US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[whogoesthere]

So, now that the Queen's hubby is dead, it's possible she might drop in the next couple of years.

By then, with the Wu Flu not being a viable excuse, just what the fuck could we expect if Joe was still around, and acting President? Would his handlers dare send him over to bury the old Queen? What excuses could they use to not let him go since, let's face it, she'd still be healthier dead than he could be alive?

Big age difference between though. Queenie is 94, Biden is 78. Although the Queen could pass for 80, and Biden looks barely a day over 500.

 

[Local FloRida-man]

Do you guys forget how antifa rampaged through America unchecked during the Trump era? Why would they miss a guy who refused to do anything about them?

Tbf he let them rampage through the DEMOCRAT cities and parts of america. Partly because it was funny to see them eat their own, and partly because any attempt at order would've been taken as "fascistic" overreach by the media, like when he sent feds to black bag folks.

More based neighborhoods just knocked a few heads and things went back to normal. Antifa is only a problem for folks who support antifa. So why not let them suffer?

 

[Grandpa Simpson]

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/bidens-china-ambassador-former-ccp-consultant/

 

[mandatorylurk]

Biden hit 59% approval because the poll was weighted D+9:

Can't even lie right.

 

[FunPosting101]

View attachment 2095959

Do any of you smell something? Because this gas is lit!

No way in fuck is he near 60 percent approval, if they had said something like 52 or 53 their lie may have been somewhat believable, but 59-60% approval is just plain bullshit.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Biden hit 59% approval because the poll was weighted D+9:

View attachment 2096298

Can't even lie right.

That's how they get away with their push polling. They shove the headline "BIDEN NEARLY 60% APPROVAL, WOW" and tuck their methodology away somewhere for when push comes to shove they can say they're not lying, but people won't see that.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Biden hit 59% approval because the poll was weighted D+9:

View attachment 2096298

Can't even lie right.

But they can lie left.

 

[CrippleThreat]

No way in fuck is he near 60 percent approval, if they had said something like 52 or 53 their lie may have been somewhat believable, but 59-60% approval is just plain bullshit.

Democrats have the national advantage. They'll be up nationally during elections, hence why contemptible pollsters fake the numbers in swing states. They are also the group that takes a poll unabated.

However, this type of shit implies that Republicans, who are such staunch Trumpers to the degree that "the usual bunch" on A&H will call them tards, also approve of President Biden, despite openly hating him. Which makes this slapdash completely false on that logic alone. But, "muh logistics" will never save the West.

The numbers don't lie, and you don't even have to dig. Just look at the point skewing, and it's enough.

COVID is the only thing keeping him above (~50%) water. I'm not even sure his "muh toughness on China and Russia" is doing anything for him, besides giving Demo--not even, people who dislike Trump or hate the right ammo against Rightist call-outs.

 

[LurkTrawl]

My point is that meaningful action is necessary, and that the "based Zoomer" expectation is a cope because it assumes that our present political spectrum will stay the way that it is in the long run and that Zoomer dissatisfaction with the current zeitgeist will make them conservative-- even more, by those standards.
...

I've taken a look at history-- the pendulum conception is largely fallacious and unfounded, and supposing there was any merit to it in any context, the reality is that it still takes an active will to swing that pendulum. It's this thinking that enabled liberal activists to achieve the successes they've had, and present conservatives have their work cut out for them because (in the best case, anyways) they're demanding society to discipline themselves and to feel shame for not doing so.

Perhaps I'm the one misunderstanding here, but when I think of the "based zoomers" meme it's in a context of an explicitly anti-progressivism, not pro-conservatism mindset. I do think they'll end up anti-progressive but I'm under no illusion that they'll be conservatives of the like that had sway over culture and government like the days of old, and I wouldn't want them to be either. If the pendulum were indeed to just swing right back in the same exact manner, to the same exact starting point, we'd just end up with the RR in charge again and we'd have effectively both gotten nowhere and set society up for another era of rampant progressivism further on down the line.

Though yeah I'd say that either side of the political spectrum putting much stock in what will turn out to be a generation even further worse off than millenials in every way imaginable, at this point in time when they're barely getting out of highschool, is laughable at best. It took the millenials getting into their late twenties/early to mid thirties for the results of their environment to show in society. We've got another five years minimum before we start seeing what comes of that generation, for good or for ill.

The numbers don't lie, and you don't even have to dig. Just look at the point skewing, and it's enough.

COVID is the only thing keeping him above (~50%) water. I'm not even sure his "muh toughness on China and Russia" is doing anything for him, besides giving Demo--not even, people dislike Trump or hate the right ammo against Rightist call-outs.

Believing any poll after the 2016 election is just bad judgement.

 

[Corpun]

I hope the Masters guy goes to play a round with Trump at Mar a lago.

