SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

Lmao, out of the ~6 I skimmed, 3 were set in the Amazon rain forest. None of them NEEDED to be set in the Amazon rain forest, because the fact that it’s in the rainforest is never relevant to the plot at all.

Just a quick tip for any aspiring writers - the first thing you come up with has a pretty good chance of also being the first thing a million other people come up with, because you’re not that fucking special. That’s why you brainstorm a lot of concepts and then do a review to toss all the cliche’d ones and pick out the best.

Anyway, I’ll throw in a few comments about Kaktus’ proposal - I’ll give him that it was interesting enough for me to read the whole thing through til the end (unlike Shaggy’s behemoth of a bore-fest that I skimmed and clicked out of once it hit the choose-your-own-adventure tales), but why is this wannabe Tolkien bullshit an SCP? As its own thing this conflict between fairies and prehistoric demi-gods could potentially be interesting, but it feels so out of theme for the SCP Foundation. The attempt to incorporate a bunch of older SCP’s that have nothing to do with each other also just comes off as very fanfictiony.

Also, I gotta say, “Bigfoot are an intelligent precursor race that humans overthrew” is a MUCH more interesting concept than “Bigfoot are actually a fairy superweapon that turned on their makers and are actually pretty much just literal bogeymen”. What makes SCP-1000 interesting is that it DOES leave a lot to the imagination. Retconning it to fit into your grand mythos just makes it lame.
 
Lmao, out of the ~6 I skimmed, 3 were set in the Amazon rain forest. None of them NEEDED to be set in the Amazon rain forest, because the fact that it’s in the rainforest is never relevant to the plot at all.

Just a quick tip for any aspiring writers - the first thing you come up with has a pretty good chance of also being the first thing a million other people come up with, because you’re not that fucking special. That’s why you brainstorm a lot of concepts and then do a review to toss all the cliche’d ones and pick out the best.

Anyway, I’ll throw in a few comments about Kaktus’ proposal - I’ll give him that it was interesting enough for me to read the whole thing through til the end (unlike Shaggy’s behemoth of a bore-fest that I skimmed and clicked out of once it hit the choose-your-own-adventure tales), but why is this wannabe Tolkien bullshit an SCP? As its own thing this conflict between fairies and prehistoric demi-gods could potentially be interesting, but it feels so out of theme for the SCP Foundation. The attempt to incorporate a bunch of older SCP’s that have nothing to do with each other also just comes off as very fanfictiony.

Also, I gotta say, “Bigfoot are an intelligent precursor race that humans overthrew” is a MUCH more interesting concept than “Bigfoot are actually a fairy superweapon that turned on their makers and are actually pretty much just literal bogeymen”. What makes SCP-1000 interesting is that it DOES leave a lot to the imagination. Retconning it to fit into your grand mythos just makes it lame.
That's probably people thinking that the message at the bottom about "we forgive you for now, bring us back" was supposed to be a cliffhanger instead of the sting. And then interpreting it in the lamest fucking way possible.
 
9C0DB7BB-5544-4A74-9530-988BFCAEDA3C.jpeg

LOOOOOL!
 
“The original will be up on RPC soon enough. SCP doesn't deserve it, even as waybacked”
based?

sure thing bro. You really dont need to make up humblebrag stories, rounder, nobody’s fooled even if they pretend they are
Did he really comment that lmfao don’t deny it too hard kid, people might start to think you’re serious about trying to look humble. We all know the company you keep and how you really feel behind closed doors. Actions speak louder than words.
KiwiFarms is taking the stand SCP is too cowardly to make again, amazing what having principles will do even in the dingiest of trash heaps.


Lmao, out of the ~6 I skimmed, 3 were set in the Amazon rain forest. None of them NEEDED to be set in the Amazon rain forest, because the fact that it’s in the rainforest is never relevant to the plot at all.

Just a quick tip for any aspiring writers - the first thing you come up with has a pretty good chance of also being the first thing a million other people come up with, because you’re not that fucking special. That’s why you brainstorm a lot of concepts and then do a review to toss all the cliche’d ones and pick out the best.

Anyway, I’ll throw in a few comments about Kaktus’ proposal - I’ll give him that it was interesting enough for me to read the whole thing through til the end (unlike Shaggy’s behemoth of a bore-fest that I skimmed and clicked out of once it hit the choose-your-own-adventure tales), but why is this wannabe Tolkien bullshit an SCP? As its own thing this conflict between fairies and prehistoric demi-gods could potentially be interesting, but it feels so out of theme for the SCP Foundation. The attempt to incorporate a bunch of older SCP’s that have nothing to do with each other also just comes off as very fanfictiony.

