Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fauci straight-up committed perjury in front of Congress. It's time to lock his lying ass up.




The Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is not inert. It's active pathogenic material. This is a protein that binds to ACE2 and triggers intracellular signaling while also rendering that ACE2 unavailable for its ordinary purpose of enzymatically cleaving Angiotensin II and inactivating bradykinin.




The proteins made by some of these vaccines, particularly the full-length proteins, are binding to ACE2 expressed on the surfaces of people's cells. It is behaving like a protein biologic ACE2-blocking drug while also triggering activity inside cells.

View attachment 2206024



For those who don't know what the hell a membrane-bound protein even is, this video certainly helps lay it all out:


Membrane-bound proteins are used for all kinds of shit. Ferrying materials in and out of cells like gateways, molecular signaling, you name it. ACE2 does not ordinarily behave as a signal transducer, or a molecular relay from the exterior of a cell to the interior. Normally, it just acts like a pair of molecular scissors, cutting specific hormones to alter their function. Spike binding to ACE2 actually causes it to trigger activity inside the cell, with unknown and possibly pathological implications. It also destroys the ACE2.

View attachment 2206050

When Spike binds to ACE2, it's irreversibly bound, creating the compound Spike-ACE2, which is both proteins attached end to end. The only way for your cells to get the ACE2 back is by taking that protein, junking it (cells have recycling centers for the express purpose of tagging and breaking down useless proteins and other junk), and then building new ones by feeding mRNA from the nucleus through the ribosomes, like any other protein. The newly-manufactured replacements travel to the cell surface and embed in the membrane. If fresh Spike proteins are continuously binding to even the newly-created ACE2, its ordinary functions will be suppressed and replaced with pathological ones.

What are the consequences? Well, look at the distribution of ACE2 proteins in cell lines in the human body.





It's all over the place. It's in vascular endothelial cells and pericytes, the lining of the GI tract, renal tubules, male and female reproductive tissues, the lungs, everywhere.

This is, of course, why COVID-19 causes blood clots, diarrhea, sepsis, and kidney failure on top of pneumonia. Anything with an ACE2 receptor can be infected by the whole SARS-CoV-2 virus. But the Spike, even without the rest of the virus, can also bind to ACE2 in those tissues, with unknown and possibly very harmful effects.

The vaccine is potentially quite dangerous.
"BUT HE'S AN EXPERT SO IT'S OKAY!" I hear fauci zealots cry
 
"No, wait, be nice to China!" Fucking neocons.
Screenshot_20210527-131609_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
Didn't Italy have cases of COVID back in September 2019? How exactly does that mesh with the lab-created origin? Lab leak doesn't equal being man-made after all. Then again, A&H spergs constantly doompost.
late october, in northern italy, which has regular, direct flights to Wuhan because of the high population of chinese immigrants connected to the fashion industry.

Meanwhile, BBC personality has died from the AZ vax:



I saw her obituary earlier in the week. They were cagey about the cause of her death, but it was pretty obvious she'd died from vaccine complications.
 
Meanwhile in Bongistan: NHS is in the final stages of move to a new huge database pooling records of 55 million patients and making it available to academic and third parties. [I wonder which these will be, considering they can pull pretty much any data they want, including yes, you guessed it- innoculation records]. :mad: Sky is the limit for all vaccine covidian shysters now!

Fuckers are pasing it under the radar, there is a bit of fuss from the privacy rights campaigners, but the general public is not even aware, because "The plan to create a new data set was announced by Matt Hancock, health secretary, in early April and publicised mainly on blogs on the NHS Digital website, and through flyers at GP surgeries, said NHS Digital," So, they can send me a few letters and 3 texts a week for about a month now to pester me about taking the vaccine, but they could not mount a public information campaign about this? I mean I know they take people for total imbeciles (may not be wrong there too, I admit), but this is just rich. Especially when you consider the cited quote ends in " the plans had been in the works for three years."

All bongistani farmers- if you want to opt out you need to print out the form from the NHS website and take it to your GP. before 23rd of June ... yep, on paper...yep, in person. Yep, to the same GP who did not want to see you for last 14 months and probably still will not let you in to hand in this paper. Slide it through the letterbox? "We never received anything, don't know what you're talking about"... Because millions of coins sunk into various NHS bozos pockets could not fund a piddly online submission/ opt out form [yes, I know they do it to create another obstacle for you and force a situation when people are unable to submit it, the hostile sociomanipulative cunts they are, but I need to went! (:_(]

Last but not least I'm sure it's a total coincidence they called this new service GPDPR, because it will not make an impression on an average Joe with 6 second attention span that it's just something to do with the GDPR so I should not think too much about it, it was made for my benefit, wasn't it?

