The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

[CharlesBarkley]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

Honestly, having blue city blocks burning just to get Trump out of office? - OK.

Blue cities burning down while most of the gov is blue - Send in the death squads. It would be pretty funny to see this guy get full inno and then Biden advises people to shut the fuck up and find racial unity in national unity in some speech. That would the funniest thing on earth.

 

[Prester John]

So what's the root cause of civilizational stagnation within once advanced cultures, like the various iterations of the Chinese Empire or the many Muslim cultures?

China went isolationist in the 15th century. See the economic boom they've enjoyed since opening trade in the '70s and beyond.

Japan was also famously isolationist until the Perry Expedition and the end of the shogunate in the mid-1800s. Japan opened up, quickly modernized, and blossomed into an empire that whipped Russia's ass before WWI.

North Korea is as isolationist as they come and, well, they're North Korea.

 

[Misery Niggas]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

Both.

I rescind any defense of George himself I might have made, I didn't realize he was such a bad person, and it's definitely not something the mainstream media wants people to argue about. But if I were arguing in defense of Chauvin all I would mention is his Felony charge in Texas.

Regardless, the principal of rights still stands. The only right that exists is a right that is fought for. And those fighting for the cops to be judge, jury and executioner are fighting against their future prosperity.

Still missing the entire point of why this is still happening. Everyone even the cops themselves agreed that the dude fucked up and there was no predjudice involved in this act almost half a fucking year prior to this point. Go ACAB cope post somewhere else.

 

[Rekkington]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

Number 2 more than Number 1; Democrats still don't want to see property damage and violence, they're just fags that wanna throw money at it until it'll stop. Repeat this every few years. BLM was used mainly by Anarchists, the street arm of which are Antifa.
Amusingly, BLM adopted Leftist rhetoric but - being niggers - did not finesse it as much as their White/Jewish academic ringleaders so you had them literally calling for the destruction of the traditional family and other wild things, whereas more learned people would say shit like "challenge the heteronormative class structure" or something. So that kinda got them in trouble because as we have addressed, Black people cannot really be controlled and more than half of them are straight up schizophrenic. This is also why they're ultimately easier to control, though; drop Air Jordans all over the place and they'll just go home, most of them don't even watch the news or understand what is happening.

 

[The Cum Consumer]

Give him a break, he was up late last night trying to correct the misinformation about his MMA record. He's 6-6 not 5-6! Huwhite supremacist smearjob!

Ah, the Ted Pill. Aka the Varg Pill. It will always be the most based imo.

Varg is a retard who couldn't even figure out how to farm. Ted's the real deal.

 

[Nobue]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

I think it's a combination-- they were the useful idiots for that party, but they're too retarded to keep under control. They tried to distance themselves in a panic when the riots kept going, and the media stopped covering them.

 

[LemmeSee]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

Those two theories aren't nearly as exclusive as you seem to think. There's a massive disconnect in goals and motivations between most the Democratic Party locally and nationally.

 

[DumbDude42]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

both
the 'extension of a greater will' part applies to the official BLM organisation itself, the part where the professional activists are working.
the 'uncontrollable random chimpout' part applies to the flash mobs that semi feral niggers form whenever the media riles them up with a floyd style story. these dont have direct connections to the actual organisation, they just yell "BLM muhfugga" because it's a catchy slogan.

 

[WolfeTone]

Both.

Still missing the entire point of why this is still happening. Everyone even the cops themselves agreed that the dude fucked up and there was no predjudice involved in this act almost half a fucking year prior to this point. Go ACAB cope post somewhere else.

Don't get it twisted. Cops are people. Veterans are people. All flow into and out of politics, whether they realize it or not. I'm looking out for the overall health of the country. Not some random dude who's family has already gotten 10x more than they could ever need for it.

 

[Hüftpriester]

Don't get it twisted. Cops are people. Veterans are people. All flow into and out of politics, whether they realize it or not. I'm looking out for the overall health of the country. Not some random dude who's family has already gotten 10x more than they could ever need for it.

Thank you for looking out for the health of the country. Now fuck off back to reddit.

Varg is a retard who couldn't even figure out how to farm. Ted's the real deal.

To be fair, we're all retards compared to Ted.

 

[AnOminous]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

I believe the rank and file of BLM are mostly people legitimately angry about actual social problems that affect them, but the leadership is mostly either corrupt or fanatics, and they use the rank and file as meat shields either to conceal their real agenda or grift for money. The looting by blacks is usually opportunistic and not directly organized by BLM itself. People see an opportunity to get a sweet flat screen and take it. And once one person breaks a window and starts grabbing shit, there's a tendency in a mob for such behavior to be contagious.

Antifa, on the other hand, doesn't just have some loose cannons. It pretty much is a group of nothing but loose cannons. These are the same assholes as the black bloc who would seize on pretty much any demonstration about anything as an excuse to smash windows and set shit on fire. They are fundamentally nihilists, and their destructive acts aren't aimed at making anything better for anyone, but just to set the world on fire, just because they're mad at their dads.

