Just when I thought I was out... they pull me right back in. Checked out for a while and came back to a new slew of comments. Most of Donal's replies are people he's duped (either intentionally or not) into thinking that Anthony Figaro has traced Mad's art. Despite the fact that even a cursory glance at the artwork would tell you it's obviously not traced, this batch of helmet kids was quick to rally behind Donal's valiant cause and to cast out the "grifter" who's trying to sell traced artwork. This is unbelievable. We've got a couple of notable exceptions here, with Cyborg Valkyrie and Preston Acevedo calling Donal out on his bullshit. Donal also says that he never claimed the picture was a tracing, which is true, but he certainly let enough people believe that without making any effort to correct them. He says Figaro "changed the lighting"... no, retard. He drew original images that were clearly inspired by Mad's style, as Acevedo points out.
Sorry I didn't like your book, Preston. Please hire a writer and editor.
Donal actually seems to believe that the issue is "people don't care" that art is being swiped, as he states in my previous post's screenshot. Missing the point entirely, he doesn't realize that the issue is his flimsy accusation that he utterly refused to corroborate with any further comparison images.
Several dipshits from WC have jumped into these threads and run their usual lamentations of CG's unspoken anti-criticism rules, joining Donal and his mob in missing the point. We even get a special appearance from TUG, who appears to be curious as to whom the nefarious tracer may be. If someone as dumb as TUG with as big of a platform as he has decided to run with this fake news, that could truly fuck over this campaign. However, considering this doesn't concern Amber Heard, I'm sure there's nothing to worry about.
I thought for some reason that CG was against hate mobs being spurred on by willful misinformation, but here we are. Our favorite cuck wishes he was "2018 Donal" again so he could call out these artistic crimes with righteous indignation and fervor. But alas, he is held to the standards of a "professional," as we all know Donal to be. Wonder how today's bowel movement was.
I know
@FROG won't want to cast aspersions on the artist of Cecil's book, but I would love to hear some input from an actual artist on this issue. And from someone who touts CG ideals.
View attachment 2002798