The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

[Corn Flakes]

So, did we flip the "days since an internet crusader was revealed to be a hypocrite" counter back to zero yet? Looks like we're going to have to. Anyway...

Just a technical note since I had someone very insistently explaining me the difference not too long ago:

Spoiler: Short terminology sperging

Those My Hero Academia characters wouldn't normally be described as "shota" unless you're being very broad. Shota is a rather specific term relating to male characters that look like young boys (or young girls, as it often happens). The key is that the character's main characteristic is that he has to be designed to be cute, and they're almost universally rather short and skinny as they're modeled after children before they undergo their growth spurt during puberty.

The characters she was drawing would more accurately be described as shonen instead. That is, a teenager between 14 and 17, who looks explicitly masculine (instead of generically cute like a shota) but still not an adult. Those are often skinny but with some muscle definition. Or a good amount of it in Deku's case. For a very popular example, Shinji Ikari from Neon Genesis Evangelion is a shonen, not a shota.

All that said, she was still drawing/consuming art depicting underage characters while complaining about people doing the same. So she can go fuck herself.

 

[gratedcheese]

I watched their most recent video and it's genuinely one of the worst videos I've ever watched. It's about being afraid of cancel culture but it takes about 25 minutes to actually discuss the topic. Before that she goes on and on about how media affects the world, but she only used western media influences that were mostly positive and tried to say how the KKK was revived due to a movie in the 1915s, and how Jaws made people irrationally afraid of sharks. She provided nothing about how loli/shota somehow makes people turn into real pedophiles. She has no fucking clue what she's talking about and just grabs things that *SEEM* like they'd work only for it to fully backfire. I genuinely lost brian sales washing dish.

> revival of the KKK
> Jaws

Oh brother, she's recycling the same two talking points that all of these morons use. Seeing the same points that have been disproven again and again is really grating. Surprised she didn't use the Slender Man stabbing too, which is often times another one of their trump cards.

Let me explain this for people that have a negative brain cell count:

• Propaganda is specifically tailored to appeal to emotions, make you feel a certain way about a certain political idea or group of people. It has an agenda to push, an idea, and is typically funded by an interest group or the state itself. Things like lolicon are not propaganda; they simply exist for the sake of entertainment. Sick entertainment? Yes, but entertainment nonetheless. It is not trying to push the message that "hey you should go out and rape little kids!" It is a depiction, not advocation. That's like saying bondage pornography is rape propaganda (which is a radfem idea that many of these retards push).
• What happened with Jaws is an absolutely shit argument because it fails to contextualize the world around the film. Basically, this argument in reference to the increase of shark killings after the film and the stigmatization of sharks. Shark attacks had been on the rise for several years prior, and the killings themselves were due to greedy overfishing, not directly linked to the movie. Of course there were probably some morons who wanted to feel like the heroes of an action movie and hunted some sharks to impress their friends, but you're always going to have idiots. And, by the way, sharks are predators. It's natural for humans to be afraid of animals that could tear us to shreds in an instant. We don't need movies to be afraid of hazards, because we instinctually know danger when we see it. If anything, the documentaries that sensationalize shark attacks and perpetuate the myth of how aggressive sharks actually are are more to blame for the continued stigma, honestly.
• Let's throw the Slender Man stabbing in while we're at debunking, shall we? In 2014, two Creepypasta fanatics attempted to murder their friend to, according to them, "appeal to Slender Man and become his proxies." They also cited a lot of Creepypasta fandom lore, such as there being a "Slender Mansion" where all the Creepypasta characters live and that's where they would go too if they sacrificed their friend to him. This instance has been cited as a "fiction effects reality" argument in recent times, and it's utterly stupid. First off, both girls were diagnosed with mental illness. Second, these kids are too young to remember, but there was an entire movement in the wake of this happening to separate fiction and reality, where people advocated that this was an isolated incident that did not represent the community. This event is not an argument against the existence of edgier media, but instead about how people, especially children, consume it, and about how the internet impacts our minds. If fiction impacted reality to this degree, then there would be many more instances of Slender Man killings, and killings in the name of other series, for that matter.