While I have to admit to a certain fondness for watching the world burn, I'm not going to set it on fire myself. At that point, you're an evil fuck.

tl;dr the scumfucks of antifa are quite consciously and knowingly evil and nihilistic with maybe a few well-intentioned pollyannas among them, BLM is a terrible organization with corrupt leadership, but most of the actual members just want to demonstrate, even if they don't particularly care if this also sets off looting.

To be fair, we're all retards compared to Ted.

His dissertation apparently helped nuke the entire field of mathematics it was about by proving a bunch of its conjectures so there was nothing left to do.

 

[Nobue]

Those two theories aren't nearly as exclusive as you seem to think. There's a massive disconnect in goals and motivations between most the Democratic Party locally and nationally.

Don't forget that powerful people get used to people doing what they want, and the constant ass-kissing makes them think they're smarter and more powerful than they really are. They thought they could control these people, and learned a hard lesson.

 

[Seminal Ointments Lain]

Cops aren't the judge, jury, and executioner. Derek Chauvin chose to pull George Floyd out of his car, he chose to kneel on a handcuffed man's neck while there were 3 other officers and eventually a crowd of people around. Regardless of how they falsified that lab result, Derek Chauvin is a cold-blooded murderer. And anyone carrying water for the state is an enormous cuck.

I suppose for y'all, it's all fun and games until it happens to someone you know, then I guess you can show the deathsquads on your punch card how many times you whiteknighted them online. Then maybe they won't send you to the fucking camps they're building out in the desert en masse.

He transended George for Floyd' benefit. The new flesh will be the judge. You are cold cum.

 

[Homer Simpson]

I am not going to be in town when the verdict is announced. I got a homie up in Two Harbors and I'm staying with him for like a month after the trial ends.

I live in downtown Minneapolis in a building that has many windows and is highly flammable, so fuck staying here for that shit.

RIP lol. Why stay there after what happened during the floyd riots? I would've noped the fuck out.

You know who was more worthy of such an extravagant funeral? David Dorn.

His black life didn't matter.

The Redditor also autistically downvotes everything because they don't like someone. We've got a lot of Redditors here now.

Nah, redditors are worse than that. They will report you for anything to get you suspended, then go through you comments to find something they can dunk on you for, and reply without fear of you reporting/replying to them. Happened when I called a guy a tranny or something.

I agree. We’re already seeing ‘he a good boy, dem poliss juss be raciss’ drooling smoothbrains emerging on this thread, and I’d dearly like to rebut with a kawaii trash can or jaunty top hat.

God that trashcan is Kawaii.

 

[Fentanyl Floyd]

So inevitably when there's more chimpouts this summer, do you conservatives will actually do something instead just whining on social media?

 

[SITHRAK!]

what? she was terrible witness because she was retarded but did they really conspire?

Yup. Trayvon was actually ‘dating’ Jeantel’s half-sister, who didn’t want to be put on the stand because she was cheating on him.
It’s why Jeantel was easily confused about details and unable to read what was supposed to be her own handwritten witness statement.
There’s a half-decent documentary called ‘The Trayvon Martin Hoax’ you can watch for the full details, I believe it’s on jewtube.

 

[DiscoRodeo]

Why does it matter if Floyd was a bad person? Are we not talking about the incident itself and how it was handled?

 

[HTTP Error 404]

So far I've encountered two major, mutually exclusive, theories about the "Black Lives Matter" movement:
1. That they're just the strong arm/useful idiots of the Democratic Party. In other words - they're nothing more than an extension of a greater will.
2. That they're a barely controllable wild card, whose acts of violence were a happy and convenient surprise to the aforementioned party. As soon as their interests start diverging, "Black Lives Matter" will turn around and, without hesitation, bite the hand that held their leash.

So, my dear American friends... which one of those two is true?

They're not mutually exclusive.

The DNC is using the DSA and other marxist groups as useful idiots. This includes BLM. But "Liberals get the Bullet Too," as they said years ago, and at the best of times BLM is a wild animal.

Alternately, you could say the DSA types are targeting the DNC's base and manipulating them to go further left.

So inevitably when there's more chimpouts this summer, do you conservatives will actually do something instead just whining on social media?

Why on god's green earth would Conservatives do SHIT about the chimpouts this summer, when the left not only encouraged the chimpouts last year but actively stopped anyone from ending them because they made President Trump look bad?

If the conservatives have any common sense they'll step back and stay absolutely stone fucking silent the entire summer about this other than to point out it sure is horrible that this is happening in Biden's America. Let the left crack down on the rioters -- and they will, holy shit they will -- and let the left take all the blame for it.

Hell, I hope to see Antifa try and start shit up this year, because it should be funny watching those little LARPing fucks suddenly get cracked down on and be completely shocked when their "allies" start ruining their lives for being inconvenient problems under the new regime. Just like how every marxist street militia ends up after they are no longer useful.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1376985020284428294

 

[The Last Stand]

Why does it matter if Floyd was a bad person? Are we not talking about the incident itself and how it was handled?

Because the media spin was that Floyd was a "gentle giant" that did nothing wrong whatsoever. The coroner report and prior run ins with the law prove that this wasn't his first rodeo with the cops.

View attachment 2043221

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1376985020284428294

Damn.