The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
1618343528319.png
 
Seriously, what the fuck is reddit's problem with schools?
Take a swig every time they make a school or capeshit analogy. You'll black out within minutes.
View attachment 2084793
When Reddit grows up and finds itself surrounded by violent raiders intent on stealing, raping and murdering everything and everyone around them they will see the value in classifying threats as either black (dangerous) or white (benign). Some will persist in holding on their fairy tale view of the cosmos but they will not be around to pass on their genes.
 
When Reddit grows up and finds itself surrounded by violent raiders intent on stealing, raping and murdering everything and everyone around them they will see the value in classifying threats as either black (dangerous) or white (benign). Some will persist in holding on their fairy tale view of the cosmos but they will not be around to pass on their genes.

Let's not pretend that all white threats are benign. There's some Night of the Living Dead shit around where I live.

The difference is that you're allowed to openly hate white losers.
 
Clip or gtfo.

Still images don't tell whether it's a transition of where he knee is/was or if he's even begun to apply pressure to that area.
That lower circle is very low and small if that's supposed to be his entire upper back. Is the prosecutor trying to suggest our arms are connected to our throat?
He says the lower circle is the still is Floyd's upper back, the upper one is his neck.
 
Just because some of the posters here are falling for the bit: The trial is not about whether or not chauvin was a good cop or if he followed policy correctly. It's about whether or not he intentionally or unintentionally killed floyd (murder and manslaughter charges). The very evidence of drugs in his system, bad heart, and having covid exudes reasonable doubt to the point that the prosecution has to flounder with semantics and move the goal post like they are now.

This will all be nullified in the minds of the jurors if Nelson does his closing argument correctly.
 
Looks like the prosecutor got stumped there. I'd like to point out, Ladies and Gentlemen, that he's mostly debating semantics and hypotheticals. I know he's seeking to make the expert's previous testimony seem unreliable, but even an apathetic jury must surely note that instead of facts we're getting yet again more rhetoric.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back