Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,450 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 285 11.0%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,599
As an aside, that episode of "I've Got A Secret" is actually quite fascinating. Seymour was, at the time, the last living person who had been present at the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. As a 5-year-old, Seymour didn't really know what was going on, but was worried about the wellbeing of John Wilkes Booth, whom Seymour saw jump down onto the stage and break his leg.

A few thoughts:

I love how granular all Russell’s whining about trolls’ antics is. “March 15, David called Plaintiff a ‘retardo homo,’ continuing on March 18-20 with false allegations that Plaintiff is ‘dumb and looks stupid’ and ‘has a 1-inch peenor lol.’”

“Pipsqueak” is now part of the legal record, lol. From the document: "David... goes into a bizarre rant, falsely claiming Plaintiff is five foot three and that Greer is going to lose to Greg Skordas.” I’m not sure that second part is a false claim…

It’s weird that Russell offered a screenshot of his buying a stun gun as an exhibit. Like, “Don’t believe me when I said I bought a stun gun! Well, look! I did!” It’s also weird that Russell offers the world’s most generic form letter from Mitt Romney’s office as proof of… well, something. Who knows.

I’d love to know who the hell sent Russell the flirtily inflected message in Exhibit H.

Exhibit I: "At first I was all, wow! An author. Then I read the reviews of one of your books and the general consensus was that you have the mindset of a serial rapist." LOL.

Start to finish, this document drips with bitterness and self-pity. It’s remarkably emotional, even for Russell. It really does draw a vivid portrait of how besieged, hopeless and miserable Russell’s world is. This passage is a particularly remarkable cri de coeur:

“This harassment is never going to end. Greer can't trust people now because he does not know if they are working with Kiwi Farms or if they are truly fans or interested in Greer. This is how Plaintiff is harmed. His life is ruined. His reputation is smeared. His dreams are unobtainable. The most important thing to a person, their name, is tarnished.”

I can just imagine Russell tearing his clothes and sprinkling ashes on his head, as I read this.
It is rather funny how Russell is so constantly torn between his desire to be seen as some sort of pitiful, pathetic, downtrodden wretch to be given pity fucks and kind words or to be admired as some sort of creative genius. His lawsuits really give us an insight into how miserable he is on a day-to-day basis. He clearly fumes over every minor slight and question to his greatness, so an entire thread dedicated to mocking him must be hell.
What exactly is Russ' audition supposed to be? A retard jumping around stage to music? Even in the delusional world of Russell Greer, how can he possibly think that anyone would want to see this or that it is possibly inspirational? If anything the network would receive negative press as cruelly broadcasting some freak for laughs.
You're exactly right they would. Russell seems to think that just existing with a disability is somehow inspiring, I'm not sure if that's because he doesn't understand normal human emotion properly and doesn't get what inspires people or he just thinks his life is so hard with his gimp face that doing anything is inspiring given how "woe is me" his life has been. But given airtime, people with no context would criticize AGT for letting him on to humiliate himself.
This might be the most unhinged filing of his, yet. I don't know, maybe I'm just forgetting just how inane his taylor stuff was, but there wasn't one sentence in this legal document that seemed to make any sense.

His entire conception of legal evidence is just... other-worldly. Showing a receipt for a stun gun to evidence what, exactly? That, in addition to being a stalker, you're paranoid? And bragging about making 'criminal complaints' (not really) is like saying your 1998 Honda Civic is worth $50,000 because you listed it for that on ebay. All it shows is that you're nuts, not that there's actually anything to your claims.

Getting into slapfights over whores on instagram and then blaming kiwifarms. Threatening to sue people over facebook comments and then blaming kiwifarms. Getting calls from some dude calling you a pipsqueak...

...well, okay, that one might be someone from here.
The language gets more and more unprofessional as time goes on with each filing. I remember in his most recent Swift lawsuit he kept bolding and italicizing words and sentences like he was getting tired of repeating himself, I always thought that was funny because it's his way of saying "listen you morons, this is why I'm right." But this one definitely has a lot of unprofessional language, it's night and day with what Skordas filed. I seem to remember some of his earlier filings having some attempt at legalese, but now they just read like something he posts on Facebook. I also appreciate the spelling errors like "ensure" instead of "endure." Why proofread when you're never wrong, after all.

And as for his evidence, I think that shows how unhinged he's become too. He has no idea that these people who call/message him are from KF. We're just a scapegoat for anything that challenges his ego. He must go around thinking everyone is a troll after him. Just like in his book how he assumes everyone who's mean to him is from KF, I can't imagine how broken his brain is by now.
View attachment 2110904
Got nothing to say to this...
"My past doesn't define me" is exactly how a narcissist thinks. That quote is meant to be used by people who've been in abusive relationships, or were drug addicts, not people who commit crimes, get a slap on the wrist and learn nothing. For Russell, quotes like this are his way of saying "I've forgiven myself for the things I've done, so you can't hold them against me because it's all in the past." Just like how in his dating profile he mentions how he doesn't let his disability bother him so it shouldn't bother women. He wants other people to ignore his faults and bad actions without actually apologizing or changing.
 
