Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

Another thing freaky about it is it’s so thin at the base but it gets fatter as you head towards the tip which is backwards and just a general heebie-jeebie inducing thing. Penises don’t look distorted by gravity even if a guy is packing serious heat.

Instead of a penis it looks like she’s playing with one of those popular “squishies” toys or a balloon full of custard; especially when she gives it the death squeeze. I was terrified it was going to pop.
It astonishes me that people can look at those images and still think "I want one".
 
It astonishes me that people can look at those images and still think "I want one".
I compare srs to ritualistic multilation because that's what it is. There have been lots of cults where genital multilation was seen as a good thing. Normal people don't understand it because they aren't brainwashed.
 
It astonishes me that people can look at those images and still think "I want one".
Tbf, that’s one of (if not the ONLY) example where you can actually see a fake dick in action. I know there’s another one out there of a fake dick being pumped to “erection” but that doesn’t show how soft and wrong it looks like this video does.
 
This has got to be some of the most reetarded shit I have ever read in my life. Let me rephrase it for them:

"I, a tranny, cannot be crazy because more than one doctor found the following!

1) I'm not CURRENTLY in the middle of a florid psychotic break
2) I'm 18 years or older
3) My brain works like I'm 18 years or older, more or less (in other words, I can consent to fucking, for example... not that I ever have had sex)
4) I'm not clinically retarded... which would make it impossible for me to consent"

That's... that's it. Guess what other medical procedures, medicines, etc work like this? Fucking NONE. I can't go to my GP and say "hey doc I really really like heroin and you can't PROVE I'm crazy so get me a script for dilaudid and oxycodone, kay?" That shit wouldn't fly anywhere (yes, I'm aware of the *former* pill mills in places like Florida) these days. But that's the tranny argument? You can't say I'm actually (clinically) retarded so give me my Rx heroin, please.

Goddamn. Everytime I start to feel sorry for one of these hackjobs I just think about this kind of stuff. Or trannies talking about shit like uterus transplants "just so they can be the first trans person to have an abortion." I mean I couldn't give a fuck if you have an abortion, people do it all the time. But I'm pretty sure it's not easy for most people who have them and... that's just fucking *grim*, man. Fuck doing uterus transplants for sterile women who want to have a kid! Give it to the tranny so they can yeet a baby into the incinerator!

Fuck these absolute ghouls. Gimme my hats.
This is such a good point. I don’t want to PL but I know certain medication would help me in the short term, but my doctor will tell me, no, I’m not prescribing it to you for x reason and I have to trust them, because I’m not a fucking doctor. It’s fucking crazy that these people think there are going to be no health repercussions from taking cross sex hormones as they age. God damn this is just a self mutilating destructive death cult lol.
Edited to add that I guess my point is that at some stage you have to accept reality and its confines instead of treating the world as some weird playground whose concepts you can manipulate at will.
 
Is the distinction made in the US between plastic surgery (surgery which relates to function) and cosmetic surgery (surgery which relates to appearance)? Half the time it seems like they're used interchangeably in relation to SRS.
There is no distinction made in anglophone countries to define and regulate "cosmetic surgery". Any surgery that has an appearance component is cosmetic surgery. Dental surgery is cosmetic surgery, for example.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons do not proffer a definition of plastic surgery, so here is the Australian definition:

Screenshot_20210430-015219_Chrome.jpg

Note the definition requiring the original unaugmented body to be deficient in some way.

As there is no health insurance regulatory body to speak of in the US and afaik every insurance company just makes shit up as they go along, I would suspect that whatever insurer was involved or not involved has the greatest say in deciding whether a surgery was reconstructive or cosmetic.

I once had a patient in my care who was a tourist from the US and had ended up in a series of mishaps that left his foot mangled.

The surgeon on duty pulled a fucking miracle and saved all 5 toes on the foot. We were drawing up rehab plans and considering writing up a case study on it and shit.

Then his insurer called and told us that because we operated before they gave approval, they were going to deny the claim, and the only provisional approvals they were willing to give was amputation of all toes except the big toe. Their reasoning? Toes are purely cosmetic and do not perforn a function.

