- Joined
- May 18, 2020
Really depends on a number of factors as TP said. Even something as seemingly irrelevant as the setting he was in when he took it could impact it, opiate users develop a kind of "behavioral tolerance" that applies depending on setting. A doper who has control over his setting and is in a relaxed state might be able to handle a full dose of his normal substance one night, then OD from the same amount the next day in a different setting because of variables he wasn't able to control that he normally would be able to, ie having somewhere to lay on the side, having a sitter, having hydration, etc.So any medical big brains in here? They are gonna try the "level of fent in george wasn't lethal because he's a seasoned user of it." approach. Bold gambit, but isn't the whole thing with fent is that like 2 specks of it can kill like a busload of people. Or did DARE lie to me again?
The fact that they're not going with the tolerance angle might signify that the defense has some legit evidence that Floyd took the drugs and didn't even know exactly what they were, which is entirely possible. He might have taken some compressed "speedballs" ie meth and opiates mixed without knowing how much of either were in there. There are a lot of things about this case that haven't even had the chance to see the light of day.
But tldr fentanyl and opiates in general are very finicky even for seasoned druggies because there are a lot of factors that influence their tolerance and a users reaction to them, and the margin for error is slim enough that plenty of addicts with decades of experience still kick the bucket every day doing the same shit they've done for years