The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can he get immunity from his other trial (unrelated charges) for testifying about this one?

Also why is he a prosecution witness anyways? Doesn't "I gave this dumb bastard drugs and a fake 20" hurt their case?
1) Not unless it's related to the GF murder trial
2) I assume the prosecution intended to have him act as a witness when their main argument was that this was an excessive force murder, but now that the drugs have been introduced into the narrative, they've changed their tune. If Chauvin is found not guilty, prosecution is implicitly threatening to go after the drug dealer now (a much more rightful pursuit). I don't think this would be wise if the state's goal is to prevent rioting. Imagine, a rayciss white KKKop gets off and Minnesota pins all the blame on a poor black man who didn't do nuffin, proving how rayciss our criminal justice system is. I don't think the state has any actual plans to do this, but they're keeping it on the table just so that Hall doesn't testify and help the defense.

If he were to get immunity he’d obviously be more likely to not take the fifth. Pleading it obviously looks bad for him but immunity means he’s more likely to go into detail about what Floyd was on and how much he took. That’s a landmine for the prosecution.
If he gets immunity, he can't plead the fifth, since he wouldn't be able to incriminate himself in a situation where he's not criminally liable for anything. He would be compelled to testify and tell the truth of everything that happened that day (including the many questions the defense would use to kneecap the prosecution). This is why the prosecution wants him to keep using his 5th amendment rights.

EDIT: funny how the drug dealer is dressed better and appears more presentable and acts more professional than most of the state witnesses so far.
 
Funniest part about this is they will do it again. They'll say CHAZ was just the "test run" but the next CHAZ will be the REAL THING! Until it fails even harder then the last time then they'll say it wasn't the true CHAZ. Kind of like what they say about communism.
Don't forget tankies, the ones who openly admit actual history and admit Stalin did what he actually did, but think he didn't go far enough. They're even more wrong than consoomer commies, but at least they have the balls to take their absolutely insane ideology to its logical conclusions.

I have a strange fondness for crazy people who at least have the purity of will to maintain ideological consistency.
 
Funniest part about this is they will do it again. They'll say CHAZ was just the "test run" but the next CHAZ will be the REAL THING! Until it fails even harder then the last time then they'll say it wasn't the true CHAZ. Kind of like what they say about communism.
Anachro-Communism is the belief that Communism can only be achieved without any sort of government, state, authority, or any sort of coercion while glorifying the individual. It has more to do with Objectivism than you would think, especially if you look into Max Stirner
CHAZ/CHOP/The Rest are more experiments in human nature, because their belief truly is that if you unshackle everyone from every sort of authority they will spontaneously make a functioning society and prosper. So in the case of the warlord they can also say, that wasn't real Anarcho-Communism, it was a bad actor (although they would never fight him at the time because he's black.) With Anarcho-Communism, their revolution is a human revolution so if there is even a scent of unwanted authority they can always offload the blame onto that.
And if you read back into Anarchist theory, nearly every single time an Anarchist has publicly assassinated someone they were just misunderstood, and any time there was a blatant terrorist plot or harm befalling innocents they just handwave it away as a police plot or a false flag. They will never, ever admit there is such a thing as a bad Anarchist.
 
What's their excuse for the almost completley one sided amounts of interracial violent crime? 20-30 thousand white women are raped by black men each year, while the reverse is virtually non existent by comparison. Must be wypipos fault theyve behaved this way decade after decade
The statistic was like 19k from the survey you're probably citing and that was like 15% of the rapes white women face. A whopping 75% (88k) of rapes on white women come from white men (meanwhile black women are raped 75% of the time by black men). And the reasons that the number is nonexistent on the reverse side is because for the stats you're citing, there were 10 or fewer sample cases surveyed, so the whole thing is bunk to begin with. I remember this whole stink being raised about these stats because David Duke shared them a few years ago.

One annoying thing about this place is that a lot of people here think they're smarter than social media BLM types when the stats they parrot and believe uncritically are just as retarded.
 
Anachro-Communism is the belief that Communism can only be achieved without any sort of government, state, authority, or any sort of coercion.
And it's literally insane. They think rich people are just going to give up their shit? Just because?

No, rich people are going to hire less rich people, and pay those less rich people to put the really less rich people against a wall and fill them with bullets.
 
Don't forget tankies, the ones who openly admit actual history and admit Stalin did what he actually did, but think he didn't go far enough. They're even more wrong than consoomer commies, but at least they have the balls to take their absolutely insane ideology to its logical conclusions.

I have a strange fondness for crazy people who at least have the purity of will to maintain ideological consistency.
Or they will deny Joseph Stalin's crimes and claim his genocide against Crimean Tatars and Chechens was just "CIA and Western propaganda".
 
Why is Judge Cahill wearing the mask now but not during the 8:30 hearing? So strange. I guess it makes him look more objective by not allowing anyone to see how frustrated he looks when the prosecution starts shitting things up.
 
Why is Judge Cahill wearing the mask now but not during the 8:30 hearing? So strange. I guess it makes him look more objective by not allowing anyone to see how frustrated he looks when the prosecution starts shitting things up.
Either that, or it's because earlier there was no one next to him so he had free range to not wear the mask?

Either way, the mask thing is stupid to begin with.
 
Why is Judge Cahill wearing the mask now but not during the 8:30 hearing? So strange. I guess it makes him look more objective by not allowing anyone to see how frustrated he looks when the prosecution starts shitting things up.
This fool and his mask drives me up the wall. I don't care if he wears it at all but at least wear one that doesn't look like a fucking turtle shell. A man of his status should have a custom one.
 
Why is Judge Cahill wearing the mask now but not during the 8:30 hearing? So strange. I guess it makes him look more objective by not allowing anyone to see how frustrated he looks when the prosecution starts shitting things up.
Imagine trying to do everything right in your life, you put in the hours, you did your job, you ended up an actual judge, a dude in a robe who gets to decide other people's fates. And then you're thrust into this fucking shitstorm, where you have the choice of getting lynched by angry groid mobsters or actually presiding over a fair trial. And no matter what you do, no matter what you believe, you are presiding over some serious bullshit. A show trial. And if it turns out not being a show trial and the defendant walks (or even just doesn't get a homicide conviction), then the city you live in burns to the ground.

Welcome to the rice fields, motherfucker.
 
If he were to get immunity he’d obviously be more likely to not take the fifth. Pleading it obviously looks bad for him but immunity means he’s more likely to go into detail about what Floyd was on and how much he took. That’s a landmine for the prosecution.
The judge has to let him testify now, especially with the dealers own attorney outright saying his testimony could implicate him in Floyds murder. That goes on the record even if the Jury will not hear it. That alone would warrant an immediate appeal for Chauvin if the guy is not put on the stand.
 
It's not an election year.

(There's an image out there of Google Search trends for BLM. It spikes in November 2016 and November 2020, then fades away, because the DNC doesn't need their pet chimps except to scare liberals into voting for them.)
Screen Shot 2021-04-06 at 10.41.46 AM.png
 
What's their excuse for the almost completley one sided amounts of interracial violent crime? 20-30 thousand white women are raped by black men each year, while the reverse is virtually non existent by comparison. Must be wypipos fault theyve behaved this way decade after decade

That's easy. Racist white men don't like sheboon pussy. Clearly, white men need to be fixed.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fliddaroonie
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back