Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
1616250053288.png

1616250075310.png


lol bob, zack is not going to befriend you or the rest of your worthless, anti-white twitterati buddies just because he doesn't like the stupid remarks made by van sciver and his podcast. how opportunistic is this amoral fat fuck to pretend he actually likes snyder after obsessively making 4 hours of videos on how much he loathed BVS?
 
Last edited:
Just for clarification, Lot's daughters get him drunk and rape him because there was no one else around to pump a baby in them and everyone else was getting knocked up so why shouldn't they?
There's an interpretation that Lot is liable for the second night onwards because he should have suspected something was up. Lots daughters both got pregnant, with the older daughter conceiving Mo'ab (translates to "From the father" or can be short for Immo-Ab "his mother is his father") and the younger conceiving Amon (translates to "Son of my people"). Both the nations of Moab and Amon were antagonists of the Kingdom of Israel/Judah. The story is a morality lesson and a way to call your enemies incest babies.
 
Is Bob actually salty about the Sonic movie redesign? The one they changed after everyone found it absolutely horrible?

I haven't seen the movie, but by all accounts it was a solid family film, got a sequel fast tracked, and did quite well at the box office despite having its run cut short by the virus. I doubt it would be as well received with a terrifying rodent man in the lead role, instead of a cartoon character.
 
Is Bob actually salty about the Sonic movie redesign? The one they changed after everyone found it absolutely horrible?

I haven't seen the movie, but by all accounts it was a solid family film, got a sequel fast tracked, and did quite well at the box office despite having its run cut short by the virus. I doubt it would be as well received with a terrifying rodent man in the lead role, instead of a cartoon character.
Yes, because to him fans don’t know shit about filmmaking as he and other filmmakers do.
 
Is Bob actually salty about the Sonic movie redesign? The one they changed after everyone found it absolutely horrible?

I haven't seen the movie, but by all accounts it was a solid family film, got a sequel fast tracked, and did quite well at the box office despite having its run cut short by the virus. I doubt it would be as well received with a terrifying rodent man in the lead role, instead of a cartoon character.

Bob sees it as the dudebros getting their way or something. Nobody but Bob and his twitter overlords can be happy.
 
Is Bob actually salty about the Sonic movie redesign? The one they changed after everyone found it absolutely horrible?

I haven't seen the movie, but by all accounts it was a solid family film, got a sequel fast tracked, and did quite well at the box office despite having its run cut short by the virus. I doubt it would be as well received with a terrifying rodent man in the lead role, instead of a cartoon character.
I think it's a combo of him hating any form of populism (the common people, especially right wingers and gamers, coming together to make a change that goes against what the handful of "experts" want. He probably sees this as similar to GamerGate and Trump's election), and him being a Chris Chan esque mega sperg who still hates Sonic because of his childhood the same way CWC still hates Hexbox.
 
At this point I want to see Snyders Justice League just to see why it's got Bob so pissed off.
It has little to do with the quality of the film, I guarantee it. Bob is just assmad at its existence giving a "win" to the Bad Nerds (TM). Ever since the Dark Knight was popular with the wrong people, he's been on this autistic crusade where anything that seems intended for that audience is inherently bad and a stain on geekdom. He assumes Zack Snyder's audience is full of the same kinds of Bad Nerds, he reveled in the Justice League initially getting hacked apart by the studio because it made those nerds mad, and threw a tantrum about the Snyder Cut getting made when it was first announced because that was a "win" for them. Whedon getting #MeToo'd and Zack Snyder dissing Bad Nerds on the G+G livestream this week led to the cognitive dissonance behind the tweet above, where he's suddenly trying to separate art from artist so he can praise the right director while also trashing his work because of its assumed fanbase.

tl&dr; in Bob's perpetual highschool worldview, Snyder fans are the jocks and anything they like is trash.
 
I love and respect true artistic vision. Even when it doesn't work, you can see intent and passion. At least it's unique.

What makes Bob a misinformed, awful critic is that he thinks artistic vision is what he's championing. Couldn't be farther from the truth. His favorite movies celebrate directors that most competently deliver committee material. There's a difference.

Motherfucker, Disney doesn't like you. They don't like anybody. They like your money. They don't need to take risks when they have unpaid brand ambassadors shilling like it gives your own life meaning. I enjoy Marvel stuff too, but don't pretend it's artistic or contemplative. They've made tweaked versions of the same movie 20 times for a reason.

When you shit on directors for actually wrenching away committee control, regardless of the outcome, you really expose yourself as a scam as a critic, and in Bob's case as a human being... because "critic" is the only identity his dumb ass has.
 
What do you think the chances are that MovieBob comes out as trans?
After Jimquisition and Philosophy tube (a leftie media critic and breadtuber respectivly) came out for the sake of clout, I suspect that Bob is consedering it. He seems like the kinda guy who has AGP and would try to get some woke pussy or atleast more relevancy.
I put the chances at zero for one simple reason: Jim's self-aggrandisement was always a front for his obvious insecurities and mental problems. Bob genuinely believes his own hype.

People like Jim troon out because they're desperate to be anyone but themselves, (and popping pills/wearing a shitty Party City wig is easier than actual self-improvement,) whereas Bobby thinks he was born perfect and it's humanity's loss that they've not yet recognised his brilliance.

