StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Rekkington said:
The thing about advertising is you don't need to consciously love it or hate it to have an effect, that was precisely my point. Nobody back in the day realized that advertising was literally establishing and reinforcing an American way of life. If you asked anyone back then about the ads they would all say they don't notice and they're stupid. And yet somehow advertising persists as a multi-billion dollar industry. In fact, the precise reason it is so effective is because people are neither hot nor cold on it. They are daydreaming, and the messaging takes passive effect. Then one day you wake up and notice that when you bring up to your family how fucked up it all seems, you're suddenly a fringe personality. Now you're the weird one for noticing, or caring.

It happened with the Kardashians too. They were shoved down everyone's throat, and very quickly it became cringe to even call it out or care about it, and then it became cool to ironically like it, and now here we are: more people make a conscious attempt to block it out while these people become influential billionaires both mainstream and transgressive at the same time. This all happened within I'd say 5 years. You can expand this process out to all sorts of things; the people calling it out shut up in an effort not to be cringe online, and all the while the rest of the world becomes slightly more retarded and hostile towards you.
The "be less white" thing, like I said in my post, is them shit-testing the system. Gillette did the same when they told all men that men suck. Just because people reel it in momentarily does not mean the movement has stopped. Usually it means it is being normalized.
The Corporate Approved Ideology is to make quarterly returns. All the products we complain about, I suppose it's never occurred to anyone that they are usually targeting males and females aged 18-35, and that this targeting is all about soft revolution, changing the world, being yourself, etc.? Like I said, it is not an ideology, it is a lifestyle. The lifestyle has always been youthful rebellion. The fact that corporations are going after it means they see it as an exploitable narrative, not because they believe in it. Nike knows their prime demographic is young niggers. So they went hard with the BLM thing. But Nike did not invent BLM. It just wants young niggers. Corporations are a cultural barometer, not a driving force.
To me the real takeaway has always been: both corporations and politicians will listen to you if you're loud enough. White people - white men especially - just think shutting up makes them smarter than everyone.
Click to expand...
No, the problem is that white males are the absolute fucking worst consumers in existence. And that they will never ever put their wallets where their mouth is regardless of how much they bitch or being insulted. So advertisers go to women instead, it's the next logical step since they spend far more of their paycheck and typically buy shit for their husbands/sons. That's why Gillette says men suck, because they want mothers to buy their tranny son new razors to shave his moustache to look more girl like. That's why Nike support BLM, because even niggers think more about what they buy than white people (when the choice is drugs or new shoes). Almost everything bad today in culture is because white people stopped thinking for themselves and just buy the same shit they had in the past for fucking perpetuity.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: janekop, Kabuki Actor, Bad Take Crucifier and 11 others
wtfNeedSignUp said:
No, the problem is that white males are the absolute fucking worst consumers in existence. And that they will never ever put their wallets where their mouth is regardless of how much they bitch or being insulted.
Click to expand...
This is true in a sense because White Males are the anti-capitalist ones. They have always been the ones leading the charge against consumerism. Within my memory and research I cannot even fathom an Indian, Asian, or Black who has been truly against consumerism. I think it is a noble thing to do, but I think people need to realize that - like hippies and eco warriors - there's not a lot of non-whites doing it, which has global repercussions.
wtfNeedSignUp said:
So advertisers go to women instead, it's the next logical step since they spend far more of their paycheck and typically buy shit for their husbands/sons. That's why Gillette says men suck, because they want mothers to buy their tranny son new razors to shave his moustache to look more girl like.
Click to expand...
I think you are overestimating the trope of women making all the purchasing decisions. I was taught this in school but over the years I never saw this really play out, except for food and superfluous expenses. What I saw more than often - which is something nobody wants to talk about in marketing - is men setting the tone in a relationship which actually informs the woman. Women, like you said, make absolutely retarded purchasing decisions. This is accurate. This is why my agency wants to dump so much money into SnapChat and TikTok. However once a man is involved he actually changes the woman, not the other way around. This is why automobile advertising is so complicated. Really anything beyond makeup, clothes, jewelry, and maybe pets needs to take men into mind.
wtfNeedSignUp said:
That's why Nike support BLM, because even niggers think more about what they buy than white people (when the choice is drugs or new shoes). Almost everything bad today in culture is because white people stopped thinking for themselves and just buy the same shit they had in the past for fucking perpetuity.
Click to expand...
Incorrect, both think about what they buy, it is just that niggers are retarded. The worst revolution in the history of marketing is that we stopped collecting data based on race. Advertising and marketing used to be the biggest redpill imaginable. I can tell you 10 ways how to sell a product to black people that you cannot use for white people, especially since the products themselves are often tailored to them.

