World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

lol Why do you care then? I posted it for those who might be interested. It's fine if you're not. It's all speculation, anyway. No one's demanding that you watch it or even believe it. I'm not even saying that I believe everything in it, merely that what's presented in it is relevant considering much of what it presents coincides with the whole Great Reset agenda (namely a planned pandemic, a medical dictatorship, and technocracy) with many of its key players also being referenced.

People were initially writing off the Great Reset, itself, as "half-baked conspiratard bullshit" (and many still are) despite the fact that it's own most prominent proponents aren't even hiding their intentions anymore. Dismissing something out of hand because "hurr durr too long muh schizo conspiracy theory" is more than just kinda retarded.
You still haven't answered why anybody should waste 3 hours of their life watching this?
 
Nobody is going to force you to give up your things! Is not communism!

Where do I begin?
If every consumer good becomes a service, then you have no choice but to live by buying that service. Capitalism isn't perfect but at least you have the certainty that what you buy, you own.
In a post-capitalist system like this, everything you use can be revoked from your use at every moment. It isn't yours, and it certainly isn't society's as a whole, it is the property of the company that rents it to you.
In this aspect, the entire economy would become a massive bike-sharing program, and the bikes you rent there are not your own.
You are absolutely forced to integrate in such a system in order to survive, this is being coherced into it, and that you have to rent and re-rent every time just makes you dependent forever on these people.

There is more to communism than "cohercion", and it is a superior arrangement to this anyway. There is no renting of services from a company, what you take (for free) belongs to society as a whole, and since you're part of society, it can be said to belong to you as well.
How would what you need be alienated from you, in absence of a state and a distinction between you and the producers, since you are also part of them? Who or what could take the decision? Society is an abstract concept, to say that it could take the decision would be to reify it.
But in this sort of post-capitalism all you need to do is say on the internet that you are not going to date the troon.

Ok, I'll give you an example: Someone gives you a phone that is unique to you. You don't own that phone but you use it. Someone gives you a house. You don't own that house, but you live in it. Someone gives you access to medical services. You didn't pay for it, but you make use of it.

You won't own anything but you'll have everything. And you'll be systematized and recorded. You won't need money to get what you need, only your code number and registry.

Of course that will only come about 20-30 years from now, where it becomes the new normal and the concept of money will start to dissapear

What you don't own isn't social, it belongs to someone else. The phone I have can be bricked from a distance, I can be evicted from my house, the medical services, I can be excluded from them, etc, etc.
You're forgetting one key aspect: SOMEONE ELSE OWNS ALL THIS.
Money isn't going to disappear, realistically it's going to be digitalized (that is, turned into ten times the abstraction it currently is) and be used to track your transactions, and thus even more aspects of your life. We're already on our way for this.

There is no way I could possibly be happy renting food made from my own excrement and water made from my own piss with "money" I didn't earn (automation would put everyone out of work), surveilled 24/7 forced to live in some urban dystopia, excluded forever from any sort of real environment unless for tourism, or anything real at all.
Living in this kind of misery, probably castrated or sterilized because what good are we if machines do all the work for us? Do you know who lives like this? The elderly in nursing homes.
We would be only waiting for our own extinction then.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't funny the 1st time isn't funny the 100 time. Fuck off newfag
I don't believe in usin' slurs, but I've been a pansexual gentlemen for a long time, its nothin' new. I agree that there's nothin' funny about government overreach and invasion of privacy. It upsets me too. All our freedoms're bein' taken away! The right wingers in power who hate multiculturalism and different sexualities are goin' too far!

One world government? The Great Reset is just them racists tryin' to erase different cultures and different ages of consent!
 
I don't believe in usin' slurs, but I've been a pansexual gentlemen for a long time, its nothin' new. I agree that there's nothin' funny about government overreach and invasion of privacy. It upsets me too. All our freedoms're bein' taken away! The right wingers in power who hate multiculturalism and different sexualities are goin' too far!

One world government? The Great Reset is just them racists tryin' to erase different cultures and different ages of consent!
you almost had it in you to explore other ways of posting because your gay pedo gimmick. Your so close keep trying you'll get there
 
Any one afraid of the great reset need only look at the recent issue with suez canal. Yes it was a few days but the damage echos and is permanent. They have too many moving parts and that means the likely hood of something going bad increases
But... but.... they'll somehow develop a sentient AI against all logic and somehow it will decide to side with the reset cabal, despite it being dumb as hell, and then all non-elites will be peasants for all eternity! Or something.
 
Nobody is going to force you to give up your things! Is not communism!

Ok, I'll give you an example: Someone gives you a phone that is unique to you. You don't own that phone but you use it. Someone gives you a house. You don't own that house, but you live in it. Someone gives you access to medical services. You didn't pay for it, but you make use of it.

You won't own anything but you'll have everything. And you'll be systematized and recorded. You won't need money to get what you need, only your code number and registry.

Of course that will only come about 20-30 years from now, where it becomes the new normal and the concept of money will start to dissapear
Sounds great, but who decides who gets what? And for how long? Imagine someone gives you a house. You don't own it, but you live in it. But then this someone declares that you can't live in it anymore, you get a different house on the other side of the country. What are your rights?
 
Sounds great, but who decides who gets what? And for how long? Imagine someone gives you a house. You don't own it, but you live in it. But then this someone declares that you can't live in it anymore, you get a different house on the other side of the country. What are your rights?
You have none and the rich have them all, just like old times. Time is a flat circle, there is nothing new under the sun. Every idea tried and true or overused and failed will be used again irregardless because despite recording history, every time a generation that committed a giant mistake is gone the next generation usually has a surface level understanding of what that mistake was or never thinks about it at all except in passing.
 
