2021-04-07 - Patrick Sean Tomlinson subpoenas Cloudflare

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let me make sure I understand this dreck; this is a subpoena for Clouldfare in San Francisco, CA to produce records for an action pending in the state of Wisconsin against a bunch of John/Jane Does for saying mean things about him on the internet? Is this a defamation lolsuit?

If he's such a famous and well known public figure as he claims then wouldn't New York Times Co v Sullivan come into play? Or would he have to argue he's actually an insignificant nobody that rants and rages on Twitter and Reddit like a spaaz off his meds?

Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Let me make sure I understand this dreck; this is a subpoena for Clouldfare in San Francisco, CA to produce records for an action pending in the state of Wisconsin against a bunch of John/Jane Does for saying mean things about him on the internet? Is this a defamation lolsuit?

If he's such a famous and well known public figure as he claims then wouldn't New York Times Co v Sullivan come into play? Or would he have to argue he's actually an insignificant nobody that rants and rages on Twitter and Reddit like a spaaz off his meds?

Please correct me if I am wrong.
Slightly. It's a subpoena to the get the information of the owners of the 3 sites. In which, more than likely, they will send subpoenas to the owners for users that were making fun of him. They could've just asked Null where to send service, but the lawyer needs to milk their client a little, so they are taking the extra step.

They never said what it's for. They are just saying, "give me this info, I need it for something. Also, I want their banking accounts."
 
Let me make sure I understand this dreck; this is a subpoena for Clouldfare in San Francisco, CA to produce records for an action pending in the state of Wisconsin against a bunch of John/Jane Does for saying mean things about him on the internet? Is this a defamation lolsuit?

If he's such a famous and well known public figure as he claims then wouldn't New York Times Co v Sullivan come into play? Or would he have to argue he's actually an insignificant nobody that rants and rages on Twitter and Reddit like a spaaz off his meds?

Please correct me if I am wrong.
I don't think you're wrong with the exception of his intent. He doesn't want money for defamation, he wants to powertrip by having the courts do the doxing of all the meanieheads who said bad words about him.
 
Let me make sure I understand this dreck; this is a subpoena for Clouldfare in San Francisco, CA to produce records for an action pending in the state of Wisconsin against a bunch of John/Jane Does for saying mean things about him on the internet? Is this a defamation lolsuit?

If he's such a famous and well known public figure as he claims then wouldn't New York Times Co v Sullivan come into play? Or would he have to argue he's actually an insignificant nobody that rants and rages on Twitter and Reddit like a spaaz off his meds?

Please correct me if I am wrong.
This is little more than an extremely expensive and pathetic attempt at doxxing some people who say mean things about him on the internet using money that he got from PPP loans intended to help businesses that were struggling during covid.
 
They never said what it's for. They are just saying, "give me this info, I need it for something. Also, I want their banking accounts."
I don't think you're wrong with the exception of his intent. He doesn't want money for defamation, he wants to powertrip by having the courts do the doxing of all the meanieheads who said bad words about him.
This is little more than an extremely expensive and pathetic attempt at doxxing some people who say mean things about him on the internet using money that he got from PPP loans intended to help businesses that were struggling during covid.
Depending on the action in WI this could be easily quashed by a second year mid-tier law school student.

Edit: @artilleryfroth coming for me next
 
This is little more than an extremely expensive and pathetic attempt at doxxing some people who say mean things about him on the internet using money that he got from PPP loans intended to help businesses that were struggling during covid.
Isn't the standard response to Civil/non criminal supoena's for annonymous user info by most ISP' s some variant on "go fuck yourself"?
 
Mainly because we have enough alogs on our own
Our peoples were peaceful refugees, willing to trade arts & crafts for a place to post. Here's lil' taste, "Abduction of Fatrick's First Wife and Daughter" by artist Mewlbrandt, in wool.

knittening.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back