Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Allow me to make a theoretical statement. If someone named Melinda THEORETICALLY wanted to no longer be a subject of discussions by an internet forum with an agriculturally inclined name, she THEORETICALLY should stop posting, take her lumps, and stop filing lawsuits. She should stop trying to prove she's superior to other people and just let the THEORETICAL spotlight fade away. Of course, if this THEORETICAL Melinda didn't do that, everyone else would have to THEORETICALLY conclude that she THEORETICALLY craved the attention and was merely THEORETICALLY upset at being shown up repeatedly.
But let’s say THEORETICALLY that person is a total fucking moron who has the IQ of a common house plant, then THEORETICALLY she’d have no skills beyond acting like a retard on the internet. Additionally, if this person was THEORETICALLY a narcissist, she couldn’t admit she was wrong. THEORETICALLY, in Minecraft or whatever the fuck.

In closing, Smelly Melly is not THEORETICALLY fat, she is actually fat and I would not have sex with her, even though 10+ guys and her cousin threw caution and good hygiene to the wind and tossed a hot dog down that hallway.
 
But let’s say THEORETICALLY that person is a total fucking moron who has the IQ of a common house plant, then THEORETICALLY she’d have no skills beyond acting like a retard on the internet. Additionally, if this person was THEORETICALLY a narcissist, she couldn’t admit she was wrong. THEORETICALLY, in Minecraft or whatever the fuck.

In closing, Smelly Melly is not THEORETICALLY fat, she is actually fat and I would not have sex with her, even though 10+ guys and her cousin threw caution and good hygiene to the wind and tossed a hot dog down that hallway.
1618289545461.png
 
Your beliefs are retarded there are no mentions of male concubines in the old or new testament and 80% of the time the concubines turns out to be nothing but trouble anyway. frankly it was always a rich mans game

oh and before you try and bullshit me about how the ancient Israelites were totally gender equal can you explain to me why we have Jesus's ancestry for 40 generations and know all 40 of his male ancestors but only 4 of his female ancestors? Hell while we're here can you name a single queen of Israel?

it's a fundamentally patriarchally belief system where you don't have those rights and trying to prove you wrong is only difficult in the same way it's hard to find a manual for a flush toilet


Genesis 3:16

To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.
Genesis 3:16 is a curse, not a command. It's not something to replicate, it's a punishment. Further, it is a curse given to Chavah and Adam, not all men and women. The "you" there is singular. As in, "you" Chavah.

Every nation that has oppressed women or silenced their views has eventually decayed and fallen away.

Now, usually people try to counter with something like "then why do women have pain in childbirth?". Look closer! It does NOT say that the punishment is "pain in childbirth". It says INCREASED pain in childbirth. Evil actions create hard childbirth labors for YHWH's people.

The Hebrew Bible is not patriarchal. That's a historical reconstruction invented by Rabbinical Judaism and reinforced by Pauline Christianity and Catholicism.

The reason only Tamar and Bathsheba are listed in the genealogies of The Messiah are twofold: (1) Tamar and Bathsheba were not virgins. It is against The Torah to bring a bad name on a Virgin daughter of Israel (Deut. 22:19). Most of the women in ancient Israel married as Virgins. Their parents were expected to protect them in their parental houses until marriage. They didn't expose their daughters to go it alone in society. In order to protect the women their names were ommitted. The absence of their names is not their lack of importance, it's for their protection.

Speaking against someone's wife is offensive and a sin in The Torah. There is a prohibition against Slander in The Torah. That is why it is written: "Many sins will be forgiven but blasphemy against The Ruach will not be forgiven". The Ruach is a female, the Wife of Elohim. You talk against her, you're toast.

(2) Second reason Tamar is mentioned: she lay with Judah. Reminding the reader that The Messiah came from Judah goes back to Jacob's prophecy in Genesis about his son Judah bringing in the Messianic line.

You're also wrong that there were no male concubines in The Hebrew Bible ("Old Testament" you call it)
Proof:

For more on what I said above you can read here. It's a lengthy topic, and the theme of my publicly published research:

"Gender Equality in The Torah"



"Is Woman an object in The Torah?"




How many times have you sinned by mistake and how many goats have you bled out and sent as a burned offering to your God. You have admitted more than one mistaken sin, but I bet you don't have the ovaries to kill a goat. Sending the goat to a processing plant and cooking it on a grill doesn't count.

I've accidentally have eaten things that have defiled my body. I used to celebrate X-mas. These sins are forgivable. The Torah says blood can atone for them. I claim the blood of The Messiah as my Atonement



They probably hate your crazy ass though.