It takes at max five minutes of critical thinking to demonstrate how stupid these arguments are.

 

[OddEyes]

BTW, since this is still on the topic of Noralities video...

That 'CP' that she claims that the creator of Dragon Maid created?

Her example...

The characters are college age.

She just went on some random hentai site, saw 'shota-con'

And thought "YUP! THIS PROVES MY POINT!"

When if you go on the wiki for coolkyou-shinsha -

https://coolkyou-shinsha.fandom.com/wiki/Chichi_Chichi

Remember folks - If you're short, you're a kid.

Now if you excuse me, I'm gonna go wipe my hard-drive.

Oh, and by the way... This wasn't a deep dive - This was stuff you could find on Google.

Bitch was either too lazy or, the more likely reason, she has an agenda to push.

 

[Slamerella]

BTW, since this is still on the topic of Noralities video...

That 'CP' that she claims that the creator of Dragon Maid created?

Her example...

View attachment 2131224

The characters are college age.

She just went on some random hentai site, saw 'shota-con'
View attachment 2131232

And thought "YUP! THIS PROVES MY POINT!"

When if you go on the wiki for coolkyou-shinsha -

View attachment 2131234View attachment 2131235

https://coolkyou-shinsha.fandom.com/wiki/Chichi_Chichi

Remember folks - If you're short, you're a kid.

Now if you excuse me, I'm gonna go wipe my hard-drive.

Oh, and by the way... This wasn't a deep dive - This was stuff you could find on Google.

Bitch was either too lazy or, the more likely reason, she has an agenda to push.

Damn, you beat me to it. I was gonna bring this up myself.
Not only are they college aged but Hiraku is a college dropout, making hentai for a living, and also living alone. So he's not at all underage. I think one of the other things about Coolkyoushinja's art is that it's very stylized, so it may lead to such perception.
To give an example, here's a piece of fanart for a couple of characters from Touhou Project.

This is Fujiwara no Mokou. She's meant to be immortal, barely/no aging thanks to drinking something that made her that way. She's over 1000 years old.

To compare, here's a picture of Fujiware no Mokou's key character art in one of the most recent in game appearances.

And her in game sprites

She's been designed specifically to have a tough girl look while also being flat. Which isn't too uncommon, but even then, you can still see she's not a loli, still rather late teen looking

Cropped for convenience, here's a picture of Komachi Onozuka. Pretend there's really huge tits smashing a dick under there, since I don't wanna put this under a spoiler.

In many of her non ZUN drawn appearances she's given a much more "adult" look, complete with a much larger bust than what we're used to seeing.

Case in point: stylization can lead to confusion, but at the same time, stylization does not equate the possibility of "younger characters." If someone drew someone like, say, Lust from FMA, shorter but with the same measurements, is she a child? No. She's just off model, maybe even chibi, who knows.

I should go back to some of my rants with friends to really showcase how dumb her arguments were, like when she brought up PROTECT Act and failed to mention that in order for virtual CP to be considered actual CP in the USA, it needs to be based on a real person... at least in her script, but she sure as fuck kept it in from the wikipedia article that was used in the video.

 

[AutoGuyNoFile]

BAHAHAHAHA! Oh man I was wondering what people would find about Noralities. To her credit she at least made me think a little but the accusations about her responding poorly to criticism? Well...both of my comments on her videos were deleted. Hard to say if that was YouTube being YouTube or an active choice by Noralities but I did find it interesting how her recent video almost felt like a response to my comments. Then again I'm sure I wasn't alone on that one.

But the main thing that really gets me is how in her video about how Ilulu is totally a loli, she spends the entire video focusing on KANA and proving how KANA is a loli and then just goes "Ilulu is the same thing". No bitch, she's not! You even PROVE that when you dig up that in the manga she's mentioned as being physically 16-ish to which she goes "So she's still a child" (which makes the MHA art OFFICIALLY hilarious). THIS is where I bring up age of consent in Japan, which she mentions in the next video...and then focus on age of consent being 13 and students petitioning to raise it to...16 SO SHE'S STILL NOT A DAMN LOLI YOU IDIOT! And I STILL wish she would have tried to tackle Uzaki-chan. Like even just acknowledging that Uzaki-chan is college age would be nice (and turns out she passes her head test).