I'll tell you the mistake you are making: you are thinking boomers are white people. I see this all the time. "White people want nostalgia!" No no, Boomers do, Boomers are used to having the entire culture well into Gen X and Millennials fashioned towards them and their fucking childhood. Their nostalgia still defines us. Their cumulative death will define us too.
Boomers are dumb, Boomers are the most easily tricked people ever, Boomers used to pay 100k for a 9 bedroom house, pay 3k to be a lawyer, get a job right out of college for 70k, eat like shit and never exercise cause the world is their oyster, steak and eggs for breakfast with sugary cereal on top, drive drunk to buy a fondue set to have at your next fucking key party where you fuck your neighbors, and get dentures cause these dumb faggots don't know how to brush their teeth, sell their house for not even that much and spend all their money on a fucking motorcycle they liked in their 20s, go straight into their taxpayer funded pension once they blow through all their savings after 7 years, and continue to literally define the entire civilization around their borderline-retarded dreams of the future. They are largely white people. They are the dumb ones who think the TV is their best friend, they are the ones who will take any order the man on the screen tells them to do but spend half an hour squeezing pears at the supermarket to beat the system, but it's not white people in general.
Anyway that was a bit of a rant but I need to explain this to people every day. White people now are more savvy than any group on the entire planet.
That's why we keep killing ourselves. I just think things can change.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Winner
Reactions: janekop, MaxPayne, Sunshine Annie and 13 others

the furry stonetoss encouraged to share their art (https://archive.md/BxR18) has apparently resurfaced
i also find it funny how everytime stonetoss appears in anything remotely outside of his own content (killstream, George Alexopoulos' podcast) the videos immediately go down afterwards.

could it be he has something to hide? surely being a furry and being whitepilled can co-exist lol
i wonder how long it'll take before this user mysteriously blanks their account again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nigger Foreskin Chewer and ABE LINN COHN
0 1 said:
"At first, Stonetoss hated this..."

There is literally not a single example of him expressing his dislike of it.
Click to expand...
I was gonna say, more like stonetoss completely ignored it publicly, then walked across the goal line unopposed while nobody was looking because everyone was too busy circlejerking about how clever their "own" was, and made everyone look really silly for feeling smug by turning it into a joke about trannies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurkio, Bethesda's Todd Howard, Glowing In The Streets and 5 others
HarblMcDavid said:
I was gonna say, more like stonetoss completely ignored it publicly, then walked across the goal line unopposed while nobody was looking because everyone was too busy circlejerking about how clever their "own" was, and made everyone look really silly for feeling smug by turning it into a joke about trannies.
Click to expand...
Her description of the event isn't even honest. That meme didn't come about naturally as joke in their own community. They themselves were trolled with a fake tweet of him claiming he hates Among Us. They created those memes because they thought they were trolling him by doing so.

He didn't embrace it as a countermeasure against their supposed trolling. He embraced it because he knew he could fuck with them and have a laugh of his own due to their stupidity.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Lurkio, Bad Take Crucifier, Glowing In The Streets and 3 others
LordofCringe7206 said:
Her description of the event isn't even honest. That meme didn't come about naturally as joke in their own community. They themselves were trolled with a fake tweet of him claiming he hates Among Us. They created those memes because they thought they were trolling him by doing so.