The insurance company then got their legal dept to send us this awful letter by fax and probably courier mailed it too, basically chastising us for performing unauthorised, unlawful cosmetic surgery and expecting us to wear the costs of the initial operation, and to perform the amputations posthaste.

The letter further threatened no funny business of leaving the toes be, because if further complications arose on those toes, they would deny all claims in the future for toes that are marked as no longer existing on their file, and they would move to press charges against the patient for insurance fraud.

After a long back and forth, the patient got to keep his 5 toes and was successfully discharged and returned to the US.

I have since been informed that this is a tactic US insurers pull on overseas healthcare providers routinely as a way to negotiate costs down, and that there was (probably?) no intent on the part of the insurer to carry these threats out.

Another poster asked this and got no response so:

How well connected are these surgical penises? Could you rip one off in an angry troon fight?

I am going to give this way too much thought, hope you all have your puzzle pieces ready.

Bearing in mind that I have not seen one in the flesh (lol) and only am going off on the medical journals, the fleshpoles are fully connected to be supplied blood, and contain harvested nerves to give sensation. Some also have lengthened urethras to allow urination. Those structures in turn have to be hooked up to the rest of the body.

These structures are pretty delicate, and I see no reason why it wouldn't, uh, misalign or come apart after a very hard pull. Since these are girls who never had reason to learn techniques to protect and avoid the groin area in general life, we just might see a case in the future.

I do not think it will literally come away at the seams, I think it will come off a bit before the sutures, like when you stitch up a rip on a pair of old jeans and it gets a new rip just under the stitching.

From the looks of it, it doesn't seem to be particularly affixed to anything in the body. I have attached a picture of a neophallus to illustrate what I mean.

Screenshot_20210430-021157_Chrome.jpg
 
I was going to say, spoiler please but you know what? Nobody is mistaking that for a glans. Hell it could be an elbow or heel.
I hesitated over the spoiler icon for like, a second, and then concluded that not only did it not look like a penis, it genuinely isn’t a penis, so SFW!
(it already is a giant hugbox tho where even the worst results are praised).
The moderator there u/hiddenstill does a reasonable job of keeping a neutral record via the subs wiki. I’ve been somewhat impressed at how he manages to walk the line between allowing horror stories but not letting the other troons start slap fights over stanning/hating surgeons. Nonetheless, I am amazed at some of the positive commentary on what are objectively literal gashes.
(Bit of useless trivia about u/hiddenstill - his user name is because he’s been medically transitioning for eons but has never come out as trans and still presents as a man)
s the distinction made in the US between plastic surgery (surgery which relates to function) and cosmetic surgery (surgery which relates to appearance)? Half the time it seems like they're used interchangeably in relation to SRS.
In the NHS, front holes are made by urologists and they subcontract a specialist private penis team (‘Andrology’) for the frankensausages.
The NHS doesn’t employ cosmetic surgeons, and the plastics teams do reconstruction/burns etc, and also some of the hand surgeries, (apparently hand ops can overlap plastic surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons and they sometimes argue over who gets to do the interesting ones, although there are special hand teams for the really interesting stuff)
Of course, urologists sometimes go rogue too, look at that Arnkoff fellow who chops balls and immediately shoves the newly ball-less into a taxi.
I am going to give this way too much thought, hope you all have your puzzle pieces ready.
It’s never too much! I very much appreciate all the doctors and other types of health care professionals who frequent this thread. It’s my favourite part of the farms.
 
1619545265578.jpg


Isn't it common knowledge that they have srs "factories" where it's one stop shopping? You see the surgeon, talk to billing about insurance and see a shrink to rubber stamp you sane. All under one roof.

Plus as was stated above the psychiatrist doesn't want to lose his/her job by denying the surgery and being sued. Because you know there's always another shrink that would say hell yes! Chop away!

Why do we deny people that feel like they shouldn't have a left arm? Shouldn't they be living their authentic life? Because it's crazy that's why. They get therapy to address this mental illness. Like that lady that blinded herself with chemicals because she was suppose to be blind. She's crazy, I mean mentally ill. 🙄

It all went to shit when transgender was taken out of the DSM-5. IMO. Money talks and morals walk and there's big money in this lunacy.

