Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think he'd be torn between supporting a megacorporation and his barkeeper waifu. His head may well explode.
He's been willing to say that Bernie Bros aren't true leftists because something something red-brown alliance. AOC campaigned for Bernie back in 2016, so I'd be very unsurprised if Blob turns on her and accuses her of being a nazbol the second God-Empress Kamala and the MSM say it's okay to do so.
-------------------
On the topic of double standards and AOC:
Screenshot_20210330-213126.jpg

Republican congresscritters at the border: bad.
ExbFQiZXAAY-Jr8.jpeg

Democrat congresscritters at the border: good.
 
1617139944254.png


Dear god, Bob. I mean I really hate a lot of the media right now, but I wouldn't even wish to watch Brian Stelzer get fed to a lion. You are a true psychotic.

Finally, let's have some fun!
Your browser is not able to display this video.
That is so horrifying... I must award you most awesome points.

I now know what weapon I will slaughter humanity with.

I'll keep it brief. I'm sure all of you know the Bee Gee song "I Started A Joke". But what is the song about? Who is the "I" in this song? Some think it is Hitler, who must die to let the whole world live. But it seems to me the song is describing someone who is stuck in his own personal fantasy world. In his isolation, he thinks he has an inordinate power over the world, someone Who Matters, someone that the perverse, backward world is always fighting against. He sees his eventual death as a sort of martyrdom, a cause of celebration to the intolerant, ignorant world, when in fact it is quiet, lonely, not so much forgotten as never acknowledged. This is a perpetual teenager. A Bob Chipman.

Bob Chipman is no Hitler, although he often speaks as though he is. His suffering brought the world a small bubbling rill of joy, of which we should be thankful. Bob loved to talk about "unneeded people", yet on reflection, there are indeed very, very feel people who the world does not need. Even someone as vile as Bob is needed, if only as an harmless, even amusing, example of vileness in this comedy of life. Now that, like the protagonist in the song, Bob finally died and the whole world goes on living, we may indulge in a little private thought: when it comes to the time we take stock of our lives, will we be haunted by the question: "Is the joke on me?"
*cheers* I knew you would be worth the wait!

They actually are developing a New Gods movie directed by Ava DuVernay, a black woman who Bob simped on a few pages back, and co-written by Tom King (who did the recent Mister Miracle series). DuVernay tweeted not too long ago that the script had progressed to a fourth draft. I think some of the #Snyder hype around Darkseid has helped there with the studio. If Eternals does decent for Disney it feels like this almost assuredly will come out in some form.
New Gods strikes me as one of those "comic only" properties. Part of it is being gaudy and over the top which I don't see movies as being able to pull off well in a way that will be appealing to enough fans to make it worth the budget.

> GQP [sic] plague

I'm surprised to learn that the Republicans run a popular bat soup stall in the Wuhan market.
I learned it's not just Bob, apparently this is a full blown dumb meme on the left.
1617140164129.png


I have no fucking idea with the following except once again Bobby is comparing a real-life situation with movies:
9.png
It is... becoming strangely fascinating how Bob has apparently adopted JD Vance as his nemesis. If (as I've heard some rumors) JD runs for president some day and gets it, that might actually kill Bob off.

Oh, do NOT get me started on Bright. That movie had so much potential it wasn't even funny, then it all got thrown away on your typical "evil racist humans" bullshit. No world building to speak of, no real character development. All it was was a master class on how to make urban fantasy suck.

Bob would probably like it just because the costumes and effects looked good.
"Brightburn" you mean but yeah, even from the trailers I could tell that it would work as a 5-10min vignette in some kind of horror anthology, could not see how they were going to make it worth 2 hrs.

From what I can make out it was basically a group of superheroes who had been convicted of crimes and basically got chucked in it as a way for the government to do stuff while having plausible deniability.
It's Dirty Dozen but with supervillains.