Getting into slapfights over whores on instagram and then blaming kiwifarms. Threatening to sue people over facebook comments and then blaming kiwifarms. Getting calls from some dude calling you a pipsqueak...

...well, okay, that one might be someone from here.
Agree.

To anyone reading this thread who has, or is considering reaching out to Russel: Please don't. The less interaction Greer receives, the funnier he is. His posts, videos, music and lawsuits are him screaming impotently into the void, demanding fame and attention from his celebrity crushes. Contacting him only provides him with validation and "exhibits" for his lawsuits. If no one was even contacting him, his filings would be even more unhinged and hilarious - trying invent another reason for why his thread should be removed. Remember when he resorted to forging a "witness letter" of the brothel owner for the whore he was trying to sue? He did that because literally no one else cared that he blew 4 grand on one hour at Olive Garden, one hour of travel time, and two hours of just talking.

I personally hope Taylor Swift has never heard of this guy and will never, ever think about him - that is the most hilarious timeline. Null won't be at oral argument for him to "confront" in person. Only based Skordas will be there and he's only there because he's getting paid. Russel should only be allowed to interact with people who are being paid to be in the same room with him. That gives us the sweetest milk.
 
It is rather funny how Russell is so constantly torn between his desire to be seen as some sort of pitiful, pathetic, downtrodden wretch to be given pity fucks and kind words or to be admired as some sort of creative genius. His lawsuits really give us an insight into how miserable he is on a day-to-day basis. He clearly fumes over every minor slight and question to his greatness, so an entire thread dedicated to mocking him must be hell.
I wonder if that last passage ("His life is ruined. His reputation is smeared. His dreams are unobtainable, etc.") signals the beginning of a shift from, "My future is bright," to, "Okay, my future isn't bright, but it's the trolls' fault." Even at his most self-pitying Russell has always, up until now, sought to frame his suffering as something that he will eventually overcome. I've long been curious what Russell's narrative will be as he approaches middle age, and perhaps this is it. "I could have been great, but it was ruined for me."
 
Russ should be thanking Kiwi Karms. As long as we're around he never has to admit how shitty any of his projects are. We're the perfect scape goat. Book doesn't sell? It's those damn Kiwi's leaving bad reviews. Song bombs? It those damn Kiwi's posting it illegally. Without us he'd still be a failure, but he'd have to admit it's because he's terrible at everything he does.
Null once joked that he should volunteer his services to lolcows. When they screw up, they contact him and pay him money, he fabricates a web forum, thread, and relevant internet history, and the cows blame that thread for their woes.
The “David Burnett” (facebook.com/david.burnerr.9/) he claims is harassing him is obviously using a fake profile picture. Here it is at full size:

View attachment 2110833

Per Russ’ “evidence,” we can see that “David” is using a new account:

View attachment 2110841

And if the timestamp on the cover picture the account is using is any indication of when it was created, then it’s ten days old:

View attachment 2110845

The evidence Russ submitted includes no source email address from this “David,” and the screenshots only have times, not dates. It’s certainly possible he’s doing this to himself to try and beef up his claim.
I was looking into the two Instagram accounts that sent him messages
View attachment 2110888
Nothing here but pictures of clothes weird they would threaten Russ
View attachment 2110890
Now this is interesting Adyn1203 follows 1800kaizen.
Tinfoil hat time, I think these are burner accounts along with the Facebook account Russ either made himself or contacted someone to send him those messages to beef up his harassment claims.
First off, bad w33n! Stahp that!
That being said,
"Dave Burnett" is a common troll name for Phil Burnell aka DarkSydePhil, anyone in the DSP-tism sphere would spot this right away.
Maybe I shouldn't point this out, because on one hand it's evidence he's frequented the Farms, on the other hand it's evidence he's just some random DSP follower so why would it matter?
Besides, it's not like anything he did rises to any criminality.
Just sayin'.
If Skordas and/or his interns are perusing the thread, I'm sure they're a little shocked to discover us autists doing the legwork for them.
 