My children love me in return. They tell me. They show me by their actions.

My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.

So, you're saying that you were and currently are living with Marshall? Because you can't do that and remain an LAT couple.
The key part there is: "harmony in the same abode(s) together". I believe a married couple can be also a LAT couple as long as the intent is made clear: "I'm going to house A for 3 days because you are being a jerk.".

Both people communicate and agree to maintain Monogamy. Separations aren't used for silent treatment, ghosting or infidelity.

My situation with Marshall is COMPLICATED. I have huge moral dilemmas I am facing. Life choices I have to make. Children are involved. Financial issues are involved. It's not an easy answer! Everytime I make a choice, Marshall bargains. He's really really good at saying sorry. We also have a lot of sexual chemistry. All these factors. Not easy!

But my 5 year Shidduch anniversary with Marshall is coming in July. Can't believe it's been 5 years already. But I told myself that I have to decide for good by then. No more going back and forth with telling him I'm leaving/abandoning the Covenant after that. Either I stay for good, reach a point of acceptance and find a way to live with him, our differences and all. Or I go for good to live in peace with the positive and potentially negative consequences of my choice.

Allow me to introduce myself again. I am number 7

Like, you want to be my male concubine? Or you're an ex of mine?

The way some of you come at me, I gotta wonder! LoL
 
Almost a thousand pages and Mel is still back with Marshall claiming she’s really gonna leave him this time, still not selling her books, still claiming her adolescent children that depend on her to throw cilantro leaves in their cages to eat are praising her out of the goodness of their wicked Yabooblyboi cursed soul-hearts, still repeating the same phrases but never really understanding the questions posed to her, still probably thinks I’m Wiccan and half the board is Christian- You think her made up deity cursed her to never move forward in life?
 
Genesis 3:16 is a curse, not a command. It's not something to replicate, it's a punishment. Further, it is a curse given to Chavah and Adam, not all men and women. The "you" there is singular. As in, "you" Chavah.

Every nation that has oppressed women or silenced their views has eventually decayed and fallen away.

Now, usually people try to counter with something like "then why do women have pain in childbirth?". Look closer! It does NOT say that the punishment is "pain in childbirth". It says INCREASED pain in childbirth. Evil actions create hard childbirth labors for YHWH's people.

The Hebrew Bible is not patriarchal. That's a historical reconstruction invented by Rabbinical Judaism and reinforced by Pauline Christianity and Catholicism.

The reason only Tamar and Bathsheba are listed in the genealogies of The Messiah are twofold: (1) Tamar and Bathsheba were not virgins. It is against The Torah to bring a bad name on a Virgin daughter of Israel (Deut. 22:19). Most of the women in ancient Israel married as Virgins. Their parents were expected to protect them in their parental houses until marriage. They didn't expose their daughters to go it alone in society. In order to protect the women their names were ommitted. The absence of their names is not their lack of importance, it's for their protection.

Speaking against someone's wife is offensive and a sin in The Torah. There is a prohibition against Slander in The Torah. That is why it is written: "Many sins will be forgiven but blasphemy against The Ruach will not be forgiven". The Ruach is a female, the Wife of Elohim. You talk against her, you're toast.

(2) Second reason Tamar is mentioned: she lay with Judah. Reminding the reader that The Messiah came from Judah goes back to Jacob's prophecy in Genesis about his son Judah bringing in the Messianic line.

You're also wrong that there were no male concubines in The Hebrew Bible ("Old Testament" you call it)
Proof:

For more on what I said above you can read here. It's a lengthy topic, and the theme of my publicly published research:

"Gender Equality in The Torah"



"Is Woman an object in The Torah?"






I've accidentally have eaten things that have defiled my body. I used to celebrate X-mas. These sins are forgivable. The Torah says blood can atone for them. I claim the blood of The Messiah as my Atonement





My children love me in return. They tell me. They show me by their actions.

My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.


The key part there is: "harmony in the same abode(s) together". I believe a married couple can be also a LAT couple as long as the intent is made clear: "I'm going to house A for 3 days because you are being a jerk.".

Both people communicate and agree to maintain Monogamy. Separations aren't used for silent treatment, ghosting or infidelity.

My situation with Marshall is COMPLICATED. I have huge moral dilemmas I am facing. Life choices I have to make. Children are involved. Financial issues are involved. It's not an easy answer! Everytime I make a choice, Marshall bargains. He's really really good at saying sorry. We also have a lot of sexual chemistry. All these factors. Not easy!

