- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
Russ responding to a racist Kang who thinks Fentanyl Floyd was a hero.
Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner
- Thread starter Cryin RN
- Start date
Russ responding to a racist Kang who thinks Fentanyl Floyd was a hero.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
The irony of Russ telling someone they have a crap personality is delicious.
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2015
I like how the thumbnail for "Yo, Yovanna!" looks like Thomas The Tank Engine
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
>> taps mic <<
He was a... RATFACED RUSSTARD
DROOLING COSTCO MUFFIN EATER!
A RAT FACED RUSSTARD
DROOLING COSTCO MUFFIN EATER!
HAS TOO MANY PLIGHTS FOR MEEE!
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
That he called himself a "legal professional" is what got a chuckle out of me.
StraightShooter2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2020
I doubt anyone's listening to those songs except ironically for the lulz.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
Ah yes. He's clearly hoping that people will think he's a lawyer, but he knows that if he just flat out lies about being one, he'll get called out and there's no way to spin it. And he hasn't worked as paralegal in several years. If he was working as one in Vegas, he would have shouted that from the rooftops that he was working as a paralegal. As someone said, he's probably in a back office somewhere doing paperwork that's not particularly important.
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
Well, it (by travesty of the law) isn't illegal to be Russell Greer (yet) so he's at least half-right.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020
I'm really interested to see how the judge is going to rule on (or the defense is going to respond to) the repeated assertions that the users of KF are stalking Russell all over the internet, leaving negative reviews of his products and laughing emojis on his FB comments, effectively sabotaging his ability to make money. That's a big part of his complaint, second only to his claims of copyright infringement. How can it be proven that those are KF users?
The complaint (Item 19) describes the day he was called into his employer's office and informed that they were being "inundated" with emails about him. That item ends with the statement "This is all linked back to Kiwi Farms". It is? How can that be even reasonably asserted? I've seen people mock him since his first Swift lawsuit and I never heard of Kiwi Farms until three or four months ago.
I suppose he'll try to explain his reasoning (for lack of a better word) in court, but I'd love to be a fly on that wall.
The complaint (Item 19) describes the day he was called into his employer's office and informed that they were being "inundated" with emails about him. That item ends with the statement "This is all linked back to Kiwi Farms". It is? How can that be even reasonably asserted? I've seen people mock him since his first Swift lawsuit and I never heard of Kiwi Farms until three or four months ago.
I suppose he'll try to explain his reasoning (for lack of a better word) in court, but I'd love to be a fly on that wall.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Didn't he literally claim in his book that they were TSwift fans?
He just claims whatever's convenient for him at the moment. He has no proof whatsoever.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
But either way, TS fans or the farms...IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE!
The judge is just going to tell butternut that people have a RIGHT to their personal opinion--and that opinion is that he sucks. At everything. He doesn't have to like it (no1curr). It is what it is, and the courts aren't there to legislate or mandate exactitudes of behavior from the public. I'd love a judge to just go off--"What do you want me to do, Greer? Make it illegal to not give you four stars on Amazon for your shitty book?" Not gonna happen.
Yes, I too, would love to be a fly on the wall of the courtroom for this one.
The judge is just going to tell butternut that people have a RIGHT to their personal opinion--and that opinion is that he sucks. At everything. He doesn't have to like it (no1curr). It is what it is, and the courts aren't there to legislate or mandate exactitudes of behavior from the public. I'd love a judge to just go off--"What do you want me to do, Greer? Make it illegal to not give you four stars on Amazon for your shitty book?" Not gonna happen.
Yes, I too, would love to be a fly on the wall of the courtroom for this one.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
How does he know it wasn't a group that doesn't like his condition known as the Moebius Dicks?
He would be their white whale.
He would be their white whale.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
Russell, like many litigiouscows, attributes KF to consequences of his actions well before this thread was posted, probably because he accurately judges KF to be an unsympathetic defendant even if the facts aren't on his side. For example, in his latest complaint, he describes his employer bringing him in to discuss being "inundated with e-mails" in February of 2017 as a consequence of Kiwi Farms... a MONTH before this thread was posted in May 2017 and anyone here cared about Russell.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
He thought Taylor's family's lawyer calling his conduct "invasive and troubling" was slander because he didn't think he was being a nuisance. He's often tried to dictate people's opinions of him and get mad when told to fuck off. His inability to grasp that other people can have opinions he doesn't like is at the root of his harassment charges. He didn't think he was being harassing so therefore Erika wasn't justified in calling the police. And we're not harassing him. We're talking ABOUT him, not TO him. If it was illegal to talk about people if they didn't want you to, then news outlets couldn't report what elected officials said or did.
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
A random thing from earlier.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2016
He can seek statutory damages regardless of actual damages because, if I remember correctly, he filed a copyright for the song in question prior to alleged infringement.
Last edited:
redbarchetta
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
Gonna have to disagree a bit there. While it's nice to think all Kiwis obey the no neghole pozzing policy, we know it simply isn't the case, with xyrichard being the obvious example. It's possible a lot of the people who spam his inbox with dumb shit come from Reddit and other sites where he's become internet famous, but we know for a fact at least one - and likely more - have come from here with their dumb trolling plans.
Russ is a well-known cow at this point, when he talks about harassment, he's usually talking about dumb people on their actual personal socials DMing him to call him an incel, as well as the few catfish he managed to figure out were catfish.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
After reading Rissells book and hearing Nick read chapters,How on earth has not a deranged Taylor Swift fan hunted down Russtard? " But it's not a date" kills me.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
I don't get the joke, Russ.