Bob's fixation on James Gunn is getting creepier than his thirst over hot dog girl. With Lindsay there was the excuse that Bob is an incel who wanted m'lady's affections but his thing with Gunn is reaching "wants to wear his skin" levels of creepy. The guy feels like he has a personal connection with Gunn and feels like he should have the success Gunn has too because of reasons I don't care enough to look up again.
This, I think, is leading Bob to subconsciously try to live through James Gunn. Yes, I say subconsciously. Bob is too much of a consoomer and too much of a nobody to consciously try to live life through James Gunn. But given his fixation on Gunn, and on what Gunn has accomplished, Bob on some level equates Gunn's success with his own. So when James Gunn is fired, it's the worst thing ever, because that somehow means Bob has failed. When Gunn's movies succeed, that means Bob has succeeded (suck it, obsoletes!)
Well, seems I'm due to post this citation every 50 pages or so.
I think he’s enormously talented and his film geek turned schlock-horror journeyman turned arthouse bad-boy turned blockbuster superhero auteur reminds me of a life-arc I’d pictured for myself (still sort-of do, if we’re being honest here…) once upon a time and I’ve always felt a tinge of personal-investment in his success and self-improvement because of that.​

James Gunn was also one of Bob's first (and only?) interviews he's done so Bob is literally 1 degree away from Gunn's movies. Gunn is the closest Bob has ever gotten to the promised land of Hollywood.

The one state solution is fucked, nobody will ever go for a single state that isn't objectively terrible for one end of the deal or the other, be it on national or religious concerns.
I mean it could. Palestinians could integrate with Israel and they wouldn't be treated as second-class citizens or anything. Some of them that have "joined up" even serve in the government. As far as I've found so far in casual investigating, there's nothing keeping them from just being Israeli and then being allowed to do their own thing in their own territories. I'm sure it's more complicated that but the state would probably even give them the same military service exemption the ultra-orthodox get if it would bring peace to the area.
 
Last edited:
I mean it could. Palestinians could integrate with Israel and they wouldn't be treated as second-class citizens or anything. Some of them that have "joined up" even serve in the government. As far as I've found so far in casual investigating, there's nothing keeping them from just being Israeli and then being allowed to do their own thing in their own territories. I'm sure it's more complicated that but the state would probably even give them the same military service exemption the ultra-orthodox get if it would bring peace to the area.
I realize that we are getting off-topic but I don't think that a one-state solution is viable simply because the Palestinians already almost outnumber Israeli Jews and certainly would within a generation. Israel enjoys the fact that it is basically getting away with South Africa-style apartheid without anywhere near the recriminations internationally that South Africa suffered.
 
I mean, does anyone even know about the OG Bloodsport? From what I got after doin' some lookin' up is the guy is one of those villains you'd easily forget about and only the most hardcore DC fans will remember who he was and what his backstory was.
He's a Byrne creation and more to the point, subject to two big stories that are fondly remembered: one is his origin story with the reveal about his brother (which is one of the most jarring moments of the Byrne Superman run) and second one, when Bloodsport meets a white supremacist that stole his name and the two basically brawl throughout the prison during a riot with Superman stuck trying to stop the riot/stop prisoners from escaping while trying to keep the two from killing each other.

Toss into the equation, is the fact that they explicitly decided to not rewrite the character when Will Smith declined to come back and opted to just change the character's name rather than just rewrite the character from scratch to be Bronze Tiger (who is a popular black character in Suicide Squad) for Elba to play.
 
I mean it could. Palestinians could integrate with Israel and they wouldn't be treated as second-class citizens or anything. Some of them that have "joined up" even serve in the government. As far as I've found so far in casual investigating, there's nothing keeping them from just being Israeli and then being allowed to do their own thing in their own territories. I'm sure it's more complicated that but the state would probably even give them the same military service exemption the ultra-orthodox get if it would bring peace to the area.
One last comment before I let the off topic sperging go. At the moment it seems to be headed there, but I don't know how far it can go. As someone else mentioned the Palestinians have the higher birth rate. And within the Israeli population the far right settlers and ultra-orthodox are using a combination of high birth rates and joiners from abroad to rapidly overtake what is left of any moderate secularists; at a certain point there may not be much left of Israeli politics that isn't based on ethno-nationalism or outright theocracy.

At this point a one state solution that is honestly trying to move towards equal rights might be the most realistic 'good' ending, but I wonder if even that will eventually become untenable.
 
My strategy is to not identify with corporate IPs to the point where you're emotionally damaged by a subpar entertainment product, and to keep in mind that if something sucks, there are a million other things out there to enjoy.
Agreed. ‘As the saying goes, there are plenty of fish in the sea.’

You shouldn’t let autistic idiots like Bob ruin your fun. No one cares about their opinions anyway. Not even the companies they shill for.

I really like Assault on Arkham. Also, Gunn really doesn't seem like that diverse of a director. Sure, everyone has a style, but the great ones can mix it up.
Very true.

Real artists are creative and don’t project themselves into everything they make.

By Bob's age, most people reach some of life's more meaningful milestones. Some are good fathers to children, great friends, a good son, an executive or at least supervisor of something, lots of things. You put energy into these roles and it creates meaning and identity.