But my 5 year Shidduch anniversary with Marshall is coming in July. Can't believe it's been 5 years already. But I told myself that I have to decide for good by then. No more going back and forth with telling him I'm leaving/abandoning the Covenant after that. Either I stay for good, reach a point of acceptance and find a way to live with him, our differences and all. Or I go for good to live in peace with the positive and potentially negative consequences of my choice.



Like, you want to be my male concubine? Or you're an ex of mine?

The way some of you come at me, I gotta wonder! LoL
Didn't read.

Show shithole or gunt.

Do you have an anal aura? An anal aura is a glowing ring around the sphincter that is very inviting. When one looks at it, it's like being in a trance. It lures you in and speaks to you asking you to come home tot he cozy place. It makes you want to eat it, love it, worship it, become it even! I hear anal auras taste very sweet.
 
Now, usually people try to counter with something like "then why do women have pain in childbirth?". Look closer! It does NOT say that the punishment is "pain in childbirth". It says INCREASED pain in childbirth. Evil actions create hard childbirth labors for YHWH's people.

The Hebrew Bible is not patriarchal. That's a historical reconstruction invented by Rabbinical Judaism and reinforced by Pauline Christianity and Catholicism.

"then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days."

Deuteronomy 22:29

"When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do."

Exodus 21:7

Sounds like complete equality to me nothing to sneeze at

The reason only Tamar and Bathsheba are listed in the genealogies of The Messiah are twofold: (1) Tamar and Bathsheba were not virgins. It is against The Torah to bring a bad name on a Virgin daughter of Israel (Deut. 22:19). Most of the women in ancient Israel married as Virgins. Their parents were expected to protect them in their parental houses until marriage. They didn't expose their daughters to go it alone in society. In order to protect the women their names were ommitted. The absence of their names is not their lack of importance, it's for their protection.

Speaking against someone's wife is offensive and a sin in The Torah. There is a prohibition against Slander in The Torah. That is why it is written: "Many sins will be forgiven but blasphemy against The Ruach will not be forgiven". The Ruach is a female, the Wife of Elohim. You talk against her, you're toast.
Umm Melinda I know you suffered some pretty massive head trauma but you know to produce little patriarchs......... I mean as much as you seem experienced in popping out burdens to the taxpayer I think you could have worked out that in Jesus's lineage only one of them was a virgin and its the one we know the most about.

Secondly for that to be protection against slander being on that list would in some way have to be a bad thing furthermore I doubt all the lads are going to be like "hey remember Ram's wife total slut" she was dead for a pretty considerable time when that got written down you know.


Pretentious self citing
Melinda the only thing your an expert in is boxed wine.


My children love me in return. They tell me. They show me by their actions.

My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.
I won't believe it until I hear it from their mouths and you teach them morse code so they can blink out torture
The key part there is: "harmony in the same abode(s) together". I believe a married couple can be also a LAT couple as long as the intent is made clear: "I'm going to house A for 3 days because you are being a jerk.".

Both people communicate and agree to maintain Monogamy. Separations aren't used for silent treatment, ghosting or infidelity.

My situation with Marshall is COMPLICATED. I have huge moral dilemmas I am facing. Life choices I have to make. Children are involved. Financial issues are involved. It's not an easy answer! Everytime I make a choice, Marshall bargains. He's really really good at saying sorry. We also have a lot of sexual chemistry. All these factors. Not easy!

But my 5 year Shidduch anniversary with Marshall is coming in July. Can't believe it's been 5 years already. But I told myself that I have to decide for good by then. No more going back and forth with telling him I'm leaving/abandoning the Covenant after that. Either I stay for good, reach a point of acceptance and find a way to live with him, our differences and all. Or I go for good to live in peace with the positive and potentially negative consequences of my choice.
He's a flat earth moron with a history of domestic abuse what is there to consider he's clearly a catch and the best you can hope for
 
