Disaster Mass shooting at florida high school - Beware the autism

http://www.wesh.com/article/multiple-injuries-reported-in-shooting-at-florida-high-school/17887738

Multiple people have been injured in an active shooter situation at a high school in south Florida, police confirmed.

The Broward Sheriff's Office is responding to the shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.

Advertisement
The Coral Springs Police Department is asking students and teachers to remain barricaded inside until police reach you.

According to WSVN, at least three people were seen surrounded by first responders and one person was seen being wheeled into an ambulance. There are reports of up to 20 injuries.

 

[Pocket Dragoon]

That being said, who said you can't beat someone to death with a pool noodle?

A PVC pipe half-filled with lead shot helps; it's what the hole in the middle of pool noodles are for.

 

[Socrates]

I agree and I will add mostly of non-stem ( including law and some areas of biology) suffer from what you described.
But this channel it worse, because a "good analysis", a usable one, of a crime from a psychology view it's "neutral", the ones that should be used by "law" or if you want know what happen, not using some terms that will add bias in the history. I heard histories from a person who worked in a field that was horrifying but he never add some words like "horrifying" etc. The only thing that I heard that was bias was a personal history and it was horrifying one.
Edit:
Tldr: This channel is worse scipop for criminal analysis.

It's definitely entertaining to watch and the channel sometimes makes some thoughtful insights, but the only useful information you should take away from all of the videos is that you should NEVER FUCKING EVER talk to cops without a lawyer present.

 

[Somchai]

I agree and I will add mostly of non-stem ( including law and some areas of biology) suffer from what you described.
But this channel it worse, because a "good analysis", a usable one, of a crime from a psychology view it's "neutral", the ones that should be used by "law" or if you want know what happen, not using some terms that will add bias in the history. I heard histories from a person who worked in a field that was horrifying but he never add some words like "horrifying" etc. The only thing that I heard that was bias was a personal history and it was horrifying one.
Edit:
Tldr: This channel is worse scipop for criminal analysis.

I don't think they make any pretense of being neutral or objective, it seems to me like the point of the channel is to make entertaining and informative documentaries that people enjoy watching. It's not a university lecture, I think it's perfectly find for them to have an angle and to share their own opinions on the topic. Can you name any specific instances where they are outright wrong or mislead the viewer?

 

[naaaaiiiiillllll!!!]

Playing footsie with the water bottle (I laughed way too hard at that impotent move). Why the hell aren't both feet cuffed to the floor?

 

[keyboredsm4shthe2nd]

I thought the drugs for lethal injection were getting harder to find. Maybe they can just let David Hogg beat him to death with a stick or something.

Just bring back the electric chair and let the little faggot roast.

 

[Gay_Frog]

I don't think they make any pretense of being neutral or objective, it seems to me like the point of the channel is to make entertaining and informative documentaries that people enjoy watching. It's not a university lecture, I think it's perfectly find for them to have an angle and to share their own opinions on the topic. Can you name any specific instances where they are outright wrong or mislead the viewer?

But it didn't say anything about parody and the only thing it's the channel description that says : "Forensic Psychology / True Crime / Social Science / Behavioral science", you can make a informative video and entertaining one. So you can't say it's only entertainment or parody if you try to make this "serious". And this video is posted in the news section, so make me believe some people will believe that is a good enough font ( And for this I blame the journals but that is another history).
And I won't watch 30 min but I can say if I read somewhere that try to analyze without bias a description like "Does the demon have an attorney? ". I will say he isn't neutral, and that neutrality is necessary if you want to analyze any "fuck up".

 

[Some JERK]

I don't think they make any pretense of being neutral or objective, it seems to me like the point of the channel is to make entertaining and informative documentaries that people enjoy watching. It's not a university lecture, I think it's perfectly find for them to have an angle and to share their own opinions on the topic. Can you name any specific instances where they are outright wrong or mislead the viewer?

Sometimes the narrator will label some bush-league interrogation tactic as "masterful" or will assign a much deeper motive to a pretty clumsy line of questioning. That's about all I can fault. Overall the channel is extremely entertaining, not the least for the insight about how police interrogations work, and as a general reminder that no matter what a cop says or how they play it off, if you get mirandized, shut the fuck up because you're being charged with a crime and nothing you say in that room will be to your benefit. You can not talk your way out of arrest at that point, and if the cops really just wanted to "ask you a few questions", they'd have come to your house.

