, express your love of diversity by suing children for copyright infringement.
 
View attachment 1998917View attachment 1998918View attachment 1998919View attachment 1998920View attachment 1998921View attachment 1998922View attachment 1998923View attachment 1998924View attachment 1998925
OK. So I was kind of onboard with all this until the "all men have muhsoggykneez in them!111" shit appeared. No self-respecting man will listen to somebody who says stuff like that. The people reposting these types of posts on Instagram are completely oblivious or unaware of some of the most predatory and sleazy men. Those who constantly bleat about feminism and are self-described male feminists are pretty suspect for being actual sociopathic predators who take advantage of this movement to prey on vulnerable women. Nevertheless, those who call out the bullshit and are doing the right thing don't need to tell everyone about it. They just do it. Actions speak louder than words.
One out of three women are raped in this country? I could understand if this was the middle east or Africa, but that seems a little off.
 
View attachment 1998917View attachment 1998918View attachment 1998919View attachment 1998920View attachment 1998921View attachment 1998922View attachment 1998923View attachment 1998924View attachment 1998925
OK. So I was kind of onboard with all this until the "all men have muhsoggykneez in them!111" shit appeared. No self-respecting man will listen to somebody who says stuff like that. The people reposting these types of posts on Instagram are completely oblivious or unaware of some of the most predatory and sleazy men. Those who constantly bleat about feminism and are self-described male feminists are pretty suspect for being actual sociopathic predators who take advantage of this movement to prey on vulnerable women. Nevertheless, those who call out the bullshit and are doing the right thing don't need to tell everyone about it. They just do it. Actions speak louder than words.
You know, there was a time when righteous men would defend women and protect them. And then harridans screamed and cursed until those men disappeared.

Now they're unhappy because they're alone and vulnerable and all they have to defend them are betas and soyboys.
 
One out of three women are raped in this country? I could understand if this was the middle east or Africa, but that seems a little off.
I guess despite the bogus one in four number they used to trot out being DEBOOONKED they've decided to exaggerate even more in response.
 
I am the only person in the world that played The Bureau

AMA
Why the fuck did this quote here, I already replied in the thread it's in.
View attachment 1998917View attachment 1998918View attachment 1998919View attachment 1998920View attachment 1998921View attachment 1998922View attachment 1998923View attachment 1998924View attachment 1998925
OK. So I was kind of onboard with all this until the "all men have muhsoggykneez in them!111" shit appeared. No self-respecting man will listen to somebody who says stuff like that. The people reposting these types of posts on Instagram are completely oblivious or unaware of some of the most predatory and sleazy men. Those who constantly bleat about feminism and are self-described male feminists are pretty suspect for being actual sociopathic predators who take advantage of this movement to prey on vulnerable women. Nevertheless, those who call out the bullshit and are doing the right thing don't need to tell everyone about it. They just do it. Actions speak louder than words.

I'm not going to autistically break down the entirety of the stupidity this retard posted, but I'll hit some high points.

- "1/3 women in this country are raped!" - No, you're misunderstanding statistics, and failing to account for things like multiple victimizations experienced by an individual in a high-risk demographic, I.E. - young women that run away from a fatherless home, and end up substance-abusing, semi-homeless, sex-workers. If a high-risk individual is raped 10 times, that's 10 incidences, and if you stand her in a room with 9 other women that have never been raped, the incidence is still 100%, because she's lives a "high-risk lifestyle."

- "[Basically a bunch of shitty image macros that rehash the Poison M&M fallacy]" - the overwhelming majority of rapists are serial offenders, and that overwhelming majority of offenders are raised in single-parent homes, which happen to be almost exclusively single-MOTHER homes. The notion that you know a bunch of guys that you suspect are secretly rapists indicates 1 of 3 things - you're either a paranoiac, or you have absolutely zero capacity to make healthy decisions about social and romantic relationships, or both. No matter which of those is the case (although I lean heavily towards the 3rd option), you need seriously mental health assistance.

Also worth noting that feminists have tried to brutalize the definitions of sexual assault, sexual harassment, rape, and associated behaviours, in an attempt to water them down to make them so broad as to be both useless, and functionally all-encompassing; they've also gone out of their way to misuse prevalence to mischaracterize the risk of rape on campuses and generally, while using broad definitions. According to US feminists, a woman on campus is at greater risk of rape than a woman in the war-torn Congo, and a woman off campus is only marginally safer. The notion that any parent is going to send their daughter to a university campus where they have a 1-in-4 chance of being raped boggles my mind, and the actual reality is that the incidence is 0.006% for university students, and 0.0067% for the average woman, according to the DoJ.

Worth pointing out that the FBI has previously reported "false and unfounded accusations" to be somewhere around 8%, which is 4x the rate for any other index crime, although they stopped reporting that almost immediately after they started, probably because feminists got mad that their narrative was being contradicted.
Moviebob is fat and neither me, nor Naomi Wu, nor Lindsay Ellis, nor Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, would have sex with him.

No one wants to sex CinemaRobert.
 
Last edited:
One out of three women are raped in this country? I could understand if this was the middle east or Africa, but that seems a little off.

That's because it IS bullshit. That's a worse rate of rape than the Congo, where warring jungle dindu tribes literally use rape as a weapon of war.