 

[Govt. Shitposting Machine]

BAHAHAHAHA! Oh man I was wondering what people would find about Noralities. To her credit she at least made me think a little but the accusations about her responding poorly to criticism? Well...both of my comments on her videos were deleted. Hard to say if that was YouTube being YouTube or an active choice by Noralities but I did find it interesting how her recent video almost felt like a response to my comments. Then again I'm sure I wasn't alone on that one.

But the main thing that really gets me is how in her video about how Ilulu is totally a loli, she spends the entire video focusing on KANA and proving how KANA is a loli and then just goes "Ilulu is the same thing". No bitch, she's not! You even PROVE that when you dig up that in the manga she's mentioned as being physically 16-ish to which she goes "So she's still a child" (which makes the MHA art OFFICIALLY hilarious). THIS is where I bring up age of consent in Japan, which she mentions in the next video...and then focus on age of consent being 13 and students petitioning to raise it to...16 SO SHE'S STILL NOT A DAMN LOLI YOU IDIOT! And I STILL wish she would have tried to tackle Uzaki-chan. Like even just acknowledging that Uzaki-chan is college age would be nice (and turns out she passes her head test).

I always like it when these people get the age of consent in Japan wrong, the national AOC is 13 but most if not all prefrectures and islands have it as 18 anyway, 16 is the lowest I've heard of in one area but can't rememeber. Local laws and all that jazz.
If they want to argue about law in foreign countries the least they can do is the bare minimum of research.

 

[Slamerella]

BAHAHAHAHA! Oh man I was wondering what people would find about Noralities. To her credit she at least made me think a little but the accusations about her responding poorly to criticism? Well...both of my comments on her videos were deleted. Hard to say if that was YouTube being YouTube or an active choice by Noralities but I did find it interesting how her recent video almost felt like a response to my comments. Then again I'm sure I wasn't alone on that one.

But the main thing that really gets me is how in her video about how Ilulu is totally a loli, she spends the entire video focusing on KANA and proving how KANA is a loli and then just goes "Ilulu is the same thing". No bitch, she's not! You even PROVE that when you dig up that in the manga she's mentioned as being physically 16-ish to which she goes "So she's still a child" (which makes the MHA art OFFICIALLY hilarious). THIS is where I bring up age of consent in Japan, which she mentions in the next video...and then focus on age of consent being 13 and students petitioning to raise it to...16 SO SHE'S STILL NOT A DAMN LOLI YOU IDIOT! And I STILL wish she would have tried to tackle Uzaki-chan. Like even just acknowledging that Uzaki-chan is college age would be nice (and turns out she passes her head test).

Something tells me that she really does not understand how to keep the subject of a video as the subject of a video considering what I've said about her cancel culture one.

 

[Krystal]

I always like it when these people get the age of consent in Japan wrong, the national AOC is 13 but most if not all prefrectures and islands have it as 18 anyway, 16 is the lowest I've heard of in one area but can't rememeber. Local laws and all that jazz.
If they want to argue about law in foreign countries the least they can do is the bare minimum of research.

IIRC, it's 13, but their Child Protection laws make to 18. Also, never forget.

 

[AutoGuyNoFile]

I always like it when these people get the age of consent in Japan wrong, the national AOC is 13 but most if not all prefrectures and islands have it as 18 anyway, 16 is the lowest I've heard of in one area but can't rememeber. Local laws and all that jazz.
If they want to argue about law in foreign countries the least they can do is the bare minimum of research.

No no. To her credit, she DOES get the confusing age of consent laws in Japan right. Sorry it's REALLY confusing because it IS as low as 13 but with a boatload of caveats (and "corruption of the innocent" laws) as well as regional differences as you mentioned. My point was calling a physically 16 dragon with tits bigger than her head a "child coded character" is a stretch especially when her focus is on the physically 12 Kana and then going "Oh this is the same thing!". There's a REALLY big difference between the two characters. Haven't read the actual manga but I saw at least one scan of Ilulu talking about how she's "at the age where she should be looking for a mate".

