The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%

  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%

  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%
  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
carltondanks said:
Do you think any of the witnesses or prosecutors are going to go on social media and make asses of themselves?
Click to expand...

Is the sun going to rise on Easter?

Coverage of this on TV is so pozzed. By the end of the trial they're going to have you believe that Jesus and the Apostles were sharing needles. I unironically used the word "lügenpresse" yesterday while watching coverage. Somewhere along the way, we really lost the ability to distinguish facts and feelings.

The MSM coverage of the trial today was mostly boiled down to this: "Small children recounted how seeing a man who looked just like their daddy being lynched in the streets made them very sad."

I think part of the inevitable frothing at the mouth and rolling of the eyes (much like the agony of our Lord and Savior on the one true cross) that will happen is going to happen in large part because journalists are tards.

Working people looking for a good trial summary are fed a lot of opinion from people who can't imagine that anyone could possibly view the world from a different perspective.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Donny Cheese, George Oscar Bluth, 6thRanger and 53 others
MikePencePraysToiggers.png
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Knight of the Rope, Chiri and 59 others
KiwiFuzz said:
Is the sun going to rise on Easter?

Coverage of this on TV is so pozzed. By the end of the trial they're going to have you believe that Jesus and the Apostles were sharing needles. I unironically used the word "lügenpresse" yesterday while watching coverage. Somewhere along the way, we really lost the ability to distinguish facts and feelings.

The MSM coverage of the trial today was mostly boiled down to this: "Small children recounted how seeing a man who looked just like their daddy being lynched in the streets made them very sad."

I think part of the inevitable frothing at the mouth and rolling of the eyes (much like the agony of our Lord and Savior on the one true cross) that will happen is going to happen in large part because journalists are tards.

Working people looking for a good trial summary are fed a lot of opinion from people who can't imagine that anyone could possibly view the world from a different perspective.
Click to expand...

I was watching ABC(?) since they had a summary during the lunch break and it was pretty pathetic. "It's so POWERFUL hearing a little girl recount watching someone die" which is typical MSM garbage but what got me was when they said that it would sway the jury that bothered me because holy fuck, you shouldn't play with someone's life by using a little girl to sway the sub 100 IQ retards in the jury.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Exterminatus, cactus and 13 others
KiwiFuzz said:
Is the sun going to rise on Easter?

Coverage of this on TV is so pozzed. By the end of the trial they're going to have you believe that Jesus and the Apostles were sharing needles. I unironically used the word "lügenpresse" yesterday while watching coverage. Somewhere along the way, we really lost the ability to distinguish facts and feelings.

The MSM coverage of the trial today was mostly boiled down to this: "Small children recounted how seeing a man who looked just like their daddy being lynched in the streets made them very sad."

I think part of the inevitable frothing at the mouth and rolling of the eyes (much like the agony of our Lord and Savior on the one true cross) that will happen is going to happen in large part because journalists are tards.

Working people looking for a good trial summary are fed a lot of opinion from people who can't imagine that anyone could possibly view the world from a different perspective.
Click to expand...
Not surprising, this is how they recruit for the riots. You have to drive up peoples anger properly. Sick thing is that it worked last time.
We even had a guy in this thread that didnt believe Floyd was a felon (or high as a kite) until someone told him here. Now imagine the people that stay on MSM/Twitter/Reddit 24/7.
The only thing i really wonder about at this point is if they will start the riots during the trial or afterwards. Maybe they think a major chimpout can affect the trial.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger, NoSpiceLife, Exterminatus and 12 others
KiwiFuzz said:
The MSM coverage of the trial today was mostly boiled down to this: "Small children recounted how seeing a man who looked just like their daddy being lynched in the streets made them very sad."
Click to expand...
The entire defense in general they've put up for him is based on feelings. "What happened is sad, prosecute Chauvin." or the best "There'll be riots if he's acquitted, so we'd better find him guilty." It's surreal. This kinda thing used to be commonplace in the early Soviet Union and still is in China and North Korea. Feelings are the most important tool Marxists have in their arsenal. They want people to think with their emotions ("It's sad someone died, this is systemic racism because he was black, be angry") rather than logic ("He died of a drug overdose he brought on himself, there's no systemic racism in American anymore and the riots, MSM support and trial should prove that") because that's how they get people on their side. Don't question how this perfect equal utopia of worker-owned industry will actually work, just think of how good that would make you feel.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: EvaBraunsGhost, Exterminatus, cactus and 22 others
BiggerChungus said:
The entire defense in general they've put up for him is based on feelings. "What happened is sad, prosecute Chauvin." or the best "There'll be riots if he's acquitted, so we'd better find him guilty." It's surreal. This kinda thing used to be commonplace in the early Soviet Union and still is in China and North Korea. Feelings are the most important tool Marxists have in their arsenal. They want people to think with their emotions ("It's sad someone died, this is systemic racism because he was black, be angry") rather than logic ("He died of a drug overdose he brought on himself, there's no systemic racism in American anymore and the riots, MSM support and trial should prove that") because that's how they get people on their side. Don't question how this perfect equal utopia of worker-owned industry will actually work, just think of how good that would make you feel.
Click to expand...
I'd be willing to bet none of these people are Marxists, they're just faggy liberals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cactus, Giga Brainlet, Neo-Holstien and 4 others
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Nazi Catboi, Coach Kreeton Of All That, Exterminatus and 5 others
artilleryfroth said:
I wish the judge had made that fat attention-seeker delete the photo in front of him, as harmless to the case a it sounds like it was.
Click to expand...
So hear me out on this, what if the fat bitch took the photo to make sure the jury knows its out there.
For some of them who might have been leaning towards innocent the very thought that their identity is now known might be enough to intimidate them without any direct threats.