The japanese seemed to genuinely like Trump when I visited Japan while he was in office for his first term, and Japan right now should be our closest ally. I saw a twitter clip of the Japanese delegation basically walking around DC by themselves at all these photo op places which just felt incredibly off and rude even for smug liberal shits. You wouldn't pull this with someone like Azerbaijan, let alone one of your closest allies.

From my understanding it was because Trump both admired Japan and was hard on China. Trump probably would've given Japan an official blessing to remilitarize and amend the US imposed Constitution however they saw fit.

View attachment 2094486

'FBI' are literally the laughing stock of the world.

Fuck the Feds.

I am glad Hoover is rolling in his grave at how pathetic his mafia is nowadays.

View attachment 2095959

Do any of you smell something? Because this gas is lit!

By a rule I always take or add 5 to a poll depending on who or what it is about, this poll definitely is lying.

Big age difference between though. Queenie is 94, Biden is 78. Although the Queen could pass for 80, and Biden looks barely a day over 500.

If Biden isn't a day past 500 then Philip was a lich.

 

[FunPosting101]

Democrats have the national advantage. They'll be up nationally during elections, hence why contemptible pollsters fake the numbers in swing states. They are also the group that takes a poll unabated.

However, this type of shit implies that Republicans, who are such staunch Trumpers to the degree that "the usual bunch" on A&H will call them tards, also approve of President Biden, despite openly hating him. Which makes this slapdash completely false on that logic alone. But, "muh logistics" will never save the West.

The numbers don't lie, and you don't even have to dig. Just look at the point skewing, and it's enough.

COVID is the only thing keeping him above (~50%) water. I'm not even sure his "muh toughness on China and Russia" is doing anything for him, besides giving Demo--not even, people dislike Trump or hate the right ammo against Rightist call-outs.

I don't know about Democrats in general, but Biden in particular isn't going to have much of an advantage at all if he somehow is still around to run for re-election in 2024. I mean, they're likely going to 25th him out in favor of Kamala Harris instead, and she will have her own massive pile of problems, but by election season 2024 Biden will be fit for hospice care,(he is now, but even more so.)not running for political office.

There's only so much dementia medication and stimulants can do to prop up someone who's got one foot on a banana peel, metaphorically speaking. The Dems had better hope they can drum up a convincing enough excuse to justify not having Biden at any debates, because if they can't, he may wind up going full alzheimers on national tv, and before anyone brings this up, there are practical limits to electoral fraud too. If HR1 is defeated like I suspect it will be, the Dems aren't going to be able to pull the shit they pulled in 2020.

 

[Garm]

Do you guys forget how antifa rampaged through America unchecked during the Trump era? Why would they miss a guy who refused to do anything about them?

You mean the democratic cities that are entering a death spiral due to the population fleeing the economic destruction. Area's that wouldn't have voted for Trump anyway you slice it? Fuck, nightly news already makes those places sound like warzones, what was a riot on top of the daily business of Chi-raq?

View attachment 2096023

It would look more honest if he wasn't squinting the entire time. I mean, I'm fairly certain everything he said was a lie, it just would have been better if you could see him be comfortable.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Perhaps I'm the one misunderstanding here, but when I think of the "based zoomers" meme it's in a context of an explicitly anti-progressivism, not pro-conservatism mindset. I do think they'll end up anti-progressive but I'm under no illusion that they'll be conservatives of the like that had sway over culture and government like the days of old, and I wouldn't want them to be either. If the pendulum were indeed to just swing right back in the same exact manner, to the same exact starting point, we'd just end up with the RR in charge again and we'd have effectively both gotten nowhere and set society up for another era of rampant progressivism further on down the line.

"Based" is squarely in the domain of conservative/"conservative" youth, and is connected to some polls that suggested children were presenting more conservative than those of the previous generation. I'm almost certain that the "based zoomer" meme embodies an unironic expectation of a conservative resurgence within the next generation, but indeed, the bare minimum of the expectation is that they're set to become anti-progressive.

Here's the rub: what, exactly, does that mean? What is it supposed to mean?

 

[soy_king]

It would look more honest if he wasn't squinting the entire time. I mean, I'm fairly certain everything he said was a lie, it just would have been better if you could see him be comfortable.

Why do you think they put him in aviators? He literally can only squint.

 

[LurkTrawl]

"Based" is squarely in the domain of conservative/"conservative" youth, and is connected to some polls that suggested children were presenting more conservative than those of the previous generation. I'm almost certain that the "based zoomer" meme embodies an unironic expectation of a conservative resurgence within the next generation, but indeed, the bare minimum of the expectation is that they're set to become anti-progressive.

"Based" is a term that's been in use as a general "that person is grounded in reality" sentiment longer than it's been associated with the right-wing and/or conservatism. It doesn't necessarily imply either. For instance, (may god forgive me for bringing it up) in gaymergate that one old feminist woman was often referred to as being "based" and she was far from what anyone would consider conservative or right-wing.