Last edited:
Genesis 3:16 is a curse, not a command. It's not something to replicate, it's a punishment. Further, it is a curse given to Chavah and Adam, not all men and women. The "you" there is singular. As in, "you" Chavah.
...and only that one specific snake was forced to crawl in the dust. We all know any other snake to this day has long, beautiful legs.
Every nation that has oppressed women or silenced their views has eventually decayed and fallen away.
Pretty much every nation oppressed women one way or another. Some decayed, some thrived and thrive to this day.
Now, usually people try to counter with something like "then why do women have pain in childbirth?". Look closer! It does NOT say that the punishment is "pain in childbirth". It says INCREASED pain in childbirth. Evil actions create hard childbirth labors for YHWH's people.
I challenge you to prove a correlation between one's moral standing and their labor pains. I don't accept anecdotal evidence or evidence based on faith, I want actual science.
The Hebrew Bible is not patriarchal. That's a historical reconstruction invented by Rabbinical Judaism and reinforced by Pauline Christianity and Catholicism.
Do you claim to be better informed than actual historians who researched it?
The reason only Tamar and Bathsheba are listed in the genealogies of The Messiah are twofold: (1) Tamar and Bathsheba were not virgins. It is against The Torah to bring a bad name on a Virgin daughter of Israel (Deut. 22:19). Most of the women in ancient Israel married as Virgins. Their parents were expected to protect them in their parental houses until marriage. They didn't expose their daughters to go it alone in society. In order to protect the women their names were ommitted. The absence of their names is not their lack of importance, it's for their protection.
Then why omit their names even AFTER they were married and no longer virgins?
And how is being mentioned in a holy book "bringing a bad name"?
Speaking against someone's wife is offensive and a sin in The Torah. There is a prohibition against Slander in The Torah. That is why it is written: "Many sins will be forgiven but blasphemy against The Ruach will not be forgiven". The Ruach is a female, the Wife of Elohim. You talk against her, you're toast.
It's "wind" (/"spirit"), not "wife".
My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.
I felt genuine sadness reading this.
My situation with Marshall is COMPLICATED. I have huge moral dilemmas I am facing. Life choices I have to make. Children are involved. Financial issues are involved. It's not an easy answer! Everytime I make a choice, Marshall bargains. He's really really good at saying sorry. We also have a lot of sexual chemistry. All these factors. Not easy!
I'd give you an (unsolicited) advice to think with your head rather than with your genitals for once but I fully expect to be ignored.
Like, you want to be my male concubine? Or you're an ex of mine?
You mean you don't even remember your exes? :)
 
My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.
15-18 is usually the age where the veneer of your parents being perfect falls away and the reality of their flaws hits you in the face. If a single one of your children is still in contact with you by the time your youngest is 25, either you will have done a hard 180 in attitude or God really does have a sick sense of humor.
 
My children love me in return. They tell me. They show me by their actions.

My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.
I just skim this thread for the most part, because Melinda is far too verbose for the stupid she spews, and I don't have the time or desire to really read that deep into the copious rantings of a madwoman, but this jumped out at me.

I'd never seen an inverse "My mom says I'm special." That's the kind of shit that keeps me skimming this shitshow of inane jibberings.
 
Genesis 3:16 is a curse, not a command. It's not something to replicate, it's a punishment. Further, it is a curse given to Chavah and Adam, not all men and women. The "you" there is singular. As in, "you" Chavah.

Every nation that has oppressed women or silenced their views has eventually decayed and fallen away.

Now, usually people try to counter with something like "then why do women have pain in childbirth?". Look closer! It does NOT say that the punishment is "pain in childbirth". It says INCREASED pain in childbirth. Evil actions create hard childbirth labors for YHWH's people.

The Hebrew Bible is not patriarchal. That's a historical reconstruction invented by Rabbinical Judaism and reinforced by Pauline Christianity and Catholicism.

The reason only Tamar and Bathsheba are listed in the genealogies of The Messiah are twofold: (1) Tamar and Bathsheba were not virgins. It is against The Torah to bring a bad name on a Virgin daughter of Israel (Deut. 22:19). Most of the women in ancient Israel married as Virgins. Their parents were expected to protect them in their parental houses until marriage. They didn't expose their daughters to go it alone in society. In order to protect the women their names were ommitted. The absence of their names is not their lack of importance, it's for their protection.

Speaking against someone's wife is offensive and a sin in The Torah. There is a prohibition against Slander in The Torah. That is why it is written: "Many sins will be forgiven but blasphemy against The Ruach will not be forgiven". The Ruach is a female, the Wife of Elohim. You talk against her, you're toast.

(2) Second reason Tamar is mentioned: she lay with Judah. Reminding the reader that The Messiah came from Judah goes back to Jacob's prophecy in Genesis about his son Judah bringing in the Messianic line.

You're also wrong that there were no male concubines in The Hebrew Bible ("Old Testament" you call it)
Proof:

For more on what I said above you can read here. It's a lengthy topic, and the theme of my publicly published research:

"Gender Equality in The Torah"



"Is Woman an object in The Torah?"






I've accidentally have eaten things that have defiled my body. I used to celebrate X-mas. These sins are forgivable. The Torah says blood can atone for them. I claim the blood of The Messiah as my Atonement





My children love me in return. They tell me. They show me by their actions.

My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.