He didn't embrace it as a countermeasure against their supposed trolling. He embraced it because he knew he could fuck with them and have a laugh of his own due to their stupidity.
Click to expand...
>Tikthot
>Dishonest Framing
Imagine my shock. :story:
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Bad Take Crucifier, Glowing In The Streets, Dean Pentel and 2 others
HarblMcDavid said:
I was gonna say, more like stonetoss completely ignored it publicly, then walked across the goal line unopposed while nobody was looking because everyone was too busy circlejerking about how clever their "own" was, and made everyone look really silly for feeling smug by turning it into a joke about trannies.
Click to expand...
stonetoss wins while his enemies lose and all st did was nothing.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: janekop, Lurkio, Leslie Nielsen and 10 others
Rekkington said:
This is true in a sense because White Males are the anti-capitalist ones. They have always been the ones leading the charge against consumerism. Within my memory and research I cannot even fathom an Indian, Asian, or Black who has been truly against consumerism. I think it is a noble thing to do, but I think people need to realize that - like hippies and eco warriors - there's not a lot of non-whites doing it, which has global repercussions.
Click to expand...
It's a hard point to argue about since at least personally I don't live next to a non-white population but pretty sure that calls against consumerism (be it from the resulting waste or removing the need for community) is as old as the bible.
I think you are overestimating the trope of women making all the purchasing decisions. I was taught this in school but over the years I never saw this really play out, except for food and superfluous expenses. What I saw more than often - which is something nobody wants to talk about in marketing - is men setting the tone in a relationship which actually informs the woman. Women, like you said, make absolutely retarded purchasing decisions. This is accurate. This is why my agency wants to dump so much money into SnapChat and TikTok. However once a man is involved he actually changes the woman, not the other way around. This is why automobile advertising is so complicated. Really anything beyond makeup, clothes, jewelry, and maybe pets needs to take men into mind.
Click to expand...
Can you name an instance of a company shitting on a white male populace and it having repercussions in the last two decades? The only thing I can point to is not watching films like new Ghostbusters and even that didn't do anything for the company besides a miniscule loss. Regardless, it's enough that women don't tend to consume the product (for example an action comedy film) to have marketing decide to write the movie for them since they take the male audience for granted (which is almost always the case).
Incorrect, both think about what they buy, it is just that niggers are retarded. The worst revolution in the history of marketing is that we stopped collecting data based on race. Advertising and marketing used to be the biggest redpill imaginable. I can tell you 10 ways how to sell a product to black people that you cannot use for white people, especially since the products themselves are often tailored to them.

I'll tell you the mistake you are making: you are thinking boomers are white people. I see this all the time. "White people want nostalgia!" No no, Boomers do, Boomers are used to having the entire culture well into Gen X and Millennials fashioned towards them and their fucking childhood. Their nostalgia still defines us. Their cumulative death will define us too.
Boomers are dumb, Boomers are the most easily tricked people ever, Boomers used to pay 100k for a 9 bedroom house, pay 3k to be a lawyer, get a job right out of college for 70k, eat like shit and never exercise cause the world is their oyster, steak and eggs for breakfast with sugary cereal on top, drive drunk to buy a fondue set to have at your next fucking key party where you fuck your neighbors, and get dentures cause these dumb faggots don't know how to brush their teeth, sell their house for not even that much and spend all their money on a fucking motorcycle they liked in their 20s, go straight into their taxpayer funded pension once they blow through all their savings after 7 years, and continue to literally define the entire civilization around their borderline-retarded dreams of the future. They are largely white people. They are the dumb ones who think the TV is their best friend, they are the ones who will take any order the man on the screen tells them to do but spend half an hour squeezing pears at the supermarket to beat the system, but it's not white people in general.
Anyway that was a bit of a rant but I need to explain this to people every day. White people now are more savvy than any group on the entire planet.
That's why we keep killing ourselves. I just think things can change.
Click to expand...
There is no fucking way that data on users has stopped, if anything it probably balooned to an insane degree due to social media companies selling our data.