And Bob's dumb ass? His identity is hating every inch of land between New York and California and the people on it. It's devotion to corporations and mascots from his childhood. It's about holding a grudge from the 16-bit console generation where his side was the evil, anticompetitive team sued and fined repeatedly for their bullshit practices... but if you twist it, kick it, and selectively discard facts, the could be seen as heroes, so that's what he does.

A wise man would correct his course. We've all been on a bad trajectory and straightened it out. Bob, the narcissistic tub, won't dare admit wrongdoing. Rather, he's doubled and tripled down it. That shitty attitude does not meaningful content create. It generates a small amount of likes from retards just as narcissistic whose identities are defined by product because they've got nothing else and can't admit they're fuckups.

In short - it's fun to laugh at a grown-ass man jerking himself off every night to Kong vs. Godzilla that has the stones to look down his nose at anybody else on Earth.
I totally agree.

The best people put effort into their roles and that’s what makes them great. I once had a friend/co-worker at Sam’s Club who had autism and he was a great person. He worked hard, he had artistic talent and he wrote a children’s book for kids with autism. The point is, he didn’t let his disorder define or restrict him, he puts effort into being his own person.

That’s what anyone should do. Be their own person.
 
Last edited:
I don't really watch capeshit but wasn't that the point of the Suicide Squad?

From what I can make out it was basically a group of superheroes who had been convicted of crimes and basically got chucked in it as a way for the government to do stuff while having plausible deniability.
Sort of.

The original Suicide Squad in the 60s (and the later retconned into being 40s version) were generic soldiers doing dangerous suicide missions.

The one that everyone loves and remembers is the 66 issue series by John Ostrander that used super-villains though it was far more than just a Dirty Dozens with super-villains book; something the films and various subsequent series books and copycats (post-Civil War rape of Thunderbolts I'm looking at you) failed to realize or care to try and follow.

Ostrander used the "Dirty Dozen but with super-villains" to give American comic fans detailed character studies that fleshed out characters who were one-dimensional ciphers. He made ausie stereotype Captain Boomerang a cold blooded coward who will stink to multiple new lows to save his own hide. He turned Deadshot into a a fully fleshed out figure with a tragic past out of Falkner, turned Bronze Tiger from a generic kung fu villain to a full on hero, plus the entire arc of Amanda Waller, who rose from an unspeakable series of tragedies involving a gang of street thugs raping/murdering half her family to a senior aid to Ronald Reagan who struggled constantly with her desire for power and the corruptive influences of it as she found her ruthless pragmatism clashing with her desire to protect those closest to her and help the innocent.

Judging the Squad by it's later day incarnation does a huge disservice to the concept as later writers wholesale don't get the point of the entire franchise as Ostrander reinvented it as.
 
Today I learned you know a group that has high numbers opposed to evolution?

Amerindians.

Would love to see Bob get slapped with a citation of that and see how his usual "only science-believers are good" rationale goes into overdrive to spin it.
He'll cover for them and say that they're a distinct culture entitled to their beliefs. That's what they all do whenever someone says something that

So in other words the government your advocating for?

You can play words games all you like. Let's just settle with: Concentrated power vs Distributed power systems of government. Basic scale where everything shifts towards one end or the other. And it was quite clear to the American founders they wanted a distributed system though not the extreme of a mob rule (aka pure democracy).
Yes, indeed. The government I was advocating for. A system where the people whose fortunes are tied to the land being prosperous are the ones who can determine what course the nation should take.

Kind of similar to a certain system where a dynasty's prospects for lasting long rested upon how much safety, security, justice, peace, and prosperity they can give to the common man.

Also, a distributed system is what most Medieval monarchies had. As I already highlighted before, the nobles didn't like having a supreme authority over the land, and they made the king swear to respect the rights and liberties of his subjects, and if he doesn't, he loses that crown and the nobles find someone else to put in charge.

Replace the word "nobles" with "landowners", rename the "king" into the "president", and give him a time limit on his "reign", and you get the early USA as envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

Oh sure, who ever heard of a monarchy scapegoating targets for why things are going bad...
/sarc
According to Tacitus and later Christian tradition, Emperor Nero blamed the devastation on the Christian community in the city, initiating the empire's first persecution against the Christians.
And what happened? The Romans killed Nero and crowned another man to become Emperor. Meanwhile, democracies blame others all the time for things going bad, and they don't get punished in the least. So at least, the monarchies actually hold their leaders responsible when he feeds them a line of bullshit and tries to kill off people who are entirely innocent.

