The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

if a woman does an abortion she should get the death penalty. If a rapist makes a woman pregnant he should get the death penalty. If somebody has sex with the intention of having children they should get the death penalty that way there would be no possibility of any abortions
Wait a minute. I know who's behind this post!
Judge_Death_headshot.jpg

Judge Death! Get outta here! Go back to megacity 1!
 
if a woman does an abortion she should get the death penalty. If a rapist makes a woman pregnant he should get the death penalty. If somebody has sex with the intention of having children they should get the death penalty that way there would be no possibility of any abortions
Finally a reasonable place to end the thread.
 
You can't "ruin" an embryo's life, because it isn't sentient.
And it never will be because you killed it. That's pretty ruined.
Its human life in the technical sense, sure (same with tumors), but it's not sentient or deserving of more rights than actual people, especially actual children.
They're called human rights, not sentient rights or deserved rights. If it's "technically" human, it has rights. That's literally the only requirement.
 
Last edited:
But it's alive, and you ruined its life by killing it.
They embryo won't know what's happening to it and won't suffer. The thirteen year old who was knocked up by her grandfather will. You people have some fucked up priorities. You bleat on and on about the children. What about the child who was raped?
 
They embryo won't know what's happening to it and won't suffer. The thirteen year old who was knocked up by her grandfather will. You people have some fucked up priorities. You bleat on and on about the children. What about the child who was raped?
I thought I already told you to eat shit for trying to use an edge case of an edge case to justify the entire institution of abortion. Now you're doing exactly what I said you were doing again, in only a couple of sentences.

I'm not humoring your forced dilemma (that I already addressed, anyhow) because you can't even use the story right. Also, who knows how many times the same song and dance of "they won't feel anything" "does that mean it's okay to kill comatose or drugged people" has been repeated.

Death itself is a form of suffering-- of course, since you apparently prefer to not be alive and you project that onto everyone else, you wouldn't realize this.
 
Last edited:
Does that mean it's okay to kill people if ”they won't suffer”?
Fetuses arent people, but even if they were you know what hospice and palliative care is? It's providing only comfort care to hopeless cases where all lifesaving care would do is just prolong suffering. Like what should've been done a long time ago with Tinslee Lewis but Texas Right to Life insists on continuing to torture her.

Texas prolifers seem to be big on child torture, between tinslee and wanting to force abused children to go through pregnancy.
I thought I already told you to eat shit for trying to use an edge case of an edge case to justify the entire institution of abortion. Now you're do exactly what I said you were doing again, in only a couple of sentences.

I'm not humoring your forced dilemma (that I already addressed, anyhow) because you can't even use the story right. Also, who knows how many times the same song and dance of "they won't feel anything" "does that mean it's okay to kill comatose or drugged people" has been repeated.

Death itself is a form of suffering-- of course, since you apparently prefer to not be alive and you project that onto everyone else, you wouldn't realize this.
Lmao ZDD really out here trying to defend chomo bullshit like forcing actual children (not fetuses) to gestate chomo embryos

If any of y'all somehow managed to reproduce, would you force your daughter to endure pregnancy if she was molested and impregnated?
 
Life begins at conception.

The fact you want to deny that doesn't mean it stops being true.
Yeah and the life that begins is microscopic life on the level of a protist or something else simply and nonsentient. Or a tumor.

Forcing children who were raped to endure pregnancy is torture and a human rights violation.
 
Yeah and the life that begins is microscopic life on the level of a protist or something else simply and nonsentient.
You say this like it's supposed to make a difference.
Forcing children who were raped to endure pregnancy is torture and a human rights violation.
On the one hand a girl has to endure 9 months of physical discomfort.
On the other hand someone fucking dies.
I feel no ethical dilemma making this choice, dude.
Killing children is a human rights violation.
I don't even know what rights of the girl would even supposedly be violated by preventing her from murdering her baby.
 
If any of y'all somehow managed to reproduce, would you force your daughter to endure pregnancy if she was molested and impregnated?
Lol at them ever getting laid. Hence why these puritan boomers want to punish women for having sex with men that aren't them

On the one hand a girl has to endure 9 months of physical discomfort.
On the other hand someone fucking dies.
I feel no ethical dilemma making this choice, dude.
You do know that women can die from childbirth, right? Especially young teenagers. You should seriously stop being a puritan boomer and try and get laid. If you actually succeed, maybe you'll lighten up a bit. Also, a fetus isn't "someone" to the vast majority of people. I know your debilitating autism makes it hard to understand that others have different view points, but I thought you were going to work on that?
 
On the one hand a girl has to endure 9 months of physical discomfort.
Physical discomfort, emotional trauma, the reaction of her peers. Then there's the childbirth itself. And then she has to look at the face of a baby that was the product of incest and rape. You truly are a monster if you think that this is preferable to terminating a pregnancy.
 
Physical discomfort, emotional trauma, the reaction of her peers.
Things that don't matter anywhere near as much as murder.
Imagine killing someone because if they live it embarrasses you and makes you uncomfortable.
I know your debilitating autism makes it hard to understand that others have different view points, but I thought you were going to work on that?
I'm not just gonna cuck myself and not think based on what I believe simply because someone somewhere disagrees with me. I'm not gonna do some weird meta-argument in my head where I ignore my views and simply adopt a majority viewpoint. It's weird that you keep suggesting this. If you want me to take your viewpoint into consideration, convince me that it's coherent and worth considering. You haven't done so. No infanticide advocate ever has.
 
Last edited:
Back