Add to that, for all his Male Feminist virtue signalling, he actually regularly extols the merits of traditional masculinity, (mistakenly believing himself to be a perfect example of it,) and I just don't see any path to troondom for old Robert.

His attention whore brother, on the other hand...
 
Also my eyes glaze over when I read posts by the Chuster, but despite these people worshiping Marvel, they really don't understand the most basic things about it.

Peter Parker's original flaw wasn't him wanting to make money, it was him being a misanthrope. In the original story, no one cheated Spider-man out of his money, he was just more interested in providing for himself and his family, society be damned. His big lesson was that sometimes if you have been given amazing power, you have the responsibility to use it to help others. Hell, Peter Parker continues to use his powers to make money as a photographer taking pictures of Spider-man and supervillains, it is kind of a famous part of his character. Its kind of hard to miss this if you actually read it. Of all the things Stan Lee was, he was not a subtle writer.

Amazing Fantasy 15.jpg
 
He never reads books, only skimming through Wikipedia articles while having his thesaurus with him.
He did manage to write a book, though.
But the most important is that if you compare them to religious zealots they will laugh in your face and call you a nutjob for even making that comparison because they believe in "nothing" rather than the man in the sky. They just made a cut cardboard substitute for religion but they cannot cope with the fact that they are what they would despise the most.
Consumerism is an attempt to replace God with an idol; a golden calf, if you will. It will fail because, by its very nature, religion requires a benevolent higher power and the invisible hand is not by any means benevolent.
How much do you thin Bob thinks he's a hardened survivor that was behind enemy lines for going through catholicism and still be "normal" instead of the typical quaker?
Bob acts like being a lapsed Catholic makes him special, so I'd assume so.
Chris likes The Synder Cut:
Untitled.png
Bob right now:
Polish_20210320_153202313.jpg

Bobby thinks Elon Musk is dumb enough to trade his colossal wealth for "magic beans":
Untitled.png
I find it hilarious how Bob is trying to pick a fight with the richest man in the world, especially when he's probably the best bet for delivering the Superyah Fyoocha.
Does Bobby know
No.
 

I can never be upset with anyone who shares the glory that is Tokyo Gore Police with the interbutts, even if it's a top-tier lolcow. 👍


Also:

At this point I want to see Snyders Justice League just to see why it's got Bob so pissed off.

I just grabbed a copy off of yts.mx late last night, I'll let you know if it's any good. Motherfucker is 4 hours long!

Keep in mind that the torrent is slammed so it's very slow to get started, if you choose to go grab a copy yourself. It will pick up and start running after a few.

Not sure how n00l is for direct-linking torrents of new releases, so I'll leave you to find it, it's not too hard.
 
Last edited:
Bob's a thin-skinned sore winner. Bob likes to win, of course, but the win isn't the really important thing. The thing Bob really likes about winning is seeing someone he hates, lose. He is consumed with thoughts about vindictive retribution. All that self-hate that he constantly feels, and he takes those feelings and tries to block them by obsessively spewing his revenge fantasies. Turn it into anger, Bob, and scream online. That's sure to make your life better.
 
Bob acts like being a lapsed Catholic makes him special, so I'd assume so.
I think that for him and any fedoramancer out there, "getting out" of religion is a huge badge of honor that proves that they are smarter than the sheeple that believe in God. Like an addict that brags about how you only need will and support to quit drugs, only to show how much better he is.
 
Pro wrestling matches being worked exhibitions have been public knowledge since the 1930s. Add this to the mountain of examples of Bobo attempting to speak with authority on subjects he knows nothing about.

in 1932, a contractual dispute caused an eventual rift between Curley and Londos; and the New York territory quickly deteriorated without its top drawing card. Pfefer therefore abandoned Curley in favor of Londos’ group in early 1933; but later that November, a peace accord was signed between Curley's East Coast promotion and the Tom Packs/Jim Londos alliance that was dominating in the Midwest. The agreement subsequently extended the Trust's influence throughout all of North America, with Curley, Packs, Mondt, Fabiani, Ed White, and Paul Bowser all agreeing to share the profits evenly. As a result, Jack Pfefer consequently found himself without any allies, as he was stuck on the outside looking in on the industry's powerful new coalition. Ostracized by his fellow wrestling peers, a bitter Pfefer looked to exact revenge, and he therefore arranged an interview with Dan Parker, who was the sports editor for the New York Daily Mirror. Pfefer subsequently took the unprecedented step of revealing most of pro wrestling's secrets and inner workings, freely admitting the sport's “fakery” and theatrics. Although fans had long suspected that pro wrestling was worked, Pfefer had introduced a feeling of cynicism among the mainstream press that they were being used as promotional “chumps” by Curley and his associates; and in a now-famous headline, the November 19, 1934 New York Daily News covered an impending Jim Londos vs. Everett Marshall bout by proclaiming, "Londos and Marshall meet at Garden tonight for 26th time. Score - Londos 26, Marshall 0."

As a result of Pfefer's stunning admission, pro wrestling had suddenly become a laughingstock, and sportswriters no longer covered its results since it was no longer deemed to be “legitimate competition.” Furthermore, with the nation immersed in the Great Depression, pro wrestling gates plummeted in New York; and in October 1934, Ring Magazine proclaimed the end of “honest-to-goodness wrestling matches.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back