The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

I think we found Erischan's new account
You mean mother.

Is it okay for a mother to not feed her child?

Yes, obviously. How is this even confusing to you?

Yes, obviously. How is this even confusing to you?

Yes, obviously. How is this even confusing to you?

Yes, obviously. How is this even confusing to you?

Yes, obviously. How is this even confusing to you?

How are any of these not unambiguously wrong?
What the actual fuck?


It's really not tricky at all.

I see no problem with any of these things. I don't see this as extreme at all, I see it as normal.
The idea that it's wrong to drug test a mother to see if she's poisoning her baby with heroin, but not wrong to fucking kill the baby, is blowing my mind right now. How?
The end. Do not pass go, do not collect 200$.

Are you under the impression that your motive for murdering someone makes any difference at all?

You can't use self defense against someone who lacks malice aforethought like your fetus does. Self defense is justified by the fact that the person chose to attack you, not by the risk to your life.

The moral rules in life or death situations are identical to the moral rules at all other times. They do not change, ever. There is no "but i really need to kill my baby!" clause in the book of life.
I ignore them because they should be ignored.

Yes, because he has not murdered anyone.
@Hollywood Hulk Hogan step on up and claim your prize.
 
The cons for adult stem cells seem to be that they're harder to produce and probably more expensive because of it. The cons for embryonic baby stem cells are definitely more in the "can kill you horribly" area of disadvantage. That and the baby-murder.
Thats because most of those Cells dont come from Homo Sapiens but Homo erectus, cant use black Stem cells to cure proper humans...
 
Abortion should be banned because people who screw without precautions or get raped deserve to be punished with mongs and deformed terminally ill spawn with no quality of life. Helpless babies who have never committed any crime are scum who deserve to be born unwanted with AIDS and fetal alcohol syndrome to drug-addicted skanks and be abused by pedophile stepfathers.

And everyone else deserves to be punished with overpopulation, not because of climate change and the End Times or some such shit, but because in many countries you can't get parked or go anywhere and be alone any more. There is no wilderness anymore and everywhere is covered in dog shit and fast food wrappers and you're bound to encounter a retard who wants to talk shite with you and some deviant wanking in a bush.

If there's a god it's proof that it's evil, if it thinks anyone other than people who actually want kids and are in a position to give them a decent start in life should have them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marfusha
Making non-medical late abortions illegal is a choice. Why would you be against that? You're not "pro-choice".


If that were the case, these maps would look more like each other:

View attachment 2004320
View attachment 2004322


View attachment 2004319
These maps are crap tbh. All of the europe is marked as either strongly christian or christian while in reality there is a huge difference in religiousness between the countries. Poland is an actual religious country. Russia and Ukraine on the other hand are not. Sure most of the people would brand themselves a christians if asked about their faith but almost none of them actually follows religious rituals or goes to church. Highly religious people and clergy are perceived in predominantly negative light.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Marshal Mannerheim
These maps are crap tbh. All of the europe is marked as either strongly christian or christian while in reality there is a huge difference in religiousness between the countries. Poland is an actual religious country. Russia and Ukraine on the other hand are not. Sure most of the people would brand themselves a christians if asked about their faith but almost none of them actually follows religious rituals or goes to church. Highly religious people and clergy are perceived in predominantly negative light.
Sure. The point was that the claim was made that it was christianity specifically that was the restraint on abortion. In that case, non-christian countries would have much more abortion, which they don't.

When you look at atheism % map, it looks much more comparable to abortion laws. It is not christianity that is predictive of abortion laws, it's religiousness.

atheism.png

Abortion_Laws.svg.png
 
Sure. The point was that the claim was made that it was christianity specifically that was the restraint on abortion. In that case, non-christian countries would have much more abortion, which they don't.

When you look at atheism % map, it looks much more comparable to abortion laws. It is not christianity that is predictive of abortion laws, it's religiousness.

View attachment 2007344

View attachment 2007345
map of all the countries jews haven't fucked with (yet)
 
Back