- Joined
- Jun 25, 2020
So I'm backing off my fuck all guntubers position and going to make an exception for Sage Dynamics. This man knows his shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The funny thing is the SR-25 is heavier than the AR-15 and AR-10.We know what stoner would do, it’s called the SR-25.
Simply put, it's a bunch of fuddlore cocksucking that's existed since the thing's inception. Karl then fed said fuddlore to the viewers of a podcast that he was on with Ian. (I think this was the same period where people were photoshopping his face onto Leon kennedy with that doofus ass haircut of his)I still dont get the autisme about the forward assist.
just leave it on and save some money ffs.
In all fairness it's meant to be more than a DMR so weight and stability are much preferred to shooting cardboard cutouts 10 feet away.The funny thing is the SR-25 is heavier than the AR-15 and AR-10.
lmao this just incentivizes people to say they're going to SBR it so they can get the handpicked samples.I just realize you have to send Russell a message if you plan on SBRing your WWSD lower.
It's so they can handpick and test your lower before you pay the ATF $200 and get stuck with a lemon?
View attachment 2215273
I know he's trying to outpace his customers when it comes to service and troubleshooting, but this sort of disclaimer is questionable at best and disconcerting at worst.I just realize you have to send Russell a message if you plan on SBRing your WWSD lower.
It's so they can handpick and test your lower before you pay the ATF $200 and get stuck with a lemon?
View attachment 2215273
That video was more directed at the AK50.It’s interesting that Ian released This video 2 days before shilling the cheaper WWSD rifle. Makes you wonder.
It probably wouldn't. Karl & Russ are just letting big daddy know where to look in the future when they want to do a "buy back", yet those potential SBRs don't resurface. My theory now is that Russ is actually the fed, and Karl is just his snitch.Telling people to contact you in the case of manufacturing an NFA item using their lower is concerning. They've tested it with automatic fire, that was basically an advertisement. How would a production example fare differently?
Lightweight ARs are appealing, but there's obviously better ways to about it than buying a WWSD.But in any case, he made that rifle look fun. Woe betide all who clicked 'buy' based on that alone.
not necessarily, depends on the composition of the receiver. most are thermoset plastics with GFR and stabilizers, often with acrylic protective finish. some cheaper blends, or ones that have a specific manufacturing process can be different of course, but "polymer degrades in UV" isn't a hard truth.The ultimate problem with polymer rifle receivers is that the sun will eventually degrade them. It's less apparent with pistols because they're almost always holstered.
WWSD is 30% GFR nylon blend. the G36 receiver is 50% and uses a special zytel-like composite explicitly developed for H&K. other parts like the handguard are around 35% GFR and are a more typical nylon blend with the exception of the handguard which is a PA66 composite. it's why the G36 receiver requires machining and can dull tool steel over time. the two aren't really comparable in terms of material.G36 is good proof that it'll work well enough
Yes.... I imagine in Arizona that could be a problem. Unless it's going to stay in a nice indoor rifle rack for the majority of it's life.The ultimate problem with polymer rifle receivers is that the sun will eventually degrade them. It's less apparent with pistols because they're almost always holstered.
Does anyone know the composition of the WWSD lowers?Yes.... I imagine in Arizona that could be a problem. Unless it's going to stay in a nice indoor rifle rack for the majority of it's life.
Karl describes the budge version as a civil defense verion... OK, in a civil defense role and you're carrying a rifle along with you constantly while you're doing other stuff, how useful is it going to be if it polymer starts to degrade.
Also not to sound like a broken record, but a few months of a rifle getting knocked about, dropped, throwen in and out of vehicles, maybe a forward assist might add a degree of reliability.
According to KEArms it's 30% Glass Filled Nylon. It smells Chinese and it most likely does not chooch.Does anyone know the composition of the WWSD lowers?
30% isn't too bad. You can kinda sorta test the percentage if you scrape it with a box cutter and feel how crunchy it is. IDK if anyone would be willing to volunteer theirs but a guntuber who has one and could also acquire test samples of 10/20/30/50% GFR nylon (they come in little squares) could gauge whether it really is or not.According to KEArms it's 30% Glass Filled Nylon. It smells Chinese and it most likely does not chooch.