Belief in a supreme being isn't universal either. Grand Orient de France - one of the most well-known and probably the largest of European masonic organizations - promotes secular values and doesn't require members to believe in a supreme being.
That one also accepts women.
Marshall is inferior to every person alive in every way possible. The only good he could ever do would be to commit a murder suicide. Otherwise he's just a beaner manlet, zeta, cuck.
Semper-fucking-fi, my friend. You have once again completely wasted Smelly Melly the Cousinfucker with a dose of actual truth and proof of her moronic posts.Proof to support your claim?
Proof to support your claim?
Proof to support your claim?
If you really didn't care about our unsolicited advice and opinions of you, you wouldn't obsessively post on this forum to respond to them. People don't spend time on things they don't care about.
Also, if you don't care about our unsolicited advice and opinions of you, then they can't be causing you emotional distress. People don't have emotional distress about things they don't care about. Therefore, you are lying to the courts about having emotional distress inflicted on you by posts on this thread, and you have no grounds to sue Null for IIED.
Can't have it both ways, Cousinfucker. You make it way too easy to prove your lies and contradictions.
No one's trying to "penetrate" your worthless life, Smelly Melly. You and Marshall both broadcast the details of your life to the Internet and the court system for all to see and hear.
Projection. Also, that's still not what "narcissistic supply" means. You remain as ignorant about psychology as you are about theology.
Except you are lying again, because you did read it, because you later posted a response to part of it, which is rather impossible to have done if you didn't read it. For someone who lies so often, Clown Car Cunt, you'd think you'd get better at it.
Here we see Cousinfucker is literally reduced to shitting her pants and cutting and pasting "get a life!" at people rather than addressing the actual points being made. This is because a malignant narcissist cannot accept when they have been proven wrong or caught in a lie. It violates the sanctity of the superior identity they have built for themselves, and their ego cannot stand the damage. She knows she's wrong and can't squirm her way out of it, so she just wants to cut and run. Hence, she turns to personally insulting the people making the points and providing the evidence proving her wrong to misdirect everyone from the fact she has, in fact, been proven wrong. This is literally textbook malignant narcissist behavior.
As @Toasty has made several references to the fact she celebrates Beltane, she's not Christian either. Yet again you have been caught in a lie about someone else's religious alignment. I don't know why you're so insistent on projecting your own religion onto people, while simultaneously vehemently denying that it is in fact your religion. It's a fascinating quirk of your psychosis.
Aren't you divorced from Marshall? You made a super big deal about that, about sending him a get or whatever and how that meant you were divorced now.
And you claim to be feminist while doing all this! Hypocrisy, thy name is Melinda Scott.
Here is where Smelly Melly loses her own plot and responds to the post of mine she swore she didn't read because she "didn't care". Proof Smelly Melly is a Liar 4: On Stranger Tides.
The Book of Revelation is a Christian text. It was written in Koine Greek by a Christian seer who called himself Ἰωάννης (Ioannis) in the text. He is often dubbed John of Patmos by scholars since the text described John as living there at the time of writing. Scholars have also determined this was likely not the same author as the one who wrote the Gospel of John or the epistles of 1/2/3 John, based on the style and skill of the author's Greek.
Again, this text was written in Koine Greek, NOT Hebrew or Aramaic. It is NOT part of the Jewish Scriptures according to any denomination of Judaism. The fact it references the Jewish Scriptures does NOT make it a Jewish Scripture any more than your referencing Jewish Scriptures makes you a Jew. Much of the New Testament refers to the Old Testament because Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism that took on a whole life of its own. The Gospels, Acts, and the Epistles also reference the Old Testament, but they are still distinctly Christian works, not Jewish.
Christians are those who believe Yeshua bar Yosef/Jesus of Nazareth/Jesus Christ/whatever you want to call him was the Messiah. Christian Scripture supports this contention. The Book of Revelation explicitly supports this contention in its very first lines:
"The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to him, to show to his servants what things must soon take place, and which he signified when he sent it via his angel to his servant John, who has confirmed as the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ, what all things he saw." -- Revelation 1:1-2
Therefore it is Christian Scripture. No amount of you delusionally claiming it isn't doesn't change the irrefutable facts, Cousinfucker. Your malignant narcissism does not have the power to alter reality to your liking. Your magical thinking can't affect anything outside your own tiny brain.
You are not a Jew, Smelly Melly. You do not have Jewish heritage, and you do not follow any actual form of Judaism. You are an oddball Christian who rejects the writings of Paul but keeps the rest of the New Testament. Nothing more, nothing less. There's nothing wrong with that really; you have the right to your own religious beliefs. And you're not even the first Christian to reject Paul in modern times; for example, the Swedenborgians have been doing it since the late 1700s. But it's pretty telling that you feel the need to lie about said religious beliefs and call them something they are not, in the interest of being more "special" than everyone else.