But... but.... they'll somehow develop a sentient AI against all logic and somehow it will decide to side with the reset cabal, despite it being dumb as hell, and then all non-elites will be peasants for all eternity! Or something.
An actual a.i would only be possible if spirits exist. So it won't be a machine intelligence. It would be a paranormal intelligence imprisoned against it's will. That's probably going piss it off
 
This debate about what you can buy with power that you can't buy with money...

Between the Rockefellahs and the Bezos and the Clintons and all that level of society, you're neglecting that money doesn't let you compete with each other. I mean, to some extent but it's who can make who do what that really matters; and who can interfere with whose goals. Sometimes money is used as an instrument in achieving that, like Bezos buying the Washington Post so he can control politicians with the threat / reward of negative or positive coverage... but ultimately it's about networks and influence.

Ayn Rand in Atlas Shrugged has a scene where a character rants at a party about "pull". That "pull" is more important than money and that all these people throwing money at the cause of the day (today it would be BLM) is just posturing and ways of acquiring "pull".

Money is for ordinary people. It can't buy you the FBI not investigating you when you violate US law by sending state secret emails to a privately owned server; or get you Seth Rich killed right on the street because the killer knows you can prevent any investigation. Power does. "Pull" does.

The chairman of the Federal Reserve last month said that printing money doesn't cause inflation. He's right - kind of. If you don't let it get into the hands of ordinary people then it doesn't. So long as it only goes into the pockets of hedge funds and banks and Fortune 500 corporations then the only things that get inflated as stock prices and assets and property values. The things the owning class already own. I.e. it creates a two tier system.

The plan isn't to get rid of money. It's to get rid of it for ordinary people. The plan isn't for nobody to own anything and be happy, it's for ordinary people to own nothing and be happy. Universal basic income, everything rented instead of owned. There'll be money but not much of it because ordinary life wont require as much of it. What does all that achieve? It burns the bridge between Middle Class and becoming wealthy. It removes generational wealth accumulation, it removes the ability to invest. I mean, when jobs pay next to nothing because UBI and free Netflix have removed the need for jobs to pay well, thus allowing others to do your job for less, then how are you going to save and invest and work your way up to be wealthy? How are you going to pass that all onto your kids so that they can complete the next stage of advancing your family in their generation? You can't. You'll own nothing and be happy. They don't need to fight to keep you down when they remove the ladder you would use to climb up. There'll be money. It'll just be for the big companies and the elites. And it probably wont be the US dollar - that they'll keep. Probably rebalanced at some point once they're all insulated from the consequences somehow.

At least, that's the plan. Whether it happens is up to you.
 
The plan isn't to get rid of money. It's to get rid of it for ordinary people. The plan isn't for nobody to own anything and be happy, it's for ordinary people to own nothing and be happy. Universal basic income, everything rented instead of owned. There'll be money but not much of it because ordinary life wont require as much of it. What does all that achieve? It burns the bridge between Middle Class and becoming wealthy. It removes generational wealth accumulation, it removes the ability to invest. I mean, when jobs pay next to nothing because UBI and free Netflix have removed the need for jobs to pay well, thus allowing others to do your job for less, then how are you going to save and invest and work your way up to be wealthy? How are you going to pass that all onto your kids so that they can complete the next stage of advancing your family in their generation? You can't. You'll own nothing and be happy. They don't need to fight to keep you down when they remove the ladder you would use to climb up. There'll be money. It'll just be for the big companies and the elites. And it probably wont be the US dollar - that they'll keep. Probably rebalanced at some point once they're all insulated from the consequences somehow.

At least, that's the plan. Whether it happens is up to you.
And how, pray tell, are we supposed to stop the great reset? It seems like the powers that be are determined to do it regardless of what we say or do, or how many people know about their plans.
 
And how, pray tell, are we supposed to stop the great reset? It seems like the powers that be are determined to do it regardless of what we say or do, or how many people know about their plans.
Your end goal is to fracture power structures as much as possible.

Reasons? To break up woke capital s market share over everything and create automonous zones where competing power structures can form.


If say india created a state sponsored clone of pay pal that would really cause havoc in woke capitals agenda.

Notice the idea of a state sponsored alternative to pay pal doesn't require fed posting bullshit. No violence required. But if you do get india to set something like that up? Man oh man that would be a serious blow against these elites.
.
Why would places like india want alternative internet structure and social media? Because that nations politicians seen how much a threat silicon valley is to their power. Why wouldn't they after how they seen facebook and the like depose trump? So now India is restricting silicon valley as a result.
The idea of a state sponsored and controlled alternative shouldn't be too far behind.

Why this idea would favor anti woke is because it realizes one way to fight back is place wegde between various elites. Sell local elites how woke capital is a threat to them and pitch them the idea creating an alaternative infrastructure would be key to keeping their power and make them look good doing it.

That's how you do it
 
Last edited:
But... but.... they'll somehow develop a sentient AI against all logic and somehow it will decide to side with the reset cabal, despite it being dumb as hell, and then all non-elites will be peasants for all eternity! Or something.
Im reminded of Deus Ex where the globohomo create an AI to help sus out Terrorists (ie anyone who disagrees with their worldview) and it ends up turning on globohomo because it fits within the parameters it was given over what constitutes a terrorist organization.
 
Why would places like india want alternative internet structure and social media? Because that nations politicians seen how much a threat silicon valley is to their power. Why wouldn't they after how they seen facebook and the like depose trump? So now India is restricting silicon valley as a result.
The idea of a state sponsored and controlled alternative shouldn't be too far behind.
And I think with all the woke people and SJWs invading Silicon Valley, I wonder if India saw this as a possible Achille's Heel?
 
Back