RPGnet Forums

The most recent ban for calling out corporate hypocrisy is a perfect illustration of why SJW culture works the way it does.

There is absolutely, positively no way to pull a coherent set of behavior from it. Every possible stance is, in essence, equally problematic - because the world is made out of compromises and the Social Justice movement has, as a core tenet, the notion that compromises are just as wrong as pure evil.

So the only way to survive is to figure out who currently has power, predictively guess what they want to hear, and say it more loudly and more stridently than everyone else - while cultivating favors with that power, and with the people that you think will replace that power in the next coup. And then you pray that you don't guess wrong and get guillotined for backing the wrong horse.

There absolutely, positively is no winning. There can be no winning. It is the whole goddamn point that you can't win. The only way to survive is to inflict more damage on others than they can inflict on you, so that they never gain enough power to punish you for all the damage you and your ancestors already inflicted on them and their ancestors.

Social justice creates an environment where "punching down" is necessary for survival.
 
The only way to survive is to inflict more damage on others than they can inflict on you, so that they never gain enough power to punish you for all the damage you and your ancestors already inflicted on them and their ancestors.
One of Machiavelli's wiser statements. "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared."
 
It's less of "the end of civilization" and more of "the guiding principle of a fledgling dictatorship."
To be more explicit/clear:

When a bunch of people with obvious, debilitating mental and physical disabilities come together and parade their victim-status as a means for determining who they should have the right to inflict suffering onto, *and* they invoke our civilization's concepts of "justice" and "ethics" to compel the able-bodied to inflict that suffering on their enemies on their behalf, and their entire system of justification relies on a predatory might-makes-right Machiavellian hellscape that is directly corossive to the very society that feeds and clothes and houses them, and in some cases literally wipes their bums for them, and provides them with the medicine and support they require to literally survive, then I humbly suggest that perhaps they did not think their cunning plan all the way through.
 
Screenshot_20210324-071412_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20210324-071443_Chrome.jpg


Today Save-vs-DM is going to demonstrate why, if one must be a whiny bitch online, one should not use the same username across all media platforms.


Username: Save-vs-DM
Real name: Ruben Smith-Zempel
Age: 41
Address: 1810 NW Everett St Apt 102, Portland, OR
Married to Jennifer A Smith-Zempel, no children. Works as a freelance print designer for ttrpg books.
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rsmithzempel
Blog (defunct): http://www.savevsdm.com
Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/save_vs_dm
Art: http://www.3d6design.com/
Screenshot_20210324-083605_Chrome.jpg
 
View attachment 2024624
View attachment 2024625

Today Save-vs-DM is going to demonstrate why, if one must be a whiny bitch online, one should not use the same username across all media platforms.


Username: Save-vs-DM
Real name: Ruben Smith-Zempel
Age: 41
Address: 1810 NW Everett St Apt 102, Portland, OR
Married to Jennifer A Smith-Zempel, no children. Works as a freelance print designer for ttrpg books.
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rsmithzempel
Blog (defunct): http://www.savevsdm.com
Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/save_vs_dm
Art: http://www.3d6design.com/
View attachment 2024642
The answer is "because you go into these conversations all guns blazing and screaming about your victimhood status". Most people don't take pleasure in being cunts to people who are polite and approachable, and the ones that do aren't worth dealing with.
A sub-answer would be "If these people unironically refer to IRL Native Americans as 'savages', they're probably not going to suddenly develop a nuanced appreciation for Native American culture from a single conversation, and you need to learn how to pick your battles and not be as thin-skinned as a latte-sipping white girl."
 
Last edited:
They really don't want any backtalk on their forums, do they?

rpgcapture10.JPG

This one confuses the fuck out of me. Jurgen's not lecturing. This is his fast-and-loose interpretation of game mechanics versus gameplay.

My guess is that he's on a 'list' and the admin will fuck with him when given the chance. Because I can't even figure out how this is offensive.
 
They really don't want any backtalk on their forums, do they?

View attachment 2026161
This one confuses the fuck out of me. Jurgen's not lecturing. This is his fast-and-loose interpretation of game mechanics versus gameplay.

My guess is that he's on a 'list' and the admin will fuck with him when given the chance. Because I can't even figure out how this is offensive.
"Gender-nonspecific persons! You can't discuss RPGs here! This is RPG.net!"
 
This one confuses the fuck out of me. Jurgen's not lecturing. This is his fast-and-loose interpretation of game mechanics versus gameplay.

My guess is that he's on a 'list' and the admin will fuck with him when given the chance. Because I can't even figure out how this is offensive.
Jurgen has always been a puppy dog level good boy. The Boxer of RPGNet if you will. On board with the politics, but always in an enthusiastic, supportive, non-meanie way. Of course he will get the bullet, not in the first round, and not in the last. He will wonder to the very end why he got it. It is because you are a goddamn dupe, Jurgen!
 
They really don't want any backtalk on their forums, do they?

View attachment 2026161
This one confuses the fuck out of me. Jurgen's not lecturing. This is his fast-and-loose interpretation of game mechanics versus gameplay.

My guess is that he's on a 'list' and the admin will fuck with him when given the chance. Because I can't even figure out how this is offensive.
That’s not the thing that gets me.

He reported on his own post, Narcing on himself ala A Scanner Darkly.
 
The answer is "because you go into these conversations all guns blazing and screaming about your victimhood status". Most people don't take pleasure in being cunts to people who are polite and approachable, and the ones that do aren't worth dealing with.
A sub-answer would be "If these people unironically refer to IRL Native Americans as 'savages', they're probably not going to suddenly develop a nuanced appreciation for Native American culture from a single conversation, and you need to learn how to pick your battles and not be as thin-skinned as a latte-sipping white girl."

Well then, good news! He's the site's latest diversity hire.

1.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back