Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Peace was never an option
05-19-21 Permanent Stifling pt1.PNG

and then he gets dunked on
05-19-21 Permanent Stifling pt2.PNG

What's amazing to me is how perpetually angry he is and how quick he is to publicly state that he would let nothing get in his way of getting rid of those he thinks have wronged him. I'd think I'd get numb from it eventually but no.
EDIT:
Added Archive
 
Last edited:
I was shocked to see Bob have a nuance, informed take on "Fearless Girl" and "Charging Bull"
I don't find his analysis nuanced, and all of the background info can be had with a quick trek to Wikipedia.

Bobby is essentially saying that all that matter in Art, all that gives Arts is value, is sensual pleasure; if Transformers and MCU give you the adrenaline hit and untap your tear ducts, they should be regarded as Art. This stance can be criticized from at least two fronts. First, how one feels about a piece of "art" depends on one's cultural background. Fearless Girl had admirers because it was a cynical exploitation of the zeitgeist, when women were paranoid that Trump was going to grab their collective pussies. When time changes, so do people's feelings, yet we have an intuition that Art "stands the test of time", and that aesthetic values are by and large constant. Second, Bobby ignores the ethical aspect of Art. Fearless Girl is parasitic on Charging Bull, and worse, it changes the meaning of the Bull ; commentators have noted that Girl turned Bull into a bully, an antagonist, and the sculptor of Bull had expressed his displeasure. Is it ethical to twist the work of another artist to suit your ideology, especially in a time when wearing an Indian chief headdress is widely regarded as unethical? I don't think Bobby cares.
 
I don't find his analysis nuanced, and all of the background info can be had with a quick trek to Wikipedia.

To be clear, I was amazed that he wasn't all SLAY KWEEN over "Fearless Girl," and that he was aware of its cynical, very corporate roots. Once he started using Death of the Author (something he usually despises, by the way) to justify his simpleton's adoration of a 35 year old toy commercial, I was off the train.

However, you're absolutely right that all the background that impressed me is easily gleaned from Wikipedia.
 
I don't get the autism about being told to smile. Fat, aging women and their gay equivalent have told me that plenty, but who cares?
Because telling a woman to smile is:
- telling her what to do (how dare)
- asking her to please a man or multiple men by appearing pleasant instead of angry or whatever and women should NEVER seek to just, be pleasant to please well, anybody. But especially men. Men deserve ONLY resting bitch-face.
- sexual harassment or pretext for raep
- sexism
- speaking to a woman when you should not be speaking to a woman UNLESS SPOKEN TO because speaking to a woman is literally raep if she did not grant you permission to do so (because speaking to her apparently is pretext for asking her out, and YOU SHOULD NEVER ASK A RANDOM WOMAN OUT, OUT OF THE BLUE)

I'm against telling people to smile unless they're taking their goddamn photograph, but not for any of those reasons above. Easiest way to get people to smile is to smile at them first, duh, also why bother anyway.

So of course Bob would stan any dangerhair that advocates the above.
 
Demi Lovato is insane. First she comes out bi, than pansexal and now non-binary. I hate how we have to treat people like this sane when they are clearly not.
Demi Lovato is quite sane. She was big back in the '90s, but faded into obscurity. She just wants her five minutes of fame back.
That's definitely why Courtney Stodden claims to be "nonbinary."

I suspect a lot of these people are also abuse victims, which is very sad, but not an excuse for us to pretend to go along with their various delusions.
According to IMDB, she did work for Disney. And we all know how the Rat is with their "special customers."
 
Peace was never an option
View attachment 2185582
and then he gets dunked on
View attachment 2185583
What's amazing to me is how perpetually angry he is and how quick he is to publicly state that he would let nothing get in his way of getting rid of those he thinks have wronged him. I'd think I'd get numb from it eventually but no.
Every time I see a post like this from the blob, I'm glad he has no actual power.

And why do these guys keep trying to destroy the electoral college like it's a good thing, a system explicitly put in place to keep little states from getting fucked by the bigger states? I'm stuck between deciding if they're astonishingly stupid or disgustingly dishonest.
 
Because telling a woman to smile is:
- telling her what to do (how dare)
- asking her to please a man or multiple men by appearing pleasant instead of angry or whatever and women should NEVER seek to just, be pleasant to please well, anybody. But especially men. Men deserve ONLY resting bitch-face.
- sexual harassment or pretext for raep
- sexism
- speaking to a woman when you should not be speaking to a woman UNLESS SPOKEN TO because speaking to a woman is literally raep if she did not grant you permission to do so (because speaking to her apparently is pretext for asking her out, and YOU SHOULD NEVER ASK A RANDOM WOMAN OUT, OUT OF THE BLUE)

I'm against telling people to smile unless they're taking their goddamn photograph, but not for any of those reasons above. Easiest way to get people to smile is to smile at them first, duh, also why bother anyway.

