Enjoy_the_Soylence
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
Welp I'm 200 pages behind.....
Thanks for the recap links.
Thanks for the recap links.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Call me a doomer, but I put Chauvin walking at 0%. There will either be a hung jury or he'll be found guilty, and I primarily think that due to America's current political and racial climate. A black man who has been framed as a saint and a pillar of the community after his death for months and months died while being arrested by a white cop. I do not believe the jurors will do their job properly and debate the evidence. I believe they will intimidate (either openly or veiled) their fellow jurors into a "guilty" verdict because a white man should not be found not guilty in the death of a black man. I have no faith in the system and expect several miscarriages of justice and rioting to take place.I still don't see how Chauvin doesn't walk in the end. Even if the jury finds him guilty now he has enough appeal material to fill the grand canyon.
With Walz and Frey still kicking around to muck shit up? No.You think the national guard are loaded with live rounds this time
We've been at that stage since the white hispanic capped Obama's son.Are we at the stage of riots no matter what?
Pretty sure there will be riots no matter what.Are we assuming riots if it’s just the 3rd degree murder?
Are we at the stage of riots no matter what?
Call me a doomer, but I put Chauvin walking at 0%. There will either be a hung jury or he'll be found guilty, and I primarily think that due to America's current political and racial climate. A black man who has been framed as a saint and a pillar of the community after his death for months and months died while being arrested by a white cop. I do not believe the jurors will do their job properly and debate the evidence. I believe they will intimidate (either openly or veiled) their fellow jurors into a "guilty" verdict because a white man should not be found not guilty in the death of a black man. I have no faith in the system and expect several miscarriages of justice and rioting to take place.
lmao fuck no they won't be. Nobody wants another Kent State.You think the national guard are loaded with live rounds this time
Only in 22LR probably lol.You think the national guard are loaded with live rounds this time
It anything happens, It will be like Waco where the media will whitewash the Biden Administration hard and blame white supremacy since majority of BLM rioters are white.lmao fuck no they won't be. Nobody wants another Kent State.
Oh, a mistrial is the best of both words.That's a possibility, but it's a little weird for state prosecutors going for the option that would leave no other enemy for BLM and antifaother than the state. beating a murder charge through a legal fuckup is going to make the prosecution look like clowns and everyone will start blaming the system.
Nothing gets a crowd angrier than a perceived miscarriage of justice, regardless of political leanings, so it's gonna be a category five chimpout. We might get a situation where rioters burn down the court house. Overall, this is the worst possible way this could end for everyone involved other than Chauvin, if he's not assassinated within a week.
Or maybe the prosecution and the Mick are retarded and fucked up royally. Either way, I'm unconvinced it's gonna go to mistrial cause of how volatile the situation is.
If anything, they'll kneel "in solidarity with the community". And such a Stunning and Brave image will go viral, as Russia and China lick their chops for war.lmao fuck no they won't be. Nobody wants another Kent State.
If the argument for that isn't made in closing arguments, then the jury will never even consider it.That Lucas machine was supposed to simulate heart pumping, so I assume his blood would circulate (plus O2 if they hooked him up), but I’m pulling that out of the same organ as you.
Judge Cahill has gone pretty far out of his way this entire case to constantly assure the prosecution that he doesn't believe there is any misconduct on their part nor does he believe there's anything being done in bad faith (ignoring the near-mistrial and potential Brady violations). Likelihood of this outcome is low.I don't know if accurate, but the judge in rare cases can set aside a jury verdict if there are allegations of misconduct and rule on the case himself. Prosecutorial misconduct can top that list for Cahill.
Go back and review pre-trial jury selection please I'm begging you.Call me a doomer, but I put Chauvin walking at 0%. There will either be a hung jury or he'll be found guilty, and I primarily think that due to America's current political and racial climate. A black man who has been framed as a saint and a pillar of the community after his death for months and months died while being arrested by a white cop. I do not believe the jurors will do their job properly and debate the evidence. I believe they will intimidate (either openly or veiled) their fellow jurors into a "guilty" verdict because a white man should not be found not guilty in the death of a black man. I have no faith in the system and expect several miscarriages of justice and rioting to take place.
Thank g_d I still have this.Don't know if I'm late to saying this, but people with CO poisoning can still have a normal reading on pulse oximetry. Doctors usually rely on patient history to make a diagnosis in the absence of direct measurement of carboxyhemoglobin.
That's why I said "call me a doomer". I fully believe the system doesn't work nowadays and juror intimidation will be outwardly punished, if only lightly, but tacitly allowed and encouraged (if you do it for the "right" reasons).Jurors who threaten other jurors like you suggest would definitely be found to be committing serious juror misconduct and that could overturn a conviction, cause a mistrial, and result in jailtime for any jurors involved.
I don't think it will be jurors intimidating each other, but I agree with the basic statement that the jury is intimidated.Go back and review pre-trial jury selection please I'm begging you.
Jurors who threaten other jurors like you suggest would definitely be found to be committing serious juror misconduct and that could overturn a conviction, cause a mistrial, and result in jailtime for any jurors involved. You would have to be retarded to seriously think that jurors intimidating each other like this and getting away with it is likely.
all someone has to do is out a juror and let the mob hound them forever.That's why I said "call me a doomer". I fully believe the system doesn't work nowadays and juror intimidation will be outwardly punished, if only lightly, but tacitly allowed and encouraged (if you do it for the "right" reasons).