- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
Is he wrong, though?Skordas is helping save the site. I don't care if he says the site is full of literal retarded niggers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is he wrong, though?Skordas is helping save the site. I don't care if he says the site is full of literal retarded niggers.
Out of curiosity, would you have worded the statement on that last attachment differently? 'Distasteful' is a matter of subjective opinion, not a legal one. I would think It seemed that Skordas was capitiulating and I'm not sure why. Is it a strategy to appeal to the judge to lighten hammering the defendant, or offset the judges possible bias towards thinking it's distasteful?Null's Reply Memorandum to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss all Claims.
View attachment 2185883
View attachment 2185884
View attachment 2185885
View attachment 2185886
View attachment 2185887
View attachment 2185888
View attachment 2185889
View attachment 2185890
View attachment 2185891
View attachment 2185892
View attachment 2185893
View attachment 2185894
View attachment 2185895
View attachment 2185896
View attachment 2185897
View attachment 2185898
View attachment 2185899
View attachment 2185901
View attachment 2185902
View attachment 2185903
View attachment 2185904
View attachment 2185905
Nick will cover it here:
Edit: Null's filling includes details about Russel's plea agreement with the court over his harassment charges.
Edit 2: Skordas' fanboys on suicide watch
View attachment 2185960
Edit 3: Having read the entirety of this reply, I can say that while I would have used other arguments, Skordas did a really good job. Sorry for the lack of long analysis, but there isn't much fault to analyse
I wonder when Russ is going to request an anal argument."Plaintiff's claim that the term "victims" was defamatory also fails because it is a true statement."
Any ideas on what's next in the case timeline? Waiting for the judge to agree to oral argument?
Incredible. Fucking incredible. I feel like giving Russell a Bond villain-style golf clap over this one. All these years later and he's still trying the exact same fucking tactics to get women to fuck him. Same horrid handwriting, same terrible formatting (like, seriously, "let's" on one line and "meet in Vegas" on the next with the "s" in "Vegas" cut off? Just put two words on each fucking line. Same exact desire: a date which will, in his mind, end in sex.HISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF
View attachment 2181430
View attachment 2181431
You know, definition of insanity and all that...
View attachment 2181435
View attachment 2181445
The distasteful one? I personally wouldn't have included it at all, but if I had to, I would have worded it similarly.Out of curiosity, would you have worded the statement on that last attachment differently?
Because he agrees with Russel on Kiwi Farms "badness" I would assume.I would think It seemed that Skordas was capitiulating and I'm not sure why.
If you can appeal to the judge to make them more favorably disposed to you, you should do it, yes. Mind you, you shouldn't completely brownnose them.Is it a strategy to appeal to the judge to lighten hammering the defendant, or offset the judges possible bias towards thinking it's distasteful?
It was denied:Waiting for the judge to agree to oral argument?
Ruling on Injuction request, I'd assume.Any ideas on what's next in the case timeline?
i love hitler
Fuck Niggers
I eat smegma
I want to rape Barb.
FART
He already covered it. Rewind about 1 hour and 15 minutes.I just tuned in to Rekieta's stream. Has Greer come up yet, or is he still on the way?
I think Skordas is being rather tactful here. I mean...
Thanks. I may as well admit I didn't know you could rewind a YouTube stream in progress.He already covered it. Rewind about 1 hour and 15 minutes.
No, he's way over it. Here's the timestamped link to the start of his Greer coverage:I just tuned in to Rekieta's stream. Has Greer come up yet, or is he still on the way?
Thank you, you distasteful people.No, he's way over it. Here's the timestamped link to the start of his Greer coverage:
I didn't know menus without prices were a thing.
It's not "alleged" evidence, though. It is evidence. Evidence is evidence.I also would have said 'alleged evidence' instead of 'alleged facts' on the opener. But i am just a layman,
It's nice to see such a concise readout of Russ's failures. Particularly the part where he got hit with court costs and didn't pay (I'm sure he didn't think he had to!) until Skordas started the process to go after his property instead of letting him just get away with his bullshit. That's what it took for pipsqueak to deflate and start ponying up.I am oddly aroused by Skordas's exhibits
They addressed it. Russ spent 5 pages on his copyright argument (it was still bad). Likewise, Skordas defeated his argument. But, yeah, Russ argued more about Defamation than CopyrightAlso, doesn't this lolsuit have something to do with copyright issues? Both sides kinda forgot about any issues relating to it.
You took me out of contextI just tuned in to Rekieta's stream. Has Greer come up yet, or is he still on the way?
I think Skordas is being rather tactful here. I mean...
Russ gets a lot of bewildered flak for his idiotic and derpy Bristol-board signs. People marvel over how he can’t just fucking put some actual effort into doing something that, to him, is an absolutely pivotal moment in his life.Incredible. Fucking incredible. I feel like giving Russell a Bond villain-style golf clap over this one. All these years later and he's still trying the exact same fucking tactics to get women to fuck him. Same horrid handwriting, same terrible formatting (like, seriously, "let's" on one line and "meet in Vegas" on the next with the "s" in "Vegas" cut off? Just put two words on each fucking line. Same exact desire: a date which will, in his mind, end in sex.
It's also worth noting that he didn't really do anything for her specifically either. This song isn't a special gift only for her, anyone can listen to it. This song has no tangible worth to her whatsoever. He didn't really do anything just for her. He's saying "hey, why don't you travel hundreds of miles in a pandemic, how you'll travel I don't care, and come on a date with me, a sketchy, deformed incel with a harassment charge as a reward for something that had no positive effect on you whatsoever." Some people have mentioned that he's trying to do one of those big public declarations of love that everyone goes "aww" when they see, and I'm sure that's what he thinks this is, but it's also him trying to create a situation where she feels uncomfortable saying no to him. He wants her to feel like she has an obligation to do something in return.
I really want him to spend tons of money reserving a table at a restaurant and a limousine just to have Yovanna ghost him. I think I could die happy if some pretty girl (or just a catfish) agreed to meet him but said she needed money to travel, and then block him after he sends it. I saw a news story once about two girls who did that to ISIS, said they needed money to travel to Iraq to join them and then when they got the money they just stopped messaging the terrorist recruiter. If you can pull off a scam like that on terrorists, you can do it with Russell Greer.
Russ probably blocks it out, despite losing the 7th (?) lawsuit he persists and continues his insane antics pursuing his next victim.What makes reading this even more satisfying is imagining Russ reading it. His head must be 90% trauma lumps after reading this sentence: Despite Plaintiff's belief that the woman he threatened and caused to fear for her safety in his criminal matter was not a"victim" the Court saw otherwise and granted a Protective Order against Plaintiff.
Also, doesn't this lolsuit have something to do with copyright issues? Both sides kinda forgot about any issues relating to it.