Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,450 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 285 11.0%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,599
Russell has said that he thinks when he sues someone he expects them to be horrified by what he alleges to the point that they drop everything and immediately give him what he wants. He doesn't get that people's natural reaction to getting sued is to defend themselves.
Unless you're getting sued by Russell, of course. The natural reaction to that is to laugh heartily and uncontrollably and then defend yourself.
 
Last edited:
He complained about not getting his "equal opportunity" at the Ariana concert, but to him that meant he should have gotten to bang her.

In school he always got the same reward for his crumpled paper smeared with drool and snot and signed Ron, as the star pupil got for their work that was an effort of weeks.
So now this bitch not treating him the same way she'd treat some super rich über Chad who courts her for months and whom she fell for when he comes in in a smelly hobo suit and with a gas station flower, is discrimination. And every time it happens, it's a shock.
 
Ariana didn't compliment his suit. I'm going to speculate a few things here. Just about every one else in the meet and greet was a teen girl.
Ariana is not much past a teen girl, and knows that these girls look up to her.
She complimented these girls" outfits. When a girl compliments another girl's clothes there is alot more going on there. It is an icebreaker for conversation, it is small talk, it is a not just a compliment of the clothes, but of the girl's choices. Often one particular item will be singled out. So not " I love your outfit!" But rather "Those boots are fire!"
However a woman commenting on a suit is very different. A suit generally doesn't take much creative thought to decide to wear. Unless you are one of those guys who are really into nice menswear, which is awesome. Women generally will not compliment that to your face. They WILL absolutely discuss with others. We know that Russ isn't this guy. He wears a rumpled cheap dirty, ruined suit that doesn't fit.
The other way that women will comment on your suit is if you do wear it like Russ. And this is the sarcastic "nice suit"
If Ariana complimented his clothing choices, it would have undoubtedly been this last one. She wisely decided to be kind and not do it.
I know women are confusing but Russ doesn't get to be treated like a tween girl and patted on the head for putting dirty pants and a jacket on.
 
I'm wondering if maybe his recent post isn't about AGT. He claims this incident happened "earlier this year", but as far as I know the AGT contestants are still being notified if they got accepted or not. The auditions only closed late last month. I've done some research and don't see any mention of them letting people know they DIDN'T make it onto the show, only that they DID. So unless Russ just pestered them nonstop after sending his video and got an exasperated "NO TARDO YOU DIDN'T FUCKING MAKE IT!!" response, he wouldn't know for sure yet that he wasn't accepted. I'm thinking whatever this incident is, that it might have something to do with the letter he had delivered and posted cryptically about.

Or maybe Russ is just being Tarded Kinda and expected to be showered with praise and immediately flown to LA after submitting his audition. The part about working his "rear off" does sound like it would be his AGT audition, but who knows. I'm sure we'll find out soon.
 
Russ has "representatives working in [his] corner" you guize! He's such a big to-do famous convicted stalker now, that he has a whole team of people working for him.

Seriously though. Every time something like this happens, he claims to have all these people on his side working for him and helping him. Not once have they ever appeared.
They’ve all been blown up by Taylor’s mafia.
RIP Ken xx
 
However a woman commenting on a suit is very different. A suit generally doesn't take much creative thought to decide to wear. Unless you are one of those guys who are really into nice menswear, which is awesome. Women generally will not compliment that to your face. .
Particularly, I think, because when you're at a function where men are expected to wear suits, there's nothing special about the fact that they're wearing suits. Unless a man really has an ultra-haute sense of style, there's not much on which to comment other than, maybe, how a man looks in a suit ("Hey, you clean up nice!") and most men won't expect us to. But you're right, a woman has to make several choices--dress, skirt, or slacks? Which top? Which shoes? Which accessories? It's an ensemble and complimenting a woman's choice or choices is a very nice compliment. Not really expected, but not uncommon.

On the other hand, there are times when wearing a suit is just weird. Hey, I'm all about "You do you, Boo" but there has to be some kind of line drawn, and would anyone chalk it up to a sense of individuality if somebody wore a suit to a barbecue? No. An Ariana Grande concert calls for fun casual wear. It just does. So when Russ showed up in that cheap suit with those cheap flowers I'm sure it startled her. In fact, Russ likes to moan and groan that she looked at him with disgust because of his disability but I'm sure he got that wrong. I'm sure the look on her face had nothing to do with his disability, and everything to do with his suit. And I'm sure it wasn't "disgust" but rather "Really? A suit?". Assuming there was any such look at all, because I'm also sure she's had to meet a lot of weirdos in her profession and she's probably got a manufactured and diplomatic smile down to an art form.
 
Women compliment other women on their clothing is for totally different reasons than Pipsqueak thinks too. For him, "nice dress" means "now take it off".

For us, it means, "Oh wow! Perfect choice for you, the style, the colour, everything brings out your best features." Of course, everything is ultimately about sex for him but it's not like that in the real world.