 

[Mnutu]

A YouTube channel called JCS criminal psychology has released a video about criminals faking mental illness during interviews and Nikolas Cruz was the main subject. Breakdown starts at 10:37

Of all the shooters, Cruz had the easiest case of claiming mental illness; dude is fucking retarded. I still remember those videos he made before the shooting, he’s suffering from the sped.

 

[Somchai]

But it didn't say anything about parody and the only thing it's the channel description that says : "Forensic Psychology / True Crime / Social Science / Behavioral science", you can make a informative video and entertaining one. So you can't say it's only entertainment or parody if you try to make this "serious". And this video is posted in the news section, so make me believe some people will believe that is a good enough font ( And for this I blame the journals but that is another history).
And I won't watch 30 min but I can say if I read somewhere that try to analyze without bias a description like "Does the demon have an attorney? ". I will say he isn't neutral, and that neutrality is necessary if you want to analyze any "fuck up".

Alright good talk.

 

[Bunny Tracks]

Both he and his biological brother were adopted by the same couple. He was adopted at birth. Newborns are in huge demand, so it's unusual for them to be placed with an ageing couple (the mother was 68 when she died last year, so would have been around 50 when he was adopted). According to a former neighbour, his adoptive mother wanted someone else to take the children once her husband died. Being raised for many years by a woman who no longer wanted the kids around would be unsettling for any children.

Two sibs from the same family means the bioparents, both of them, were likely categorically unfit to care for children and probably had some major mental problems. Going to an aging family also means they were probably turned down by younger couples first, which isn't a great sign. Adoptive parents who are less than perfectly qualified are often so glad to get a newborn that they don't ask too many questions. They believe nurture will trump nature and that they've got a tabula rasa of a child. It's only later on that they realize a kid born to, say, a schizophrenic mother impregnated by her repeat-felon boyfriend may have some challenges that are not fixable with love and a stable home environment. Some kids just never have a chance.

Late, but according to this, Cruz's birth mother was arrested 28 times, and heavily used drugs and alcohol when she pregnant with him-including crack which at the time she was addicted to. She's also currently in jail for beating someone with a tire-iron. Cruz's half-sister is also currently in jail for attempting to kill a police officer.

So yeah, looks like he was kind of screwed no matter what. It sucks, but his gremlin-ass should still be thrown in jail forever.

Edit: His mother was addicted to crack cocaine, and not just the regular stuff. Sorry!

 

[Underestimated Nutria]

Late, but according to this, Cruz's birth mother was arrested 28 times, and heavily used drugs and alcohol when she pregnant with him-including cocaine which at the time she was addicted to. She's also currently in jail for beating someone with a tire-iron. Cruz's half-sister is also currently in jail for attempting to kill a police officer.

So yeah, looks like he was kind of screwed no matter what. It sucks, but his gremlin-ass should still be thrown in jail forever.

Interestingly, maternal cocaine use causes very little trouble -- very slightly lower IQs, but the fear of crack babies in the 80s was grossly overstated. And fetal alcohol syndrome takes a lot of drinking, though I agree that one should be cautious (no, one glass of wine will not hurt your baby) and certainly alcohol is the recreational drug (actually I consider it a toxin more than a drug -- since there's no single mechanism of action, low potency, and effects are to a large extent related to membrane activity not receptor mediated, etc) that causes the most fetal damage. Opioids are safe but cause enormous suffering for the poor babies who are born addicted (funnily enough, I read that 50% of kids born to methadone-dependent mothers do NOT have withdrawal symptoms: pretty weird, huh?).

 

[Bunny Tracks]

Interestingly, maternal cocaine use causes very little trouble -- very slightly lower IQs, but the fear of crack babies in the 80s was grossly overstated. And fetal alcohol syndrome takes a lot of drinking, though I agree that one should be cautious (no, one glass of wine will not hurt your baby) and certainly alcohol is the recreational drug (actually I consider it a toxin more than a drug -- since there's no single mechanism of action, low potency, and effects are to a large extent related to membrane activity not receptor mediated, etc) that causes the most fetal damage. Opioids are safe but cause enormous suffering for the poor babies who are born addicted (funnily enough, I read that 50% of kids born to methadone-dependent mothers do NOT have withdrawal symptoms: pretty weird, huh?).

