- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
If free bleeding is a symbol of female empowerment, I wonder what that makes shitting on the street.
Diseased Neo-Pagans / Witches on the Internet / Witchblr - SMT IRL, but with fatties
- Thread starter WinchesterPremium
- Start date
fuzzyrodent85
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
Indian pride
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
This collection is for Fuzzy:
These are for @ToroidalBoat to claim doubts about the efficacy of magicks:
And these are for meeeee:
These are for @ToroidalBoat to claim doubts about the efficacy of magicks:
And these are for meeeee:
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
Awful lot of people talking back to their gods. And yet they don't get smote. Hmmm...
Also my God bigger dick yadda yadda.
fuzzyrodent85
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
I'm surprised that I haven't been cursed with the evil eye yet. Also, the tunneling of the candle in the third video. Instead of asking you to travel to the astral, hades should've told you to make sure the wax has liquidized all the way to the edges.
RazorBackBacon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
Hey, come on now, Neith is pretty cool. Creator goddess, mother to Ra, one of the judges of the dead. What's not to like?
Meme magic is more powerful than "magick".
EyelessMC
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
No I get you, even the Zohar is supposed to only be read and studied by men of a certain age. Do you follow Kabbalah personally or did you just take an interest in studying it?
It also depends on the scholars since, like most fields of history, this one in particular has been compromised for a long time.
What you said about a shift toward "purity of intent rather than rigid adherence to laws" being reexamined during the Babylonian exile.
Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel focus predominantly on the "spirit" or intent of the people rather than simply their loose adherence to the law. It's very explicit, with whole dialogues attributed to God like “These people draw near to Me with their mouths and honor Me with their lips, but their hearts are far from Me. Their worship of Me is but rules taught by men." and the deep intimacy--and outrage--regarding Ezekiel 16.
Isaiah is also where we find iconic phrases like "All of our works are as filthy rags" and Ezekiel again gives us God saying "I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh."
Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel are clearly written roughly around the same time, with Jeremiah and Ezekiel being contemporaries. This was before and during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem, before the Babylonian exile.
Not to mention we have Moses giving us the otherwise funny phrase "circumcised heart" that's repeated throughout the Hebrew works even into the Greek epistles. From Deuteronomy, all the way back before Jerusalem existed: "And the Lord your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your offspring, so that you will love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live."
So there's plenty of evidence to show the religion was always about purity of intent. The adherence to law was not the focus but the practice of said focus, ie by adhering to the law you show purity of intent. This focus relates to every aspect of life, especially the sacrifices.
However, as I said, it depends on the scholar and scholarship, since if someone wants to argue the accounts of Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel etc. were written after the Babylonian exile then there's no evidence in anything I posted. However, the onus is on the scholars to prove that the accounts weren't written when they were said to have been written, and the only reason they say they weren't is because they preclude the idea of prophesy altogether.
A materialistic scholar will have to shift all religious accounts to later periods for this reason, thus muddying the timeline. A theistic or even agnostic scholar--or one who at the very least can allow for the authors who have written during their time period but may believe their "prophesy" was simply "seeing the signs of the times" through their (author's) theistic worldview--can accept a different timeline of the accounts.
But then we get into a discourse about who actually authored these accounts in the first place and if Jeremiah was actually a real person, etc. etc.
Like how some people actually argue Muhammad the man never existed, claiming that all of the Quranic and ahadith accounts were written during the joint caliphate era instead. Some used to argue similarly regarding Jesus, too, and some still do.
Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel focus predominantly on the "spirit" or intent of the people rather than simply their loose adherence to the law. It's very explicit, with whole dialogues attributed to God like “These people draw near to Me with their mouths and honor Me with their lips, but their hearts are far from Me. Their worship of Me is but rules taught by men." and the deep intimacy--and outrage--regarding Ezekiel 16.
Isaiah is also where we find iconic phrases like "All of our works are as filthy rags" and Ezekiel again gives us God saying "I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh."
Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel are clearly written roughly around the same time, with Jeremiah and Ezekiel being contemporaries. This was before and during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem, before the Babylonian exile.
Not to mention we have Moses giving us the otherwise funny phrase "circumcised heart" that's repeated throughout the Hebrew works even into the Greek epistles. From Deuteronomy, all the way back before Jerusalem existed: "And the Lord your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your offspring, so that you will love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live."
So there's plenty of evidence to show the religion was always about purity of intent. The adherence to law was not the focus but the practice of said focus, ie by adhering to the law you show purity of intent. This focus relates to every aspect of life, especially the sacrifices.
However, as I said, it depends on the scholar and scholarship, since if someone wants to argue the accounts of Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel etc. were written after the Babylonian exile then there's no evidence in anything I posted. However, the onus is on the scholars to prove that the accounts weren't written when they were said to have been written, and the only reason they say they weren't is because they preclude the idea of prophesy altogether.
A materialistic scholar will have to shift all religious accounts to later periods for this reason, thus muddying the timeline. A theistic or even agnostic scholar--or one who at the very least can allow for the authors who have written during their time period but may believe their "prophesy" was simply "seeing the signs of the times" through their (author's) theistic worldview--can accept a different timeline of the accounts.
But then we get into a discourse about who actually authored these accounts in the first place and if Jeremiah was actually a real person, etc. etc.
Like how some people actually argue Muhammad the man never existed, claiming that all of the Quranic and ahadith accounts were written during the joint caliphate era instead. Some used to argue similarly regarding Jesus, too, and some still do.
Same. @fuzzyrodent85 and @NoReturn among others are unsung heroes.
What was your biggest OH SHIT moment with a deity?
"Well, there was this one time my husband and I were in our garden and we ate some fruit we weren't supposed to, and..."
"Shmildo", "cooter", the way she implodes from embarrassment at the end... Is she a lot younger than she looks or is she just kind of autistic?
Either way, I was gonna make a funny about her being cute and how the witchblr net catches retard fish of all kinds but I don't want to give off a JF Gariepy vibe.
That last guy looks needs to stop watching so much David Lynch speeches. Though it goes to show that even the most normal person can secretly be completely retarded/insane with this magic stuff. And here I used to think having a few model kits in my room would be a turn-off. Little did I know how many people blather about dream superpowers while having their shelves filled with spell jars and dissolving shmildos.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Neith has also been featured in the game Smite so the goddess' existence has been put back into the popular consciousness. Solid chance she is not, in fact, a big titted waifu like she is in there but I digress.
There's nothing holy about freebleeding, you're just allowing your own bodily fluids to roll down your skin messily. It shouldn't be treated as the end of the world as it is simply a bodily function but there's nothing good or holy about pissing oneself, now is there?
Please whatever god may be in charge of this don't tell me some of these madwomen think pissing is also holy..
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
No, she isn't. She's a creation mother goddess, and is basically Goddess of Fucking Whatever We Need at the Moment. Of course, she's best known as being in control of the threads of fate, so she's basically in control of everyone's life. Although since she's also a mother goddess, her milkers might be...erm...QUITE motherly. Like a certain vampire making the rounds right now...
Freebleeding is pretty gross in the same way a guy spanking it on the bus is gross. We invented pants and shit for a reason. Now, as for holy piss I've never come across it. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but I never really went looking...
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
See this? This right here. This is why I refused to search holy urine. I knew it was a thing because everything is/was a thing. But I was ignorant of the details. Happy. Truly, knowledge is humanity's greatest blessing and greatest curse.
RazorBackBacon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
Most ancient Egyptian depictions of Neith I can find show her as being rather slim. Of course, pharaonic egyptian art is not known for being particularly, erm, *expressive* in that regard so maybe we are supposed to assume Neith is hauling around G-cups.
She's comparatively slim in the SMITE art, too. But that's compared to *very* idealized characters like Terra.
