Clashes between Jews and Palestinians in Jerusalem. Israel now invading Gaza according to (Questionable) Reports - If your thoughts are "I don't like either" you don't need to fucking post because it's been said 100 times you fucking dullard

Pol retards were out protesting.
Kick /pol/tards off the internet and they will just start showing up irl.
Inb4 they all get their doors kicked in and put on watchlists.
They hung an anti-jew banner up and got 20 cops, a helicopter, and an actual glower to show up. They are all over the lists.
The video is archived in the ip2 thread, i dont want to waste disc space reuploading a 100meg vid here

When they confronted a single cop the cop ran away.


2 days old at least.

Bless their shitposting little hearts. Onwards you magnificent autists. :semperfidelis:
They are on the ip2 network. I mentioned it in that thread. These are more then a week old.
 
Last edited:
Kick /pol/tards off the internet and they will just start showing up irl.

They hung an anti-jew banner up and got 20 cops, a helicopter, and an actual glower to show up. They are all over the lists.
The video is archived in the ip2 thread, i dont want to waste disc space reuploading a 100meg vid here

When they confronted a single cop the cop ran away.

View attachment 2179901



They are on the IP2 network. I mentioned it in that thread. These are more then a week old.
Damn. Mad fucking lads.
 
1621341468915.png
 
Why cant the jewfags just nuke Gaza into oblivion?
Or barricade the entire place from land and sea blocking all supplies and starve the sandniggers into death.
using a nuke, against an enemy that is completely harmless and absolutely incapable of seriously damaging you, targeted at a mostly civilian location? that would turn them into complete international pariahs.
these do not apply to israel. israel is tiny and very much dependent on international support, and israel also does not have the luxury of full state control over the media.
Any use of a nuclear weapon will seriously destabilize global politics no matter who does it, though Israel has pretty thick Teflon coating (approaching DSP levels of immunity against long-term fallout). While Israel is absolutely propped up by the rest of the world, they have so successfully and deeply infiltrated most of the major world powers and plenty of smaller players that they're practically immune to long-term consequences no matter what they do.

They might experience short-term sanctions, but few politicians have the political will (or capital) to make long-term sanctions stick. Hell, look at the United States: the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement has enraged politicians (even non-Jewish ones) so much that several jurisdictions around the country have actually tried to legislate against it, with some municipalities even adding clauses to all their contracts forbidding contractors from participating in or publicly supporting the movement. At the federal level, in most cases any politician who openly expresses anti-Israel sentiments or tries to reduce funding to Israel is quietly shuffled out of office or at least "neutered" so they can no longer tug on those levers of power.

The only real consequences Israel would suffer from actually using a nuclear weapon on Gaza are the same "basic" consequences any nation would suffer for it in modern times. Nukes are officially a Big Deal(tm) and seeing one actually used in a military action would give everybody else twitchy trigger fingers. Lots of "safeties" would get turned off and a lot of launch buttons would get dusted off. The United States got away with dropping two nuclear bombs on Japan because they were the only ones with nukes in the first place at the time and the sheer devastation caused by the detonations shocked the world and scared the shit out of everyone. Today, with several other world (and regional) powers armed with nukes, the US wouldn't enjoy similar immunity from consequences.

Nobody would actually launch a nuclear attack against Israel in response, though. Beyond the aforementioned infiltration of major world governments by the Israelis (which would likely derail any legitimate effort to get a launch planned, authorized and executed), Israel is infamous for its "Samson Option" doctrine -- if they ever reach the point where they feel they're facing extinction (an inbound nuke would certainly qualify), they'll pre-emptively launch all their weapons simultaneously at as many global targets as possible. It's their flavor of the mutually-assured destruction doctrine.

For better or ill, they're a wily bunch and they've gotten their claws buried pretty deep into the world's halls of power. That gives them a second Iron Dome of sorts on the world stage.
 
an aggressor state that refuses to answer to the UN can claim to be unfairly treated when others use force against it
Giving a shit about the UN = cucked
Yeah well to be fair, Saddam thought that his Republican Guard, while actually pretty good and gave the US Military a serious challenge, would be enough to repel the US Military from Iraq in a conventional matter. It wasn't because Iraq is a flat desert. Meaning it is super fucking hard to defend that shit and really easy to invade. If Saddam was in Afghanistan or another mountainous country then maybe he'd have a good point since the Republican Guard could easily become Guerrillas. Like how the Taliban today is running the US Military out of Afghanistan.
The Iraqi Republican Guard was a force of maneuver warfare, that got outmaneuvered and outgunned by a better force of maneuver warfare (although they were kicking shitite ass in the Iran-Iraq War for a time).

The were a highly conventional force designed to be conventional.
In order for them to succeed at guerrilla warfare they would have to be completely restructured and remade into something that didn't resemble the Republican Guard anymore.
 
Back