Also, note that even the early Christians, when they did take over Rome, did not replace the monarchy. They just absorbed it into the system of the Church and made it a tool of Christianity. And prior to that, Christians served in the monarchy in civilian jobs and in the army, and would follow any order given by a pagan magnate outside of committing apostasy.

Even if historians debunk this one instance, there are plenty more. Just look at how many mideast concentrated power govs love to blame Jews and the West.
And most of those countries are republics, whose people actually share those sentiments and who openly blame the west and keep electing anti-western leaders. Go figure.

Here I'll save you time. Estimate 20k military for ECW out of 4mil pop is 0.5% of the population.

CW America: 600k out of 31mil = 1.9% of the population.

For the ottoman empire (a monarchy) had an army around WW1 of 2.87mil. Out of 24 mil population. ~12% of the population.

So whatever point you're trying to make we can play the counter-example all day.
The Ottomans at the time were transitioning away from Monarchy. The Sultans were already weakened beyond belief by Jannisarries, and the power structure that was traditionally under the power of the Sultan was replaced by a progressive group called the Young Turks. Not to mention that at the time, the Ottomans were part of a larger world war that became even worse when democracies butted in on what was a debate between eastern monarchies.

Oh here we go! The 'ole "That wasn't real communism monarchy" canard.

I'd ask you to post your definitions but I know how it goes: "The ones I like are 'monarchy,' and the ones I don't aren't."

Yeah it's amazing how when you get to play with definitions you can "prove" how ideal your system is. You and millions of college commies have been doing that schtick for years. Fuck off out here with that dishonest bullshit.
And you're going to claim the same for democracies when many of the centralized governments doing bad things today are also republics. Bite me. Those Middle Eastern countries you were bitching about? The ones that hate the west? How many of them are democracies? Oh, but just because they have concentrated power in the hands of one guy (whom they probably elected) that's not real democracy!

What a fucking joke.

Daily basis? No. Worship wasn't done on a daily basis either. Try reading what is written instead of making shit up.
What is written is that democracies had just as much, if not even more fuck-ups than the monarchs do. I mean, where else did you see people fuck up so badly that society invented Communism and bomb-throwing anarchists to cope with how robber barons and rich people were keking the supposed "democratic" system? Back in the time of monarchs, the worst they had to deal with was some uppity peasants or lords or some dynastic rivalry, which usually sorted out in a couple years, or decades. Back then, when you were mad at the king, you join a rebellion to put in another king who would be more amendable to your interests. Nowadays, when people get pissed off at capitalist democracies, they don't start movements to oust corrupt politicians and business owners and replace them with more responsible politicians and business owners, they try to burn down the whole fucking system.

And what's worse? The democracies just let them. As bad as some of the tyrannical monarchs are, at least when there's a rebellious movement that threatens to destroy everything that society holds dear, from religion, to national values, to gender roles and family traditions, the monarchs actually TRY to stamp it out. With democracies? They tolerate the same people who want to destroy the family (essentially, the basic building blocks of society) as well as religion, public order, and general civility. And the cops come, not to arrest the punks who burned down stores and harassed people on voting booths, but to arrest the few who dared to try and defend themselves, exercising that mythical "Second Amendment" right.

God Bless America.

Here's the difference between a monarchy and a democracy: a monarchy has to be overthrown. A democracy or a republic can vote itself into disaster and even oblivion.

Also did you just argue that Egyptian monarchies that lasted for centuries didn't kill kids?

Then Pharaoh gave this order to all his people: “Every Hebrew boy that is born you must throw into the Nile, but let every girl live.” -Exodus 1:22 (NIV)
You do realize that happened only ONE TIME, right? And the previous pharaohs were kind of chummy with the Hebrews since one of them was THE FUCKING PRIME MINISTER?

Not to mention the multiple times democracies engaged in eugenics and extermination bullshit. From the Trail of Tears, to the extermination of many Indian tribes, to sterilizing people in the 1920s and 30s, and of course, a democratic Germany electing a certain Austrian painter who blamed a certain group of people for all of Germany's troubles and shoved millions of people into ovens. Not to mention a certain Republic that arose on the largest Asian nation, which came to power with tons of peasant popular support, only to turn around commit atrocities in the name of their popular leader, atrocities that would make even the Austrian painter look like a schoolyard bully.

Kind of makes the Pharaoh look like a little punk, right?