The arguments against boomers is two decades old by now. I'll agree that they ushered some fucking retarded ideas and live on the fact that pension is a giant ponzi scheme, but by this point their effects is relatively small. They have zero technical literacy and are dying out. The people you see on social media sucking Disney's cock are 20-40 year old soy faced morons, with the 40 year age group keep doing the same mistakes like believeing that an academic degree, even a useless one, is important to having a succesful career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunshine Annie, ABE LINN COHN and Pomme Poire Peche
wtfNeedSignUp said:
There is no fucking way that data on users has stopped, if anything it probably balooned to an insane degree due to social media companies selling our data.
Click to expand...
Kind of. The issue we are having now is all of these platforms have been restricting user data access for years. There are a lot of people you cannot target, and the number shrinks day by day. There was a glory day where everyone had access to the data but every platform (Facebook, Google, all of them) capture it different and give different access so that era is ending unfortunately. Also a greater number than you would think are savvy to internet tracking. One good example is Google Ads, if you use a certain type of browser they can't really get a lock on your geographic location or any other data.
wtfNeedSignUp said:
The arguments against boomers is two decades old by now. I'll agree that they ushered some fucking retarded ideas and live on the fact that pension is a giant ponzi scheme, but by this point their effects is relatively small.
Click to expand...
I disagree. Boomers still define our society. The fact that an argument is old does not mean it is less valid, just because you've been hearing it doesn't mean it gets less true with time. Boomers have a wildly disproportionate effect on the media, consumer trends, reporting, etc. In fact many of the big news agencies understand that the only people who watch them are boomers, they are singlehandedly keeping news channels alive. So the news knows who their audience is and acts in order. You really need to think about the exponential effects this generation has in non-obvious ways.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: MaxPayne, ABE LINN COHN, Fanatical Pragmatist and 1 other person
Vida said:
Faggot zoomer doesn't understan stonetoss
View attachment 2098985
Click to expand...
0:45 - "When I saw this one, I was like...I don't really get this..." And then he goes on to show he still doesn't get this. He acts as if conservatives believe democrats operate on a two dimensional plane of existence and clip through reality.

1:36 - He tries to tackle the joke about a female cop shooting a suspect by accident and fails to understand the joke in any capacity, and just assumes it's Stonetoss complaining about women.

2:40 - He almost understands the joke but falls just short of the first hurdle by using the dumbest interpretation, which is thinking Stonetoss believes moving to another country is colonizing, and he then proceeds to act smug because he fails to understand a joke.

4:05 - "I don't understand the joke so I'm just going to assume this is just a series of random pixels on a screen with no purpose." I'm paraphrasing but listen to this yourself, he genuinely says this.

5:08 - He seems to actually believe Stonetoss is criticizing his politics specifically. Not liberals or democrats, but literally this individual's politics, and so he uses his own opinions to discredit a comic which doesn't even apply to him.

5:30 - At this point I'm starting to realize this guy doesn't understand what "jokes" are.

6:13 - He very clearly understands the joke and is pretending not to get it. Gee, I wonder why?

6:40 - He claims Stonetoss is complaining about racism in this comic which, once again, is the dumbest interpretation possible, and he then proceeds to dismantle this nonsensical stance he made up and applied to Stonetoss.

7:08 - When Stonetoss says he is pro-speech, he once again chooses to interpret this as Stonetoss thinking people are genuinely against speaking. Not even free speech, but saying words aloud.

7:31 - He touches on Stonetoss claiming he is "transgressive," and because he doesn't understand the word, the video is cut short. Common sense would dictate if you don't do anything with a clip, you shouldn't put it in your video, but I guess he wants to use every part of the buffalo.

7:42 - "I put a lot of effort into making these."

I honestly doesn't care if this guy is too young to know any better. Whether he's just 15 years old, he is aggressively stupid even for that age.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Madre Muerte, EnemyStand, Haramburger and 17 others
Vida said:
Faggot zoomer doesn't understan stonetoss
View attachment 2098985
Click to expand...
According to the kid's twitter, he's only 14.
zoomer faggot.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: GhastlyGhost, Madre Muerte, Brain Power and 23 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back