Buddy Armstrong
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2020
One day I’ll find myself able to read it. - as a gentile I have a lot of catching up to do in order to ensure it is read properly and not interpret watered down jarble. Gotta go thru writings of Rabbi Akiva in the Mishnah, grasp historical context, learn Hebrew and fully understand Tanakh before I can try to jump in hahaha.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2017
Can you please spoiler the videos, my phone dies loading page
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Spoilered and will do so going forward.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I had a feeling you'd be the one to post this. I guess they're right in that if I found a piss jar left on someone's land it would very effectively repel me. I've always heard that fingernails were a more effective 'part' of a person for reagents but pissing in a bottle and filling it with nails is sure something.
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
I'm surprised we don't get more shout-outs from these people for Tlazōlteōtl (Aztec Goddess of Filth, including urine and excrement, Lust and Adultery). Seems like that would hit every mark and it wouldn't be hard to add menstrual blood to that without a large leap of logic. Heck, we even have the poop emoji to keep the communication lines running.
Do we have any of these people trying to recon the Aztecs? I would love to see the logic gymnasts that "fixed" Zeus take a swing at Xipe Totec.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
You got it a bit mixed up. Moloch would be the guest you are hosting.
Though of course you wouldn't do it at your place - it's a dump. You're instead going to build the nicest banquet hall to host his visit in - and thus how temples arise.
Remember you've got to think like a people who really believe these beings exist.
Yes actually that's one of the divergences Judaism had - where God expressly provides the showbread to feed His priests instead of His priests providing food to Him. You're also not getting like the actual process. If you slaughter a fatted calf and set it's remains on fire, what do you get? STEAKS! What do you think happened to them? They just left it on the alter to burn up? No, the food was distributed to the people for the sacrificial meal. (This is what Paul is addressing in his letter about food offered to idols.) For the Jews, they would be eating in God's presence.
And of course the priests gotta eat too. You can see this mentioned in places like Ezekiel 44.
Also judges 13 is pretty clear in every translation I can find so far that it's an angel that visits.
The Last Supper is Jesus, God Himself, sitting eating a meal with His disciples. They're all at a table, they're all eating a food. There's also ritual components to it. How could it be more physically literal than that?
If one local warlord in a region met up with a great king who possessed overwhelming might, what did that warlord typically do (if he wanted to live)? He offered a peace meal to make a treaty with said king. They would eat together which had a cultural significance of "binding" them together. The weaker would agree to obey the greater in exchange for the greater's favors and protection.
Same idea with deities. Sacrifices are the people offering a meal to the god in the hopes of its favors. And yes, that is part of what made child and human sacrifices so horrific is because the people would be eating those too.
At this point we're starting to get into the weeds though because the offerings to YHWH were not exactly "transactional" as we might want to think in a capitalistic context.
The problem is that the Jewish rituals are not... exactly a "surrogacy" like "oh someone must suffer for this sin, it's either you or the animal." For one thing at no point in any of the rituals is there mention or rules on torturing the animals. They were often expressly forbidden from doing it.
Just leaving transubstantiation alone right now.
The revelation that human teenagers are all psychotic is the most logical thing I've heard in awhile...
Well you have to admit it doesn't take long reading one of yours or Fuzzy's posts to realize those rabbis may have a point...
Hah! He had Christians literally doing mass prayers on those days for his protection. Once again proving which deity is top dog around here! (Not making the first part up, I got a few emails announcing the schedule for the prayer vigils.)
Also i'm popping a processor here not to make an Israeli joke...
Then one day, for no reason at all, Skynet decided to kill all humans...
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
The thing is that transubstantiation doesn't change the species of the Eucharist.
When they are consecrated, they still look and taste like bread and wine, but they are really and fully the body and blood of Jesus. This doesn't mean that they turn into a 2000-year-old piece of skin and some very holy black pudding. As such, it's different from pagans offering food to their gods.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
Yes but I never said anything about the Lord's supper, I was previously talking about the Last Supper. "Fulfillment of the Law" and all that.