The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Even more " Non-bias" thumbnails that are not influencing people's opinions
20210413_122809.jpg

I think once this dog and pony show is over the verdict is going to be predictable. I know that's been said. However since officer chauvin has already been convicted in the court of public opinion the jury will follow suit
 
It technically works as the lighter mass of the target trigger has less momentum on impact that the regular triggers. That being said, yeah, it's a shit, half-baked fix.
This is completely off-topic; the more widespread the weapon, the more common it’s faults. As long as it averages at 60% on meaningful metrics, it’s a fine weapon.
 
Even more " Non-bias" thumbnails that are not influencing people's opinions
View attachment 2084475
I think once this dog and pony show is over the verdict is going to be predictable. I know that's been said. However since officer chauvin has already been convicted in the court of public opinion the jury will follow suit
>"BLACK LIFE" on his lips :story:
 
Even more " Non-bias" thumbnails that are not influencing people's opinions
View attachment 2084475
I think once this dog and pony show is over the verdict is going to be predictable. I know that's been said. However since officer chauvin has already been convicted in the court of public opinion the jury will follow suit
Is this a Catholic church?
 
I know that's been said but since the officer chauvin has already been convicted in the court of public opinion the jury will follow suit
Yeah just like zimmerman and darrel wilson were right?
By my count, the not guilty outweigh the guilty in these big public cases, take from that what you will, but certainly don't think what random faggots on twitter say, or what niggers burning down a target think, is an accurate representation of what a court will necessarily decide
 
Even more " Non-bias" thumbnails that are not influencing people's opinions
View attachment 2084475
I think once this dog and pony show is over the verdict is going to be predictable. I know that's been said. However since officer chauvin has already been convicted in the court of public opinion the jury will follow suit
Holy shit what is that font m8
 
Anyways any fun from the defenses witnesses? I still assume we're at the weakest witnesses right now.

Did they get the earlier arrest submitted as evidence?
1) The third witness, Shawanda Hill, was really pissy with the prosecution and she might have been on something. She was acting borderline retarded and very frustrated. It was hilarious. The prosecutor asked her a question about Floyd's demeanor and she went into some kind of story out of a comedy movie, complete with hand gestures and impersonations. I think Nelson only brought her in to testify that Floyd was falling asleep suddenly due to his fent overdoses (She was the woman who was in Floyd's car buying drugs from Morries Hall). She tried to say "Yes he was fallin asleep but dat was because he was werkin late" but the second half of that was cut off by a non-response objection. Highly recommend checking out just that segment if absolutely nothing else.

2) Yes, the first two witnesses this morning were a cop and paramedic from the 2019 arrest and they were able to submit the bodycam footage from it as evidence. They were both cross-examined by a frankly furious and witchlike Erin Eldridge, who came across as much colder and focused than she was when conducting direct over the last few weeks.
 
Last edited:
>"BLACK LIFE" on his lips :story:
I just noticed that lol
Is this a Catholic church?
Yes
Yeah just like zimmerman and darrel wilson were right?
By my count, the not guilty outweigh the guilty in these big public cases, take from that what you will, but certainly don't think what random faggots on twitter say, or what niggers burning down a target think, is an accurate representation of what a court will necessarily decide
I think in this case it's a little different because they spent an entire year burning down cities in the name of fentanyl Floyd the saintly. And Reversing that narrative is going to be hard
 
I just noticed that lol

Yes

I think in this case it's a little different because they spent an entire year burning down cities in the name of fentanyl Floyd the saintly. And Reversing that narrative is going to be hard
There was a lot of protesting in the wake of Trayvon Martin's death as well. It wasn't a full year, but it's not like it was quiet. I don't remember personally if it involved full-on riots, but either way, in this case all of the jurors were asked about potential fear for their safety and all said that they could put it aside for the sake of a fair trial and their fears were mostly assuaged by the promise of anonymity until some date after the trial. I think "public reactions" really won't have as huge an effect on the jury's decision at this time as many people are speculating.
 
I think in this case it's a little different because they spent an entire year burning down cities in the name of fentanyl Floyd the saintly. And Reversing that narrative is going to be hard
That's why I want Chauvin acquitted. If he's convicted, the Summer of Love is rewarded, and the Left will henceforth riot whenever they want something.
 
I think in this case it's a little different because they spent an entire year burning down cities in the name of fentanyl Floyd the saintly. And Reversing that narrative is going to be hard
lmao, were you paying attention during the coverage of st. michael brown or blessed trayvon's horrible murders? It's hardly different, aside from rioting being more widespread with floyd, and that can be taken in a nearly infinite number of directions.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he won't be found guilty, I'm not even saying bias won't play into it, but I keep seeing people insisting he will absolutely 10000% be found guilty bc jury are sheeple and it's already over, despite having no good proof or evidence for this aside from "yeah everyone is a mindless ZOGbot who can never think for themselves and won't put any thought into this trial because they're so brainwashed and are all mindless nigger cattle (except me)"
Not even saying to have a little faith, just give some actual reasoning, or at least let nool give me my clock reaction back
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back