The key part there is: "harmony in the same abode(s) together". I believe a married couple can be also a LAT couple as long as the intent is made clear: "I'm going to house A for 3 days because you are being a jerk.".

Both people communicate and agree to maintain Monogamy. Separations aren't used for silent treatment, ghosting or infidelity.

My situation with Marshall is COMPLICATED. I have huge moral dilemmas I am facing. Life choices I have to make. Children are involved. Financial issues are involved. It's not an easy answer! Everytime I make a choice, Marshall bargains. He's really really good at saying sorry. We also have a lot of sexual chemistry. All these factors. Not easy!

But my 5 year Shidduch anniversary with Marshall is coming in July. Can't believe it's been 5 years already. But I told myself that I have to decide for good by then. No more going back and forth with telling him I'm leaving/abandoning the Covenant after that. Either I stay for good, reach a point of acceptance and find a way to live with him, our differences and all. Or I go for good to live in peace with the positive and potentially negative consequences of my choice.



Like, you want to be my male concubine? Or you're an ex of mine?

The way some of you come at me, I gotta wonder! LoL
Once again, your thread hits page two, and you trot right on in to rescue it. Amazing.
 
15-18 is usually the age where the veneer of your parents being perfect falls away and the reality of their flaws hits you in the face. If a single one of your children is still in contact with you by the time your youngest is 25, either you will have done a hard 180 in attitude or God really does have a sick sense of humor.

15? You obviously haven't raised a small herd of children.

Most children who aren't an "only child" start talking back about the age of 5. At 5 you begin to see the "why?"s appear as your child makes you begin to prove that you really know what you're talking about.

Your comment is not only insulting and rude to the intelligence of children, it's also insulting and rude to the hearts of children. Children aren't puppies looking for treats, wagging their tails. They are very perceptive. Small children will shy away from neglectful or cruel caretakers. They know even at a young age who is kind and caring, and who is not.


You mean you don't even remember your exes? :)
I mean obviously if I sit and think about it, I can remember their first and last names. Except one or two, might have forgotten a last name. But they don't live in my heart. I might recall terrible things they said if I have a conversation with another woman, or watch a movie, or write something, or see something that reminds me of my experience/correlates. I guess I could say I remember the lessons I learned from interacting.


Do you have an anal aura? An anal aura is a glowing ring around the sphincter that is very inviting. When one looks at it, it's like being in a trance

I dunno, how would I even find it? Sounds like I'd have to spread my legs in a V, bend over, spread my butt checks, lean forward and look backwards through my legs in a vertical dressing mirror. You think I could see my butthole like that?
then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days."

Deuteronomy 22:29



When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do."

Exodus 21:7

The word is not "slave", that's an incorrect translation. The Hebrew there is "servant". You know how you know? The Torah forbids Israelites from enslaving other Israelites (Lev. 25:44).

I have some written on that passage:

Here: https://www.academia.edu/38858826/On_the_Error_of_Polygyny

And...

Here:

 
I dunno, how would I even find it? Sounds like I'd have to spread my legs in a V, bend over, spread my butt checks, lean forward and look backwards through my legs in a vertical dressing mirror. You think I could see my butthole like that?
Yes that seems like it would work, or alternatively you could put your camera in selfie mode, squat down and take the pic of your slit and anus from below. Ive done that before. I sent someone a picture of my nutsack and boii cunt that way.
If you'd like my thoughts or to review the pics feel free to DM them to me or to my email bubbaprison@yahoo.com
 
The word is not "slave", that's an incorrect translation. The Hebrew there is "servant". You know how you know? The Torah forbids Israelites from enslaving other Israelites (Lev. 25:44).
Technically correct but besides the point my point simply being that a man is entitled to sell up to seven years of his daughters life because he loved wine more than her. Kind of like she's a pawn on a game board and all the players are men
Further most people in the modern world consider indentured servitude little better than slavery and most people would consider it slavery with extra steps if its not even your choice to enter in to such a contract

As for you citing yourself again no one has ever been impressed by that.
 
I've accidentally have eaten things that have defiled my body. I used to celebrate X-mas. These sins are forgivable. The Torah says blood can atone for them. I claim the blood of The Messiah as my Atonement
Could've sworn one of the key defining features of Judaism was Jesus not being their Messiah. Huh.

My children love me in return. They tell me. They show me by their actions.

My 5 year old runs around telling me I'm the "best mom ever". My 14 year old told me "mom, if everyone was like you the world would be a better place". Children SEE.

Children are hard-wired to trust and love their parents, even abusive ones. Frankly, considering testimony from children is considered shaky at best, I'd find these statements hard to believe even if they were actually said by those children.
 
Back