Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

fnaarf said:
She's really into putting people into situations where they can be easily abused and raped. That's creepy.
Click to expand...
Melinda's wires got crossed when her Dad was raping her. Now she conflates rape with love. This is why she excuses Marshall's raping her. So she considers putting her kids into a situation where they can easily be raped as a good thing. Like she's a matchmaker or something. This is one sick, sick bitch
 
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Toasty and Baby Yoda
She actually thinks that being a single mom with half a dozen kids makes her attractive to a landowner who needs free farmhands. She's bragged about this regularly. It doesn't occur to her that her children may have other goals in life than being free slave labor for whoever their new daddy is, or that the farm owner might have more nefarious plans for the vulnerable homeless single mom and her 6 kids that she is so ready to turn over to him for whatever labor he might wish. Here's the skinny, @TamarYaelBatYah, that dream guy who seems to be so eager to take on you and your brood is more interested in your brood. Not that I think you care. You've already said that you would sell your children into indentured servitude for financial gain. So why not prostitute your daughters? You're poor, you have good reason. You said so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: super thug, Anne Hyroe, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 3 others
@TamarYaelBatYah Since you have been banned from using the traditional banking system for Yahuah only knows what, have you considered opening up a Cryptocurrency wallet and investing in various cryptos? You should consider investing in Dogecoin, or maybe ever Garlicoin. I've personally made a killing over the past years HODLing various shitcoins and even mainstream ones like Ethereum.
Why were you locked out of the US banking system?

1619891110218.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist
Cup Noodle said:

Father Abraham also had a concubine because his wife couldn't bare children. Hell his wife gave her to him. It gets more complicated but that's a good enough explanation for here. Pam is likely barren, so I will take her for a wife and Mel will be my concubine to bear me children. It all holds up with the old testament/torah. There was plenty of polygamy in the old testament and in history in general. When everyone is constantly at war the the ratio of men to women skews towards women. If a woman wanted to get married she had to be a prime example or be the second or third etc. wife.
Click to expand...
Firstly, I have to correct your term before I can answer it. The correct word is P-O-L-Y-G-Y-N-Y (not a typo!). Not Polygamy. Polygyny appears in The Hebrew Bible, not Polygamy.

Just as many sins were recorded, P-O-L-Y-G-Y-N-Y is not an exception. It was a sin described, not a way commanded to live.

It was never Abraham's idea to have a concubine, it was Sarah's lack of faith. Rebekah was wiser and instead of a concubine, she and Isaac PRAYED to get pregnant. Imagine that! Prayer instead!

Your idea of valuing women on a scale to be wife or concubine is narcissistic. The same could be reversed on men: "a man had to be in his prime, able to hold an erection, have an 8 pack and be rich or he would never get a wife. The old men would be discarded at 50 when their ability to hold a stiff erection for long periods of time diminished". See how I can create made up narcissistic narratives to dehumanize men?

Yet the truth is that throughout history people found spouses compatible to themselves, regardless of their circumstances. Widow women found widow men. Single mothers found single fathers. Virgin men find virgin women. Poor men go with poor women. Divorced men choose divorced women. It's not about a heirarchy, it's about compatibility.

There's nothing wrong with a man picking a wife solely because of her looks (as long as he tells her upfront that's the reason and foundation of the marriage) and there's nothing wrong with a girl choosing a guy for money (as long as she disclosed it upfront), but that doesn't mean every guy and every gal follows that pattern. People pick life partners based on many other reasons besides money and sexuality. That's been all throughput history.

Either way, Polygyny was always a sin and always will be a sin

www.academia.edu

On the Error of Polygyny

In this paper the scriptural basis for Monogamy is discussed ©2013, 2016, 2019
www.academia.edu

You'll find in my essay how the evil men are recorded to value barren women above those that have birth. Interesting. Nothing new under the sun!
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Viridian, Deadpool, Anonymus Fluhre and 5 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Firstly, I have to correct your term before I can answer it. The correct word is P-O-L-Y-G-Y-N-Y (not a typo!). Not Polygamy. Polygyny appears in The Hebrew Bible, not Polygamy.

