IGN, Game Informer express, retract support for Palestinian civilians - IGN cucks

wtfNeedSignUp

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
www.gamesindustry.biz/amp/2021-05-17-ign-game-informer-express-retract-support-for-palestinian-civilians

IGN, Game Informer express, retract support for Palestinian civilians​

Gaming sites pull stories compiling charity links for victims, similar posts from Kotaku and GameSpot remain up​

On Friday, a number of games industry media outlets posted stories informing their readers about how they can donate to charities to help Palestinians hurt by recent bombardment by Israel. By Monday morning, two of the largest such publications had taken their stories down.

IGN was the first such publication to post its collection of charity links, with a brief note beforehand stating, "Palestinian civilians are currently suffering in great numbers in Jerusalem, Gaza, and West Bank, due to the active Israel-Palestine conflict." The story also featured a graphic of a Palestinian flag next to the IGN logo.
The story was pulled over the weekend, with IGN releasing a statement about the removal early Monday morning.

"We have a track record of supporting humanitarian efforts and charities across the globe. In the instance of our recent post regarding how to help civilians in the Israel-Palestinian Conflict, our philanthropic instincts to help those in need was not in-line with our intent of trying to show support for all people impacted by tragic events.

"By highlighting only one population, the post mistakenly left the impression that we were politically aligned with one side. That was not our intention and we sincerely regret the error."
GamesIndustry.biz understands the decision to pull the IGN article was not made by editorial staff.

GameStop-owned Game Informer posted its own story on Saturday, with charity links prefaced by a statement about the crisis, saying, "As violence escalates throughout the region with the Israeli Army raising the threat of war, Palestinian civilians are suffering. Numerous lives have been lost, people are injured, and families are being evicted from their homes in Gaza, Jerusalem, and surrounding areas."

As of this writing, it too has been removed, with the URL returning a 404 error. A GameStop representative did not immediately return a GamesIndustry.biz request for comment.

Not everyone has backed off their original statements of support. GameSpot posted its own story Saturday morning and it remains up as of this writing. Likewise, Kotaku's Saturday article remains up, despite having the most pointed assessment of the situation, calling Gaza "an open-air prison subject to apartheid conditions imposed by the fascist Israeli government."

In light of the stories' removal, GamesIndustry.biz invites our readers to donate to the charities IGN and GameInformer were trying to support.

IGN's story sought to raise money for the Palestine Children's Relief Fund, Anera, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, Medical Aid for Palestinians, and Doctors Without Borders.

GameInformer's article was encouraging donations to the Palestine Children's Relief Fund, a Just Giving fundraiser, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, Medical Aid for Palestinians, Doctors Without Borders, and Friends of Al-Aqsa.
Putting it in its own thread hoping for some interesting developments. As for my own thoughts, maybe the "we're not supporting a single side" argument would have worked better without adding a flag next to the website, or willful ignorance on who was the first side to shoot rockets unto the other. Also apperantly Kotaku had a specifically spicy take on the topic.
 
If there is one thing that i love about this conflict, is that more leftists will eat each other over whether to take the side of jews or muslims.
Having to choose a side in every single conflict presented to you means it's inevitable and hilarious. It also doesn't help that their entire knowledge base consists of e-celeb gossip, Marvel movies, or video games.
 
www.gamesindustry.biz/amp/2021-05-17-ign-game-informer-express-retract-support-for-palestinian-civilians


Putting it in its own thread hoping for some interesting developments. As for my own thoughts, maybe the "we're not supporting a single side" argument would have worked better without adding a flag next to the website, or willful ignorance on who was the first side to shoot rockets unto the other. Also apperantly Kotaku had a specifically spicy take on the topic.
Looks like IGN israel won in the end
1621343595634.png
is anyone actually shocked by this tho? Companies don't want to get involved in issues that they can't smear as anything more than "our side good, their side bad" shit. God bless the soul of whatever HR person put that tweet out there and I hope he can get a job after being nuked from orbit by cooperate lol.
 
V I D E O G A M E S

Seriously, if they want to write articles about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict then they should leave this industry.
They should have been fired on the spot for using the company - that they don't own - as a platform to virtue-signal about a current conflict overseas.
 
V I D E O G A M E S

Seriously, if they want to write articles about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict then they should leave this industry.
They should have been fired on the spot for using the company - that they don't own - as a platform to virtue-signal about a current conflict overseas.
Except this kind of virtue-signaling have been going on since goobergape, and if it didn't stop then, what makes you think it'll stop now?
 
I really don't get why the latest IGN drama needs its own thread that doesn't pertain to a specific game when it's going to be defunct in like a week and the Games Journalism General thread has already been on the subject as its been developing, starting here:
Weird flex, IGN.

https://archive.md/2AUuN
View attachment 2172548

There's been plenty corporate shilling of gay/trans colors in video game websites over the years, but I've never seen this before, especially unexpected of the most normie major outlet.

Pretty sure this hasn't been done regarding Hong Kong, either.
 

Attachments

  • 1621348938301.png
    1621348938301.png
    770.4 KB · Views: 108
V I D E O G A M E S

Seriously, if they want to write articles about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict then they should leave this industry.
They should have been fired on the spot for using the company - that they don't own - as a platform to virtue-signal about a current conflict overseas.
Granted it would be kinda fun if someone made an Israeli-Palestine game, where the objective was to genocide the other side.
 
If there is one thing that i love about this conflict, is that more leftists will eat each other over whether to take the side of jews or muslims.
Ultimately the conclusion to all of this post-modern faggotry. You cannot support everything, else you will exclude something. Take recent American happenings for example like the Florida night club shooting. Bringing the hajjis in to replace Whitey inevitably creates conflict with children, women, and the LGBTQAARP crowd through culture clash. Bringing in illegals takes jobs away from White trash and Nogs and vice versa.
 
This has been so much fun to follow. Both groups are considered "oppressed" in the United Facists of America so media outlets can't pick either side without it coming off as a hot take.

They are probably going to have to squeeze in how colonialism is at fault, some way or another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slap47
Granted it would be kinda fun if someone made an Israeli-Palestine game, where the objective was to genocide the other side.
Genocide makes everything easier.

Bad day at work? Genocide.

Traffic-jam? Genocide.

Coffee maker broken down?
...
..
...

Okay; almost everything.
 
Back