The 1 in 3 number comes from some radfem bullshit study that asked something like:

"Has a man ever made you feel uncomfortable?" Yes? Congratulations, you're a VICTIM!

I believe the study was "Hilden Rape: Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Aggression and Victimization In a National Sample of Students in Higher Education" by Mary P. Koss which I've attached, but it might be a different one from her. The SJWs tend to bury the shit out of the study while citing it in some ungodly deep academic wankery, because because a: NO ONE believes 1 in 3 people on American schools, literally one of the safest places on the planet for women, are raped and b: The women who were surveyed in the study insist that it's bullshit.

It unironically is a stirling example of why Feminist and other Post-Modernist / Cultural Marxist "research" is complete and utter bullshit and should never be listened to.
 

Attachments

That's because it IS bullshit. That's a worse rate of rape than the Congo, where warring jungle dindu tribes literally use rape as a weapon of war.

The 1 in 3 number comes from some radfem bullshit study that asked something like:

"Has a man ever made you feel uncomfortable?" Yes? Congratulations, you're a VICTIM!

I believe the study was "Hilden Rape: Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Aggression and Victimization In a National Sample of Students in Higher Education" by Mary P. Koss which I've attached, but it might be a different one from her. The SJWs tend to bury the shit out of the study while citing it in some ungodly deep academic wankery, because because a: NO ONE believes 1 in 3 people on American schools, literally one of the safest places on the planet for women, are raped and b: The women who were surveyed in the study insist that it's bullshit.

It unironically is a stirling example of why Feminist and other Post-Modernist / Cultural Marxist "research" is complete and utter bullshit and should never be listened to.

Since we're citing, I'll throw my citation in, for hte rape rates according to the DoJ (which I misremembered slightly) - https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf

I was off on the non-student rape rates, which are 0.0076%, and the rate for students is 0.0061%. I wouldn't want it to be claimed that I was being intentionally misleading, but fact remains, the rates are incredibly low. The only way to get claims of 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, etc. is to grossly misuse the lifetime prevalence, and misrepresent it as the incidence.
View attachment 2000406
 
Worth pointing out that the FBI has previously reported "false and unfounded accusations" to be somewhere around 8%, which is 4x the rate for any other index crime, although they stopped reporting that almost immediately after they started, probably because feminists got mad that their narrative was being contradicted.
I think this is also subject to the same statistical shenanigans as other such claims. I don't think rape accusations are, if taken from a random claimant, any more likely to be false than any other crime report, but there are serial accusers who accuse sometimes dozens of different people of rape, either out of malice or pure insanity, so a future accusation from one of these people is almost certainly false.
 
I think this is also subject to the same statistical shenanigans as other such claims. I don't think rape accusations are, if taken from a random claimant, any more likely to be false than any other crime report, but there are serial accusers who accuse sometimes dozens of different people of rape, either out of malice or pure insanity, so a future accusation from one of these people is almost certainly false.

The 2 years that the FBI made any mention of false reporting were 1996 & 1997, which is long before there was significant social gains to be made by making a public claim, which is the situation we're in now, with #BelieveWomen, #MeToo, #YesAllWomen, and the rest of the hashtags that allow massive and near instantaneous propagation of claims. There's enormous social incentives to be a victim in the current social climate, and there's massive pressure against investigating or even suggesting investigation of claims, especially the ones made on social media.

If a woman comes forward and says "I've spoken to police, filed a complaint, a rape kit was done in the immediate aftermath of the event", I'm biased in favour of her claim having a degree of legitimacy, but if a woman jumps on social media and starts blasting some guy, especially a guy that isn't an over-the-top SJW/male feminist ally, I assume she's lying for clout, and I'm 100% certain she's lying for clout if she insists it doesn't need to be investigated, or people just "need to believe her truth." If she blasts a male feminist, I just reset the clock.

The DOD has also since reported their own findings put the false accusations rate at ~17%. I'm not buying Kanin's claims of 50%+, which hinged on 3 Midwestern campuses that couldn't form a nationally representative sample if the sample size was doubled. I'm definitely more willing to believe 8-17% than I am the 2% feminist claims about false reporting, which exist only as a repetition of Susan Brownmiller's unverified and unattributed claims from her book "Against Our Wills", with the entirety of the credit for it going to an unnamed NYPD sex crimes unit detective that she claimed she spoke to in the 1970's, and that has never been proven to have any statistical source.

Edit - New SJW bullshit -
1615856736829.png

1615856761431.png

1615856772832.png


Archive of the article she linked
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1999603

:story:

The laughable part about this is that they had to capitalize music with a “M” just like how they’re capitalizing black people with the word “Black” to show how diverse and inclusive they are.

It almost reads like an ad for CNN than it does for the Grammys. “Sense Of unity across all lines of difference” = apparently more random amounts of black people and women hogging all the awards and delivering political agendas that have nothing to do with music.

At least 4chan’s /mu/ summed up this awards show with a bingo chart:

View attachment 1999627
Nice TV.

The music industry isn't above copyrighting and claiming YouTube videos because a song would play for a few seconds, transformative or not. And YouTube allows it.

Inclusive until it starts costing them money.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Brain Problems
Back