The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
If Floyd couldn't Sneed but he could Chuck, does that make the name of the store Floyd's Sloyd and Floyd? I don't get the joke...
 
What the fuck is Chauvin writing the whole time?
Nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger also sneed
 
The case is such a farce he has to reiterate how court works on a basic level
It's shocking to me (well not really) just how conveniently the left/Twitter/Reddit/whatever has forgotten that the burden of proof is on the prosecution. Chauvin does not legally have to prove his innocence. It would help, but the prosecution is the one that has to prove because all reasonable doubt that Floyd would be alive if not for Chauvin.

It's not even a civil case where it's a 51% burden. I think THAT is going to piss a lot of people off.
 
So how long until Eric Nelson gets randomly attacked or his property vandalized due to his defense of Chauvin? Three days after verdict?
Probably not long at all
1A720D9E-B32F-45CF-96DB-4490A105B598.jpeg
 
Nothing like coming back to this thread and it's all vague posts about how everyone now knows that Floyd smells like ass and something with aliens coming down to knee niggas with them pointy ass white beyond comprehension joints or whatever.

Gotta love American justice.
From the trial we know the prosecution has no real case. In American justice this never would have been even charged.

So the actual arguments and such hardly matter its really just a contest between a dozen peoples fear for their safety and their desire to sneed.
 
the fuck does mansplaining mean anyway?
It's a term invented by feminists that indicates a man is telling a woman something she already has expertise in, eg layman telling a female MD that infection is caused by germs.
Mostly it exists because feminists are too self-centered to understand how men transfer knowledge, and offer their understanding up for fact checking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back