Something tells me that she really does not understand how to keep the subject of a video as the subject of a video considering what I've said about her cancel culture one.

Yup. I saw the supposed Cancel Culture one too which was more about responding to the Dragon Maid video than it was about cancel culture. That and trying to prove that fiction affects reality. Really she SHOULD have titled it "How Fiction affects Reality". But then again YouTube is frustrating because these days every video has multiple titles with the thumbnail and video title being completely different.

 

[School of Fish]

I've been debating whether to actually post this but since this specific YouTuber has been making the rounds recently and more info has come out about her I feel I might as well make it known.

So there's a YouTuber by the name of Noralities whose videos have been blowing up in the algorithm recently especially this fucking thing:
View attachment 2129522
The TL;DR of this is that it's the same shit we've already seen in this thread, that loli shit "normalizes pedophilia" and that characters are apparently coded to be a certain way, you know, typical shit we've seen before.

Had that just been the case I would have brushed this person off as just another dumbass anituber.

But then I saw the video she made before this:
View attachment 2129554
I shit you not, she is simultaneously complaining about lolis while also propping up a shotacon anime.

And as if that's not enough to make her look like a massive hypocrite, here's art she drew from her Tumblr blog:
View attachment 2129560View attachment 2129561View attachment 2129562
I don't think I need to actually mention the ages of the MHA characters, it's common knowledge at this point.

There's a lot more I can say about her like how in a recent follow up video she compared lolis to fucking MINSTREL SHOWS but honestly, I'm too lazy to do a proper write up of this right now.

Feel free to do some digging on her if you want, I've heard she doesn't take criticism of her videos very well either.

Well I guess you can say she was caught in:

I watched their most recent video and it's genuinely one of the worst videos I've ever watched. It's about being afraid of cancel culture but it takes about 25 minutes to actually discuss the topic. Before that she goes on and on about how media affects the world, but she only used western media influences that were mostly positive and tried to say how the KKK was revived due to a movie in the 1915s, and how Jaws made people irrationally afraid of sharks. She provided nothing about how loli/shota somehow makes people turn into real pedophiles. She has no fucking clue what she's talking about and just grabs things that *SEEM* like they'd work only for it to fully backfire. I genuinely lost brian sales washing dish.

This was basically Noralties' stupid video in a nutshell anyway.

 

[OddEyes]

Mark me as late if you want, or stating the obvious... But I haven't seen anyone bring this up...

But Noralities deleted the MHA pics from her tumblr. Gee... What a coincidence that they happened to disappear immediately after people found those and began pointing them out.

What perfect timing.

 

[Atatata]

But in the video above, about halfway through her seething at the series, she claims to understand that our protagonist has PTSD and understands that he has died multiple times for people who can never acknowledge his suffering; that, in his curse enforced silence, he can’t directly tell people what’s wrong. This situation leads to him lashing out at the ones closest to him verbally, driving a wedge between him and those whom he’s fighting to save. Subaru’s anguish is an all-to-human reaction to the otherworldly situation he finds himself in. But by the same token, Emilia and Rem both have the right to be taken aback when they’re held up to a version of themselves that now only exists in Subaru’s memories. A normal person with a sense of empathy and a basic moral compass would see, from an outsider perspective, the inherent tragedy in the situation. But Nora though? She’s just upset that he yelled at women,

I was thinking about this recently when I remembered something kind of funny, if autistic and offtopic.

Spoiler: Autistic Ramblings

Actually the character canonically self harms due to his ptsd, to the point where he can't sleep at night unless he cuts himself because he's terrified of dying in his sleep.
It's never mentioned much other than in passing that he does this, and they cut much of it from the adaption, but there's an important scene later on that has yet to be adapted where he is found to have deep scratches along his wrists by another character, where she laments about how its a terrible habit of his and how if he keeps doing it that badly that people will start to notice.
Calling something like that a power fantasy and saying the main character is in the wrong for lashing out, wouldn't that be seen to be in incredibly horrible taste? Isn't shit like self harm and mental health seen as an incredibly sensitive subject in the community she keeps? Of course, she has the excuse that she probably only watched the anime, but she should at least do a bit of diligence and look up the wiki before she starts ranting on something, at the very least.