So no, that's you putting a relatively new usage of the word on what could otherwise plausibly be interpreted as a neutral sentiment. And no, as said I don't expect them to be conservative, anybody with brains doesn't expect them to be "conservative" because, well, fuck conservatism. It obviously hasn't worked and prior to the current progressive mania it elevated the right-wing equivalent to a place of prominence in society... which was bad enough that today's zeitgeist arose from the repercussions of such people being at the helm of society writ-large.

Here's the rub: what, exactly, does that mean? What is it supposed to mean?

I assume here that this is a rhetorical question but I'll answer it anyway, I suppose. I would think it would at the minimum involve a rebuke of identitarian politics as well as other progressive shibboleths like gender theory adjacent shit like transgenderism being pushed on the populace. Beyond that it would boil down to the individual but, I mean you should already get the gist. A pushback against progressivist ideals without turning fully over to entirely conservative ideals. For instance, wanting to curb immigration illegal or otherwise, but not really caring one way or the other about the state of the legality of abortion or gay marriage. Or not wanting universal healthcare or U.B.I., but not giving a shit about single motherhood, divorce rates, or the state of the nuclear family in general. I'm thinking very much a "the buck stops here" sort of attitude.

To wit, less conservative and more "hey, we're okay with the changes in society that occurred up until Occupy Wallstreet". I'm going to preempt you here, and say that calling that kind of attitude "conservatism" is the same kind of shit feminists pull when they ask the whole "do you want equality for women? You do? Then you're a feminist!" shit. Where it goes from there, and if it does indeed go further right-wing, expect less conservatives of old and more Nick Fuentes style degenerates.

 

[AnotherPleb]

I don't know about Democrats in general, but Biden in particular isn't going to have much of an advantage at all if he somehow is still around to run for re-election in 2024. I mean, they're likely going to 25th him out in favor of Kamala Harris instead, and she will have her own massive pile of problems, but by election season 2024 Biden will be fit for hospice care,(he is now, but even more so.)not running for political office.

There's only so much dementia medication and stimulants can do to prop up someone who's got one foot on a banana peel, metaphorically speaking. The Dems had better hope they can drum up a convincing enough excuse to justify not having Biden at any debates, because if they can't, he may wind up going full alzheimers on national tv, and before anyone brings this up, there are practical limits to electoral fraud too. If HR1 is defeated like I suspect it will be, the Dems aren't going to be able to pull the shit they pulled in 2020.

Where's that SOTU address, Joe?

 

[UselessIdiot]

View attachment 2095959

Do any of you smell something? Because this gas is lit!

I don't even remember Obama getting 59% approval ratings.

This is just getting ridiculous. I guess Sleepy Joe on the ticket was the only reason anyone voted for Obama. LOL

 

[FunPosting101]

Where's that SOTU address, Joe?

Has he given one yet? If not, I don't think he ever will, if he did, that will likely be the only one he ever gives. If anyone starts giving SOTU addresses it will be Harris, in an attempt to get people used to her as president. That won't work probably, and will be seen as being very peculiar, but the Dems don't have any good options other than even more blatant electoral fraud.

 

[CrippleThreat]

I don't even remember Obama getting 59% approval ratings.

He got as high as 63%, iirc, through sheer charisma and what he represented (HOPE and all of that noise). It fell when even the Republicans who voted for him saw through the bullshit.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

Tbf he let them rampage through the DEMOCRAT cities and parts of america. Partly because it was funny to see them eat their own, and partly because any attempt at order would've been taken as "fascistic" overreach by the media, like when he sent feds to black bag folks.

More based neighborhoods just knocked a few heads and things went back to normal. Antifa is only a problem for folks who support antifa. So why not let them suffer?

It was a retarded strategy that was one of many things that cost him the election. You are no longer the candidate of law and order if you let cities burn to own da libtards. Republicans will keep doing nothing to own da libs and then I have to hear them wail and gnash their teeth when they lose because *what a shock* doing nothing is an awful idea.

For instance, (may god forgive me for bringing it up) in gaymergate that one old feminist woman was often referred to as being "based" and she was far from what anyone would consider conservative or right-wing.

Christina Hoff Sommers is an interesting example of how hard to the left things have gone in a few years. Sommers is a registered Democrat who was concerned boys were being left behind. A few years later, the best we can do for based feminists is Abigail Shrier, who is perfectly okay with boys getting fucked over but believes boys need to make it their life’s mission to protect girls from troons. She has no interest in helping boys. It’s a sad sign of how bad things are overall in less than five years.

I don't even remember Obama getting 59% approval ratings.

This is just getting ridiculous. I guess Sleepy Joe on the ticket was the only reason anyone voted for Obama. LOL

Obama had ratings in the mid 60s in maybe a few weeks. However once he started his apology tour, his ratings never got to that point again. Seems like quaint times by comparison.