[for non-bongs and non-eurofags: GDPR stands for General Data Protecting Regulation introduced in 2018 in all of the EU countries, setting legal framework for how your data is handled and was always advertised as something to protect you as a data owner from predatory companies/offices misusing your sensitive info]


Anyhoo, have a look for yourself :
Archive of the FT article, original is paywalled so no point in linking it here I guess
Some security points https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/24/nhs_digital_gp_data_store/ and its archive
HIPAA went the way of the Fourth Amendment. (:_(
 
Didn't Italy have cases of COVID back in September 2019? How exactly does that mesh with the lab-created origin? Lab leak doesn't equal being man-made after all. Then again, A&H spergs constantly doompost.
It was studies that did testing months and months later that found antibodies and RNA in blood samples and wastewater, ranging from September 2019 all the way to March 2020. I would take those with a grain of salt. They could have found antibodies of any coronavirus. They could have run the PCR tests over and over until they found COVID. I remember one study, can't remember where it was, that claimed they found antibodies in wastewater in March of 2019. But when someone tried to replicate it to confirm their findings, they were like, "Oops all that wastewater is gone now."

The earliest detected case in Italy may have been in late November. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/2/20-4632_article
 
I love the vaccination lotteries! You get to play twice for nothing! Either you get real fucking sick for a day and take a day off work or die and never have to work again plus you get a chance at dollars. That’s unlimited ROI if you think about it, which is really great.
Or you have to spend all the winnings on medical bills when you get complications from the jab years down the line.
 
I love the vaccination lotteries! You get to play twice for nothing! Either you get real fucking sick for a day and take a day off work or die and never have to work again plus you get a chance at dollars. That’s unlimited ROI if you think about it, which is really great.
Hmmm... $150 in gift cards? I think I'll make more money if I work that day - instead of getting sick from the side effects. My boss doesn't pay us if we call in sick, and I already missed two weeks of work last spring with what I think was real Covid.
 
Neocons bringing out the knives?
View attachment 2208888
National Review used to own when William Fucking Buckley was in charge. Example from the mid 90s when they deconstructed the war on drugs:


Glad to see they’re firing again.
 
Alright gents, put up your bets:
1) She dies of an STD/STI
2) She dies of alcoholism and/or overdose
3) She pays the toll
Honestly, it probably wasn't covid, but something related enough (one of the common human coronaviruses? Possibly an animal coronavirus bits in there, too) to trigger the 40 parses PCR test. After all, if it was so prevalent in Italy in 2019, where was the spike in deaths like we had at the start of the pandemic? It would have been noticed, if it was covid, look at how it actually hit Italy when things gor real.

The PCR test gets something like 90% false positives. The test is worse than useless at the levels we were running it, it was there to feed into the hysteria and red herring people away from uncomfortable truths.
The analysis of blood samples from both Italy and the US which prove that COVID was circulating in the fall/winter of 2019 were both seroprevalence/antibody studies, not PCR.

There is a chance of false-positive or simple cross-contamination with any one of four other human coronaviruses, but both are still low.

I don't see the point in disbelief of early COVID arrival, especially because its more evidence of 1) how much of a nothingburger COVID is and 2) the overall futility of the measures taken to "stop the spread"
 
Alright gents, put up your bets:
1) She dies of an STD/STI
2) She dies of alcoholism and/or overdose
3) She pays the toll

The analysis of blood samples from both Italy and the US which prove that COVID was circulating in the fall/winter of 2019 were both seroprevalence/antibody studies, not PCR.

There is a chance of false-positive or simple cross-contamination with any one of four other human coronaviruses, but both are still low.

I don't see the point in disbelief of early COVID arrival, especially because its more evidence of 1) how much of a nothingburger COVID is and 2) the overall futility of the measures taken to "stop the spread"
Two ways to look at the recent acceptance of the lab leak theory by the MSM

1) China is in fact not responsible but for some reason the DC bugmen and their propaganda outlets have decided to go full press because reasons. This doesn't seem all that likely to me as there is just too much money invested in the Chinese economy and the corporate sector cannot countenance any restrictions in the flow of capital into China (the main reason they got rid of Trump).

2) This is a cover for something far worse. What could that be? Don't know but I have noticed all the media reports and the Biden administration statements constantly referencing "the possibility of an accidental leak". What if they had overwhelming intelligence that China, or some other state actor, released the coof on purpose? A good tell for a cover up is when confirmed liars start admitting the truth, but only part of the truth. It makes sense as the scientific consensus that the coof is man made is now overwhelming and admitting this allows them to cover up the bigger scandal which if it became common knowledge would lead to sanctions against the Chinese (costing them trillions).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back