Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

There's just so many and I wouldn't want you getting overwhelmed.
@Postal_Rat
I suggest a compromise:
1617908795396.png

This way no matter where a rat is going you'll have some power over them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Postal_Rat
When I die, I go to Crom. He is strong! If I die, I have to go before him, and he will ask me, "What is the riddle of steel?" If I don't know it, he will cast me out of Valhalla and laugh at me. That's Crom, strong on his Mountain!
Your father was wise. (by the way, there's similar thing in Buddhism).
 
Folkvangr seems like a nice place to reside after death. Can we go there after Mel tries to wage war with her puny deity?
I mean, why wait? Let's head there on the next bus. I'm sure there's a bus headed there soon. It's finding the bus back that's a bit tricky, mind.

Like Buddhist's after life. That shit can get confusing. Hungry Ghosts are awesome though.
Aren't there an effectively infinite series of thereafters in Bhuddism?

@Postal_Rat
I suggest a compromise:
View attachment 2070597
This way no matter where a rat is going you'll have some power over them.
Indeed, and you'll look quite dapper in the cloak.

Great Idea I'm on board
Excellent. Just don't get the deliveries mixed up with the pickups as it were and you're good to go.

When I die, I go to Crom. He is strong! If I die, I have to go before him, and he will ask me, "What is the riddle of steel?" If I don't know it, he will cast me out of Valhalla and laugh at me. That's Crom, strong on his Mountain!
Words from a far wiser scholar and philosopher than Melinda shall ever be.
 
Aren't there an effectively infinite series of thereafters in Bhuddism?
Depends on the Buddhism you believe in, or if you combined a few to make your own (Which you can do, it's not wrong to do so. If you didn't find enlightenment with it, doesn't mean someone else wont. It's pretty common practice in Japan).

Bhavacakra for instance is the Wheel of Existence. That's Mahayana Buddhism.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: ConSluttant
Leviticus 19:34 The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt

We've already discussed this passage.

But I'll repeat it...

Keyword: "...residing among you". Goyim NEVER were allowed within the gates of Israel. Word there for "foreigner" is not Goy, it's GER.

Further you Goyim do not "reside among [me]". You're worthy of nothing but my hatred, contempt, and disgust.

I am kind to GeR though. I consider they might be Lost Sheep.


PigLinda thinks an endless string of losers should want to put up with spending their live's time and savings feeding and supporting her pack of autistic niglet/piglets,
This kind of statement is typical of the Goyim cultures.

In Ancient Paths cultures, children are assets, especially for agricultural contributions to the household. A wealthy Israelite man with land would gladly welcome marrying a woman with many children who would contribute to working the land.

Too big a thought for you, I know, I know.

I mean things like stamina, not attractiveness.

Are you about to tell me that a woman over 30 is going to run out of breath fucking a man?

I don't think you've been with a woman over 30...

Should I mention that the woman Melinda likes to link to was divorced in 2009 after separating in 2008?
This kind of argument goes against Kantian Ethics.

Kantian Ethics: The consequences of an action do not determine its moral worth.

Person A might not finish a book, doesn't mean they shouldn't try to read.


Modern society is very hedonistic and materialistic. Marrying for money is being brainwashed by modern society.

Yet isn't that what Capitalism drives people to do?
 
This kind of argument goes against Kantian Ethics.

Kantian Ethics: The consequences of an action do not determine its moral worth.

Person A might not finish a book, doesn't mean they shouldn't try to read.
Actually Kantian Ethics is "It is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be considered good without limitation except a good will"

But a good try. E for effort.

By the way, did you know his writing influenced people like Karl Marx? Look how that turned out over the years. You should read about the criticism Kant has. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel is one of my favourites.

How is this relevant to the modern day United States?
Same way Richard Watson thinks the ancients affect modern day. Aliens!
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: ConSluttant
I am kind to GeR though. I consider they might be Lost Sheep.
What's the difference other than your personal feelings about specific person?
This kind of statement is typical of the Goyim cultures.
Could you name some Ger cultures?
In Ancient Paths cultures, children are assets, especially for agricultural contributions to the household. A wealthy Israelite man with land would gladly welcome marrying a woman with many children who would contribute to working the land.
It's ancient. That means: long ago. World changed, wherever you like it or not. Adopt or stay behind.
Are you about to tell me that a woman over 30 is going to run out of breath fucking a man?
Are you about to tell me life \ sex life ends around 30? I mean much older.
I don't think you've been with a woman over 30...
I'm not you so I'm not going into details about my sex life but I'll have you know I'm a bit older than you. Fill the blanks :)
Kantian Ethics: The consequences of an action do not determine its moral worth.

Person A might not finish a book, doesn't mean they shouldn't try to read.
I know it under another name.
Yet isn't that what Capitalism drives people to do?
I already told you I'm not some crazed anarchocapitalist or lolbertarian. I believe we need to find balance between free market and social support system. And, just for the sake of this discussion, actual hard work and contributing to society.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel is one of my favourites.
1618017970198.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
We've already discussed this passage.

But I'll repeat it...

Keyword: "...residing among you". Goyim NEVER were allowed within the gates of Israel. Word there for "foreigner" is not Goy, it's GER.
Well shit lets do some reading on the difference


A ger toshav ("resident alien") is a Gentile (non-Jew) living in the Land of Israel who accepts to follow the Seven Laws of Noah

The seven commandments of the Noahic Covenant to which the ger toshav agrees to be bound are enumerated in the Babylonian Talmud

And the commandments of noah are
  1. Do not worship idols.
  2. Do not curse God.
  3. Do not murder.
  4. Do not commit adultery, bestiality, or sexual immorality.
  5. Do not steal.
  6. Do not eat flesh torn from a living animal.
  7. Establish courts of justice.
Well shit I was already doing that weird how low that bar is

almost like it was never meant to absolve white trash of being white trash by dehumanizing the rest of humanity oh well

Further you Goyim do not "reside among [me]". You're worthy of nothing but my hatred, contempt, and disgust.
that's right you would only ever sleep with them and use them to have children but never reside with them their basically animals
 
We've already discussed this passage.

But I'll repeat it...

Keyword: "...residing among you". Goyim NEVER were allowed within the gates of Israel. Word there for "foreigner" is not Goy, it's GER.

Further you Goyim do not "reside among [me]". You're worthy of nothing but my hatred, contempt, and disgust.

I am kind to GeR though. I consider they might be Lost Sheep.



This kind of statement is typical of the Goyim cultures.

In Ancient Paths cultures, children are assets, especially for agricultural contributions to the household. A wealthy Israelite man with land would gladly welcome marrying a woman with many children who would contribute to working the land.

Too big a thought for you, I know, I know.



Are you about to tell me that a woman over 30 is going to run out of breath fucking a man?

I don't think you've been with a woman over 30...


This kind of argument goes against Kantian Ethics.

Kantian Ethics: The consequences of an action do not determine its moral worth.

Person A might not finish a book, doesn't mean they shouldn't try to read.




Yet isn't that what Capitalism drives people to do?
Somebody noticed that her thread had fallen off the first page again, so we got this pile of bullshit.
 
Don't think she was trying to butcher relativism, but definitely managed to butcher the laughably basic-to-the-point-of-a-toddler-understanding-it concept, "Morality is based on intent, not result of an action". Shuffling the words around doesn't make you sound smart, Matilda. It just tells the teacher you're copying off of your neighbouring student's test paper.
 
Back