Coke Zero
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2021
I think the wwe spending was hid so well he didn't have to even explain it. I suspect he was (and still does) including his entire mortgage payment, internet, utilities, etc as "business expenses", basically he classifies all his bills as business expenses because technically he couldn't operate his business if he didn't have a roof over his head or if he was starving to death. The confusing part is he duplicates these exact same expenses as his income after expenses. So he claims his mortgage, utilities etc as business expenses and then says his remaining money goes towards bills like his mortgage, utilities, etc, the stuff he already said was business expenses. Because he double dips like this, its like half his money is actually just for him to waste and have fun with. The idiot who called in during his bankruptcy call was on the right track with this but both Nancy and the lawyer were confused and he let them avoid addressing it further. Neither of them would really think he includes the same bills as business expenses and then as regular living expenses after business expenses so they couldnt grasp what he was trying to point out and he let them move on without looking deeper into what he was saying. If that retard could have explained what he was trying to say better, phil would have had to address the mysterious $5,000 monthly business expenses.He also finished Cyberpunk, THEN got it refunded. That's another -60$. Yeah, those 5k a month in expenses look more plausible every day. You gotta wonder how a bunch of internet sleuths can figure this out but Nancy couldn't.
Tinfoil hat theory: He just fessed up to the Champions whaling behind the scenes and passed it off as a bad business investment. He did intend to do streams of that. After all, Bankruptcy is there to help truly unfortunate or unbelievably irresponsible people. And if Nancy pressed X on it being business related, Rochelle could have just slammed the table, yelled OBJECTION and said "Prove it". It's very nature as a 0 value e-heroin trinket that will one day vanish without a trace when Scopely closes up shop, and it lacking even possible returns like gambling would make it really difficult to prove it was acquired for pleasure. You could just present your client as Schrödinger's idiot. He was just making investments in his business, your honor, and they didn't pan out. No, of course he's not a wasteful closeted homosexual, he has a wife. Yes, of course he kept spending in spite of seeing no returns. If he was smarter he wouldn't need bankruptcy.