Late, and not to invalidate your post, but I misread the reports, and it turns out she was addicted to crack cocaine, and not just the regular stuff. Which makes sense, considering how he looks, and definitely how he acts.

Sorry about the mix-up.

 

[The Last Stand]

This scumbag shot up a school and created a grifter from said tragedy. Send him to the chair TWICE for his absurd stupidity and selfishness.

 

[Snekposter]

The chair is a light punishment for Cruz for his crimes. Punishment by Transportation is the only proper course of action.

 

[henstepl]

Nikolas Cruz plead guilty today.

A Florida man has pleaded guilty to murdering 17 people in a 2018 mass shooting at a high school campus in Parkland, Florida.
Nikolas Cruz, 23, also pleaded guilty to 17 counts of attempted murder for those he injured in the attack on Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
He faces the possibility of the death penalty or life in prison.
One of the deadliest school shootings in US history, the incident became a rallying cry for gun control activists.
Mr Cruz was 19-years-old when he shot dead 14 students and three employees with an AR-15 rifle at his former school. Another 17 people were wounded.
The case will now head to a penalty trial in which jurors must determine whether Mr Cruz is spared the death penalty to face life without parole.

Judge Elizabeth Scherer has said she hopes that the case - for which thousands of jurors will have to be screened - can begin in January.

From the point of view of the guy who set his doctor's office on fire, I thought this part was extremely informative:

Mr Cruz added that he has "nightmares" about his crime and "can't live with" himself. He also said that he believes that the US would "do better if everyone would stop smoking marijuana".

And it's informative because it's an obvious cope!

It's just like me when I say psychiatrists have failed me by "mobilizing tiny teddy bear women against me". It's as implausible as it is easy to run through the brain to excuse abhorrent actions. I'd doubt that he really satisfies himself that that's the whole story, in which case it suggests that he's had a difficulty that isn't easy to put to words.

Do you think Nikolas Cruz, who shot people and immediately requested a psychologist, needed the Henstepl method, which would be to go to the big doctor's office (before the shooting) and call police on himself to see the big doctor?

Is there really any precedent by which that would work rather than go badly? But couldn't it have solved a problem?

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

Nikolas Cruz plead guilty today.


From the point of view of the guy who set his doctor's office on fire, I thought this part was extremely informative:


And it's informative because it's an obvious cope!

It's just like me when I say psychiatrists have failed me by "mobilizing tiny teddy bear women against me". It's as implausible as it is easy to run through the brain to excuse abhorrent actions. I'd doubt that he really satisfies himself that that's the whole story, in which case it suggests that he's had a difficulty that isn't easy to put to words.

Do you think Nikolas Cruz, who shot people and immediately requested a psychologist, needed the Henstepl method, which would be to go to the big doctor's office (before the shooting) and call police on himself to see the big doctor?

Is there really any precedent by which that would work rather than go badly? But couldn't it have solved a problem?

This fool is getting the chair.

 

[WinchesterWhiskey]

This fool is getting the chair.

With how he keeps acting and how much he can't fucking hide in an interrogation room, it's probably for the best.

 

[LaxerBRO]

This fool is getting the chair.

Nope.

Florida has executed 99 people since 1979 but has a little over 300 on death row. Cruz will spend the next 20 to 30 years in endless appeals, then await the execution that will never come.

 

[(((Obar Lazcano Kamz)))]

Nope.

Florida has executed 99 people since 1979 but has a little over 300 on death row. Cruz will spend the next 20 to 30 years in endless appeals, then await the execution that will never come.

So youre telling me this guy kills 17 people and gets free shit for the next twenty to thirty years...

Why not just kill him immediately, it would save so much of the publics time and money.

 

[Bunny Tracks]

Nope.

Florida has executed 99 people since 1979 but has a little over 300 on death row. Cruz will spend the next 20 to 30 years in endless appeals, then await the execution that will never come.

Florida is a fucking joke.