- Joined
- Jun 6, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lurk more. When the story first broke the first dozen pages were mostly "oh look, another Weinstein."What I am hearing is that because you personally weren't privy to private information that it didn't exist. Those things are not mutually exclusive.
Look at how you reacted to when he was outed. That is the exact reason why he stayed for so long. You're the perfect example of why it was so hard to get rid of him. Lets not forget that it was SONY that fired Vic, not Funi directly. He was fired shortly after Sony finished taking over which is suspected due to him being protected by Gen Fukunaga. Gen is definitely complicit for allowing this to happen for so long. Good thing he isn't fully in charge anymore.
I noticed that any hypothetical in which Vic did do something, it always includes someone else being to blame and that somehow shifting the blame from Vic for his actions? So in these hypotheticals, does Vic carry any blame for his own actions or is it entirely the fault of the people who didn't stop him?
If they were all untrustworthy and it was all lies, why did nobody submit to the court that they were committing perjury? Can you show me filings stating they committed perjury? You guys seem to have all this proof that they committed perjury?Lurk more. When the story first broke the first dozen pages were mostly "oh look, another Weinstein."
As people actually investigated they discovered nothing made sense.
In any hypothetical where Vic actually did do the thing he's accused of, we'd immediately turn KickVic.
No evidence has come forward yet, and the people who wlcould give that evidence have shown themselves to be so untrustworthy we would suspect it to begin with.
Because it is.You're also conflating the record keeping by conventions as efficient and not primarily by word of mouth.
Oh yes, they do. Especially when it comes to money handling, dealing with sponsors, and the venues themselves.These are for the most part fan run events and have no legal guideline or responsibility for record keeping.
Thank you for that correction. I was more referring to incident reports or analyses on staff and guest performance. They definitely have standards regarding financial record keeping, but that's about where it ends.Because it is.
Oh yes, they do. Especially when it comes to money handling, dealing with sponsors, and the venues themselves.
Legal liabilities are a bitch, especially if fraud is on the table.
Because none of the affidavits have even been tested before the court. Chupp took none of them into consideration.If they were all untrustworthy and it was all lies, why did nobody submit to the court that they were committing perjury? Can you show me filings stating they committed perjury? You guys seem to have all this proof that they committed perjury?
Trolls should be ignored.That makes the assumption that they were quiet because they had indeed blacklisted him.
So why did Ty not attempt to challenge these during the time between when they were submitted and the TCPA hearing? Why weren't these challenged in or before his TCPA response?Because none of the affidavits have even been tested before the court. Chupp took none of them into consideration.
Should anything come back on the CoA, you can absolutely bet that the affidavits are going to be scrutinised, particularly several of them that are blatant lies - Jennifer Lynn Cunt being the main one. Others will be thrown out for having absolutely nothing to do with the case - Vic’s Ex, the chick that got the high school vic taught at wrong.
then others will be challenged completely, the twins, Monica, Jamie and others.
and some will be ignored, like Emmett, who should be used to it.
Well, this should be interesting.The U.S. Justice Department has extended its antitrust review of Sony’s proposed $1.2 billion acquisition of anime-streaming service Crunchyroll.
View attachment 2025804
https://archive.ph/vLxC4
The last time anyone cared about perjury was when the Republicans were trying to nail Clinton for getting his dick sucked.If they were all untrustworthy and it was all lies, why did nobody submit to the court that they were committing perjury? Can you show me filings stating they committed perjury? You guys seem to have all this proof that they committed perjury?
Larger shows are required to have insurance not only for the venue they are renting but for general liabilities such as injury and property damage. They should be keeping detail records of any and all incidents that happen prior, during and after their show ends for that very reason. They should be keeping those records forever. When the show gets sold to another owner those records should be passed over. There is no telling when someone will come out months or years later to claim that something happened to them at their show. I would not be surprise that both the show and venue have copies of all or any incident reports for any given year.Because it is.
Oh yes, they do. Especially when it comes to money handling, dealing with sponsors, and the venues themselves.
Legal liabilities are a bitch, especially if fraud is on the table.
Who is this Deanna Carrier?Deanna Carrier has showed her face in the Metrotham Con post on Vic's invite.
Now I’m curious about this.The U.S. Justice Department has extended its antitrust review of Sony’s proposed $1.2 billion acquisition of anime-streaming service Crunchyroll.
View attachment 2025804
https://archive.ph/vLxC4
"Kiwifarms are never right"Seeing as literally anything presented to you results in you covered your ears and yelling "nanananana its all lies" as shown by your buddy above, I would say that the standards of evidence for you versus the legal system are 2 different things. Good thing your standards aren't what matter in his employment decisions.
That's the girl who wouldn't tell Emmet about her underwear.Who is this Deanna Carrier?
Oh. "Dee" the pigeon carrier.That's the girl who wouldn't tell Emmet about her underwear.
Holy shit, that’s pathetic. It’s bad enough that this muskrat is stalking Vic and his fans on Twitter, but now she’s trying to cause trouble on a con’s Facebook page. So wait, who’s harassing who again?That's the girl who wouldn't tell Emmet about her underwear.
Oh. "Dee" the pigeon carrier.