Pips also doesn't understand that it's the personal grooming and style that matters more than the type of clothing. I don't think I've ever complimented a man's suit. I've complimented ties, I've complimented casual shirts. I also appreciate and speak up when faced with a nicely kept beard or a good hair style. He's far more likely to gain approval in a clean pair of jeans and a t-shirt and if he sorted out the weird facial hair thing and used some shampoo.

But this is it with Russ, he cannot distinguish between inanimate things being good or bad, they just are. Obviously, the suit. That fucking sofa, shabby, dirty, too small, but it's a sofa, as good as any other out there. Wilted, cheap flowers and crappy dollar store gifts, they might as well be a dozen red roses bred especially for her and priceless diamond earrings, what's the difference? It's all flowers and gifts.

He's guilty of 'splitting' when it comes to people, they are each all good or all bad, but, one thing is indiscernible from the other thing.
 
There is never one moment where Russ is denied something he wants without retaliation, whether that's threatening to sue someone, write a bad review of them, cuss at them and threaten that he will harm them or himself.

Never, not even with mundane things like the service he gets at a taco shack being below par. Any perceived slight needs action. He is always one inconvenience away from trying to get revenge.
 
America’s got talent lawsuit coming soon....
Once again, he misunderstands how disability law works. NBC can't STOP him from auditioning, but unless they say "no you can't be on the show because you're disabled" he really doesn't have a case. Russ thinks his disability means people have to use lower standards in evaluating him/his work but that's not how it works.
People like him are such a pain in the ass when you're trying to hire someone for a position and one of these imbeciles strolls (or limps or wheels) in to the interview with a chip on the shoulder so big they can barely fit through the front door. You just instantly know they're going to pitch a fit if they don't get the job. Yes, their discrimination claims are without merit (they can be answered with "you aren't qualified for the position" or "you weren't the best candidate available for the position"), but it still means lawyering up and dealing with it.

EDIT: Russ's message to Sam(f) indicated he was genuinely shocked that Null got a lawyer. I think he was expecting Null to settle in order to make this go away.
I mean wtf are you supposed to do when someone sues you? If I sue someone I expect a response. That Russ is puzzled YET AGAIN that someone dares respond to his suit is mind boggling. He has no theory of mind, no higher assessment processes. Everything is life according to Russ-dreams and omg what do you mean that's not happening?
This is more common than you might think. Civil litigation is expensive and intimidating if you want it done right (i.e. you hire a lawyer) and extraordinarily difficult to do successfully if you go pro se (i.e. you can't afford a lawyer). People and companies use this fact, along with general ignorance about how civil suits work and the simple fear factor of actually being sued to scare people into compliance and settlement.

They really do expect you to buckle the moment the process server knocks on your door and hands you a thick envelope. They figure most people will do practically anything to just make it go away. Sad thing is they're generally right. It's a (slightly) more expensive bluff than just threatening to sue, but usually they get what they want for just a few thousand dollars.

I was sued once by a shitty company over a review I wrote about their shitty scam. They threatened to sue, I said "lol do it faggot," and they did. They flexed and pushed hard to get me to settle then and there, but I refused and said "nah, I'll see you court." I couldn't afford a lawyer, so I replied to the complaint myself. Raised several issues -- jurisdiction, anti-SLAPP, truth as defense -- provided arguments in defense, and listed what I intended to seek from the company through discovery. A week later the court wrote back and said "sounds good, hearing scheduled."

Those fuckers were back on the phone with me so fast, begging to settle before that hearing. They offered to pay all legal fees, dismiss all their claims with prejudice and retract what they'd said about me publicly. Fighting them sounded fun, but I settled just to be done with it. Didn't have to pay a dime. It turns out they really didn't want me going through their books and attendance records and realized it would be less damaging to leave the review online than letting the details of their scam become a matter of public record.

Dirtbags who pull this shit are rarely prepared for you to call their bluff. They don't really spend much effort planning (or making) a real case, and most people don't realize that the "opening volley" of a lawsuit is still often a bluff and that offering even just a little token resistance is often enough to make it go away.

Of course in Russ' case, he's 100% sure he's argued an open-and-shut case at the first filing and his victory is a foregone conclusion; it's just a matter of formality and courtesy to let the court go through the motions (heh) and award him his hard-earned bounty. Without exception, he's fallen apart completely the moment the court throws it back at him because of some defect or the defense actually shows up, ready to fight.

His pattern recognition process is just weird. He's obviously capable of recognizing patterns -- he learned early on that he can use his disability to manipulate people and avoid punishments, for instance -- but for whatever reason he seems to be completely blind to the pattern of failure in every case he's ever filed. These are potentially very expensive failures, so it's a real wonder he keeps the blinders on like this.
 