I've no interest in continuing to pick apart the arguments of one who does not bother engaging in intellectual honest debate. You did good simulating the arguing with moviebob experience. Keep it up and you'll prove as intelligent and insightful as him any day now.

The fact that you keep turning a blind eye to the fact that many of the nations that do horrible shit now are republics and democracies, and the fact that you overlook the crimes done against humanity now even by people here in the USA, crimes for which other nations eradicated the likes of the Carthaginians and the Aztecs for, astounds me. In the 1500s, the monarchies would have spat at the idea of sacrificing and killing your own children for your financial well-being, with the exception of the Aztecs, who got slaughtered by the Spanish for their crimes(and their gold). Modern "democratic" people in the capital of western liberal democracy throw their own babies, their own flesh-and-blood, in the dumpster just because they didn't feel like raising kids despite there being a welfare state that would help you do that, and you focus more on that one time a monarch killed the boys of another race and got his butt whooped by God for it.

One last comment before I let the off topic sperging go. At the moment it seems to be headed there, but I don't know how far it can go. As someone else mentioned the Palestinians have the higher birth rate. And within the Israeli population the far right settlers and ultra-orthodox are using a combination of high birth rates and joiners from abroad to rapidly overtake what is left of any moderate secularists; at a certain point there may not be much left of Israeli politics that isn't based on ethno-nationalism or outright theocracy.

At this point a one state solution that is honestly trying to move towards equal rights might be the most realistic 'good' ending, but I wonder if even that will eventually become untenable.
That's probably going to be what happens. You'll just have two groups filled with zealots willing to slaughter each other like what happened in the Balkans decades ago. A one-state solution, however, is impossible at this point. The only hope would be that the "allies" of both Israel and Palestine would try to hold them back from outright butchering each other instead of fueling the fire.
 
Last edited:
I totally agree.

The best people put effort into their roles and that’s what makes them great. I once had a friend/co-worker at Sam’s Club who had autism and he was a great person. He worked hard, he had artistic talent and he wrote a children’s book for kids with autism. The point is, he didn’t let his disorder define or restrict him, he puts effort into being his own person.

That’s what anyone should do. Be their own person.
That's exactly it. Healthy people don't define themselves by something they're not. It's the same reason Bob's content to be the scum he is - when all these people are "beneath" him, it justifies his shit behavior.

Famously, the fucker spoke about troglodytes stealing his future to prolong their existence. The financial insurance drain of his fat, diabetic ass is literally stealing the future of others to prolong his existence, but that's fine because he's not a Christian, transphobe, Nazi, "mayo ghoul," or any other of Bob's labels for people he doesn't understand.

Be something. Don't be the anti-something. Your fucking obituary isn't going to say how much you hated Oklahoma. It will list your positive attributes if you ever have one, Bob.
 
He's been willing to say that Bernie Bros aren't true leftists because something something red-brown alliance. AOC campaigned for Bernie back in 2016, so I'd be very unsurprised if Blob turns on her and accuses her of being a nazbol the second God-Empress Kamala and the MSM say it's okay to do so.
-------------------
On the topic of double standards and AOC:
View attachment 2043273
Republican congresscritters at the border: bad.
View attachment 2043293
Democrat congresscritters at the border: good.
Can't have Cruz documenting those kids that will form a cheap labor pool and be free future Dem voters.


I wouldn't be surprised if Bobby agreed with and fully endorsed the "demographic destiny" concept that Dem operatives have thrown around. If you can't wipe out the mayoghouls, then just import lots of people illegally to replace and outnumber them.
 
That's exactly it. Healthy people don't define themselves by something they're not. It's the same reason Bob's content to be the scum he is - when all these people are "beneath" him, it justifies his shit behavior.

Famously, the fucker spoke about troglodytes stealing his future to prolong their existence. The financial insurance drain of his fat, diabetic ass is literally stealing the future of others to prolong his existence, but that's fine because he's not a Christian, transphobe, Nazi, "mayo ghoul," or any other of Bob's labels for people he doesn't understand.

Be something. Don't be the anti-something. Your fucking obituary isn't going to say how much you hated Oklahoma. It will list your positive attributes if you ever have one, Bob.
Here lies Movbiebob. He lived in a society.
 
Untitled.png
I have a better chance catching smallpox than a "viral #Blockbuster discourse".

Bobby doesn't care about pedophilia (surprise!); instead he cares about how a man looks and dresses:
Untitled.png

Biden uses covid as the excuse to stop journalist nosing in the illegal-immigrant camps. Bobby doesn't care. He only cares that the journalist was sent by Ted Cruz.
Untitled.png
So much for the crocodile tears about "kids in cages". What surprised me is how the True Believers are turning their croc tears against Ted Cruz!

