I think the judge mentioned that they would be going home to their families after court on day 1 when he was reading them their instructions, but they were explicitly told to avoid media coverage of the trial and not to discuss it with anyone except their immediate family (going by some of their jury profiles, I would be surprised if many of them keep to this)
Also, this isn't the first time a jury has had media attempt to expose them in a high-profile court case. I hate to keep bringing up the Casey Anthony trial, but that one was also very big, and had a lot of angry normies paying attention to it and happened in the Internet age.
This article was published a month before the verdict was delivered.
For Zimmerman's trial,
this article was published a few weeks before the verdict.
And I'm sure there's plenty of other juries who received similar treatment. It's hard to find articles like this on O.J.'s trial that was published at the time due to most news being delivered by TV or paper, but it probably happened there too. I think if journos publishing information about jurors while still keeping them anonymous is considered "jury tampering/intimidation," it would have been addressed at the very least within the last 10 years, so it's really kinda dumb to keep seeing people in the thread to be clutching their pearls and shrieking "The media is doxxxing jurors! This is illegal!" The media's also pretty aware that if they publish any real juror info, it could very quickly lead to a mistrial and that's why they don't publish the jurors' actual personal information, just general profiles of the people on the jury.
Stacey Castor is one of my favorite interrogations just because of how comical that line was, like right out of a cartoon