Edit cause I am the dumb
 
There is no distinction made in anglophone countries to define and regulate "cosmetic surgery". Any surgery that has an appearance component is cosmetic surgery. Dental surgery is cosmetic surgery, for example.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons do not proffer a definition of plastic surgery, so here is the Australian definition:

View attachment 2128844

Note the definition requiring the original unaugmented body to be deficient in some way.

As there is no health insurance regulatory body to speak of in the US and afaik every insurance company just makes shit up as they go along, I would suspect that whatever insurer was involved or not involved has the greatest say in deciding whether a surgery was reconstructive or cosmetic.

I once had a patient in my care who was a tourist from the US and had ended up in a series of mishaps that left his foot mangled.

The surgeon on duty pulled a fucking miracle and saved all 5 toes on the foot. We were drawing up rehab plans and considering writing up a case study on it and shit.

Then his insurer called and told us that because we operated before they gave approval, they were going to deny the claim, and the only provisional approvals they were willing to give was amputation of all toes except the big toe. Their reasoning? Toes are purely cosmetic and do not perforn a function.

The insurance company then got their legal dept to send us this awful letter by fax and probably courier mailed it too, basically chastising us for performing unauthorised, unlawful cosmetic surgery and expecting us to wear the costs of the initial operation, and to perform the amputations posthaste.

The letter further threatened no funny business of leaving the toes be, because if further complications arose on those toes, they would deny all claims in the future for toes that are marked as no longer existing on their file, and they would move to press charges against the patient for insurance fraud.

After a long back and forth, the patient got to keep his 5 toes and was successfully discharged and returned to the US.

I have since been informed that this is a tactic US insurers pull on overseas healthcare providers routinely as a way to negotiate costs down, and that there was (probably?) no intent on the part of the insurer to carry these threats out.



I am going to give this way too much thought, hope you all have your puzzle pieces ready.

Bearing in mind that I have not seen one in the flesh (lol) and only am going off on the medical journals, the fleshpoles are fully connected to be supplied blood, and contain harvested nerves to give sensation. Some also have lengthened urethras to allow urination. Those structures in turn have to be hooked up to the rest of the body.

These structures are pretty delicate, and I see no reason why it wouldn't, uh, misalign or come apart after a very hard pull. Since these are girls who never had reason to learn techniques to protect and avoid the groin area in general life, we just might see a case in the future.

I do not think it will literally come away at the seams, I think it will come off a bit before the sutures, like when you stitch up a rip on a pair of old jeans and it gets a new rip just under the stitching.

From the looks of it, it doesn't seem to be particularly affixed to anything in the body. I have attached a picture of a neophallus to illustrate what I mean.

Fat lot of good the nerve harvesting does since the female erectile tissue (the clit) is still at the base and by their own admission the only thing the nerves allow them to "feel" is abnormally cold.
 
Fat lot of good the nerve harvesting does since the female erectile tissue (the clit) is still at the base and by their own admission the only thing the nerves allow them to "feel" is abnormally cold.
I always got the impression that the reason for the nerve is so that the neophallus does not get pinched, sat on etc, like how leprosy sufferers get themselves into scrapes that fester because the disease causes neuropathy.

There is a separate procedure that embeds the virilized clitoris into the neophallus. I cannot imagine it is very popular.
 
Phalloplasty is the gift that just keeps on giving, isn't it?

I found these pictures on the homepage of a Dr. Chen who practices from a clinic in San Fransisco and supposedly is considered an "expert" on phalloplasty and the numerous procedures that surround this rather... complex frankensteining.

These pictures are of a FTM who wanted a hair bologna crafted out of thigh meat (ALT phalloplasty) and... it looks every bit as hideous and unnatural as you'd expect.

Phallo_horror4.jpg

Phallo_horror.jpg

Phallo_horror2.jpg

Phallo_horror5.jpg

Phallo_horror3.jpg

Phallo_horror6.jpg
 
Phalloplasty is the gift that just keeps on giving, isn't it?

