- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Pigeon still has a pigeon sized brain.Bunch of non lawyers acting like experts and obviously haven't read a current case from the Texas Court of appeals.
Also Fat gets her mention, but I'm fairly confident a rock on the side of the road knows more about law then her.
View attachment 2019706
https://archive.ph/zi3Xu (Nicks Tweet)
https://archive.ph/B8jVd (Psycho cunts tweet)
There's more in these I just don't feel like going through all the autism.
In the case of a non-public figure, the standard is negligence. Even if you genuinely believed Vic Lasagna is a horrible pedorapist, and said as such all over twitter, you'd get slammed with defamation.
For a (limited) public figure, the standard is actual malice, that is, knowledge of falsity (you know it was a lie, but told the lie anyway) or reckless disregard for the truth (you had serious doubts about how true it was, but you went ahead and spread the lie anyway).
So, what did the courts say?
This is from the recent Watkins v. Miller decision from the second court of appeals.
According to TCPA standards, Vic's version of events is held to be true, while the defendant's (let's use Monica) is held to be false. Monica claimed Vic attacked her in the hotel room. Vic says lol, no.
So no, Monica screeching "but I believed it was true!" wouldn't overcome he-said she-said, where the he, in this case Vic, is presumed to be telling the truth at the TCPA stage.
My head hurts.
I'll admit I still tend to watch English over Nipponese, but the screeching between Jap watchers and English watchers is fucking autistic.The worst part is, I went through this phase myself for a long while. I missed a lot of shit I still have to watch many shows like Bunny Girl Senpai, MILF Isekai, & many more because I was waiting on the dub for them.
God I fucked up.
TL;DR: That picture's a fucking lie.