I think it's been established that she fucks him for a place to stay.
What's really hilarious is the part where she thinks she's a strong matriarch when every man she's ever been with left her with a bastard and nothing else
Philosophical Riddle: if a woman fucks a man, what is she getting from the sex?
A Socialist is not a weak person. A Socialist is a humble person willing to take help when they need it.
I'm going to put aside the fact that your version of my life history is inaccurate here, and instead focus on a term you brought up, because it's pretty radical to use the term "bastard" in the year 2021.
Back to square one: you accuse me of sin.
gaslighting and victim blaming all rolled into oneNot if you're doing ecological breastfeeding correctly!
That doesn't mean she is experienced or knowledgeable about ECOLOGICAL BREASTFEEDING
And yet her site fails to mention any personal experience whatsoever with practicing ecological breastfeeding
I don't respond to anything except philosophical issues about women's sexuality and theological issues of The Hebrew Bible
They do when they are extracting information for legal reasons
So very wrong. This entire paragraph just shows how much self awareness you lack.
gaslightingIt can't be a projection, moron, when I don't even know who you are behind your coward fake profiles
TAG: EXHIBIT
You're absolutely delusional. The word "gathering" was used. The word "E-ster" was not even written
Being written in Greek does not equate to being "Christian".
The only thing "telling" here is your incessant crusade to write long paragraphs to a complete stranger on the internet attempting to write a script to form their reality, history, and identity. Mentally healthy, well adjusted people do not behave that way.
Your lack of self awareness here is astounding. First go learn the difference between gender equality and internalized misogyny.
Aside from the fact that Marshall is bigger in size than that, this comment is so completely SHALLOW. Dick size isn't the measure of a man's value.
Look, if you want to fuck him so bad, just go fuck him. Stop playing this public back and forth game.
First I would like to know why you continuously disparage traditionally feminine interests whenever you get mad at another woman.
Depending on many factors like relationship between them, mutual attraction, performance - many things. From pleasure on one end to pain and humiliation on the other.
Give it to the needy.
There is a difference between charity and social benefits. Social benefits are, for example, easily exploited.
I think only "nigger" is a no-no word in 2021. Possibly other racial and homophobic slurs.
Originally - a child born outside of marriage.
Jewish person born in an incestual or otherwise forbidden relationship, forbidden from entering a congregation. Typical for your Yah-Sothoth to punish children for their parents' deeds.
Whatever we say will turn out to "not be a sin".
That's called "anecdotal evidence". Worthless in a scientific discourse.
If you suffer social abuse it's not because of us.
You can easily deduce some our personality traits based on this thread. I can and you're here much longer than I am.
Yes, but deeds speak louder than words. So, stop preaching, start doing what you preach.
Yes, but you advocate for women to conform with your idea of femininity.
Very rarely. Gigolo more likely. Never heard "bimbo" being used to describe a man. Toyboy would be a good equivalent.
Had no problem following.
No, @Viridian has very scientific style of writing, only spiced up a bit.
1. Ted Kaczynski's pseudonym was "Unabomber".
You mean to tell me ladies posting here secretly hate themselves? I need to press big X for doubt.
Yeah, laughing at guy's size is a low-tier humor. But also funny
Always thought man's value is determined by factors other than the size of his dong but whatever floats your boat.
I grant you a "deviant" rating for this. And I really hope by "bucks" you don't mean "tries to free herself from unwanted sexual advances".
Yes, we know you think it's not. You'd be wrong as per Yeshy the Meshy, and it's not like the majority of us are actually concerned with your imaginary standing with the fella.
Factual statement. Nearly everything we know is from your own admissions.
Mel mad she was proven wrong.
Factually incorrect.
Except you're not. If anything you're torpedoing your case.
IIED is about extreme an unconscionable action that causes extreme distress, which you are clearly not suffering from.
Again, that one was factual. For example, we only learned he was refusing to sign a birth certificate because you told us he was.
Actually that makes it more likely to be a projection. You know nothing about us, and so fill in gaps with your own failings.
Actually it was. Exactly like that. By you. In this post when you said Christians would be away because of it and it would logically be the family gathering you assumed Toasty was done with late on Easter Sunday. Try pedantry all you like, we can and will out pedant you.
In this case, it does. Koine greek is the language of the new testament.
Irony, thy name is Melinda Leigh Scott.
Neither of you are Jewish, neither of you would be allowed to go to Israel. I've stated this before. To them, you're just another person wanting free benefits from their system.
My question was, "why do you disparage women for enjoying typically feminine interests?" Your answer is not relevant. Please try again.