Showing a receipt for a stun gun to evidence what, exactly? That, in addition to being a stalker, you're paranoid?
I think he wanted to show that the alleged harassment has put him in fear for his life (which is half of what you need for a harassment claim in Utah), but there are about 4 problems with that from the top of my head.
1. He didn't tie it in to Kiwi Farms.
2. He's not suing the posters, and the site is protected under 230
3. He's missing the other half of Harassment claim requirment.
4. Brandenburg v Ohio (possibly) since Utah harassment claim requires a threat to be made, and Brandenburg v Ohio makes sure 99% of threats aren't legally considered ones.
But he fails to SHOW the connection.
He fails to understand that he has to show a connection. He saw some caselaw about asumptions on whatever or not mail has arrived based on credible evidence, and assumed he could just replace all facts with assumptions.
But because Russ declared it he thinks the court will accept it. The problem though is that it cannot. It is not properly pled. There is no supporting evidence.
It's Skordas' job to point out to the court that this is bullshit, to make sure they don't take it as fact.
Because it doesn't ever say what Russell says it says and it doesn't ever mean what Russell says it means.
I especially like those exhibits that prove that he made shit up to the court about what was said to him.
I like how he said he knew he had to prove all four factors for granting a preliminary injunction and then just said basically but I'm not going to because I don't feel like it and then moaned about a bunch of irrelevant shit.
Tbf, he did cover them. He failed horribly at even pretending to do it properly, but he did cover it, even though as you mention it was nothing more than an excuse to whine about us.
He's probably doing it because of the statue of limitations part in Skordas's response look at the messages he received on Instagram he got both of them at 11:37 pm the day before he took the screenshot but claims they were from December of 2020
Statue of limitations was over Defamation though, not mean harassing comments online, so it doesn't help.
 
I appreciate the effort but this is not what I was referring to. Recently, Russ was convicted for stalking a non-celebrity after she clearly told him to fuck off and not contact her(which he admits to doing in his own damn lawsuit). The video provided is him losing a civil suit to Ariana Grande. While it may have been humiliating, I was referring to the case that lead to an actual conviction for stalking on his record.
 
I appreciate the effort but this is not what I was referring to. Recently, Russ was convicted for stalking a non-celebrity after she clearly told him to fuck off and not contact her(which he admits to doing in his own damn lawsuit). The video provided is him losing a civil suit to Ariana Grande. While it may have been humiliating, I was referring to the case that lead to an actual conviction for stalking on his record.
Search the thread for Erika.
 
I appreciate the effort but this is not what I was referring to. Recently, Russ was convicted for stalking a non-celebrity after she clearly told him to fuck off and not contact her(which he admits to doing in his own damn lawsuit). The video provided is him losing a civil suit to Ariana Grande. While it may have been humiliating, I was referring to the case that lead to an actual conviction for stalking on his record.
He pled guilty to Electronic Communication Harassment in Utah for stalking/harassing Erika Albino via cell phone and social media. The court case was broadcasted publicly, but I have no idea if anyone archived a video of it.

Also, can someone explain what the "outcome" of Russ' latest music video for Yovanna Ventura was? In his filing, he claims that trolls "ruined it" or "caused it to get rejected", or something?
 
Tbf, he did cover them. He failed horribly at even pretending to do it properly, but he did cover it, even though as you mention it was nothing more than an excuse to whine about us.
He doesn't in his opposition.
1619151289339.png

He did talk about it in the original brief, but he specifically doesn't address it in this. Instead, he says he's going to address it in a different opposition to a completely different thing, which will be decided by a different judge.
 
Now that I think about it, why did Russ take this to "small claims" court to begin with, given that he was claiming that Swift and Grande owed him millions of dollars?

(I'll assume its because he was too cheap and lazy to find a lawyer, or knew that a real lawyer would read his nonsense and tell him to take a hike - but then what's the point of him filing his lawsuit at all - other than maybe hoping to win a few $1000 for his hooker slush fund?).

Could be any number of reasons:

* Small claims means Plighty Mason can file pro se and create his own minstrel show of fail
* He claims in his tard book that he tried getting a lolyer, but they brushed Pipsqueak off
* Any lolyer who rolled his eyes and considered his tard case thought "Any port in a storm" but demanded a retainer fee
* Upstairs strip mall business Collage (As seen on Maury Pauvich) never taught anything above small claims
* He is a Pipsqueak, ergo, you file in Pipsqueak court (Small claims)


In reference to Erika's case: That was Zoom and there were only very short clips (audio and visual) which I don't think were saved because they couldn't be saved AFAIK.
 
I appreciate the effort but this is not what I was referring to. Recently, Russ was convicted for stalking a non-celebrity after she clearly told him to fuck off and not contact her(which he admits to doing in his own damn lawsuit). The video provided is him losing a civil suit to Ariana Grande. While it may have been humiliating, I was referring to the case that lead to an actual conviction for stalking on his record.
There were some stern warnings on the entry page that recording the proceedings was illegal. And thanks to jokers signing up for the stream with obviously fake names, which the judge commented on at multiple points during the proceedings, the court is aware that there was unusual outside interest in that case. It certainly would have been possible to record, but if anyone did, I would strongly suggest not releasing it.
 
There were some stern warnings on the entry page that recording the proceedings was illegal. And thanks to jokers signing up for the stream with obviously fake names, which the judge commented on at multiple points during the proceedings, the court is aware that there was unusual outside interest in that case. It certainly would have been possible to record, but if anyone did, I would strongly suggest not releasing it.

Maybe 'BasedSkordas' will reveal themselves one day.
 
Like when he immediately apologized for not realizing usernames were visible to the court?
I dont remember that? I remember the judge calling out to him asking if he was Greg Skordas, and there being no response and then Rusty's lawyer saying 'I dont think that's him'. I know I couldn't see usernames during proceedings.
 
Back