Just as many sins were recorded, P-O-L-Y-G-Y-N-Y is not an exception. It was a sin described, not a way commanded to live.

It was never Abraham's idea to have a concubine, it was Sarah's lack of faith. Rebekah was wiser and instead of a concubine, she and Isaac PRAYED to get pregnant. Imagine that! Prayer instead!

Your idea of valuing women on a scale to be wife or concubine is narcissistic. The same could be reversed on men: "a man had to be in his prime, able to hold an erection, have an 8 pack and be rich or he would never get a wife. The old men would be discarded at 50 when their ability to hold a stiff erection for long periods of time diminished". See how I can create made up narcissistic narratives to dehumanize men?

Yet the truth is that throughout history people found spouses compatible to themselves, regardless of their circumstances. Widow women found widow men. Single mothers found single fathers. Virgin men find virgin women. Poor men go with poor women. Divorced men choose divorced women. It's not about a heirarchy, it's about compatibility.

There's nothing wrong with a man picking a wife solely because of her looks (as long as he tells her upfront that's the reason and foundation of the marriage) and there's nothing wrong with a girl choosing a guy for money (as long as she disclosed it upfront), but that doesn't mean every guy and every gal follows that pattern. People pick life partners based on many other reasons besides money and sexuality. That's been all throughput history.

Either way, Polygyny was always a sin and always will be a sin

www.academia.edu

On the Error of Polygyny

In this paper the scriptural basis for Monogamy is discussed ©2013, 2016, 2019
www.academia.edu

You'll find in my essay how the evil men are recorded to value barren women above those that have birth. Interesting. Nothing new under the sun!
Click to expand...
I've got a eight inch dick that can get hard on command and the homestead you dream of and can't obtain. I'm living the dream and the more you reject me, the more you reject your dream.
 
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: Anne Hyroe and Baby Yoda
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Firstly, I have to correct your term before I can answer it. The correct word is P-O-L-Y-G-Y-N-Y (not a typo!). Not Polygamy. Polygyny appears in The Hebrew Bible, not Polygamy.

Just as many sins were recorded, P-O-L-Y-G-Y-N-Y is not an exception. It was a sin described, not a way commanded to live.

You'll find in my essay how the evil men are recorded to value barren women above those that have birth. Interesting. Nothing new under the sun!
Click to expand...
And why didn't you say anything about John 4:16-17 and Matthew 22:23-33/Luke 20:27-40?
Surely they bear some relevance to the topic of your...
47 page drabble.
 
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Firstly, I have to correct your term before I can answer it. The correct word is P-O-L-Y-G-Y-N-Y (not a typo!). Not Polygamy. Polygyny appears in The Hebrew Bible, not Polygamy.
Click to expand...
Polygamy is the correct term, as it is general and can refer to both polygyny, plural wives, or polyandry, plural husbands. It's the same as using the term "child" rather than the specific "boy," or "girl." You don't look like you know a special smart word. You look pedantic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223, Shaka Brah, Mr. Faget and 3 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Imagine that! Prayer instead!
Click to expand...
"When I was a child I prayed to God for a bike. Nothing happened and I realized that's not how God works. I stole a bike and prayed for forgiveness".
TamarYaelBatYah said:
You'll find in my essay how the evil men are recorded to value barren women above those that have birth. Interesting. Nothing new under the sun!
Click to expand...
That's dehumanizing for both people with different priorities in life and people with specific medical condition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223, ConSluttant, Kosher Salt and 4 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
There's nothing wrong with a man picking a wife solely because of her looks (as long as he tells her upfront that's the reason and foundation of the marriage) and there's nothing wrong with a girl choosing a guy for money (as long as she disclosed it upfront), but that doesn't mean every guy and every gal follows that pattern. People pick life partners based on many other reasons besides money and sexuality. That's been all throughput history.
Click to expand...
She says all these kinds of choices and relationships are AOK, but suddenly when it's people getting together who either can't conceive or choose not to, we get:
TamarYaelBatYah said:
You'll find in my essay how the evil men are recorded to value barren women above those that have birth. Interesting.
Click to expand...
Interesting indeed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, ConSluttant, B’Elanna and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back