So of course Bob would stan any dangerhair that advocates the above.
Sometimes I wonder if the fascists are right, and the normies need someone to tell them how to live.
 
Every time I see a post like this from the blob, I'm glad he has no actual power.

And why do these guys keep trying to destroy the electoral college like it's a good thing, a system explicitly put in place to keep little states from getting fucked by the bigger states? I'm stuck between deciding if they're astonishingly stupid or disgustingly dishonest.
They hate the US Senate as well. They love pure democracy not because of mob rule but because of ballot box stuffing.
 
They hate the US Senate as well. They love pure democracy not because of mob rule but because of ballot box stuffing.
I argued with a person who wanted to abolish the electoral college a while back, they no joke said that since the cities have the largest portion of the population, then they should be allowed to decide what the rest of the country should do and that since the rural states had a smaller population, obviously the opinions of the people living there don't matter.
 
I argued with a person who wanted to abolish the electoral college a while back, they no joke said that since the cities have the largest portion of the population, then they should be allowed to decide what the rest of the country should do and that since the rural states had a smaller population, obviously the opinions of the people living there don't matter.
The opinions of the people who grow my food doesn't matter. Hey, why am I starving?
 
I was shocked to see Bob have a nuance, informed take on "Fearless Girl" and "Charging Bull" ... and of course was sandbagged by the steroid-fueled autism that allowed him to dovetail that take into fucking Transformers.

This guy. This fucking guy.
I'm absolutely amazed/appalled that the Unicron Theme by Vince DiCola started playing while he was babbling about the guy who made the bull. Made for some unintentional hilarity. Then switching to Death of Optimus Prime after sperging about Fearless Girl backlash to the backlash. Now I know it was for his TFTM video, but it would have made as much sense to put in "Death of Aeris" from Final Fantasy VII. It's for schmaltz value.
 
xddsf.png
E1xywj7WUA0J4Ep.jpg
Pat is his mom so Catie is the sister.
And credit where credit is due: I thank you Chris on behalf of the recepient, for your gift of life.

xddsf.png

+ + + +
In a totally uncharacteristic move, Bobby repudiates his former belief and, instead of dismissing it as a joke, admits he was wrong:
154.png
Unfortunately Bobby has since deleted his whole blog and I can locate no archive.

154.png

Loki. Nutters are already fantasying the sex life of a fucking cartoon clock:
xddsf.png
When you are on the internet long enough, the urge to exterminate a large swathe of people becomes irresistible.
(Don't make me sympathize with Bobby.)

Netflix is reviving The Addams Family:
xddsf.png

Infrastructure:
xddsf.png
 
View attachment 2185943
View attachment 2185945
Pat is his mom so Catie is the sister.
And credit where credit is due: I thank you Chris on behalf of the recepient, for your gift of life.

View attachment 2185953

+ + + +
In a totally uncharacteristic move, Bobby repudiates his former belief and, instead of dismissing it as a joke, admits he was wrong:
View attachment 2185976
Unfortunately Bobby has since deleted his whole blog and I can locate no archive.

View attachment 2185969

Loki. Nutters are already fantasying the sex life of a fucking cartoon clock:
View attachment 2185964
When you are on the internet long enough, the urge to exterminate a large swathe of people becomes irresistible.
(Don't make me sympathize with Bobby.)

Netflix is reviving The Addams Family:
View attachment 2185959

Infrastructure:
View attachment 2185963
I don't think people are as stupid as Bob believes in the context of him thinking that the MAGA Mayonnaise CHUD Ghouls of the wastelands of inner Why-oming would object to a Latina being cast as Wednesday Addams.
 
Every time I see a post like this from the blob, I'm glad he has no actual power.

And why do these guys keep trying to destroy the electoral college like it's a good thing, a system explicitly put in place to keep little states from getting fucked by the bigger states? I'm stuck between deciding if they're astonishingly stupid or disgustingly dishonest.

The people who want to nuke the electoral college are the same people who think the tyrannical system of government from the Hunger Games is to be idolized and made into a reality.

A lot of the people leading the way on this is the types who live in California and New York and welcome becoming the new Capital to the rest of the states Districts. And they get off on the thought of turning everywhere else into the new slave plantation while they finally get to openly cosplay as Vivian Leigh, Bette Davis, Clark Gable, Leslie Howard, and other famous actors who played wealthy slave holders in pre-Civil War American movies.
 
In a totally uncharacteristic move, Bobby repudiates his former belief and, instead of dismissing it as a joke, admits he was wrong:
View attachment 2185976
Unfortunately Bobby has since deleted his whole blog and I can locate no archive.

It's on archive.org, but the indexing is fucky

 
The opinions of the people who grow my food doesn't matter. Hey, why am I starving?
That's where The Terror comes in. The anti-electoral college types are the type who will call for carpet bombings, rape camps (to force white women in middle americans to breed mixed race babies against their will), castration-chattel slavery for the white males, to make sure middle americans don't dare raise up against them. And if all else fails? Holocaust 2.0 baby......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back