Also, I gotta say, “Bigfoot are an intelligent precursor race that humans overthrew” is a MUCH more interesting concept than “Bigfoot are actually a fairy superweapon that turned on their makers and are actually pretty much just literal bogeymen”. What makes SCP-1000 interesting is that it DOES leave a lot to the imagination. Retconning it to fit into your grand mythos just makes it lame.
It’s the early wiki and the Indian Ocean Tsunami all over again.
 
Last edited:
Not familiar with this, were there a bunch of SCP’s that tried to “explain” the tsunami as the result of some sort of anomaly?
I've heard of these stories, and I've also heard that many of the stories featured 682 in some way, but they're all deleted from the wiki now. A common trope for bad SCP articles is trying to attribute some major real world event/disaster to the actions of the Foundation or an SCP. It almost never works out well.
KiwiFarms is taking the stand SCP is too cowardly to make again, amazing what having principles will do even in the dingiest of trash heaps.
Please tell me you're just fucking around.
 
I mean, just objectively, one is choosing to show their logo with pretty colors and one is not, regardless of context. Knowing context, my tongue is only just barely in my cheek. ;)
Wait, no shit, scp didn't pride it up? I didn't really catch your meaning. Why aren't the masses up in arms lol?
 
I mean, just objectively, one is choosing to show their logo with pretty colors and one is not, regardless of context. Knowing context, my tongue is only just barely in my cheek.
The only reason you're here is because you clicked on the wrong link 10 years ago and went down a rabbit hole. What "principles" are you even talking about? You didn't even claim to have principles until it was convenient for you. SCP could solve world hunger and you'd still find a way to hate it. Your only "principle" is getting back at people you don't like.
 
Playing Devil’s advocate, there is a funny question here; SCP’s policies have contributed mainly to concretized echo chambers; unhealthy systems which tend to cause political extremism and purity spiraling. So why not do the pride logo at this point? The cat is out of the bag. It was a really awful idea, but only once. Like continuously nuking the same crater.
 
Playing Devil’s advocate, there is a funny question here; SCP’s policies have contributed mainly to concretized echo chambers; unhealthy systems which tend to cause political extremism and purity spiraling. So why not do the pride logo at this point? The cat is out of the bag. It was a really awful idea, but only once. Like continuously nuking the same crater.
The Virgin SCP: puts up Pride logo, takes it down after mass hysteria
The Chad Kiwi Farms: puts up Pride logo just for the pure lulz of it, nobody bats an eye
 
Speaking of deleting SCP articles, SCP-1162 The Hole in the wall, has been deleted by the Author after being banned in the chat.

05 log
Hey there! As someone who is definitely not the author of SCP-1162, SCP-1019, and several others that got deleted for "offensiveness" "slut-shaming" "ableism" and "harassment," I can bring you the good news that 1162 is back up on RPC http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/rpc-354 and that the rest of that author's articles will follow. Once again, I must assure you that I am surely not the author in question. ;)
 
Hey there! As someone who is definitely not the author of SCP-1162, SCP-1019, and several others that got deleted for "offensiveness" "slut-shaming" "ableism" and "harassment," I can bring you the good news that 1162 is back up on RPC http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/rpc-354 and that the rest of that author's articles will follow. Once again, I must assure you that I am surely not the author in question. ;)
Heads-up not author. There's still an instance of "SCP-1162" in the test logs.
 
Hey there! As someone who is definitely not the author of SCP-1162, SCP-1019, and several others that got deleted for "offensiveness" "slut-shaming" "ableism" and "harassment," I can bring you the good news that 1162 is back up on RPC http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/rpc-354 and that the rest of that author's articles will follow. Once again, I must assure you that I am surely not the author in question. ;)
Let me get this straight, are you saying they didn’t just ban you for your chat content but deleted your articles too? Or did you do that yourself?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baubius
Hey there! As someone who is definitely not the author of SCP-1162, SCP-1019, and several others that got deleted for "offensiveness" "slut-shaming" "ableism" and "harassment," I can bring you the good news that 1162 is back up on RPC http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/rpc-354 and that the rest of that author's articles will follow. Once again, I must assure you that I am surely not the author in question. ;)
No one cares, your article is shit and reuploading it to a sad excuse of a knockoff isn't going to make it any better.
 
Back