These are potentially very expensive failures, so it's a real wonder he keeps the blinders on like this.
In Russes mind these failures aren't his fault. He's the most brilliant legal mind of his time and all his cases are air tight. It's the bias judges and shady lawyers who are wrong and one day everyone's gonna see him for the legal and musical genius he is. Every future lawsuit is just another chance to finally win and catapult him into fame, fortune, and pop star pussy. Of course Russ cant accept the fact that his knowledge of the law is on par with a meth head sovereign citizen. so he's gonna keep on suing women who wont suck him his penis , anyone who laughs at him, and anyone who wont give him what he thinks he deserves.
 
Scenario 5 had me giggling. But I spoke to God, and he reluctantly admitted Russ was one of his failures. He keeps trying to smite the little shit, but Satan must be taking delight in keeping him alive to torment the Almighty. I think we should have a lengthy theological discussion on how Russ fits into the divine plan. Or we could just keep making fun of him for embarrassing himself.
In the Bible, it says that some people are made for honor, and others for dishonor (2 Timothy 2:20, Romans 9:21.) Russell seems to be made for dishonor.
America’s got talent lawsuit coming soon....
Case in point.
 
America’s got talent lawsuit coming soon....
He doesn't understand what "discrimination" is. The whole thing about AGT is they have people with actual talents going on stage to display this. They've had singer songwriters on there before but the difference is they could all sing or at least attempt it. Pipsqueak Ratmouth can't sing. So what are they supposed to do? Him playing his shitty song when motivational messages pop up on the screen behind him, or he "dances" to it is not a talent. It's not interesting. Nobody wants to see that other than people like ourselves because it would be fail of the highest caliber.

And there's been loads of people on AGT with one disability or another who were able to wow the judges because they had actual talent. Writing shitty pop songs about women? That's literally a dime a dozen.
 
He doesn't understand what "discrimination" is. The whole thing about AGT is they have people with actual talents going on stage to display this. They've had singer songwriters on there before but the difference is they could all sing or at least attempt it. Pipsqueak Ratmouth can't sing. So what are they supposed to do? Him playing his shitty song when motivational messages pop up on the screen behind him, or he "dances" to it is not a talent. It's not interesting. Nobody wants to see that other than people like ourselves because it would be fail of the highest caliber.

And there's been loads of people on AGT with one disability or another who were able to wow the judges because they had actual talent. Writing shitty pop songs about women? That's literally a dime a dozen.
His audition video was a singer singing, a drummer drumming, possibly a guitarist (?), and then Russ way off to the side bobbing up and down near a laptop, holding his keytar but not playing it.

How would he even be considered the star of that act? Maybe AGT wants the rest of the band on and only rejected Russ?
 
His audition video was a singer singing, a drummer drumming, possibly a guitarist (?), and then Russ way off to the side bobbing up and down near a laptop, holding his keytar but not playing it.

How would he even be considered the star of that act? Maybe AGT wants the rest of the band on and only rejected Russ?

My dream scenario would be to have him on the show, and display his most hideous Facebook posts on a screen behind him that he can't see as the band plays. After the act was done, the judges would hammer him about the posts and the audience would boo him into to trauma-lump oblivion.
 
In Russes mind these failures aren't his fault. He's the most brilliant legal mind of his time and all his cases are air tight. It's the bias judges and shady lawyers who are wrong and one day everyone's gonna see him for the legal and musical genius he is. Every future lawsuit is just another chance to finally win and catapult him into fame, fortune, and pop star pussy.
I wonder if he thinks that a future legal victory would allow him to go back and retroactively "win" the lawsuits he's already lost. Like "setting reverse precedent" or something. He's enough of a waterhead for that to seem like a possibility to him.

Pipsqueak Ratmouth can't sing.
Is there any footage available [he asks because he secretly hates himself and wants to suffer] of him attempting to sing? I think it'd be as hilarious as it would be horrifying.
 
In Russes mind these failures aren't his fault. He's the most brilliant legal mind of his time and all his cases are air tight. It's the bias judges and shady lawyers who are wrong and one day everyone's gonna see him for the legal and musical genius he is. Every future lawsuit is just another chance to finally win and catapult him into fame, fortune, and pop star pussy. Of course Russ cant accept the fact that his knowledge of the law is on par with a meth head sovereign citizen. so he's gonna keep on suing women who wont suck him his penis , anyone who laughs at him, and anyone who wont give him what he thinks he deserves.
That sounds like a good name for his next book.

The Legal Plights of Russell Greer: Shady Lawyers and Bias Judges

Front cover shows Skordas and Judge Havas looking down on him menacingly as the security guards from the Ariana Grande concert tackle him to the ground. Ariana in the background laughing with a bunch of saggy pants thugs and kids with their legs blown off
 
I haven't seen this. Was an achieve saved to this thread?

Yes. Citracett pulled a screenshot:

1618943757608.png
1618943766409.png

Still looking for the tard vidya of it...
 
Back