No, it was a homicide. Any death which is not A: of natural causes, B: Not deliberately self-inflicted, and C: Has a clear second party involved is homicide. All ODs for instance, since the person had to buy the drugs off someone else.
Why haven't you gotten the fuck out of there? There are plenty of areas where riots weren't an issue.
Medical Examiners' and Coroners' Handbook on Death
Every time I stumble accross Wikipedia users blundering their way through "accurately" "reporting" current political events "without bias" I understand more why it can't be used as a source in high school essays. It's just random people writing down whatever is most PC (although most fringe topics not to do with social-political events are still decent).
This is why I provided the criteria of homicide. This isn't accidental, as there is clear fault at play (An accidental death would be "The ladder broke at the same time and I dropped a hammer on his head") and is a case where literally nobody could be said to be at fault. Its clearly not suicide. And CoD is determinable. That leaves Homicide.
Prosecutor got cucked out of their own witness. That was the biggest happening.
TW: WaPo https://archive.md/GlAR0
WaPo said:
Is there a name for this fallacy? Because I see it in every lib article about anything race-related. They won't come out and say that the defense's arguments are informed by race because that would be too obviously stupid, but they're eager to assert that it "rings of" or "recalls" of some earlier thing and make insinuations.
I remember finding a debate thread from 2009 about a page on "The link between Socialism and the Nazi party" and you could watch the progression over the years until it ended with the entire "Yes there is a link" group being banned, as dozens of new accounts joined. Eventually, one dude went on a schizo rant about how every new user who commented pro link was just the same banned old users. Over like, years.
Day late and a dollar short, but...
The thing they're going do next after they ban guns is get rid of those they don't like.
Something about Nelson violating the 13th amendment on the prosecution.
Judge wanted to catch up to the KF and chan thread. He's downloading all the floyd memes he can carry
If I'm getting you right, its a bit of equivocation (comparing two unlike things as if they're alike) and maybe poisoning the well (pre-emptive discrediting of future arguments by asserting a connection/character flaw when it's unrelated to the actual argument).
I don't want to delve too off topic, but I think there is 0 chance of a gun ban. It's simply unnecessary.
She looks like she gives a very lazy blowjobs on a first date
I doubt people will rise up but I truly believe they will try to get rid of firearm ownership.
