- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
If it plays out like the Zimmerman trial, those who outweigh them and see this case for the farce that it is will pressure and make them swing the other way.
The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!
- Thread starter Random Internet Person
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
O.J Simpson got scot free from 2 indefensible murders because the jury liked him, its not unheard of for a jury to be swayed by frivolous superficial shit
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Juries are shit, they just happen to be the best method we have so far.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
To do what? A civil rights charge? If Chauvin walks it would be more meaningless shrieking. It would never withstand summary dismissal. Jury verdicts are borderline ironclad, and since this show trial has a majority minority jury, how in the fuck will they be able to argue racial animus by the initial fact finders? It's a colossal own goal. They got the jury of their dreams and now they have completely borked the case.
On live video no less. I truly feel bad for these jurors though. History itself has literally plopped them out of their quiet lives and into the middle of the maelstrom. I imagine its not lost on them that more is on trial here then just Chauvin. Pray for them.
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
Not saying it isn't, all i'm saying is: don't be surprised if the jury unanimously declares Derek guilty without a shadow of a doubt
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2020
I'm just hoping the defence gets the toxicology report in, getting sick of the comments on the trial videos accusing anyone who brings up the fact that George Floyd had a lethal overdose of fentanyl in his system of being racist or bringing up irrelevant history about him
Hopefully the actual jury isnt as dumb as the comment section
Hopefully the actual jury isnt as dumb as the comment section
Last edited:
I wonder how many "friendly advice" they've already received, both in-person and via anonymous messages. I can only imagine the Inbox of their e-mail accounts, if anyone from the media got a hold of them and quietly leaked them.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
I have started to re-watch the Karen firefighter questioning. Fucking hilarious. Can't wait to see that bitch back in court.
edit: meh I guess she won't be back.
edit: meh I guess she won't be back.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
At least, unlike with OJ, the criminal trial should be the end of it (unless there are appeals) because the family already got paid off civilly.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
Either case, Chauvin is public enemy #1. He won't ever be a police officer again and his name and face are plastered everywhere to shame.
I'm more concerned about the jury. All it takes is one piece of information and they're hosed. I don't think the city is doing a well enough job of protecting them.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
And that's for the best. Even if he didn't have anything to do with biggus dindus going to the great jungle in the pits of hell, he shouldn't have any future in law enforcement and he might as well move out because niggas rather go to jail than let him live
Edit: and i agree with the city not doing enough for the jury. I moreso don't trust the media not to dox them and plaster their faces on the internet because they didn't kiss the progressive ring
Young Ned of the Hill
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
The Nation will burn regardless. We're talking about anarchists and their pet niggers here.
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2020
About the whole drug thing, at some point there were people saying Floyd was ODing because he swallowed his whole stash at once to hide if from the cops. Is that still the case or was he just ODing on a regular dose?
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2020
I think that it's still the case here... or at least the defense is attempting to prove it (at a snails pace.)
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Defense still hasn't gotten to their witnesses. This is all stuff they are pulling from the prosecution. When it comes to their turn I expect things to pick up again.
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
Hey! This the best inclusive, anti-racist, anti-fascist, ACAB, Islamic, Anti-American, neolib legal team money and virtue signalling can acquire.
I almost feel bad for his mother; imagine thinking your son was begging to see you one last time but it turns out he just wanted his tranny-looking white bitch instead. I wonder if they can sue the state somehow over this and get even more ghetto lottery money?>there's a very good chance that when Floyd was calling out mama in the last few moments of his life he wasn't calling for his actual mother but his junkie SJW Karen mommy gf who'd previously saved him from an OD
How is the prosecution this much of a clown world shitshow? I'm sure plenty of BLM simps are going to start saying the State is intentionally throwing the case because of white supremacy at this point and I might at least sympathize with that if it wasn't blatantly obvious they have no case.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2020
Gypsymagic
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
From my understanding supposedly he only took a few pills which contained fentanyl and meth, while he was being arrested to hide them, but this is also after he was already high as clearly shown in the store before the arrest where he gave us the Fentanyl Shuffle. It's also likely the same pills that sent him to the hospital the month before and the one's that his junkie mama gf took one time, and that she told the FBI it made her feel Jittery, stay up all night, and feel like she was about to die.
JamFlowMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2017
There was footage from a bodycam showing Floyd had something in his mouth which disappeared. Not sure if it was pre trial for this or another case but it was the judge who pointed out he had a "tablet" in his mouth.
Add in the fact his drug dealer was in the car and Floyd had previously ingested drugs during an encounter with police in 2019 and it's a hell of a jumping off point for the defense if all of that information is admissible.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2021
This thread is gold! As a fascinated Britfag, it seems the prosecution has so far established:
- by the testimony of one of their later witnesses, that members of the crowd of witnesses may have contributed to the unfortunate outcome as their actions required Officer Chauvin to focus on their potential as a threat rather than offer aid to Mr Floyd.
- that one of their witnesses may have been a drug dealer who not only provided Mr Floyd with the drugs that contributed to his demise, but also withheld that important information at the time of the incident, when such information could have been of help.
- That Mr Floyd's white girlfriend may have been the 'momma' he was crying out for as she had previously aided him after a previous OD. Thus casting doubt on one of the key emotive takes that 'he died crying for his mother '.
- That a man with a third grade education was giving out sensible advice to Mr Floyd on how to behave and to remain calm.
- That the only person who has thought their actions contributed to the unfortunate outcome was the poor kid behind the counter at the bodega.
- That one of their expert witnesses was not, in fact, qualified to give an expert opinion in the matter he was called to the stand for.
Now, I admit I'm not the brightest of bulbs (and a Britfag, to boot), but it is Officer Chauvin they are meant to be prosecuting, isn't it, not Mr Floyd?
- by the testimony of one of their later witnesses, that members of the crowd of witnesses may have contributed to the unfortunate outcome as their actions required Officer Chauvin to focus on their potential as a threat rather than offer aid to Mr Floyd.
- that one of their witnesses may have been a drug dealer who not only provided Mr Floyd with the drugs that contributed to his demise, but also withheld that important information at the time of the incident, when such information could have been of help.
- That Mr Floyd's white girlfriend may have been the 'momma' he was crying out for as she had previously aided him after a previous OD. Thus casting doubt on one of the key emotive takes that 'he died crying for his mother '.
- That a man with a third grade education was giving out sensible advice to Mr Floyd on how to behave and to remain calm.
- That the only person who has thought their actions contributed to the unfortunate outcome was the poor kid behind the counter at the bodega.
- That one of their expert witnesses was not, in fact, qualified to give an expert opinion in the matter he was called to the stand for.
Now, I admit I'm not the brightest of bulbs (and a Britfag, to boot), but it is Officer Chauvin they are meant to be prosecuting, isn't it, not Mr Floyd?
Last edited:
- Status