86586.png
Such ghoulish gallery.

More random dehumanization, because a woman dared to stand up to our glorious workers in journalism:
-8.png
CNN wouldn't have lost the last tatter of their reputation had they filmed and investigate jellyfish.

I have a feeling that Glenn Greenwald has become Bobby's new Peter Coffin:
8467.png

8467.png
+ + + +

Bobby tells us how much he loves the Maoist way:
-=6.png

Saint Fentanyl Floyd:
5.png
Not only did Floyd got his trials; he got a whole fucking rap sheet.

67.png

Celebrating workers -- the wrong workers anyway -- is a sign of Fascism.
67.png

At least Jeff Bezos didn't beat his wife!!!!
67.png

+ + + +
67.png
What an eyesore. These imbeciles will consoom anything with the word Marvel on it.

Bobby mistakes Falcon to be the history of American racial relations:
67.png

Bobby gets hoity-toity when people laughs at him taking a kid's show seriously:
-=.png

Gotten rid of the troll, Bobby and co continue their adult discourse:
Untitled.png
1.png

86586.png

-=6.png

"Super-gay". Does Bobby realize how many trannies he has killed by saying that?
-=6.png
Just reclaim your garbage and don't come back. I haven't even heard of LilGayX until two weeks before.

Pity the Little Angels! (or Mermaids, I don't care)
-=6.png

Lots of fake tits. Naomi, please send a note to your handler that the average Chinese does not give a damn about the spa shootings, nor do they buy the anti-Asian violence narrative.
-=6.png
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Bobby agreed with and fully endorsed the "demographic destiny" concept that Dem operatives have thrown around. If you can't wipe out the mayoghouls, then just import lots of people illegally to replace and outnumber them.
/pol/: ”Demographics are destiny! The group of people I belong to is superior and we need to genocide or deport all Americans who aren't members of that group!”
Kino Roberto: ”Demographics are destiny! The group of people I belong to is superyah and we need to genocide or deport all Americans who aren't members of that group!”
Bobby doesn't care about pedophilia (surprise!); instead he cares about how a man looks and dresses:
Untitled.png
Looking ugly makes you a paedo?
MarioBob (1).jpg

:thinking:
More random dehumanization, because a woman dared to stand up to our glorious workers in journalism:
-8.png
Greenwald is, overall, a pretty based guy, and this proves it. Journalists get away with shit that would be considered A-logging here at KF, and then say they're ”investigating” people or ”holding them accountable”.

And as per usual, you know Movieblob's lost the argument when he dehumanises his opponents.
I have a feeling that Glenn Greenwald has become Bobby's new Peter Coffin:
8467.png
He has, and Blob can safely bully Greenwald because Greenwald isn't higher on the progressive stack than Blob.
Bobby tells us how much he loves the Maoist way:
-=6.png
> foot soldiers

This man acts like the atsimu at the Capitol was a plot by everyone right of God-Empress Kamala to destabilise Our Democracy™ instead of a few Q boomers taking some guy on 8chan too seriously and stealing Nancy Pelosi's envelopes.
Saint Fentanyl Floyd:
5.png
Not only did Floyd got his trials; he got a whole fucking rap sheet.
You don't support trials? Good to hear, comrade. The People's Revolutionary Council has decided to charge you with being a bourgeois parasite.

Since you're against trials, comrade, all you need to do is face that wall.
Economic anxiety doesn't make people take drugs. Economic anxiety, in some sects of leftist thought, made people vote for Trump. There's a difference.
Celebrating workers -- the wrong workers anyway -- is a sign of Fascism.
67.png
Comparing people on Breadtube who use hurty words to describe St Alexandria of the Bronx to Hitler is incredibly low, even for an Angel.
-=6.png
Just reclaim your garbage and don't come back. I haven't even heard of LilGayX until two weeks before.
Lil Nas X may well be ”conquering the last bastions of refuge” for people who don't like woke capital shoving homosexuality down their throats, but if he is, him and his side are doing it in the same way the Muslims conquered Spain and France.

The Battle of Tours will soon come, and then it'll be time for our Reconquista and an Alhambra Decree of our own.
Pity the Little Angels! (or Mermaids, I don't care)
-=6.png
Threatening to an hero because you won't get hormones is not the best way of proving to everyone you, or troons, are mentally sane.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back