 

[School of Fish]

Mark me as late if you want, or stating the obvious... But I haven't seen anyone bring this up...

But Noralities deleted the MHA pics from her tumblr. Gee... What a coincidence that they happened to disappear immediately after people found those and began pointing them out.

What perfect timing.

Well I'm pretty sure there are other things out there that has yet to surface anyway. It didn't took that long for her shit from her Tumblr to surface and I'm sure that there are other things that has yet to come to light that I'm sure is embarrassing or worse anyway.

So give it some time, eventually more dirt will surface so that we can laugh at her more. This is usually how it goes then.

 

[Notgoodwithusernames]

I've been debating whether to actually post this but since this specific YouTuber has been making the rounds recently and more info has come out about her I feel I might as well make it known.

So there's a YouTuber by the name of Noralities whose videos have been blowing up in the algorithm recently especially this fucking thing:
View attachment 2129522
The TL;DR of this is that it's the same shit we've already seen in this thread, that loli shit "normalizes pedophilia" and that characters are apparently coded to be a certain way, you know, typical shit we've seen before.

Had that just been the case I would have brushed this person off as just another dumbass anituber.

But then I saw the video she made before this:
View attachment 2129554
I shit you not, she is simultaneously complaining about lolis while also propping up a shotacon anime.

And as if that's not enough to make her look like a massive hypocrite, here's art she drew from her Tumblr blog:
View attachment 2129560View attachment 2129561View attachment 2129562
I don't think I need to actually mention the ages of the MHA characters, it's common knowledge at this point.

There's a lot more I can say about her like how in a recent follow up video she compared lolis to fucking MINSTREL SHOWS but honestly, I'm too lazy to do a proper write up of this right now.

Feel free to do some digging on her if you want, I've heard she doesn't take criticism of her videos very well either.

At this rate she should have her own thread

 

[The Demon Pimp of Razgriz]

Noralities video seems to have struck a nerve in the anime community, as a number of channels have produced responses to her videos. Just a few (from shortest to longest):

 

[Slamerella]

It took me a second watch to realize that she compared actual real events and the glorification and memorial of such events to cartoons.
Holy shit, this woman is batshit insane. Never make a video essay ever again.

 

[OddEyes]

It took me a second watch to realize that she compared actual real events and the glorification and memorial of such events to cartoons.
Holy shit, this woman is batshit insane. Never make a video essay ever again.

Also the smug as all fuck egotism is really off putting.

 

[AutoGuyNoFile]

Yeah no kidding on her striking a nerve! Working on a response video of my own even. A LOT of the responses are over an hour long, but it's really striking when you realize all her bombshell statements are wrong: There is no evidence of child sexual assault increasing in Japan, the Dragon Maid author did not draw lolicon, her examples of how fiction affect reality are questionable at best, AND she drew My Hero Academia lewds...and never really explained how Ilulu is different from La Brava.

Currently watching this response video which has a good pinned comment from a Japanese user explaining that anime fans are a very small part of Japan and would not make an impact on nation-wide statistics:

Noralities: Hypocritical anituber worried cancel culture will eat people she likes. A response

Noralities is a anituber that critiques anime through a feminist lens. Recently her channel blew up in relation to a video that she did on Miss Kobayashi's d...

www.youtube.com

 

[Niggerman]

These people are insane, how the hell are they gonna explain all this when pedophilla becomes widely accepted like with the gays and trannies?

 

[Slamerella]

These people are insane, how the hell are they gonna explain all this when pedophilla becomes widely accepted like with the gays and trannies?

Considering her own video, she straight up is more than willing to accept the usage of "drawn CP" if it means no real children get hurt.
So in the long run, she's going on and on about it being bad, and if pedophilia becomes a sexuality, she's going to be all for such content.
This would be like saying "I am against the genocide of a population no matter the race, gender, sexuality, religion, or status, BUT if we need to cull a few hundred thousand a day to combat overpopulation, then so be it."