I found these pictures on the homepage of a Dr. Chen who practices from a clinic in San Fransisco and supposedly is considered an "expert" on phalloplasty and the numerous procedures that surround this rather... complex frankensteining.

These pictures are of a FTM who wanted a hair bologna crafted out of thigh meat (ALT phalloplasty) and... it looks every bit as hideous and unnatural as you'd expect.






Holy shit that hair situation in the last shot. Why get the fake balls if you're going to hide them in a thicket of 8" pubic hairs?

The most horrifying thing about this one may be the fact that it is so much thinner and more ... fragile-looking at the base then at the end. Like any minor stress is going to yank it right off. (Which i guess explains the hair situation, to hide the fact that it looks like a toothpaste tube squeezed from the bottom...)
 
Fresh Islamic Content from a petcow on manmadepussy

Blech!

Let’s highlight the elements of a classic troon:
Demented AGP smirk ✅
Cone tits ✅
Man face but wants a BA ✅
Hons in the comments saying his stink trap is beautiful✅


I can’t tell if the most horrifying thing is that he is rubbing literally nothing (where a clit should be), or that he dips his finger into the hog-hole, comes out fully dry and adds another finger. :cryblood:

X
 
Phalloplasty is the gift that just keeps on giving, isn't it?

I found these pictures on the homepage of a Dr. Chen who practices from a clinic in San Fransisco and supposedly is considered an "expert" on phalloplasty and the numerous procedures that surround this rather... complex frankensteining.

These pictures are of a FTM who wanted a hair bologna crafted out of thigh meat (ALT phalloplasty) and... it looks every bit as hideous and unnatural as you'd expect.






Kalfsleverworst.jpg

Because it is every girls dream to be pleasured with a sausage.....
 
Phalloplasty is the gift that just keeps on giving, isn't it?

I found these pictures on the homepage of a Dr. Chen who practices from a clinic in San Fransisco and supposedly is considered an "expert" on phalloplasty and the numerous procedures that surround this rather... complex frankensteining.

These pictures are of a FTM who wanted a hair bologna crafted out of thigh meat (ALT phalloplasty) and... it looks every bit as hideous and unnatural as you'd expect.






Did something I've been meaning to for a long time (NSFW)
1.PNG
Initial implantation, headed by Dr. Mengele

2.PNG
3.PNG
Implantation begins to split
4.PNG
Project deemed success
See? Slap a black and white filter or desaturate the pictures and give them a few captions and you'd absolutely believe this was Nazi experimentation. That should be frightening.
 
Did something I've been meaning to for a long time (NSFW)
View attachment 2131478
Initial implantation, headed by Dr. Mengele

View attachment 2131480
View attachment 2131481
Implantation begins to split
View attachment 2131484
Project deemed success
See? Slap a black and white filter or desaturate the pictures and give them a few captions and you'd absolutely believe this was Nazi experimentation. That should be frightening.
Would've totally worked if it wasn't for one tiny detail in photo #2: ankle socks weren't a thing in the 1940's. That's strikingly modern.
 
Last edited:
Fresh Islamic Content from a petcow on manmadepussy

Blech!

Let’s highlight the elements of a classic troon:
Demented AGP smirk ✅
Cone tits ✅
Man face but wants a BA ✅
Hons in the comments saying his stink trap is beautiful✅


I can’t tell if the most horrifying thing is that he is rubbing literally nothing (where a clit should be), or that he dips his finger into the hog-hole, comes out fully dry and adds another finger. :cryblood:

X
Literally manhandles it
 
I came across this under the "glansplasty" tag on Dr. Chen's website, and it boggles my mind that any so-called professional would want to advertise this monstrosity as a successful result worthy of adding to your portfolio.

Hairy_fauxphal.jpg
 
I came across this under the "glansplasty" tag on Dr. Chen's website, and it boggles my mind that any so-called professional would want to advertise this monstrosity as a successful result worthy of adding to your portfolio.

Jesus fuck it reminds me of a spider. Maybe we should all be grateful she's being honest about the outcome if you don't electrolysis your hair off first. Plenty of these bitches shave or use nair because it's basically just a fucked up extension of your leg anyway.
 
Back