Like "It would be a shame if Chauvin was found not guilty, just so happens you got a nice looking house and dog." type of thing going on. I know someone linked the criminality of jury intimidation but a societal and implied threat is much less actionable for the justice system.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: AnotherPleb, EvaBraunsGhost, NoSpiceLife and 9 others
BiggerChungus said:
The entire defense in general they've put up for him is based on feelings. "What happened is sad, prosecute Chauvin." or the best "There'll be riots if he's acquitted, so we'd better find him guilty." It's surreal. This kinda thing used to be commonplace in the early Soviet Union and still is in China and North Korea. Feelings are the most important tool Marxists have in their arsenal. They want people to think with their emotions ("It's sad someone died, this is systemic racism because he was black, be angry") rather than logic ("He died of a drug overdose he brought on himself, there's no systemic racism in American anymore and the riots, MSM support and trial should prove that") because that's how they get people on their side. Don't question how this perfect equal utopia of worker-owned industry will actually work, just think of how good that would make you feel.
Click to expand...
"Ignore the facts, focus on the now, not the past or future, and push yourself to work hard so someone else can be better"

Thats all the shit boils down, and next thing you know, you have a Dictator in power, who basically was that Someone else made better, while your forced in a sweatshop 18 hours a day, made to suffer
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundae, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, luigismanslave and 1 other person
KiwiFuzz said:
Is the sun going to rise on Easter?

Coverage of this on TV is so pozzed. By the end of the trial they're going to have you believe that Jesus and the Apostles were sharing needles. I unironically used the word "lügenpresse" yesterday while watching coverage. Somewhere along the way, we really lost the ability to distinguish facts and feelings.

The MSM coverage of the trial today was mostly boiled down to this: "Small children recounted how seeing a man who looked just like their daddy being lynched in the streets made them very sad."

I think part of the inevitable frothing at the mouth and rolling of the eyes (much like the agony of our Lord and Savior on the one true cross) that will happen is going to happen in large part because journalists are tards.

Working people looking for a good trial summary are fed a lot of opinion from people who can't imagine that anyone could possibly view the world from a different perspective.
Click to expand...
A lot of news organizations have found out that sensationalist headlines and absurd news stories get more traffic than regular old news. It was around that time the malaysian airline fell into the ocean and the articles that were viewed the most had titles like "WE FOUND THE PLANE!!!!!1!!1!" But when you actually read the article, they explain that we might have found which area it might have crashed, but the actual plane wreckage still hasn't been located. Also "does bruno mars is gay?" Then it's just been an arms race to think of the most absurd things to put inside a title, so you can get both rage clicks and people who can't believe what they just read in the title. That's why you should never bend the knee to a sensationalist articles or journalist, because "game developer does what we said" won't get traffic, so they'll find something else to criticize you or your product for so they can get that precious ad revenue. Covfefe, 2 scoops, etc.

That's at least what I think happened. Could be wrong. Also not guilty
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Shield Breaker, PozzedByCoronachan, greengrilledcheese and 6 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back